Distributed Registries The Challenge Jon Phipps * Diane Hillmann The NSDL Registry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Issues in methods and reuse for hypermedia ethnography Presented at QUADS Showcase day September 28, 2006 Louise Corti.
Advertisements

Delivering HILT as a shared service Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath
CATCHPlus Valorisation project for CATCH research programme. –Public funding –But: development mainly by commercial parties –Open source required Cultural.
1. The Digital Library Challenge The Hybrid Library Today’s information resources collections are “hybrid” Combinations of - paper and digital format.
Disseminating Service Registry Records Ann Apps MIMAS, The University of Manchester, UK.
ECHO: NASA’s E os C learing HO use Integrating Access to Data Services Michael Burnett Blueprint Technologies, 7799 Leesburg.
Issues and challenges Stakeholder workshop, 29 Jan 2003.
The NSDL Registry Diane Hillmann  Jon Phipps. What We’re Doing Received an NSF grant in Oct. 2006, to: Register metadata schemas, vocabularies, application.
ADL_Initiative Report to #CETISROW.
Administrivia Turn in ranking sheets, we’ll have group assignments to you as soon as possible Homeworks Programming Assignment 1 due next Tuesday Group.
Information architecture Summary Natalia Shatokhina CS575 Spring 2010.
The NSDL Registry: An Update Diane I. Hillmann Jon Phipps Stuart Sutton.
Networked Resources and Metadata Interest Group Diane I. Hillmann Research Librarian Cornell University Library.
Domain Modelling the upper levels of the eframework Yvonne Howard Hilary Dexter David Millard Learning Societies LabDistributed Learning, University of.
Putting it all together for Digital Assets Jon Morley Beck Locey.
Exchange formats and APIs Questions – how and when to access metadata? – lifecycle/status – how to access? can things disappear? – is CSV enough? – is.
Automated XML Content Data Exchange and Management draft-waltermire-content-repository-00
The NSDL Registry Jon Phipps Stuart Sutton Diane Hillmann Ryan Laundry Cornell U. U. of Washington.
OpenMDR: Generating Semantically Annotated Grid Services Rakesh Dhaval Shannon Hastings.
W w w. i l u m i n a – d l i b. o r g iLumina: A Digital Library of Educational Resources for Science & Mathematics National Science Digital Library All-Projects.
1 The NSDL: A Case Study in Interoperability William Y. Arms Cornell University.
Creating rich shareable metadata: The DLF Aquifer MODS implementation guidelines Sarah L. Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ALA Annual.
A Mission Statement: –To provide a timely, sustainable, useful and usable digital resource for those engaged in teaching and learning with and about computing.
Using IESR Ann Apps MIMAS, The University of Manchester, UK.
METADATA QUALITY IN EUROPEANA , Den Haag.
Ensemble Computing in the National Science Digital Library (NSDL)
Improving Metadata Quality: Augmentation and Recombination Diane I. Hillmann Naomi Dushay Jon Phipps National Science Digital Library.
1 Issues in Reusing and Sharing the Content of Thesauri and Taxonomies in OOR Marcia Zeng NKOS (Networked Knowledge Organization Systems/Services) My participating.
7. Approaches to Models of Metadata Creation, Storage and Retrieval Metadata Standards and Applications.
Text linking in the humanities: citing canonical works using OpenURL CNI Spring 2009 Task Force Meeting Eric Rebillard Departments of Classics and History.
“Integrating Standards in Practice” 10th Open Forum on Metadata Registries July 9-11, 2007 New York City, NY USA An international conference to share and.
Metadata Lessons Learned Katy Ginger Digital Learning Sciences University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR)
A bad case of content reuse Validator Website to Validate License Violations Validator – Only requires the URI of the site to check This work by Oshani.
A bad case of content reuse Validator Website to Validate License Violations Validator – Only requires the URI of the site to check for a license violation.
Common challenges, common issues Lorcan Dempsey School for scanning The Hague, 16 October 2002.
AUKEGGS Architecturally Significant Issues (that we need to solve)
InSPIRe Australian initiatives for standardising statistical processes and metadata Simon Wall Australian Bureau of Statistics December
It’s all semantics! The premises and promises of the semantic web. Tony Ross Centre for Digital Library Research, University of Strathclyde
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
Service Service metadata what Service is who responsible for service constraints service creation service maintenance service deployment rules rules processing.
Joint Information Systems Committee Supporting Higher and Further Education Rachel Bruce Programme Manager, JISC Executive Collection.
Integrating Access to Digital Content Sarah Shreeves University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Visual Resources Association 23 rd Annual Conference Miami.
OWL Representing Information Using the Web Ontology Language.
EUROPEANA DATA MODEL, short-term plans EDM worskhop 2015 Netherlands, Public Domain , Rijksmuseum Anonymous Arrival of a Portuguese ship.
JISC/NSF PI Meeting, June Archon - A Digital Library that Federates Physics Collections with Varying Degrees of Metadata Richness Department of Computer.
“A Library outranks any other one thing a community can do to benefit its people.” Andrew Carnegie Mary Marlino DLESE Program Center Tamara Sumner University.
WoT Outreach: joint slide set Outreach slide set aims to increase the awareness of W3C’s WoT work # Comments Arne: Abgrenzung zu anderen Initiativen.
Optimising Interoperability in Multi-KOS Subject Searching: Framework for a Collaborative Approach? Dennis Nicholson, Centre for Digital Library Research.
ET in a m2m environment Britta Rackmann. What’s it all about?  Search for the human  Look beyond the labels!  Do the testing which suits the system.
IESR, A Registry of Collections and Services: Using the DCMI Collection Description Profile in Practice Ann Apps MIMAS, The University of Manchester, UK.
NeOn Components for Ontology Sharing and Reuse Mathieu d’Aquin (and the NeOn Consortium) KMi, the Open Univeristy, UK
Registry Community Workshop 2009 organised by UKOLN and the DCMI Registry Task Group Welcome!
The Earth Information Exchange. Portal Structure Portal Functions/Capabilities Portal Content ESIP Portal and Geospatial One-Stop ESIP Portal and NOAA.
The JISC Information Environment Service Registry (IESR) Ann Apps Mimas, The University of Manchester, UK.
Adoption of RDA-DFT Terminology and Data Model to the Description and Structuring of Atmospheric Data Aaron Addison, Rudolf Husar, Cynthia Hudson-Vitale.
Using a Simple Knowledge Organization System to facilitate Catalogue and Search for the ESA CCI Open Data Portal EGU, 21 April 2016 Antony Wilson, Victoria.
WREC Working Group IETF 49, San Diego Co-Chairs: Mark Nottingham Ian Cooper WREC Working Group.
Web Design Vocabulary #3. HTML Hypertext Markup Language - The coding scheme used to format text for use on the World Wide Web.
DIANE HILLMANN CATALOGING NORMS IG ALA ANNUAL 2015 SAN FRANCISCO WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT OUR LEGACY?
SOA for Storage Simon Eldridge, Product Manager, Omneon Inc.
1 CS 430: Information Discovery Lecture 13 Case Study: the NSDL.
1 The XMSF Profile Overlay to the FEDEP Dr. Katherine L. Morse, SAIC Mr. Robert Lutz, JHU APL
Evolving Architecture at NSIDC
TRSS Terminology Registry Scoping Study
The JISC IE Metadata Schema Registry
Geospatial and Problem Specific Semantics Danielle Forsyth, CEO and Co-Founder Thetus Corporation 20 June, 2006.
JSTOR as a Shibboleth Target
Disseminating Service Registry Records
Presentation transcript:

Distributed Registries The Challenge Jon Phipps * Diane Hillmann The NSDL Registry

The Current Environment Registry development taking off … in multiple directions In order to ensure success for all, registries need to define their users broadly—to include those who don’t yet know they exist They need to be willing to direct users who approach the task of discovery through their portal to some other registry if that’s more appropriate

The Challenge is … Discovery Finding available vocabularies/metadata schemas/APs regardless of starting point Use Directing users easily from one registry to another Reliable m2m interactions between registries to ensure timely and up-to-date information Providing a base level of services to users, no matter their starting point

Strawman #1 Registries enable automated caching of other registry content Each registry can then enable searching of available content without the difficulties of federated search Requires agreements on mapping between vocabulary standards (SKOS, Zthes, etc.) May require “registry of registries” or other mechanism to locate content May require agreement on a common search API (SRU, OpenSearch, Z39.50)

Strawman #1 Questions Is this politically feasible, given the wide variety of funding regimes represented? Would “branding” be useful/necessary? Can such a solution accommodate both open and semi- open registries? Differing assumptions about licensing and access? What other registry discovery mechanisms are available? Will registries support discovery based on term/concept label search as well as registry-level descriptive metadata?

The Politics of Re-Use What can we enable using distributed methodologies, and do we want to enable them? Are there IP issues? If so, how are they expressed? Extending existing vocabularies Adopting existing work (terms or whole vocabularies) and changing the domain or focus in a reused vocabulary What about abandoned vocabularies?

Other Potential Issues How much information can or should be shared? How do we accommodate differences in approach that might affect download/caching/presentation of one vocabulary in another registry? At what point should users be directed from one registry to another, instead of browsing the vocabulary from the starting point registry? What would we need to accomplish to begin trying this out?