Beam Dynamics and Instabilities in MEIC Collider Rings Byung C Yunn Jefferson Lab Newport News, Virginia, USA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
Advertisements

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Stephen Kramer, VUV Ring Manager CSR Emission Studies in VUV/IR Ring NSLS.
1 Accelerator Physics Aspects LHCb Accelerator Physics Aspects LHCb CERN SL/AP n Layout n Crossing Scheme n Luminosity n Collision.
Ion instability at SuperKEKB H. Fukuma (KEK) and L. F. Wang (SLAC) ECLOUD07, 12th Apr. 2007, Daegu, Korea 1. Introduction 2. Ion trapping 3. Fast ion instability.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Halo calculations in ATF DR Dou Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Kaoru Yokoya (KEK), Theo Demma (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF2 Accelerator.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Issues.
Copyright, 1996 © Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Intra-beam Scattering -- a RHIC Perspective J. Wei, W. Fischer Collider-Accelerator Department EIC Workshop,
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Theoretical studies of IBS in the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, Y.Papaphilippou MSWG – LIU meeting, 1/10/2013.
Fast Ion Instability Studies in ILC Damping Ring Guoxing Xia DESY ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Vacuum Issues from the Beam Dynamics Point of View Marc Muñoz.
Electron cloud simulations for SuperKEKB Y.Susaki,KEK-ACCL 9 Feb, 2010 KEK seminar.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Beam-based vacuum observations and their consequences Sergei Nagaitsev August 18, 2003.
F Project-X Related Issues in Recycler A.Burov, C.Gattuso, V.Lebedev, A.Leveling, A.Valishev, L.Vorobiev Fermilab AAC Review 8/8/2007.
Simulation of Beam Instabilities in SPring-8 T. Nakamura JASRI / SPring-8
RADWG-RADMONLHC Beam Loss Rates1 Beam Loss mechanisms Where? Beam loss in cycle – when? Totals per fill: before and during physics Totals per annum Comparison.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
Lecture 25 - E. Wilson - 12/15/ Slide 1 Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
ATF2 background and beam halo study D. Wang(IHEP), S. Bai(IHEP), P. bambade(LAL) February 7, 2013.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Impedance of the CLIC-DRs: What we know so far and what else we need to study…. E. Koukovini-Platia M. Barnes, A. Grudiev, N. Mounet, Y. Papaphilippou,
NICA start-up scenario + questions of instabilities A.Sidorin For NiCA team NICA Machine Advisory Committee at JINR (Dubna) October 19-20, 2015.
Overview of Collective Effects in MEIC Rui Li MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 6-8, 2015.
Interactions with Rest Gas – Typical Case Interactions with Rest Gas – ELENA Quantitative analysis for ELENA Evaluations at 100 keV Ejection Energy Evaluations.
Ion effects in low emittance rings Giovanni Rumolo Thanks to R. Nagaoka, A. Oeftiger In CLIC Workshop 3-8 February, 2014, CERN.
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
1 Update on Ion Studies Guoxing Xia, Eckhard Elsen ILC2007 Workshop, May 30~Jun 2, 2007 DESY, Hamburg.
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Two beam instabilities in low emittance rings Lotta Mether, G.Rumolo, G.Iadarola, H.Bartosik Low Emittance Rings Workshop INFN-LNF, Frascati September.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
IBS and Touschek studies for the ion beam at the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou, T. Bohl.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
LEIR IMPEDANCE AND INSTABILITY MEASUREMENTS
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Large Booster and Collider Ring
A. Al-khateeb, O. Chorniy, R. Hasse, V. Kornilov, O. Boine-F
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
FCC-ee: coupling impedances and collective effects
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Collective effects in CEPC
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Beam-Beam Interaction in Linac-Ring Colliders
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
HE-JLEIC: Boosting Luminosity at High Energy
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Presentation transcript:

Beam Dynamics and Instabilities in MEIC Collider Rings Byung C Yunn Jefferson Lab Newport News, Virginia, USA

