Prioritizing Standards How do we decide what matters most?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Advertisements

Navigating the Common Core State Standards through History-Social Science What.
JUSD Common Core Priority Standards for ELA. SEE THE “BIG PICTURE” FIRST.
Common Formative Assessments
Standards help teachers ensure their students have the skills and knowledge they need by providing clear goals for student learning. Common standards.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Alan Bancroft UCMO PLC Resource Specialist
Arizona Department of Education School Improvement and Intervention.
2 From NECAP to the Common Core and New Assessments English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects Fall 2010,
Common Formative Assessments
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume II Standards-Based Curriculum.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Preparing for the Data Team Process 1.  Know the rationale for “Step A” with respect to the data team process.  Experience Step A as a tool to help.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 1: Analysis of a Research Simulation Task in CTE Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous.
Into the CORE of the Next Generation Standards School-wide strategies for addressing Science Literacy through the Common Core Learning Standards.
Best Practices for Adolescent Literacy Secondary Alabama Reading Initiative ARI Content Literacy 2010.
Common Core 2 Miles Ahead!. ACTIVITY As a team, create an graphic representation that shows the relationship between standards, assessments, results and.
ICSD K-5 ELA CCSS Alignment and Curriculum Revision August 2011.
Integration and Differentiation of Curriculum
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
Designing Communication Objectives Supporting Language Acquisition and Global Competencies.
SEPT 20 8:00-11:00 WHAT ARE WE MEASURING? HOW DO WE MEASURE? DHS English Department Professional Development.
1 District PLC/Curriculum Team  To provide a liaison between the PLC teams and the Admin SIPPLC team  Revise and align K-12 curriculum to.
Power Standards: An Overview
Determining Essential Learnings or Essential Outcomes September 14, 2010.
1 Investigating the Standards: K-12 English Language Arts Bruce Bufe, Ann Craig, Kathy Learn, Leigh McEwen, Nicole Peterson, Pat Upchurch, Martha Yerington.
Buckeye Elementary School District’s Curriculum Mapping Initiative
Arizona’s Common Core Standards 1.  Identify Priority Standards to prepare students for college and careers.  Incorporate research-based instructional.
All Standards All Students
Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.
1 Determination of Power Indicators James Frakes & Associates, LLC.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
The Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum January 29, 2013 Karen M. Beerer, Ed.D.
  Standards in Oregon  Oregon Department of Education  Standards elsewhere  You can search standards for other states  For a good compilation,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Unpacking Standards and Using Student-Friendly Language Facilitated by: Catherine Garrison Professional Development Specialist.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
What is it we expect students to learn? Curriculum learning tasks need to be clearly stated 1.What policies and practices, regarding curriculum development,
Data Teams. Which comes first – the data or the team?
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
ESL Teacher Networking Meeting Session - 2 Raynel Shepard, Ed.D.
November 20-21, 2013 Christina Orsi wiki.sjcoe.net/groups/jefferson.
Differentiation PLC.
Statewide Transition Plan: Indiana Academic Standards for E/LA & Mathematics (2014) Update: Teacher Resource Guide Amy Horton, Asst. Supt. for Student.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume III Curriculum Prioritization and Mapping.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Vertical Alignment Professional Development February 8, 2012 Northern.
Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum
Welcome! March 2013 ELA Network
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
English/Language Arts Common Core Standards Learning Targets:  How different are the Common Core Eng/LA standards compared to the current Program of Studies?
Connecting the IEP to Arizona College and Career Ready Standards Kyrene School District Special Education Advisory Council (KSEPAC) Presentation November.
Student Growth Goals for Coaching Conversations. Requirements for Student Growth Goals Time line Reference to an Enduring Skill Proficiency and Growth.
CCRS Quarterly Meeting CCRS Quarterly Meeting English Language Arts
Academic Excellence Framework How can we meet the complex learning needs of students in a standards based environment? In brief, how can we achieve.
1. Welcome 2. Working with the WIKI 3. Discussion of Assessment in curriculum development 4. Break 5. Divide into curricular areas – discuss: A.Standards.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Making Common Core Standards Work For ALL Students Unwrapping the standards “focused alignment of curriculum, assessment, and instruction” *Information.
 Effective monitoring of adult actions – teaching and leadership – strongly linked to gains in student achievement  “Implementation gap” between intention.
May 8, Let’s Do Some Math 6 cats catch 6 rats in 6 minutes. How many cats will it take to catch 100 rats in 50 minutes?
BUILDING A STRONG CURRICULAR FOUNDATION - PATHWAY TO RIGOROUS CURRICULUM DESIGN (RCD) WINTER 2014 Prepared & Presented By: Maria Escalera, Heather Goodwin-Parreno,
Overview of Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects The Common Core State Standards.
Implementing the Common Core State Standards in Arkansas Jennifer Gonzales SPDG Positive Behavior Support Coordinator
All Standards All Students
Assessment Information
Developing a Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum
Power & Priority Standards
Presentation transcript:

Prioritizing Standards How do we decide what matters most?

Four Critical Questions that Guide a PLC O 1. What are students supposed to know and be able to do? O PRIORITIZED CORE STANDARDS O 2. How do we know when our students have learned? O COMMON FORMATIVE ASSESSMENTS O 3. How do we respond when students haven't learned? O INTERVENTION O 4. How do we respond when students already know the content? O DIFFERENTIATION

Content and Language Objectives O Teachers will be able to identify priority standards from the Utah Core Standards to guide their instruction and support student learning -BY- O Reading and discussing an article, learning the criteria for selecting priority standards, evaluating and analyzing standards, and coming to consensus on priorities for each grade level.

A High Impact Initiative: The Utah Core State Standards Accomplishment begins with a focused set of action steps! 1. Priority Standards

A High Impact Initiative: The Utah Core State Standards Accomplishment begins with a focused set of action steps! 1. Priority Standards

Priority Standards Defined Very carefully selected sub-set of the whole. Students must know and be able to do by end of year Used for common formative assessments/data

Leading Researchers on Standards Thoughts To Consider: O James Popham: “Reduce to a modest number of truly significant skills.” O Robert Marzano: “Cut content by about two-thirds.” O Mike Schmoker: “Half of them.” O Doug Reeves: “Those that meet the selection criteria.” O Larry Ainsworth: “Time needed to teach, assess, re-teach, and reassess.”

How do you decide which standards are the most important when you realize there is no way to teach all of them?

Guiding Questions: O Will the length of the school year afford teachers the time needed to adequately teach, assess, re-teach, and reassess students on all of the Utah Core State Standards (UCSS)? O What knowledge and skills must I impart to my students this year so they will enter next year’s class with confidence and a readiness for success?

Safety Net Article/Task O Read and highlight significant ideas in the article.(5 min.) O Share your insights from the article with nearby colleagues O Share out any key points, issues, concerns, “A-has!” with the group

PRIORITY Important Nice to Know UTAH CORE STATE STANDARDS

Priority Standards “Priority Standards” are the foundation upon which daily instruction needs to be focused. “Supporting Standards” are curricular standards which bind and connect the Priority Standards.

Guiding Questions for Identifying Priority Standards O What do my students need for success in life? (L) O What do my students need for success in school? (S) O What do my students need for success on the state test or other appropriate assessments? (A)

Life Skills (Endurance; Leverage) O Provide students with knowledge and skills beyond a single test O Life skills are ideas that apply to other fields of learning!

Success in School (Readiness) O What do this year’s students need so they will enter next year’s class with confidence and a readiness for success?

Floor and Ceiling No more than 70% No less than 40%

Success on Assessments O What teaching and learning is most essential so that students can show proficiency on tests and assessments?

Two Standards: One Post/One Rail O RL.4.1 O Refer to details and examples in a text when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences from the text. O RL.4.3 O Describe in depth a character, setting, or event in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text (e.g., a character’s thoughts, words, or actions).

You have to teach them all, but some are more important than others.

