Radiative Influences on Glaciation Time-Scales in Mixed-Phase Clouds Zachary Lebo, Nathanial Johnson, and Jerry Harrington Penn State University Acknowledgements:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water in the Atmosphere
Advertisements

Studying the Arctic Stratiform Clouds Using Four Different Microphysics Schemes Ping Du, Prof. Eric Girard.
Steven Siems 1 and Greg McFarquhar 2 1 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 2 University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA Steven Siems 1 and Greg McFarquhar.
UNDERSTANDING WEATHER. The Water cycle The amount of water vapor in the air is called humidity. As water evaporates and becomes air vapor, the humidity.
Section 04 Thermodynamics Adiabatic Processes Lesson 10/11.
1/26/10MET 61 topic 01 1 MET 61 Topic 1 Precipitation Processes.
Climate Forcing and Physical Climate Responses Theory of Climate Climate Change (continued)
Radiative Properties of Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 3 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds Cloud microphysics.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology The Effect of Turbulence on Cloud Microstructure,
METR215- Cloud Droplet Formation
Radiative Properties of Clouds ENVI3410 : Lecture 9 Ken Carslaw Lecture 3 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
Convective Weather Thunderstorms Lightning Tornadoes… …and more.
Lecture 11 Cloud Microphysics Wallace and Hobbs – Ch. 6
Radiation’s Role in Anthropogenic Climate Change AOS 340.
5.03 Moisture References: FTGU pages ,
Precipitation.
Horizontal Distribution of Ice and Water in Arctic Stratus Clouds During MPACE Michael Poellot, David Brown – University of North Dakota Greg McFarquhar,
Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloudy Boundary Layers with the Adiabatic Assumption Paquita Zuidema*, Janet Intrieri, Sergey Matrosov, Matthew.
Case Study Example 29 August 2008 From the Cloud Radar Perspective 1)Low-level mixed- phase stratocumulus (ice falling from liquid cloud layer) 2)Brief.
Matthew Shupe, Ola Persson, Amy Solomon CIRES – Univ. of Colorado & NOAA/ESRL David Turner NOAA/NSSL Dynamical and Microphysical Characteristics and Interactions.
Condensation in the Atmosphere The atmosphere contains a mixture of dry air and a variable amount of water vapor (0-4% or 0-30 g/kg) An air parcel is said.
Precipitation Based Air Motion Based (Convective Charging) Williams, Scientific American 122-
Precipitation Hydrology (Spring 2013) Illinois State University Instructor: Eric Peterson.
Chapter 8: Precipitation ATS 572. “Precipitation” Can be: 1.Rain 2.Snow 3.Hail 4.Etc. However, it MUST reach the ground. –Otherwise, it is called “virga”—hydrometeors.
Aerosol-Cloud Interactions and Radiative Forcing: Modeling and Observations Graham Feingold 1, K. S. Schmidt 2, H. Jiang 3, P. Zuidema 4, H. Xue 5, P.
Atul Kapur.  Direct effects i. Aerosols scatter & absorb solar radiation ii. Scatter, absorb & emit thermal radiation  Indirect effects: Aerosols can.
Moist Processes SOEE1400: Lecture 11. SOEE1400 : Meteorology and Forecasting2 Water in the Atmosphere Almost all the water in the atmosphere is contained.
Boundary Layer Clouds.
Cloud-Aerosol-climate feedback
Sally Pavlow NWS Indianapolis
The Sensitivity of a Simulated Supercell to Emulated Radiative Cooling beneath the Anvil Paul Markowski and Jerry Harrington Penn State University.
Distribution of Liquid Water in Orographic Mixed-Phase Clouds Diana Thatcher Mentor: Linnea Avallone LASP REU 2011.
Towards a Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds Matthew D. Shupe a, Pavlos Kollias b, Ed Luke b a Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental.
High-Resolution Simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part II: Water Budget SCOTT A. BRAUN J. Atmos. Sci., 63,
Water in the Atmosphere Lab 5 October 5, Water Is Important!!!
Formation of cloud droplets from supersaturated vapor
NATS 101 Section 13: Lecture 13 Precipitation. Precipitation: Any form of water particles—liquid or solid—that falls from the atmosphere and reaches the.
Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment, Part II: Multi-layered cloud GCSS.
Stratiform Precipitation Fred Carr COMAP NWP Symposium Monday, 13 December 1999.
Horizontal Variability In Microphysical Properties of Mixed-Phase Arctic Clouds David Brown, Michael Poellot – University of North Dakota Clouds are strong.
Investigation of Microphysical Parameterizations of Snow and Ice in Arctic Clouds During M-PACE through Model- Observation Comparisons Amy Solomon 12 In.
Particle Size, Water Path, and Photon Tunneling in Water and Ice Clouds ARM STM Albuquerque Mar Sensitivity of the CAM to Small Ice Crystals.
Modeling. How Do we Address Aerosol-Cloud Interactions? The Scale Problem Process Models ~ 10s km Mesoscale Models Cloud resolving Models Regional Models.
Chapter 7 Precipitation Processes Chapter 7 Precipitation Processes.
Towards parameterization of cloud drop size distribution for large scale models Wei-Chun Hsieh Athanasios Nenes Image source: NCAR.
Update on progress with the implementation of a new two-moment microphysics scheme: Model description and single-column tests Hugh Morrison, Andrew Gettelman,
SHEBA model intercomparison of weakly-forced Arctic mixed-phase stratus Hugh Morrison National Center for Atmospheric Research Thanks to Paquita Zuidema.
The Lifecyle of a Springtime Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloudy Boundary Layer observed during SHEBA Paquita Zuidema University of Colorado/ NOAA Environmental.
THE INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED ON SHALLOW CUMULUS CONVECTION from LES and bulk theory Louise Nuijens and Bjorn Stevens University of California, Los Angeles.
High-Resolution Polarimetric Radar Observation of Snow- Generating Cells Karly Reimel May 10, 2016.
Radiative Equilibrium Equilibrium state of atmosphere and surface in the absence of non-radiative enthalpy fluxes Radiative heating drives actual state.
Full calculation of radiative equilibrium. Problems with radiative equilibrium solution Too hot at and near surface Too cold at and near tropopause Lapse.
COPE PRESENTATION Process Modeling and Ice Nuclei.
Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes.
Clouds (Condensed PPT)
Condensation in the Atmosphere
Review for Exam 2 Fall 2011 Topics on exam: Class Lectures:
Virtual temperature AMS glossary: ( virtual temperature—(Also called density.
Ice Microphysics in CAM
Advisors: Fuqing Zhang and Eugene Clothiaux
Clouds and Large Model Grid Boxes
H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR) , S. Ghan (PNL)
The Effect on Thunderstorm Charging of the Rate of Rime Accretion by Graupel Trent Davis 9 March 2017.
Condensational Growth
DRY GROWTH Latent heat is released due to freezing of water; this heat that is liberated warms the surface of the stone. At low to moderate LWC’s, this.
The representation of ice hydrometeors in ECHAM-HAM
Condensation in the Atmosphere
Microphysical-macrophysical interactions or Why microphysics matters
A. Gettelman, X. Liu, H. Morrison, S. Ghan
Review of Roesenfeld et al
Presentation transcript:

Radiative Influences on Glaciation Time-Scales in Mixed-Phase Clouds Zachary Lebo, