Some slides on UCLA LM-MHD capabilities and Preliminary Incompressible LM Jet Simulations in Muon Collider Fields Neil Morley and Manmeet Narula Fusion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
Advertisements

Fluent Overview Ahmadi/Nazridoust ME 437/537/637.
Chapter 30. Induction and Inductance
Outline Overview of Pipe Flow CFD Process ANSYS Workbench
Chapter 2 Introduction to Heat Transfer
CHAPTER 2 DIFFERENTIAL FORMULATION OF THE BASIC LAWS 2.1 Introduction  Solutions must satisfy 3 fundamental laws: conservation of mass conservation of.
Basic Governing Differential Equations
Continuous casting - comparison between numerical simulation and experimental measurement EPM-MADYLAM Y.Delannoy, O.Widlund, J.Etay Presented by Y.Fautrelle.
Design Constraints for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. Shin, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, M. Yoda and ARIES Team G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta,
MUTAC Review April 6-7, 2009, FNAL, Batavia, IL Mercury Jet Target Simulations Roman Samulyak, Wurigen Bo Applied Mathematics Department, Stony Brook University.
Who Wants to Be a CFD Expert? In the ME 566 course title, CFD for Engineering Design, what does the acronym CFD stand for? A.Car Free Day B.Cash Flow Diagram.
Adam Koenig, Wichita State University Mentors: Dr. Ron Riggs, University of Hawai’i, Manoa Dr. Sungsu Lee, Chungbuk National University Krystian Paczkowski,
UNICAMP THE HEIGHT OF LIQUID METHOD FOR FREE SURFACE FLOWS Flow simulations of real processes often involve fluids that are separated by a sharp interface.
Progress on UCLA MTOR Film Flow Experiments for ALIST (Nov April 2003) Presented by Alice Ying M. Abdou, N. Morley, T. Sketchley, J. Burris, M.
1 APEX Task I Progress, Status, and Plan Presented by Alice Ying APEX Meeting Nov. 3, 2003.
Thermo-fluid Analysis of Helium cooling solutions for the HCCB TBM Presented By: Manmeet Narula Alice Ying, Manmeet Narula, Ryan Hunt and M. Abdou ITER.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Collaboration Meeting May 26 – 28, CERN, Geneva Target Simulations.
Additional Calculations of the MERIT Mercury Jet Using the UCLA HIMAG Code Neil Morley and Manmeet Narula Fusion Science and Technology Group, UCLA
Task II Status: Papers, Continued Research, Lessons Learned N. Morley, S. Smolentsev, M-J Ni, R. Miraghaie, A. Ying, M. Abdou (UCLA) Ramakanth Munipalli.
Experimental Verification of Gas- Cooled T-Tube Divertor Performance L. Crosatti, D. Sadowski, S. Abdel-Khalik, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, UCSD (June 14-15,
Jordanian-German Winter Academy 2006 NATURAL CONVECTION Prepared by : FAHED ABU-DHAIM Ph.D student UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Targetry Meeting May 1 - 2, Oxford, GB Target Simulations Roman.
Image courtesy of National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review March 16-17, 2006, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Computational.
Temperature Gradient Limits for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting (June 2004) G. W. Woodruff School of.
Thermofluid MHD issues for liquid breeder blankets and first walls Neil B. Morley and Sergey Smolentsev MAE Dept., UCLA APEX/TBM Meeting November 3, 2003.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy ARIES Project Meeting on Liquid Wall Chamber Dynamics May 5-6, 2003, Livermore, CA Numerical Simulation.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 17-19, 2008, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target.
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC CG Mingham, L Qian, DM Causon and DM Ingram Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Nuclear and Energy Technologies.
Computational Modeling of Turbulent Asymmetric Jet Flows Prof. Ed Akin Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science Rice University Houston, Texas Jon.
Chapter 6: Momentum Analysis of Flow Systems
Introduction to COMSOL Travis Campbell Developed for CHE 331 – Fall 2012 Oregon State University School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering.
By S. Saeidi Contribution from: S. Smolentsev, S. Malang University of Los Angeles August, 2009.
S.S. Yang and J.K. Lee FEMLAB and its applications POSTEC H Plasma Application Modeling Lab. Oct. 25, 2005.
Slide 1 APEX Task II Overview Neil Morley for the APEX Task II Participants APEX E-Meeting August 7, 2001.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review January 14-15, 2003, FNAL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Center for Data Intensive.
Steps toward MTOR Experimental Investigations for ALIST Project Where we stand? This Step: Investigation of Conducting Wall Effects on MHD Film Flow:in.
1 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT Experiment and Post-Simulation H. Park, H. Kirk, K. McDonald Brookhaven National Laboratory Princeton University.
Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.
Content  Turbulent Validation  Thermal Validation  Simple Model Test  Plans for Next Period.
Simulation of Muon Collider Target Experiments Yarema Prykarpatskyy Center for Data Intensive Computing Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department.
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
1/9 Session III-B Special Liquid Lithium Technology Session Summary C. H. Skinner, session chair Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 2 nd International.
Electromagnetic Waves and Their Propagation Through the Atmosphere
Content  Mesh Independence Study  Taylor-Couette Validation  Wavy Taylor Validation  Turbulent Validation  Thermal Validation  Simple Model Test.
CFX-10 Introduction Lecture 1.

