Cosmic Ray Excesses From Multi-Component Dark Matter Da Huang Physics Department, Fo Guang Shan Fo Guang Shan PRD89, 055021(2014) [arXiv:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ze-Peng Liu, Yue-Liang Wu and Yu-Feng Zhou Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics China, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Advertisements

Fermi LAT Observations of Galactic and Extragalactic Diffuse Emission Jean-Marc Casandjian, on behalf of the Fermi LAT collaboration 7 questions addressed.
Combined Energy Spectra of Flux and Anisotropy Identifying Anisotropic Source Populations of Gamma-rays or Neutrinos Sheldon Campbell The Ohio State University.
Dark Matter Annihilation in the Milky Way Halo Shunsaku Horiuchi (Tokyo) Hasan Yuksel (Ohio State) John Beacom (Ohio State) Shin’ichiro Ando (Caltech)
MSSM in view of PAMELA and Fermi-LAT Ts. Enkhbat 2 nd workshop on LHC physics, CYCU, Chungli Based on: arXiv: B. BajcB. Bajc, Ts. E, D. K. Ghosh,
Implication of recent cosmic ray data Qiang Yuan Institute of High Energy Physics Collaborated with Xiaojun Bi, Hong Li, Jie Liu, Bing Zhang & Xinmin Zhang.
Dark Matter Explanation For e^\pm Excesses In Cosmic Ray Xiao-Gang He CHEP, PKU and Physics, NTU.
Significant effects of second KK particles on LKP dark matter physics
Annihilating Dark Matter Nicole Bell The University of Melbourne with John Beacom (Ohio State) Gianfranco Bertone (Paris, Inst. Astrophys.) and Gregory.
Testing astrophysical models for the PAMELA positron excess with cosmic ray nuclei Philipp Mertsch Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University.
1 Search for Dark Matter Galactic Satellites with Fermi-LAT Ping Wang KIPAC-SLAC, Stanford University Representing the Fermi LAT Collaboration.
CAN WE UNDERSTAND THE PAMELA POSITRON EXCESS AS WINOS? Gordy Kane January 2009 Ann Arbor arXiv , see also Phill Grajek, Aaron Pierce,
SLAC, June 23 rd Dark Matter in Galactic Gamma Rays Marcus Ziegler Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
The positron excess and supersymmetric dark matter Joakim Edsjö Stockholm University
Enhancement of Line Gamma Ray Signature from Bino-like Dark Matter Annihilation due to CP Violation Yoshio Sato (Saitama University/Technical University.
Significant effects of second KK particles on LKP dark matter physics Mitsuru Kakizaki (Bonn Univ. & ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) 13 March, Bad Honnef.
CMB constraints on WIMP annihilation: energy absorption during recombination Tracy Slatyer – Harvard University TeV Particle Astrophysics SLAC, 14 July.
Primordial BHs. 2 Main reviews and articles astro-ph/ Primordial Black Holes - Recent Developments astro-ph/ Gamma Rays from Primordial.
Constraining DM scenarios with CMB Fabio Iocco Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris Institut de Physique Theorique, CEA/Saclay In collaboration with: G. Bertone,
Significant enhancement of Bino-like dark matter annihilation cross section due to CP violation Yoshio Sato (Saitama University) Collaborated with Shigeki.
Quintessino model and neutralino annihilation to diffuse gamma rays X.J. Bi (IHEP)
Potential Neutrino Signals from Galactic  -Ray Sources Alexander Kappes, Christian Stegmann University Erlangen-Nuremberg Felix Aharonian, Jim Hinton.
HEAD 2010 – Mar.3, 2010 :: IVM/Stanford-KIPAC 1IVM/Stanford-KIPAC 1 PAMELA Workshop, Rome/May 12, 2009 Igor V. Moskalenko (stanford/kipac) Leptons in Cosmic.
High-energy electrons, pulsars, and dark matter Martin Pohl.
Singlet Dark Matter, Type II Seesaw and Cosmic Ray Signals Nobuchika Okada Miami Fort Fauderdale, Dec , 2009 University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
Overview of indirect dark matter detection Jae Ho HEO Theoretical High Energy group Yonsei University 2012 Jindo Workshop, Sep
Dark Matter Particle Physics View Dmitri Kazakov JINR/ITEP Outline DM candidates Direct DM Search Indirect DM Search Possible Manifestations DM Profile.
Dark matter in split extended supersymmetry in collaboration with M. Quiros (IFAE) and P. Ullio (SISSA/ISAS) Alessio Provenza (SISSA/ISAS) Newport Beach.
Lake Louise - February Detection & Measurement of gamma rays in the AMS-02 Detector J. Bolmont - LPTA - IN2P3/CNRS Montpellier - France.