Outline MEIC e-ring – Impedances – Single-bunch instabilities – Coupled-bunch instabilities – Intrabeam scattering and Touschek scattering – Beam-gas scattering, ion trapping MEIC p-ring – Single- and coupled-bunch instabilities – Intrabeam scattering and Touschek scattering – Beam-gas scattering – Electron clouds Summary

Impedances For the overall longitudinal broadband impedance of the MEIC e-ring, is assumed. This is equivalent to assuming roughly the same amount of impedance in e-ring as in PEPII ring. Transverse impedance is estimated to be about 1 MΩ/m from With the help of existing B-factory designs with comparable beam parameters a first cut on impedance budgeting has been made. Estimation of the total inductive component of impedance at MEIC e-ring is 0.2 Ω. where b is beam pipe radius, c the light velocity.

The MEIC inductive impedance budget ComponentNo. of itemsInductive part of Z/n(Ω) Bellows128 Flanges1024 Valves10 BPMs256 Vacuum ports256 Tapers8 DIP screens IR, injection, crotches2 Feedback pickups, kickers 5

Total loss factor in e-ring is estimated to be 25 V/pC. The beam power lost to higher order modes (i.e. HOM loss) is given by where k B is the total number of bunches and f 0 is the revolution frequency in the ring. Note that HOM loss will be less with more bunches for a fixed amount of total charge in the ring. The total HOM loss for 5 GeV electron beam at the design current of 3 Ampere is only 150 kW. Loss factor (V/pC) Ring components m resistive walls1.5 Four 5-cell cavities20

Single bunch instabilities e-ring parameters Longitudinal microwave instability limits the bunch peak current. For the Gaussian bunch the threshold current is given by Energy E5 GeV Circumference C1000 m Bunch charge1.25 Bunch length7.5 mm Bunch current0.6 mA Beam current3 A Energy spread Momentum compaction0.003 Synchrotron tune0.045 RF voltage V4.8 MV

Single-bunch instabilities For the broadband impedance seen by the short MEIC bunch the Spear scaling law is assumed. With 3 cm of beam pipe radius assumed longitudinal microwave instability threshold bunch current is estimated to be 3.1 mA for MEIC e-ring.

Transversely the mode coupling instability is to limit the single bunch current. The threshold current is estimated to be 4.2 mA from The average beta function of 20 meter has been assumed. MEIC e-ring is not expected to suffer from single bunch instabilities. This was expected because the bunch current is rather low considering very large beam current in the ring by filling every bucket at 1.5 GHz RF frequency. Broad band impedance requirements in MEIC e-ring are less demanding compared to other existing and/or proposed rings of comparable beam parameters.

Coupled-bunch instabilities Narrow band impedance in a storage ring, typically from the higher order modes of RF cavities can induce coupled bunch instabilities as wakefields generated by a bunch ring long enough to interact with the following bunches. In MEIC effectively all HOMs of CEBAF cavity can cause the coupling of successive bunches leading to a possible instability problem. Damping for a HOM Q may be estimated from Q of only about 10 will make inter-bunch interaction possible for MEIC. For N bunches in the ring there are N coupled bunch modes. A coherent mode is specified by one index specifying the phase shift between bunches and another index describing its motion in synchrotron phase space.

Instabilities are counteracted by Landau damping from the synchrotron frequency spread within the bunch. Longitudinally a growing mode is Landau damped when Transversely a growing mode is Landau damped when For MEIC e-ring longitudinal Landau damping condition will be satisfied if the longitudinal impedance is less than 7.1 mΩ. Therefore, it is not likely to get a help from Landau damping. Situation is similar in transverse oscillations.

The total number of particles in e-ring is (to be compared with in PEPII LER). MEIC will be expected to suffer from coupled-bunch instabilities as these instabilities are driven by this total charge in the ring and cavity impedance is much higher presently compared to PEPII. Calculations of ZAP with CEBAF cavity data show unstable longitudinal modes (from Shahid Ahmed) ModeGrowth time (µs) a = a =

Coupled-bunch instabilities induced particularly by cavity resonances will limit the total current in MEIC e-ring both in longitudinal and transverse phase spaces. In storage ring these instabilities are routinely controlled by the feedback system. Obviously, damping of higher order modes of CEBAF cavity for use at MEIC rings would require a major R&D effort in controlling resonant modes. A detailed study on the design of the feedback system will be required with upgraded cavity modes.

Intrabeam scattering and Touschek scattering Multiple small-angle Coulomb scattering causes diffusion in both longitudinal and transverse phase space resulting in a degradation of beam emittances in both spaces. The intrabeam scattering growth rates of emittances depend on beam parameters as follows Compared to PEPII transverse phase space volume is about 10 times smaller. But the number of electrons in a bunch is smaller by a factor of 5. Consequently, IBS growth rate is expected to be worse by a factor of 2 for the same energy electron. PEPII design study concluded that no significant emittance growth from intrabeam scattering was to be expected even for the 2.5 GeV beam operation in the low energy ring. It is safe to say that intrabeam scattering will not be a problem at MEIC for the 5 GeV beam. One needs to confirm this conclusion with a detailed numerical study when the design of MEIC optics is advanced sufficiently to allow such a study.

Large-angle single scattering events during intrabeam collisions can change the momentum sufficiently to make it fall outside the momentum acceptance of a ring. The momentum acceptance may come from the RF system or by the dynamic and physical aperture of the accelerator. Touschek half-lifetime for a flat beam is given by where F is a very slow varying function of its argument. For the 5 GeV electron beam the momentum acceptance from the RF system is 0.42 %. With this RF aperture I have estimated the half-lifetime of MEIC electron beam to be 12 hours. The momentum acceptance associated with dynamic aperture is also needed to complete. Currently MEIC design team is studying the dynamic aperture of the machine with several optics codes.

Beam-gas scattering, ion trapping Electron beam-gas scattering with residual gas nuclei results in the loss of beam particle either from the excitation of betatron oscillation or from a momentum change exceeding the dynamic and/or the momentum acceptance of the ring. Two processes of particular interest are elastic scattering on nuclei and the bremsstrahlung on nuclei of which the latter is more dominant for the 5 GeV electron beam in MEIC. The total cross section for the bremsstrahlung is given by where Z is the atomic number of the residual gas species. The lifetime (hour) is related to the gas pressure P (N 2 equivalent). I get 43/P (nTorr) hours for the MEIC electron beam. The beam lifetime from beam-gas scattering is about 8 and a half hours at a gas pressure of the 5 nTorr. The overall beam lifetime from gas and Touschek scattering is 4 hours.

The trapped ions resulted from beam interactions with residual gas molecules in the vacuum chamber degrade the performance of electron storage rings. For any ring there exists a critical mass A c such that ions with mass greater than the critical value. An expression for the critical mass from linear theory is given by Critical masses are much less than one with MEIC design beam parameters. In other words all ion species will be trapped and stable. In order to avoid ion trapping there will be a gap (or several gaps) in the MEIC electron bunch train and the total length of the gap will be about 5 to 10% of the ring circumference. Note that clearing electrodes are also necessary in addition to the gap.

Single turn ions though unstable can affect the beam. They can produce a betatron tune spread between bunches and also induce a two beam instability known as the fast beam-ion instability, for example. The growth rate for the beam-ion instability is given by the linear model as (L sep is the bunch spacing) The strength of this instability is about the same as that of B-factories when the machine is operated under a similar vacuum pressure. MEIC may need a feedback system like those used at B-factories.

Outline MEIC p-ring – Single- and coupled-bunch instabilities – Intrabeam scattering and Touschek scattering – Beam-gas scattering – Electron clouds Summary

MEIC p-ring MEIC ion complex consists of several rings and instability issues only in the final proton storage ring are discussed here. It is assumed that for the overall broadband longitudinal impedance of the MEIC p-ring. A detailed impedance counting is yet to be carried out. This implies

Single- and coupled-bunch instabilities p-ring parameters Maximum acceptable impedances for p-ring required to run design beam current are obtained. Energy E60 GeV Circumference C1000 m Bunch charge0.415 Bunch length10 mm Bunch current0.2 mA Beam current1 A Energy spread Momentum compaction Synchrotron tune RF voltage V8 MV

From the microwave instability threshold formula p-ring can tolerate the longitudinal impedance up to 14 Ω. From the transverse mode coupling instability follows the limit on the transverse impedance

Assumed impedances are well within the above limits. As expected proton beam in p-ring is not likely to suffer from single-bunch instabilities. Coupled-bunch instabilities were observed in several proton rings at about protons. Instabilities are also expected in MEIC p-ring. The total number of protons in MEIC p-ring is Calculations of ZAP with CEBAF cavity data show unstable longitudinal modes (from Shahid Ahmed) We will need feedback systems to control as in e-ring. ModeGrowth time (µs) a = a =

Intrabeam scattering and Touschek scattering Scaling e-ring results from growth time for emittance in p-ring is estimated to be about the same as for the electron beam. Scaling from e-ring results based on Touschek half-lifetime for 60 GeV proton beam is estimated to be about two order of magnitude larger than that of 5 GeV electron beam in e-ring. Momentum aperture assumed is 0.2 % provided from the RF system.

Beam-gas scattering Beam-gas scattering with residual gas nuclei which is critical to the lifetime of electron beam as we saw in the first half is not critical anymore. Both the bremsstrahlung and elastic scattering on nuclei provide completely negligible contribution to the beam loss rate. Angular scattering of the proton beam by multiple Coulomb scattering in the gas can cause an emittance degradation. This effect may be estimated from

For 60 GeV beam at 5 nTorr (room temperature) the growth time is estimated to be about 30 minutes. Electron trapping may be a problem due to very short bunch spacing. It may be necessary to provide a gap in the bunch train. Such a gap in p-ring may lead to a slight reduction in luminosity due to a likely beam-gap collision. Background rates of secondary particles reaching the detectors due to beam-gas scattering will be taken into account later in selecting the operating vacuum pressure in p-ring.

Electron clouds Very short bunch spacing in MEIC makes forming electron clouds through the multipacting mechanism rather complicated. One may use the following relation to estimate the resonance which gives h y = 1.5 mm. This indicates multipacting is unlikely. Electron clouds once formed can produce both single- and coupled-bunch instabilities for the proton beam (and the positron beam in e-ring). Single bunch transverse mode coupling instability is possible when the density of electron clouds is greater than the threshold density For both p-ring and e-ring the electron cloud threshold density is estimated to be about 5 x /m 3. Numerical study is necessary to determine whether such a cloud density can be reached in MEIC rings.

The growth rate of coupled-bunch instability caused by electron clouds may be estimated from A rough estimate gives the growth time of this instability in p-ring at about a few millisecond. Numerical study is necessary to find out whether MEIC rings will suffer from these instabilities. If necessary, MEIC will consider various measures (solenoid coils, coating the vacuum chamber with TiN, etc) which have been taken at B-factories to avoid electron cloud problems.

Summary As long as the design of vacuum chamber follows the examples of ring colliders, especially B-factories, we will be safe from the single-bunch instabilities. No bunch lengthening and widening due to the longitudinal microwave instability is expected and no current limitation from the transverse mode coupling instability. The performance in MEIC collider rings is most likely to be limited by coupled-bunch instabilities. Feedback system able to deal with the growth has to be designed. All ion species will be trapped at the e-ring. Total beam current limitation and beam lifetime will depend upon the ability of the vacuum system to maintain an acceptable pressure, about 5 nTorr in the presence of 3 A of circulating beam.

The following problem areas require special attention for the MEIC design team: a)HOM damping of CEBAF cavity b)Feedback system c)Vacuum system d)Dynamic aperture