Numerical simulation of droplet motion and two-phase flow field in an oscillating container Tadashi Watanabe Center for Computational Science and e-Systems.
FREE CONVECTION 7.1 Introduction Solar collectors Pipes Ducts Electronic packages Walls and windows 7.2 Features and Parameters of Free Convection (1)
1 MAGNETOSTATIC FIELD (MAGNETIC FORCE, MAGNETIC MATERIAL AND INDUCTANCE) CHAPTER FORCE ON A MOVING POINT CHARGE 8.2 FORCE ON A FILAMENTARY CURRENT.
Review of Thermofluid / MHD activities for DCLL Sergey Smolentsev & US TBM Thermofluid/MHD Group 2006 US-Japan Workshop on FUSION HIGH POWER DENSITY COMPONENTS.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Project Review December 12, 2005, BNL, Upton NY MHD Studies of Mercury Jet Target Roman Samulyak.
Targetry Simulation with Front Tracking And Embedded Boundary Method Jian Du SUNY at Stony Brook Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration UCLA.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 2nd Oxford - Princeton High Power Targetry Meeting November 6 - 7, Princeton, NJ Mercury Jet Target.
SPH weekly meeting Free surface flows in Code Saturne Results 23/11/2009 Olivier Cozzi.
Reducing the Iron in the Endcap Yoke of CLIC_SiD Benoit Curé, Konrad Elsener, Hubert Gerwig, CERN CERN, June 2014 Linear Collider Detector Magnet Meeting.
DCLL Thermofluid/MHD R&D Sergey Smolentsev, Neil Morley and the ITER- TBM thermofluid group US ITER-TBM Meeting August 10-12, 2005 INEL.
Appendix A.
School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Numerical Simulation of Centrifugal Compressor Stall and Surge Saeid NiaziAlex SteinLakshmi N. Sankar School of Aerospace.
Heat Transfer Su Yongkang School of Mechanical Engineering # 1 HEAT TRANSFER CHAPTER 7 External flow.
FEASIBILITY ANALYS OF AN MHD INDUCTIVE GENERATOR COUPLED WITH A THERMO - ACOUSTIC ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM S. Carcangiu 1, R. Forcinetti 1, A. Montisci.
Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations
Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Multi-physics Simulation of a Wind Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Validated by Experimental Results Giuseppe Acciani, Filomena Di Modugno, Ernesto Mininno,
Fluent Overview Ahmadi/Nazridoust ME 437/537/637.
Chapter 28 Sources of Magnetic Field
Presentation transcript:

Some slides on UCLA LM-MHD capabilities and Preliminary Incompressible LM Jet Simulations in Muon Collider Fields Neil Morley and Manmeet Narula Fusion Science and Technology Group, UCLA Nov 16, 2005

 HIMAG second order accurate, finite volume based Navier-Stokes solver on unstructured grids  including free surface with Level Set  electric potential and induction equation MHD models  The code has been written for complex geometries and there is much flexibility in choosing a mesh: Hexahedral, Tetrahedral, Prismatic cells can be used.  2-D as well as 3-D flows can be simulated. A fully developed flow option has recently been created.  The code is parallel. All problems can be run across parallel computers.  Electromagnetics and flow physics are solved in a coupled manner. Two different formulations for electromagnetics are now available: phi and B.  An arbitrary set of conducting walls maybe specified. Free surface flows are modeled using the Level Set method. Multiple solid materials can be simulated  Graphical interfaces are available to assist users from problem setup to post-processing.  A preliminary turbulence and heat transfer modeling capability now exists. HIMAG attributes in a nut-shell

Free surface capture HIMAG uses the Level Set method to capture free surfaces A higher order TVD procedure is used to enhance mass conservation and numerical stability Examples of HIMAG simulations:

Jet flow under a 3-component applied B-field for fusion: The warping of a liquid metal jet under a B-field with sharp spatial gradients is studied. The free surface can deform sizably. Right: Jet deformation and Axial current density at two cross sections Jet at the real aspect ratio, and exaggerated aspect ratio on the left.

BOB magnet QTOR magnet and LM Flow Loop FLIHY Electrolyte loop UCLA MTOR Lab MagnetoThermofluid Omnibus Research

5 cm wide Ga-In-Sn flow in a “NSTX-like” scaled toroidal and poloidal field  Film flow example pictured: both numerical & experimental results show that the free surface height variation is asymmetric in span wise direction when both toroidal and normal field components are applied. Features like  ridge formation (orange ellipses) and  wall separation (yellow ellipses) are observed  Drag is also significant and film height doubles in the first 20 cm Experiments and Modeling of 3D MHD flows (both films & jets) show interesting free surfaces features HIMAG simulation (z direction mag ~10x)

Preliminary Muon Collider Simulation Jet Parameters  Horizontal solenoid with center at 0,0,0  Field approximated as a single coil with the inner diameter 30 cm, outer diameter 40 cm, and length 100 cm. The total current is 7200 X 78 X 24 = A.  Nozzle outlet at x (longitudinal) = -40 cm and y (vertical) = -4 cm  Nozzle tilt is 0.1 rad in xy plane (pointing only slightly upwards but mostly horizontal)  Nozzle outlet radius is 5 mm  Nozzle is not simulated, idealized inlet boundary conditions used with no MHD forces for first 5 cm.  Jet initial average velocity is 25 m/s  Mesh is uniform 50x50x200, space is 4x4x80 cm

g Jet trajectory relative to the magnetic axis of the solenoid. Magnification in x:y is 1:2 Solenoid center is at x = 0.4 in this simulation

Jet cross sections cut every 10 cm Jet cross section deformation

Zoomed in view. Sections at X = 10, 20, 30 and 40 cm. Reversal in induced current direction occurs between X = 20 and X = 30 cm.

Jet section at X = 60 cm Jet section at X = 40 cm Jet section at X = 1 cmJet section at X = 20 cm

Remarks  Neglect of electrically conducting nozzle in such a strong field is a big simplification – transition from nozzle to free surface flow will likely be an initial disturbance affecting jet shape. Future simulations should include this nozzle.  For future simulations, higher resolution should be used  This simulation executed in 1day on 16 3GHz Xeon processors at UCLA  Experiments at UCLA experimental facility using gallium alloy possible at low field ~1.5T, or higher field with magnet upgrade (if any interest I will look for suitable magnet in fusion community)