Determining Priority Standards Graphic Organizer

Priority Standards Table

TASK O Examine Reading Standards for Literature in the UCSS for your grade band. O Individually mark standards under Key Ideas and Details as L, S, A

Table Talk O Talk to your team and share the standards you picked O Note where you agree, disagree or where you’re not sure O The goal is to reach an initial consensus O Record your thinking on the Determining Priority Standards Graphic Organizer

Next Steps… O We will continue to identify Priority Standards in grade band teams. O GOAL: Complete ELA and math standards by the end of our sessions.

High Impact Initiatives & The Common Core: Accomplishment begins with a focused set of initiatives! Priority Standards Common Formative Assessments Data Teams Unwrapping the Standards

Day 2 Objectives O Teachers will identify priority standards for English Language Arts to guide their instruction and support student learning -BY- O evaluating and analyzing standards, and coming to consensus on priorities for each grade level.

WOWs-Wonders O Process O How do we determine priority standards? O Can we have more priority standards in one area than another? O Will the priority standards be the same across grade levels and the district? O What is the difference between readiness and assessment? O Assessment O Will the CRT’s and other assessments reflect priority standards? O How will this help with test scores that we are held to? O Application O Will the process work and will our teaching be more clear? O How do Special Education teachers incorporate the priority standards for student achievement? O Why? O Why doesn’t the curriculum department do this for the whole district?

WOWs-One Ah-Ha! O Process O The core is going to be less overwhelming after determining the priority standards. O Super nice to be able to focus attention to priority areas. O It is difficult to determine whether the details are important or the central message. O Application O Don’ t have to teach the whole thing. O Appreciate knowing things can be focused on. O Priority standards are not key concepts. O Why? O This will make the core more manageable. O Nice to know we can synthesize most important tasks to focus on in-depth instead of surface teaching. O We can decide what our students need at our school.

WOWs-Wishes O Process O More direction and clear instructions on selecting priority standards. O Wish we would have had this opportunity sooner. O Application O Wish the vocabulary wasn’t so lengthy in all subjects because students have very little background. O Why? O Wish it was quicker and easier, but I understand that it is worth the time. O Wish we could see the District priority list first.

It is a process not an event.

Priority Standards “Priority Standards” are the foundation upon which daily instruction needs to be focused. “Supporting Standards” are curricular standards which bind and connect the Priority Standards.

You have to teach them all, but some are more important than others. Determining Priority Standards Graphic Organizer Endurance: Lasting beyond one grade or course; life concepts and skills Leverage: Cross-over application within the content area and to other content areas Readiness for the next level of learning: Prerequisite concepts and skills students need to enter a new grade level or course of study. External exams: Benchmarks, state and national, college and career entrance

Todays Work Lincoln and Roosevelt Individual Grade Levels Roosevelt Roosevelt K-2 Lincoln K-2 Grade Levels Grade Bands

Floor and Ceiling No more than 70% No less than 40%

You have to teach them all, but some are more important than others. Determining Priority Standards Graphic Organizer 6/10 = 60%

Step 1 O Work in your grade level by school site. O Examine ELA UCSS for your grade. O Start with Reading for Literature. O Individually check standards as L, S and/or A. O Talk to your team and share the standards you picked O Note where you agree, disagree or where you’re not sure O The goal is to reach an initial consensus O Record your thinking on the Determining Priority Standards Graphic Organizer.

Step 2 O Meet with cross school grade level. O Schools do not have to have the exact same priority standards O Discussion Points: O Compare and contrast the standards you have checked as L, S and/or A.

Step 3: Collaborative Grouping O Work together as a grade band simultaneously. O Start with the highest grade in the band you are sitting with. O You may not have selected the same priority standard for each grade level. O Discussion Points: O Do priority standards support and build on one another; look for vertical alignment within the grade span. O Identify gaps, overlaps and omissions between grade spans. O Have a recorder mark the colored sheet for each grade level. O Turn in your colored sheet when completed. So we can map out the entire school.