045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Glenn Bateman Lehigh University Physics Department
Advertisements

Examples of ITER CODAC requirements for diagnostics
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
ASIPP HT-7 belt limiter Houyang Guo, Sizhen Zhu and Jiangang Li Investigation of EAST Divertor Asymmetry in Plasma Detachment & Target Power Loading Using.
Conference on Computational Physics 30 August 2006 Transport Simulation for the Scrape-Off Layer and Divertor Plasmas in KSTAR Tokamak S. S. Kim and S.
SUGGESTED DIII-D RESEARCH FOCUS ON PEDESTAL/BOUNDARY PHYSICS Bill Stacey Georgia Tech Presented at DIII-D Planning Meeting
Who will save the tokamak – Harry Potter, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Shaquille O’Neal or Donald Trump? J. P. Freidberg, F. Mangiarotti, J. Minervini MIT Plasma.
George Sips ITPA, active control, 14 July Real-time Control ( and development of control systems ) at ASDEX Upgrade George Sips Max-Planck-Institut.
ELECTRON CYCLOTRON SYSTEM FOR KSTAR US-Korea Workshop Opportunities for Expanded Fusion Science and Technology Collaborations with the KSTAR Project Presented.
Y. Ueda, M. Fukumoto, H. Kashiwagi, Y. Ohtsuka (Osaka University)
Physics Analysis for Equilibrium, Stability, and Divertors ARIES Power Plant Studies Charles Kessel, PPPL DOE Peer Review, UCSD August 17, 2000.
Atomic collisions in fusion plasma physics An introduction to the course Atomic Physics in Fusion, ED2235 Henric Bergsåker 26 Oct 2011.
Physics of fusion power
Proposals for Next Year’s MFE Activities C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Sept. 24, 2000.
Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10 : Running a discharge / diagnostics.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Introduction Tony Donné Information taken.
D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.
1 MHD for Fusion Where to Next? Jeff Freidberg MIT.
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
Plasma particle fuelling a general view of methods and issues David Terranova.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
Edge Neutral Density (ENDD) Diagnostic Overview Patrick Ross Monday Physics Meeting Monday, March19, 2007.
TOTAL Simulation of ITER Plasmas Kozo YAMAZAKI Nagoya Univ., Chikusa-ku, Nagoya , Japan 1.
Divertor/SOL contribution IEA/ITPA meeting Naka Nov. 23, 2003 Status and proposals of IEA-LT/ITPA collaboration Multi-machine Experiments Presented by.
Nuclear Fusion The JET project. Conditions for fusion Fusion occurs at a sufficient rate only at very high energies (temperatures) - on earth, temperatures.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 Response to Questions – Day 1 Summary of Answers Q: Maximum pulse length at 1MA, 0.75T, 1 st year parameters? –A1: Full 5 seconds.
Tritium burnup fraction C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project meeting, July 27-28, 2011 Gaithersburg, MD.
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions Lecture 3 Atomic and Molecular Processes.
TRANSP Needs for Physics Modules R. J. Hawryluk TRANSP Users Group Meeting March 24, 2015.
Fyzika tokamaků1: Úvod, opakování1 Tokamak Physics Jan Mlynář 8. Heating and current drive Neutral beam heating and current drive,... to be continued.
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.
Pellet Charge Exchange Measurement in LHD & ITER ITPA Tohoku Univ. Tetsuo Ozaki, P.Goncharov, E.Veschev 1), N.Tamura, K.Sato, D.Kalinina and.
Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
1) Disruption heat loading 2) Progress on time-dependent modeling C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Bethesda, MD, 4/4/2011.
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
ASIPP HT-7 The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by impurity injection The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 12: Diagnostics / heating.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
STUDIES OF NONLINEAR RESISTIVE AND EXTENDED MHD IN ADVANCED TOKAMAKS USING THE NIMROD CODE D. D. Schnack*, T. A. Gianakon**, S. E. Kruger*, and A. Tarditi*
B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.
Comprehensive ITER Approach to Burn L. P. Ku, S. Jardin, C. Kessel, D. McCune Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory SWIM Project Meeting Oct , 2007.
RFX workshop / /Valentin Igochine Page 1 Control of MHD instabilities. Similarities and differences between tokamak and RFP V. Igochine, T. Bolzonella,
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
TITLE Stuart R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello, A.H.Reiman, D.J.Strickler, S.P.Hirshman, L-P. Ku, E.Lazarus, A.Brooks, M.C.Zarnstorff, A.H.Boozer, G-Y. Fu and G.H.Neilson.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Technical Readiness Level For Control of Plasma Power Flux Distribution.
QAS Design of the DEMO Reactor
MCZ MCZ NCSX Mission Acquire the physics data needed to assess the attractiveness of compact stellarators; advance understanding.
M. Ono NSTX FWP 2014 Budget Planning Meeting Apr. 15, 2012 Chapter 10. NSTX-U Facility Status and Proposed Upgrades Text, figures – mostly there except.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
Advanced Tokamak Modeling for FIRE C. Kessel, PPPL NSO/PAC Meeting, University of Wisconsin, July 10-11, 2001.
ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.
NSTX Meeting name – abbreviated presentation title, abbreviated author name (??/??/20??) Goals of NSTX Advanced Scenario and Control TSG Study, implement,
Boundary Physics Breakout Session was a Good Start Breadth of topics: many issues pointed out in three plenary talks: pedestal, SOL/div/PFC, and technology,
Conceptual Study for the Dynamic Control of Fusion Power Plant
A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, H. St John
No ELM, Small ELM and Large ELM Strawman Scenarios
Presentation transcript:

045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting Georgia Tech., Atlanta, GA December A.D. Turnbull, General Atomics

045-05/rs Is There A Comprehensive Approach to Asking The Right Plasma Control Issues Begin with Engineering Question: –Select possible solution: oFormulate Physics Questions: –Select alternative solution: oFormulate Physics Questions: Example: Engineering Question: How is the power flow to be handled ? –Possible solution: H-mode with a radiative divertor to distribute heat and radiation oPhysics Questions: Can H-mode thresholds be maintained ? oCan divertor detachment be maintained ? –Possible solution: L-mode oPhysics Questions: Is fusion performance sufficient ?

045-05/rs Basic Question For Plasma Control Issues: How Are Performance And Heat Loads Balanced And Controlled Possible solution: Measure fusion performance and heat loads and feed back on input power and deposition: –Physics Questions: oHow is fusion performance to be measured ? oHow are heat and radiation loads to be measured ? oHow is the input deposition to be controlled ? oHow does input power deposition modify performance ? oHow does input power deposition modify heat and radiation loads ? oWhat algorithm translates performance to input power ? oWhat algorithm can be used to translate heat and radiation loads to input power ? oWhat are the limits to the control of performance and power fluxes from this solution ?

045-05/rs Other Engineering Questions Relevant To Plasma Control Issues How is control regained after excursions occur outside the normal parameters ? How is plasma startup done ? How is plasma shutdown achieved ? How is fusion ash removed ? How is the distribution of power fluxes to external surfaces controlled ? How is cleanup after disruptions achieved ? How is the required level of diagnostic capability achieved in a fusion environment ? Not all issues can be formulated as: Engineering question  Proposed solution  Physics questions –Some do not have physics content: solution is just a few numbers –eg What are the wall loading limits ?

045-05/rs Is There A General Formal Approach to Formulating The Right Plasma Control Issues ? Maybe ! Many of the plasma control issues boil down to requiring control of a finite number of physics parameters: –Essentially requiring measuring a quantity and modifying it ! Additional issues not encapsulated in questions of control of plasma parameters can and need to be addressed separately: –How is cleanup after disruptions achieved ? –How is the required diagnostic capability achieved in a fusion environment ? Profiles are closely coupled and should be considered simultaneously These all have the same set of general physics questions: –What values of the parameter are required ? –What is the allowable range of values –How are the parameters measured ? –How are they modified - what is the input controller ? –What is the algorithm for translating the required change in parameters to the needed change in controller ?

