LIGO-G010004-00-M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
Advertisements

LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
LIGO-G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
VIRGO: WHERE WE COME FROM WHERE WE ARE GOING GIOVANNI LOSURDO - INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Project Leader for the Virgo Collaboration (and the LIGO Scientific.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Construction Proposal Submission Gary Sanders LIGO Laboratory PAC 12 June 2002, Cambridge.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO- G W LIGO Update by Fred Raab Local Educators Network LIGO Hanford Observatory October 27, 2005.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory Who? Presented By: Bonnie Wooley.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish LSC Meeting 19-Aug-02.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors David Shoemaker NSF Operations Review Hanford, 26 February 2001.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
LIGO-G M Status of LIGO Barry Barish PAC Meeting Caltech 3-June-04 Upper limits on known pulsar ellipticities.
G M LIGO Laboratory1 Overview of Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker PAC meeting, NSF Review 5 June 2003, 11 June 2003.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
LIGO-G Opening the Gravitational Wave Window Gabriela González Louisiana State University LSC spokesperson For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO MREFC (Construction) Proposal Submission Gary Sanders Caltech/LIGO November 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
19 Aug 2003, LSC Hannover G Z1 State of the LSC Peter Saulson Syracuse University.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
LIGO-G M Management and Operation Plans/Budget Stan Whitcomb NSF Annual Review 8 November 2004 Caltech.
LIGO-G M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001.
LIGO-G M Summary Remarks: Management of LIGO Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology NRC Committee on Organization and Management of Research.
CARRUTHERS LSC 3/20/06 1 LIGO-G M The View from NSF Tom Carruthers LIGO Program Officer National Science Foundation (703)
January 12, 2006ILIAS-WG3 Frascati1 Virgo+ & Advanced Virgo B. Mours With material from G. Losurdo, M. Punturo, A. Viceré and others.
LIGO-G D What can we Expect for the “Upper Limit” Run Stan Whitcomb LSC Meeting 13 August 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory A Personal Reading of.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
RedGreenBlue Discussion topics LIGO-G v1 Benno Willke, David Shoemaker.
Update on Activities in Suspensions for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University LSC meeting, Hanford, Aug 20 th 2002.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Report Barry Barish LSC Meeting - Hanford 14 Aug 01.
LSC - Hanford, WA 19–22 August 2002 The View from NSF GP Funding FY 2002 NSF Funding Prospects FY 2003 Funding Opportunities for GWP Some Areas of Special.
LIGO-G M Collaboration With Virgo Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Baton Rouge March, 2001.
G R Proposed Adv. R&D FY R&D for Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker & Dennis Coyne 29 January 2001.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
WG3 Report Michele Punturo Harald Lück. WG3 composition Co-Chairmen M.Punturo INFN Perugia, Italy H.Lück MPI für Gravitationsphysik, AEI, Hannover, Germany.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 The Future - How to make a next generation LIGO David Shoemaker, MIT AAAS Annual Meeting 17 February 2003.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
LIGO - G M LIGO Laboratory and LSC Background on Major Collaborative Efforts Gary Sanders LIGO Lyon Virgo-LIGO Discussion 8 January 2001.
LIGO-G M LIGO Overview Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.
PX444 – The Distant Universe Lecture 13 The History of Star Formation.
LIGO PAC11, Nov 2001 Syracuse proposal to NSF LIGO-G Z 1 Proposal to NSF: “Research in Gravitational Wave Detection with LIGO” Peter R.
Advanced Towards Advanced Virgo Giovanni Losurdo – INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Coordinator on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Construction Proposal Submission Gary Sanders LIGO Laboratory LSC Meeting August 2002, Hanford.
LIGO G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
LIGO-G M State of the LIGO Laboratory Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech LSC Meeting, LLO March 16, 2004 State of LIGO.
LIGO- G M LIGO Status Stan Whitcomb Oversight Committee 20 October 2004.
LIGO-G M LIGO Overview PAC 14 DRAFT VERSION Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
LIGO-G M Managing LIGO: Lessons for a Collaboratory Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech NEES Awardees Meeting NSF, December 19, 2001.
Page 1 Coles – Operating the Observatories PAC 9 Dec. 13, 2000 G L Operating the Observatories Mark Coles.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
Dawn II, July 8, 2016 GaTech Organizing the international community: issues, open questions, opportunities Dave Reitze LIGO Laboratory, Caltech LIGO Laboratory.
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
GEO HF Limits/Goals/Options…
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
David Shoemaker AAAS Conference 17 February 2003
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Hanford 15 August 2005
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
Discussion of GWIC 3G Report: acceptance and follow-up actions
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D2 Program and Mission of the LIGO Laboratory l observe gravitational wave sources; l develop advanced detectors that approach and exploit the facility limits on interferometer performance; l operate the LIGO facilities to support the national and international scientific community; l and support scientific education and public outreach related to gravitational wave astronomy.

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D3 LIGO Proposes To: l Complete commissioning of the initial LIGO interferometers; l operate the LIGO interferometers for the initial LIGO Science Run; l process and analyze the Science Run data and publish the results of the first scientific searches for gravitational wave sources; l characterize and improve the sensitivity and availability of the operating interferometers; l define interferometer upgrades and carry out a research and development program to underpin future upgrade proposals; l support the development and research of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration; l support the development of the international network of gravitational wave detectors; l interpret the LIGO program to the public; l leverage LIGO in educational settings; l and address new industrial technologies and applications stimulated by the requirements of gravitational wave observation.

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D4 The Original Vision for LIGO LIGO was conceived as a program to detect gravitational waves LIGO construction was approved to provide an initial set of feasible detectors and a set of facilities capable of supporting much more sensitive detectors It was planned that the initial detectors would have a plausible chance to make direct detections It was planned that more sensitive detectors would be required to enable confident detection This R&D proposal describes the program to enable the exploitation of the large investment in the facilities.

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D5 LIGO Facilities Support Detector Upgrades

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D6 Advanced LIGO Detector Reach ” hours of operation will exceed the integrated observations of the 1 year LIGO Science Run...”

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D7 An Example from Thorne Survey

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D8 History of LIGO R&D Early R&D leading to initial LIGO took place during the 1970’s and 1980’s Preconstruction R&D for initial LIGO was included in the award for the LIGO construction »LIGO construction $272 million »Preconstruction R&D $20 million (addressing final issues) »Early operations $69 million NSF invited proposals for R&D in support of more advanced detectors in 1996 LIGO Laboratory has been receiving $2.7 million/year of a ~$6.9 million program

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D9 LIGO Laboratory Funding To Date MRE

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D10 Role of LIGO Scientific Collaboration... A research community around LIGO was formally stimulated as early as 1995 Following the 1996 McDaniel Panel, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration was formed in 1997 During 1996, proposals submitted to NSF for R&D support were already highly collaborative The 1996 and 1997 R&D plans and proposals were built around certain sensitivity levels as targets for next generation detectors During 1999, the Lab/LSC established a reference design for the advanced LIGO detectors

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D11 … Role of LIGO Scientific Collaboration The LSC and Lab submitted a White Paper and a Conceptual Project plan in late 1999 »this was reviewed by NSF > encouraging current R&D This LIGO study sharpened the design and the R&D focus The R&D program has been highly coordinated across the LSC by the Lab and LSC »all R&D tasks are defined in MOU’s with the Laboratory »the program is conducted as the early stages of a construction project »systems engineering is carried out »the R&D is organized with a detailed cost estimate and schedule »monthly coordinating meetings are held to monitor progress

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D12 LSC Participation in Advanced LIGO R&D

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D13 The Advanced LIGO Detector Fabry-Perot Michelson interferometers Power recycling AND signal recycling 180 W Nd:YAG laser possible sapphire core optics much better isolation through the use of a fully active seismic isolation system, and a multiple pendulum suspension with silica suspension fibers

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D14 R&D Challenges Suspension and test mass thermal noise Management of thermal consequences of high laser power Prestabilized laser performance Seismic isolation The controls problem

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D15 Approach to Interferometer Upgrades Gravitational wave interferometers are “point” designs »substantial improvements in performance are difficult to achieve with incremental upgrades »lowering one noise floor encounters another »changing the performance of one subsystem causes system mismatch with other subsystems Installing an interferometer into the vacuum system is a major campaign »much of the campaign overhead is encountered even with subsystem upgrades Installing an interferometer has a high cost in missed scientific opportunity Upgrade should be a major increase in sensitivity

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D16 Advanced LIGO Program Assumption R&D in progress now »major equipment expenditures in 2001, R&D is substantially completed in 2004 »some tests are completed in 2005 Construction funds will be requested for 2004 start »some long lead purchases occur as early as 2003 »assembly outside vacuum system takes place in 2005 Advanced interferometers will be installed beginning in early 2006 »when LIGO Science Run I is producing published results

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D17 R&D Program Approach to Risk Reduction All significant risks are planned for measurement or verification during the proposed program Faithful prototypes of advanced LIGO subsystems are fully tested in parallel to operating LIGO Goal is to fully qualify all designs before installing in LIGO vacuum system »40 Meter qualifies controls system »LASTI qualifies the isolation/suspension system and the prestabilized laser/input optics systems Installation into LIGO vacuum system occurs when new systems are fully ready and qualified

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D18 LIGO Funding Evolution and Proposal Request

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D19 Proposal Request Includes technical support for R&D

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D20 The R&D Program Most work supports Advanced LIGO realization Some far reaching research All work highly collaborative Lab coordinates program through LSC »full cost/schedule planning in use »monthly telecons with each working group Engineering and some senior effort supported from Lab Operations Big ticket equipment items for LSC program in Lab proposal

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D21 Increased Staffing to Support R&D and Modeling

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D22 R&D Effort

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D23 R&D Equipment in Support of LSC Research Program Equipment costs for the development of advanced seismic isolation prototypes. Equipment costs for the development of multiple pendulum, fused silica fiber suspension prototypes. Materials and manufacturing subcontracts to support the development of sapphire test masses and high Q test mass materials and coatings research. Investment and non-recurring engineering costs for a large coating chamber and its commissioning »study of coating strategy in progress

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D24 FY02 N.B.: Does not include LSC research staff. Isolation Research (STO, SUS, TNI, SEI)

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D25 Lasers & Optics Research (LAS, OPT, IOS, AOS) FY02 N.B.: Does not include LSC research staff.

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D26 Advanced Interferometer Systems, Sensing & Control (ISC, 40m, SID, SYS) FY02 N.B.: Does not include LSC research staff.

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D27 Total LIGO Laboratory R&D FY02 N.B.: Does not include LSC research staff.

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D28 Major International Roles in Advanced LIGO GEO (UK, Germany) project has joined the LSC »Initial LIGO involvement is in data algorithms and analysis »advanced LIGO involvement includes leading roles in suspensions, configurations, prestabilized laser. »GEO is proposing a capital contribution/partnership in construction of advanced LIGO ACIGA project has joined LSC »Initial LIGO involvement is in data algorithms and analysis »advanced LIGO involvement includes laser development, sapphire development and high power issues Recent discussions have begun with Virgo on collaboration in coating development and in joint data taking and data analysis

LIGO-G M LIGO R&D29 Advanced LIGO Plan R&D for a baselined detector proceeds through 2004 LIGO will propose construction to start in 2004 »proposal submitted late this year for 2 year review cycle Installation commences in 2006 »R&D complete »assembly outside vacuum sufficiently advanced »initial LIGO results in publication