DWG – Dependable Capacity Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Task Force - Chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Demand-Side Management Influence on Reliability NERC Demand-Side Management Task Force (DSMTF) Rick Voytas, Chair November 2007 Presented To The U.S.
Advertisements

1 IEEE Power Engineering Society IEEE Standard 762: Standard Definitions for Use in Reporting Electric Generating Unit Reliability, Availability, and Productivity.
WORKSHOP ON UTILITY WIND INTEGRATION STUDIES: MODELS AND METHODS Panel 6 – Base Load Unit Cycling Costs Gene Danneman P.E. June 24 & 25, 2010.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
PV Market Trends and Technical Details. All of US has Suitable Solar Resource for Large Scale PV Deployment.
NERC/GADS Reporting Requirements John Yale Hydro Plant Engineering Manager Chelan County PUD 1.
Preliminary Impacts of Wind Power Integration in the Hydro-Qubec System.
Technical Conference Avoided Cost Modeling January 6, 2015.
Power Supply Adequacy Assessment Model/Methodology Review Steering Subcommittee Meeting January 29, 2010.
Overview of Loss of Load Expectation (LOLE) and Unforced Capacity (UCAP) Dan Huffman FirstEnergy Solutions November 20, 2007 OMS Board Workshop Resource.
Preliminary Review of July 24 th Extreme Temperature Event & Implications for Pilot Capacity Standard Mary Johannis & Wally Gibson PNW Resource Adequacy.
A Summary on Probabilistic Workshop held on September 9, 2014 Milorad Papic (RAWG Chair) Salt Lake City, January 13, 2015.
Capacity Valuation.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Results of the 2012 Loss of Load Study January 18, 2013.
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO Independent Energy Producers 2011 Annual Meeting - October 5, 2011 Stanford Sierra Conference.
BOSTON DENVER LONDON LOS ANGELES MENLO PARK MONTREAL NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON Effective Load Carrying Capability of Wind Generation: Initial Results.
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
GE Energy Asia Development Bank Wind Energy Grid Integration Workshop: Issues and Challenges for systems with high penetration of Wind Power Nicholas W.
Study Results Drought Scenario Study This slide deck contains results from the 2011 TEPPC Study Program. This study shows the impact in the interconection.
ERCOT PUBLIC 4/21/ Loss of Load Probability Assessment for NERC April, 2015.
Achieving Independent Net Zero Energy Through Building Technologies Presented by: Michael Hendrix, Atkins North America.
Draft Avoided Cost Forecast and Marginal CO 2 Offset Value of Conservation Regional Technical Forum Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
A Resource Adequacy Standard for the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Technical Committee January 17, 2008 Portland Airport.
ENERGY CENTER State Utility Forecasting Group (SUFG) Alternative Resources and Energy Capacity Presented by: Douglas J. Gotham Purdue University Presented.
Adequacy Assessment for the 2017 Pacific Northwest Power Supply Steering Committee Meeting October 26, 2012 Portland, Oregon 1.
VARIABLE GENERATION OPERATING RESERVE TASK FORCE VARIABLE GENERATION OPERATING RESERVE TASK FORCE Don Badley, Chair VGORTF Report to Operating Committee.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
ERCOT Planning October 2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System - Methodology.
Powered by the Loads and Resource Information System (LaRIS) Pacific Northwest Loads and Resources Operational Peaking Adjustment Council Briefing.
HMTF Understanding PLF August 31, 2015 Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Work Group - Chair.
Resource Adequacy Steering Committee Meeting October 4, 2011.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Update to WMS November 18, 2009.
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
EFFECTIVE LOAD CARRYING CAPABILITY FOR WIND-POWER.
HMTF Update TAS Nov 3-4, 2015 Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Work Group - Chair.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
TAS – Review Load and Hydro Shapes for use in TEPPC 2026 Common Case Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Task Force - Chair.
What’s happening in Spain? Access to the grid request of STE projects by Oct MW.
Atcllc.com Using CEMS Data to Estimate Coal-Fired Plant FORs and Scheduled Maintenance Chris Hagman
NW Loss of Load Probability James Gall Power Supply Analyst
Gen Maintenance w/ GridView DWG – Dec. 14, 2015 W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL WECC System Adequacy Planning.
ISO Confidential Overview of California’s Current Drought and its Effects on the Energy System Dede Subakti, P. E. Director, Operations Engineering Services.
Defining LOLP Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Subcommittee Meeting November 14, 2008.
Economic Planning Study June 23, In this presentation  Major changes from last meeting  Results: 2010, 2014, 2019  Finish analyst  Next steps.
Power Supply Adequacy for the 2021 Operating Year Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Steering Committee Webinar June 8, 2016.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Variable Energy Resource Capacity Contributions Consistent With Reserve Margin and Reliability Noha Abdel-Karim, Eugene Preston,
EPS Updates ColumbiaGrid Planning Meeting October 13, 2016
DWG Meeting March 7, 2017 (Update to a Meeting held July 26, 2016)
WECC 2026 Common Case Capacity Assessment with RECAP
Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Model Work Group - Chair
Hydro Modeling Improvement for TAS Approval May 4, 2017
MWG Recommended Hydro Improvement March 7, 2017
Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Model Work Group - Chair
Outline Background Study Assumptions Study Results To Do
ColumbiaGrid Summary of: COI Utilization Report dated May 4, 2011
Recommended Hydro Improvement April 11, 2017
Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Task Force - Chair
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Outline Modeling Issue 2017 Modeling Goals
MWG Recommended Hydro Improvement March 14, 2017
Jeff King Northwest Power & Conservation Council July 28, 2010
MWG Recommended Hydro Improvement March 7, 2017
Hydro Modeling Improvement for TAS Approval May 4, 2017
Recommended Hydro Improvement April 11, 2017
2021 Adequacy Assessment Status Report
Capacity Analysis in the Sixth Plan
Study Results Drought Scenario Study
Planning Reserve Margin
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
Presentation transcript:

DWG – Dependable Capacity Kevin Harris, ColumbiaGrid TEPPC\Hydro Modeling Task Force - Chair

Overview GADS EFORd and SOF for Understanding Maintenance in GV – Risk of Scheduling Maintenance in PCM Dependable Capacity – Concept presented at WECC DWG on 2/13/2014 and GridView user group 10/19/2015 2

NERC GADS NERC GADS (Generation Availability Data System) EFORd: Equivalent Forced Outage Rate Demand – EFORd measures the probability that a unit will not meet its demand periods for generating requirements because of forced outages or deratings. SOF: Scheduled outage factor AF: Availability Factor 3 PW: Diablo & PV BW: Columbia GS

Understanding Maintenance in GV 4 A LOLP (Loss Of Load Probability) or equivalent method measures a systems ability reliably serve load – A commend criterial is 1 day in 10 years or probability of – LOLP ranges from Maintenance is scheduled when LOLP is low LOLP inputs: units rating, forced outage rate and served peak demand In GV outage rate are not considered for Hydro, and hourly shapes ( like Hydro, wind, solar), i.e. its perfect/firm capacity – As the penetration of Hydro, wind, and solar capacity increases LOLP drops to zero Existing PNW Supply (WA, OR, ID and MT): 24% dispatchable (13,610 MW), 61% Hydro (35,487 MW) and 13% renewable (8,662 MW)

Understanding Maintenance in GV 5 LOLP is calculated weekly based on inputted hourly loads – Maintenance is scheduled based on a nominal year (by season/monthly) Maintenance is preformed by regions which may not line up with actual operations – The use of a user define maintenance areas where areas and/or units can be assigned

Dependable Capacity Dependable capacity should be used instead of physical capacity when calculating LOLP for maintenance scheduling – Dependable capacity is used only for scheduling maintenance – Expected available capability during the peak hour – If an EFOR is not modeled some form of probability of exceedance should be applied for expected peak hour Dependable Capacity is: – For traditional thermal units this is the winter/summer rating – For Hydro dependable capacity is limited to the plants ability to serve load on a daily bases Dependable Hydro:= Min(Rating or [ROR (aMW) + (Gen – ROR (aMW)) * 2 (Equiv to 12 hours of op [24/12]) Example: 50% CF with 40% of generation used for base load (ROR): – min(100%, 20% [50%*40% ROR] + (50% - 20%) * 2):= min(100%, 80%):= 80% rating If 100% ROR formula results in dependable capacity equal to ROR capacity In an emergency full load capability can be achieved. – For Wind/Solar the expected capacity during the peak hour with a 90+% probability of exceedance Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) California NQC 6

Dependable Hydro 7 Dependable Hydro capacity is limited by the available Hydro energy to serve load Dependable Hydro:=Min(Rating, ROR aMW + [Mo Gen – ROR aMW] * 2) Hydro gen in the fall cannot support full rating except for short periods of time Assuming 20,000 MW rating Dependable Cap in Sept is 12,000 MW, a 8,000 MW derate Including a ROR component decreases dependable capacity

Example PNW Dependable Capacity 8 Hydro and thermal maintenance patterns are not similar – They peak during different seasons Dependable capacity in June is 10,000 MW less than capability A 12,000 MW reduction in dependable capacity from Jun to Sep Sep dependable capacity is 30% lower than capability Dependable Capacity ST, CC, GT:= 100% Wind:= 0% Solar:= 0% Hydro:= Daily Sched Capability Min(Max, ROR + 2*[Gen-ROR]) Chart from 2/13/2014 DWG presentation

9 Kevin Harris (503)