045-05/rs Plasma Physics Parameters Requiring Diagnostics And Control Global parameters: –Fusion power –Plasma beta –Confinement quality –Overall heat and radiation loads Power handling control: –Heat and radiation load distributions –Edge recycling –ELM size and frequency –Sawtooth size and frequency Equilibrium profiles: –Current density (safety factor) –Pressure –Density –Temperature –D-T ratios –Impurities –Plasma rotation

045-05/rs Some Answers To Current Profile Control Questions Required current profile set by ARIES-AT design Allowable range needs to be determined from calculations Profile measurements using Motional Stark Effect (MSE): –Requires at least a diagnostic Neutral Beam –Requires full equilibrium reconstruction to obtain resultant current profile from magnetic field pitch angle Current profile modified by noninductive current drive: –ECCD –Lower Hybrid Translation of desired current profile to input current drive requires: –Ray tracing and current drive deposition calculations –Possible coupling with pressure profile changes due to heating

045-05/rs Some Answers To Pressure, Density, And Temperature Profile Control Questions Required profiles set by ARIES-AT design Allowable ranges need to be determined from calculations: –T i from fusion cross section requirements –nT  restrictions –Control of spontaneous transport barrier formation Profile measurements using Thomson scattering and Charge Exchange Recombination (CER) diagnostics Profiles modified by: –Pellet injection, gas puffing, and Neutral Beam input –RF wave heating –Divertor pumping –Alpha particle heating Translation of desired profiles to fueling input requires: –Deposition calculations for pellets, RF, beams, and gas –Alpha particle slowing down and heating calculations –Full equilibrium reconstruction to obtain resultant pressure profile

045-05/rs Some Answers To Questions Of Control Of D-T Ratios Required values set by fusion yield calculations Allowable range needs to be adjustable during operation D-T mix diagnostics: –Global D-T ratio measurements from neutron rates –Profile measurements using ?? Global mix and profile modified by: –Tritium neutral beam input –Control of isotopic differential transport rates Translation of desired D-T ratios to fueling input requires: –Deposition calculations for beams –Alpha particle slowing down and heating calculations

045-05/rs Some Answers To Impurity And Alpha Particle Ash Control Questions Required values set by fusion yield requirements: –Presumably minimized Allowable range set by fusion yield requirements Impurity profile measurements using ? Impurity profile modified by: –Altering balance between particle and energy confinement oHow ? –MHD fluctuations from Sawteeth and ELMs Translation of desired ash and impurity concentration to MHD fluctuation size and frequencies requires: –Impurity transport calculations –ELM and sawtooth frequency and size control through: oCross section shaping oEdge seeding oDivertor pumping oNonaxisymmetric shaping

045-05/rs Some Answers To Plasma Rotation Profile Control Questions Required rotation values and profile set by resistive wall mode (RWM) stability and possibly confinement requirements Minimum generally needs to be satisfied only: –Low momentum input  a reactor is unlikely to rotate too fast Rotation profile measurements using: –CER for impurity rotation –Main ion rotation ? Rotation profile modified by: –Momentum input from Neutral Beams –Possibly external rotating nonaxisymmetric fields –Particle losses ? Translation of desired rotation to beam input requires: –Beam deposition calculations –Angular momentum transport calculations –Particle loss calculations –Magnetic drag calculations

045-05/rs Some Answers For Control Of Global Parameters: Fusion Power, Beta Confinement, And Power Loads Required values set by fusion power requirements Range set by POPCON calculations Measurements using: –Neutron rates –Equilibrium reconstruction –Input power flows –Rates of profile changes –Power flows to material surfaces Parameters modified by: –D-T ratios –Control of transport barriers –Input heating power Translation of desired global parameters to input heating and D-T ratios requires: –Time dependent 1 1/2 D transport calculations

045-05/rs Some Answers To Power Handling Control Questions: Power Distribution, Recycling, ELM And Sawtooth Sizes Required values set by materials engineering specifications Range set by materials engineering specifications Measurements using: –Diagnostics placed near external surfaces –Magnetic diagnostics, edge impurity density diagnostics –Divertor diagnostics (Thomson, cameras, etc.) Power distribution parameters modified by: –Profile control –Fusion power control –Divertor geometry control Translation of desired power flow parameters to input requires: –Edge and SOL simulations –Radiation calculations –Time dependent transport calculations

045-05/rs Two Key Issues Not Encapsulated In Terms Of Control Of Plasma Profiles Or Parameters Require Serious Attention How is cleanup after disruptions achieved ? –This is an issue that needs to be resolved by ITER –Requires techniques that work in a hostile fusion environment oIs glow discharge cleaning sufficient ? oIs Lithium conditioning a working option ? –Requires developing wall conditions that minimize cleanup oLow Z ? oNo carbon ? How is the required level of diagnostic capability achieved in a fusion environment –This is a big issue that may not get resolved by ITER

045-05/rs An Advanced Tokamak Reactor Will Require An Unprecedented Array Of Diagnostics DIII-D Diagnostics