ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-1 Unit 7 Constitutional Limitations Regulatory Takings: Condemnation, Regulation and Impermissible Takings of Private Property.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Handling The Eminent Domain Process Bergman Dacey Goldsmith, APLC Greg M. Bergman Brian J. Bergman Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 900 Los Angeles, California.
Advertisements

Right of Way Acquisition Process Jesse W. Smith Right of Way Manager.
AASHTO 2005 Right of Way and Utilities Conference Austin, Texas Acquisition Alternatives and Eminent Domain.
The Role of Custom Thornton v. Hay, 462 P.2d 671 (Or. 1969).  Appeal from decree enjoining building of fences.  Court rejected prescription because it.
THE LEGAL BASES OF PLANNING. TOPICS KEY QUESTIONS POLICE POWER & PLANNING EMINENT DOMAIN AND PLANNING TAKINGS & PLANNING HOW IS THE “PUBLIC INTEREST”
Intangible Takings, Extraordinary Consequences New Supreme Court Guidance on Inverse Condemnation.
______________ Eminent Domain, Condemning Real Property In Federal Court; A Wisconsin Perspective ______________ Eminent Domain, Condemning Real Property.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises.
CHAPTER 17 Ownership and Leasing of Real Property
Constitutional Law II: First Review Prof. Morrison Feb. 15, 2006.
BUSINESS AND THE CONSTITUTION Chapter 2. Constitutional Impact on Business The Constitution applies only to GOVERNMENT action. The Constitution gives.
July 26, 2007 Arizona City/County Management Association Proposition 207 How Are You Handling It?
CONDEMNATION LAW What’s New? Raymond O. Howd, Assistant Attorney General.
Property II Professor Donald J. Kochan Spring 2009 Class March 2009.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1.6 FIFTH AMENDMENT. Fifth Amendment "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment.
APA Minnesota State Planning Conference St. Cloud, Minnesota September 30, 2011 Jean Coleman, Attorney/Planner CR Planning, Inc.
Due Process and Equal Protection
The Constitution and its Influence on Business OBE 118, Section 3 Fall, 2004 Professor McKinsey.
The Courts and the Takings Clause Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005). TM.
Kelo vs. New London Zach Messersmith 12/5/2006. Eminent Domain Legal right of government to seize private land for public good Government receives power.
Real Property – Eminent Domain Eminent Domain is the government’s power to take private property “Condemnation” is the procedure through which the power.
Access to Justice and Technology Ronald W. Staudt Class 8: Alternatives to Current Justice Processes March 26, 2003.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 23 Personal Property, Real Property, and Land Use Law.
2015 ACEC- KY/FHWA/KYTC Partnering Conference CONDEMNATION PITFALLS JOHN F. ESTILL.
The Constitution and Dispute Resolution OBE 118, Section10, Fall, 2004 Professor McKinsey Recommended Chapter Three review problems beginning on page 136.
Background Claremont residents and officials have voiced concerns over the water rate increases imposed by the Golden State Water Company (GSWC). On average,
1 Welcome to the International Right of Way Association’s Course 803 Eminent Domain Law Basics for Right of Way Professionals 803-PT – Revision 3 – USA.
Economics: American Free Enterprise Chapter 2 Section 1.
Lucas vs. South Carolina Coastal Council By Alisha Renfro Geology 558.
Balancing Private Property Rights and the Public Interest Rebecca Roberts.
The Other Expressed Powers Chapter 11 Section 2. Key Terms Copyright Copyright Patent Patent Territory Territory Eminent domain Eminent domain Naturalization.
Its Legal, Ethical & Global Environment 6 th Ed. Its Legal, Ethical & Global Environment 6 th Ed. B U S I N E S S MARIANNE M. JENNINGS Copyright ©2003.
Balancing Private Property Rights and the Public Interest Rebecca Roberts.
Today’s Focus: How does the government use land for building? What rights to people have to stop the government from taking their land?
Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director Real Estate Overview Matt Kouskouris, Division.
Responding to Climate Change: Is the Takings Clause an Obstacle? Alan Weinstein Cleveland-Marshall College of Law Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban.
EMINENT DOMAIN. Eminent Domain is the government’s power to take private property “Condemnation” is the procedure through which the power of eminent domain.
Bulldozing Homes to Build Shopping Malls: The Chinese Takings Law Revisited from a Comparative Perspective Chenglin Liu LL.M (China), LL.M (Sweden), LL.M,
The Road to Nowhere Introduction Eminent domain and the people of western N.C.
Organization and Legal Framework of Public Education Admin MCLA Leading Schools in context Barbara Malkas.
David H. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council U.S. Supreme Court 505 U.S June 29, 1992.
David H. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council U.S. Supreme Court 505 U.S June 29, 1992.
Sustainable Development. Tragedy of the Commons pollution & overutilization of limited resources Sustainable development Brownfields Conservation easements.
Three Types of Taking 1. Seizure (Eminent Domain) Kelo v. New London 2. Nuisance Barron v. Baltimore, U.S. v. Causby 3. Regulatory Lucas v. So. Carolina.
Water and Takings John D. Echeverria Vermont Law School 60 th Annual Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute Vail, Colorado July 17-19, 2014.
Modern Real Estate Practice in Illinois Eighth Edition Chapter 6: Brokerage Agreements ©2014 Kaplan, Inc.
Types of Laws Chapter 1-2. Sources of Law What’s Your Verdict? (pg. 10) The federal constitution guarantees the citizens of the U.S. many rights. These.
Evaluating Conservation Easement, Solar Lease, and Land Lease Proposals Theodore A. (Ted) Feitshans Extension Professor Department of Agricultural & Resource.
Regulation as Taking Prof. David Glazier April 10, 2007 PropertyProperty.
Eminent Domain in Finland
Chapter 5 Business and the Constitution
The Legal Context of Business
The Legal Context of Business
REAL ESTATE AND BUY AMERICA Matt DeLong, Chair Subcommittee on Right-of-way, Utilities, and Outdoor Advertising Control Development Services Division.
Essential Requirements of the Uniform Act for Local Public Agencies
Water System Acquisition
The Basics of Zoning for City and Town Officials
CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON REGULATION
CAN YOU DIG IT? The Valuation of Fill Materials in Determining the Fair Market Value of Condemned Property.
What are the roles of government in our free enterprise economy?
Land Use Exactions, Takings and Impact Fees
The U.S. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended Douglas M. Hummel, SR/WA Land Assembly Coordinator,
Common Law Environmental Liability
Unit 13 ARE 306 Regulatory Takings: Condemnation, Regulation and Impermissible Takings of Private Property.
Slide Set Twenty-Three: Modern Challenges in Property Law – Land Use 3
Eminent Domain.
Your Rights in the Legal System
The Bill of Rights And Civil Liberties
Free Enterprise System
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES
Presentation transcript:

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-1 Unit 7 Constitutional Limitations Regulatory Takings: Condemnation, Regulation and Impermissible Takings of Private Property

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-2 5th Amendment Takings Clause “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” –Public use –Just compensation

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-3 Public Use All governmental uses of property Private, for profit, public utilities Urban renewal

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-4 Just Compensation Fair Market Value (FMV) The price that a willing buyer would pay a willing seller

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-5 Eminent Domain in NC Power conferred solely by General Assembly Condemnors –Public –Private

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-6 Eminent Domain Procedure No prior offer to purchase required Notice Institution of action –Service of summons & complaint –Deposit with the court Answer by defendant

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-7 Eminent Domain Procedure Determination of damages & other issues –Commissioners used if sole issue is compensation –Trial de novo from findings of commissioners Vesting of title –Quick take –Standard

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-8 Inverse Condemnation No legal action by public entity Corresponds to the torts of trespass or nuisance Physical v. nonphysical Attorney fees available (NC)

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-9 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Physical invasion Regulatory takings –Usually, but not necessarily, nonphysical

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-10 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Lucas v. S.C. Coastal Council (1992) Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) Loretto v. TelePrompter Manhattan CATV Corp. (1982)

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-11 Other cases Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. U.S. (Fed. Cir. 1994) - framework problem [appeal from U.S. Court of Federal Claims] Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. U.S. (Fed. Cir. 1994) - partial taking Bormann v. Bd. Of Supervisors in & for Kossuth Co., Iowa (Iowa Supreme Court 1998)

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-12 NC Law Exactions –Meets need created by developer –Commensurate benefit to development –Schools & general road improvements forbidden in N.C.

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-13 NC Law No state equivalent of Takings Clause NC cases more generous than federal Partial takings –Calculation FMV before less FMV after –Offsets

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-14 Summary of limitations on federal & state power Constitutional Statutory Institutional

ARE 309Ted Feitshans07-15 Constitutionality of Zoning Uniform scheme No spot zoning No guarantee of highest & best use