Summary of indirect detection of neutralino dark matter Joakim Edsjö Stockholm University
Reionizing the Universe with Dark Matter : constraints on self-annihilation cross sections Fabio Iocco Marie Curie fellow at Institut d’Astrophysique de.
1 Additional observable evidences of possible new physics Lecture from the course “Introduction to Cosmoparticle Physics”
Analysis methods for Milky Way dark matter halo detection Aaron Sander 1, Larry Wai 2, Brian Winer 1, Richard Hughes 1, and Igor Moskalenko 2 1 Department.
中国科学院高能物理研究所 INSTITUTE OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS Constraints on the cross-section of dark matter annihilation from Fermi observation of M31 Zhengwei Li Payload.
The Millisecond Pulsar Contribution to the Rising Positron Fraction Christo Venter 34 th ICRC, The Hague, The Netherlands, 30 July – 6 August 2015 Collaborators:
The science objectives for CALET Kenji Yoshida (Shibaura Institute of Technology) for the CALET Collaboration.
KIAA-WAP, Peking U 2015/9/28 Implications on CRs and DM from the AMS-02 results Xiao-Jun Bi ( 毕效军 ) Center for Particle and Astrophysics IHEP, Beijing.
Neutrino mass and DM direct detection Daijiro Suematsu (Kanazawa Univ.) Erice Sept., 2013 Based on the collaboration with S.Kashiwase PRD86 (2012)
Collider searchIndirect Detection Direct Detection.
MARCH 11YPM 2015  ray from Galactic Center Tanmoy Mondal SRF PRL Dark Matter ?
Study of the Atmospheric Muon and Neutrinos for the IceCube Observatory Ryan Birdsall Paolo Desiati, Patrick Berghaus,
Anisotropies in the gamma-ray sky Fiorenza Donato Torino University & INFN, Italy Workshop on High-Energy Messengers: connecting the non-thermal Extragalctic.
Indirect Detection Of Dark Matter
Bremen, Germany Patrick Slane (CfA) COSPAR 2010: E19 Fermi Studies of Collaborators: D. Castro S. Funk Y. Uchiyama J. D. Gelfand O. C. de Jager A. Lemiere.
Propagation of CR electrons and the interpretation of diffuse  rays Andy Strong MPE, Garching GLAST Workshop, Rome, 17 Sept 2003 with Igor Moskalenko.
Yu-Feng Zhou KITPC/ITP-CAS
Low scale gravity black holes at LHC Enikő Regős ( CERN )
What we do know about cosmic rays at energies above eV? A.A.Petrukhin Contents 4 th Round Table, December , Introduction. 2. How these.
Multi-wavelength signals of dark matter annihilations in the Galactic diffuse emission (based on MR and P. Ullio, arXiv: )‏ Marco Regis University.
Fermi/LAT observations of Dwarf Galaxies highly constrain a Dark Matter interpretation of Excess Positrons seen in AMS-02, HEAT, and PAMELA DPF 2015 –
Type II Seesaw Portal and PAMELA/Fermi LAT Signals Toshifumi Yamada Sokendai, KEK In collaboration with Ilia Gogoladze, Qaisar Shafi (Univ. of Delaware)
Fermi LAT Observations of Galactic and Extragalactic Diffuse Emission Jean-Marc Casandjian, on behalf of the Fermi LAT collaboration 7 questions addressed.
Dark matter search at HERD X.-J. Bi Institute of High Energy Physics 3 nd Workshop of Herd. Xi’an,
“VERITAS Science Highlights” VERITAS: TeV Astroparticle Physics Array of four 12-m Cherenkov telescopes Unprecedented sensitivity: ~100 GeV to ~30 TeV.
The 2nd workshop of air shower detection at high LHAASO detection of dark matter and astrophysical gamma ray sources Xiao-Jun Bi IHEP, CAS.
Recent developments in Dark Matter Malcolm Fairbairn.
CHARGED COSMIC RAYS PHYSICS DETECTION OF RARE ANTIMATTER COMPONENTS LOW ENERGY PARTICLES (>GeV) HE ASTROPHYSICS.
On the Galactic Center being the main source of Galactic Cosmic Rays as evidenced by recent cosmic ray and gamma ray observations Yiqing Guo, Zhaoyang.
Topics on Dark Matter Annihilation
CR Backgrounds for DM Searches
Dark Matter in Galactic Gamma Rays
Dark Matter Subhalos in the Fermi First Source Catalog
Can dark matter annihilation account for the cosmic e+- excesses?
Implications of new physics from cosmic e+- excesses
Cooperate with X-L. Chen , Q. Yuan, X-J. Bi, Z-Q. Shen
Particle Acceleration in the Universe
Gamma-ray emission from warm WIMP annihilation
We-Fu Chang, Wei-Ping Pan
Leptophilic Dark Matter from ATIC and Pamela
Kunihito Ioka & Mihoko M. Nojiri (KEK, Japan)
Presentation transcript:

Cosmic Ray Excesses From Multi-Component Dark Matter Da Huang Physics Department, Fo Guang Shan Fo Guang Shan PRD89, (2014) [arXiv: ] & Invited Paper for the Special Issue of "Indirect Dark Matter Searches" In collaboration with C.-Q. Geng and L.-H. Tsai [arXiv: ]

2 Content  Motivation and Review of Experimental Status  General Phenomenological Analysis– Single- and Multiple- Component Decaying DM  Diffuse γ -ray Prediction  Summary Fo Guang Shan

3 Motivation  This uprise was already observed by many other previous experiments, such as PAMELA, Fermi- LAT, AMS-01, et al., but AMS-02 gives the most accurate one up to now. Fo Guang Shan  Last year, AMS-02 collaboration published a measurement of the positron fraction spectrum, showing an uprise above 10 GeV, extending up to 350 GeV.

4 Motivation  The excess is also observed in the total e + +e - flux spectrum by AMS-02, PAMELA, Fermi-LAT. Femi-LAT e + +e - Spectrum Fo Guang Shan  Conventional theorectial expectation : Both spectra should show decreasing power law behaviors.

5 Motivation  Moreover, both the AMS-02 positron fraction spectrum and the Femi-LAT total e + +e - flux spectrum show some substructure around 100 GeV. Femi-LAT e + +e - Spectrum AMS-02 Positron Fraction Spectrum Substructure? Fo Guang Shan

6 Recent Status  Recently, AMS-02 released new data, including the spectra of positron fraction, e + ( e - ) flux and total e + +e - flux.  e + ( e - ) flux: Spectrum hardening above ~30 GeV Fo Guang Shan

7 Recent Status  Positron fraction : first evidence that positron fraction stops increasing with energy above ~200 GeV  Total e + +e - flux: good fit with a single power law at high energy Fo Guang Shan AMS-02 Positron Fraction Spectrum

8 Motivation  All the excesses indicate that there are additional positron and/or electron sources beyond our current knowledge, either in astrophysical or particle physical origin.  In literature, there are two compelling candidate origin for these excesses: Pulsars and Dark Matter. Fo Guang Shan  In this talk, I concentrate on the decaying dark matter interpretation for this AMS-02/Fermi-LAT excess the TeV DM lifetime τ DM ~O(10 26 )s >> τ Universe ~ O(10 17 )s Requirement

9 Further Constraints on Decaying DM  The measured antiproton spectrum agrees with the prediction of the conventional astrophysical theory well Leptophilic DM Fo Guang Shan

10 Decaying DM: Status  Previous Studies concentrated on the Single-Component Decaying DM models with the dominant decay channels e + e -, μ + μ -, τ + τ -,W + W -, b + b -, … Their general conclusion is that there is some tension between AMS-02 positron fraction and Fermi- LAT total e + +e - flux data. Jin et al APJ (2013) arXiv: ; Yuan, et.al. arXiv: … wayout Three-body or four-body decay channels Multi-Component DM  We also perform the fitting on the Single-Component DM decaying mainly via two-body leptonic process, confirming their result.

11 Decaying DM: General Formula e - ( e + ) flux: κ denotes the uncertainty in primary electron normalization. Primary electron flux: assumed to be broken power law Br =: Secondary e - ( e + ) produced in propagation, modeled by GALPROP Fo Guang Shan

12 Two-Component Decaying DM  DM Source Term: ρ(x): DM density distribution, here we use isothermal profile τ i : DM lifetimeM i : DM Mass DM Injection Spectra: with condition: Fo Guang Shan  DM decay process : Half Density

No CPV, so =.  By adding this term into the electron(positron) diffusion equation and numerically solve them by GALPROP, we can obtain the flux of electron and positron due to DM decaying.  Normalized Injection Spectra for Electrons : : obtained by fitting the τ-decay electron spectrum simulated by PYTHIA Two-Component Decaying DM Fo Guang Shan

14 Two-Component Decaying DM Observations:  The excess of total e + +e - flux by Fermi-LAT extends to 1 TeV, so at least one DM cutoff should be larger than 1 TeV;  The substructure observed at around 100 GeV by both AMS-02 and Fermi-LAT indicates something change sharply. Femi-LAT e + +e - Spectrum AMS-02 Positron Fraction Spectrum Substructure? One DM drop at 100GeV Fo Guang Shan

15 Two-Component Decaying DM  The observations above indicates that DM at least contains two components, with E c1 > 1000 GeV and E c2 ≈100 GeV. For generic discussion, we take two DMs’ cutoffs E ci and masses M i as follows: E c1 M1M1 E c2 M2M GeV3030 GeV100 GeV416 GeV Fo Guang Shan

16  Fitting Results: Two-Component Decaying DM  Conclusion: Double-Component DM decaying mainly via two-body leptonic decay CAN fit to AMS-02 positron fraction and Fermi-LAT total flux simultaneously. Fo Guang Shan

17 Diffuse γ -ray Constraint  Previous studies showed that the diffuse γ - ray measured by Fermi-LAT could already give strong constraint to decaying DM Cirelli et al PRD(2012); Essig et al. PRD (2009); Ibe et al(2013), ; Cirelli & Panci, NPB (2009); …  Question: Does our two-component DM (or multi-component DM) scenario still survive after the consideration of diffuse γ -ray constraints?  Strategy: We compute total various diffuse γ -ray spectrum, including the ones from two-component DM decays, which is compared with the Fermi-LAT data. Fo Guang Shan Total Predictions of Phen. Model !

18 Model Prediction to Diffuse γ -ray Conclusion: With the parameters fitted by AMS-02 and Fermi- LAT, the predicted γ ray is still allowed by the Fermi-LAT measurement. Fo Guang Shan Substructure?

19 Summary Fo Guang Shan  In this talk we investigate the multi-component decaying Dark Matter model to explain AMS-02 and Fermi-LAT e + /e - excesses, and show that two DM components are enough to explain the data.  We also show that the predicted diffuse γ -ray spectrum agrees with that observed by Fermi-LAT.

Fo Guang Shan

21 Two-Component DM with New Data Fo Guang Shan

22 Single-Component Decaying DM Χ 2 Fitting Results: Fo Guang Shan

23 Propagation Parameters Fo Guang Shan

24 Single-Component Decaying DM Conclusion: Single-Component DM decaying mainly via two-body leptonic decay CANNOT give reasonable fit to AMS-02 positron fraction and Fermi-LAT total flux simultaneously. wayout Three-body or four-body decay channels Multi-Component DM Fo Guang Shan Χ 2 Fitting Results:

25 Microscopic Realization of Multi- Component DM Particles ζηN R1 N R2 SU(2) L ×U(1) Y (2,1) (1,0) Z2Z Z2’Z2’+---  Particle Content  Relevant Lagrangian Break Z_2 and Z’_2 Fo Guang Shan

26  Relevant Feynman Diagram Microscopic Realization of Multi- Component DM If N h(l) ’s lifetime is O(10 26 )s, then it only requires Fo Guang Shan

27 Microscopic Realization of Multi- Component DM  Model Prediction: Since the coupled leptons are left-handed, after SU(2) L transformation, the DM N h(l) can also decay into neutrinos, thus produce the same amount of neutrino flux, which can be observed by IceCube.  Unfortunately, current IceCube’s constraint is very loose for general decaying DM models.

Fo Guang Shan

29 Possible Explanation of the Excess  In literature, there are two compelling candidate origin for these excesses: Pulsars and Dark Matter. Some Comments on Pulsars: Pulsars and their wind nebulae (PWN) are ideal electron-positron factories Fo Guang Shan

30 Comments on Pulsar Scenario In general, the extra source for e + and e - can be a single nearby pulsar, or the total contribution of many pulsars  Famous nearby pulsars: Geminga[J ], Monogem[B ], …  Multiple pulsars: Spatial Distribution: Injection Spectrum: Both scenario can fit the AMS-02 and Fermi-LAT excess spectrum very well. Fo Guang Shan

31 Comments on Pulsar Scenario  General Pulsar Prediction: Anisotropy  However, current exp. do not see any anisotropy Not Support Pulsar Explanation  DM Prediction: Isotropic Spectrum Fo Guang Shan

32 Annihilating DM v.s. Decaying DM  Problem for Annihilating DM:  From the perspective of fitting both experimental results, both scenarios would give essentially the same degree of goodness of fitting, since fitting mainly depends on the injection spectra which can be the same. Needing much larger annihilation cross section than that for WIMP relic abundance Such a large boosting factor is incompatible with the one obtained in numerical simulation of LSS formation Extraordinarily Large boosting factor b~O(1000), possibly due to Sommerfeld Enhancemnet or Resonance Enhancement Fo Guang Shan

33 Annihilating DM v.s. Decaying DM  Decaying DM: Free of such problems, especially for the γ-ray bound since the final flux only depends on single power of DM density  Problem for Annihilating DM: (continued) Due to DM density square dependence, the associated γ- ray produced by FSR and IC is enhanced much and already exceeds the Fermi-LAT and EGRET bounds for most channels In order to explain the observed flux, it generically needs the TeV DM lifetime τ DM ~O(10 26 )s >> τ Universe ~ O(10 17 )s Previous fitting shows it seems difficult in fitting AMS-02 and Fermi-LAT simultaneously with leptophilic decaying DM Jin, Wu, Zhou (2013); Yuan et al. (2013); Bertone et al, PRL(2013); … Fo Guang Shan

34 Motivation  Cosmic ray is an important probe to tell us a lot about the information of our Galaxy and our Universe.  Composition of CR:  Energy Range of CR: Fo Guang Shan HHeC,O,…e 90%9%1%

35 Diffuse γ -ray Origin Conventional Contributions (Background):  Inside the Galaxy: Bremsstralung Inverse Compton(IC) Scattering π 0 decay GALPROP Fo Guang Shan

36 Diffuse γ -ray Origin  Outside the Galaxy: Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) obtained by fitting low energy spectrum of EGRET K.Ishiwata, S. Matsumoto and T. Moroi PRD 78, (2008) Fo Guang Shan

37 Diffuse γ -ray Origin DM Contributions (Signal):  Inside the Galaxy: DM Electron Diffusion: Bremsstralung Prompt Decay Inverse Compton(IC) Scattering GALPROP e - ( e + ): FSR l-l- γ l-l- μ - ( μ + ): FSR + μ radiative decay ( μ  eννγ ) τ - ( τ + ): FSR + π 0 decay Fo Guang Shan

38  Outside the Galaxy: Diffuse γ -ray Origin DM Contributions: DM Electron Diffusion: Inverse Compton(IC) Scattering: e - ( e + ) with CMB Prompt Decay e - ( e + ): FSR μ - ( μ + ): FSR + μ radiative decay ( μ  eννγ ) τ - ( τ + ): FSR + π 0 decay Cosmic Expansion: Fo Guang Shan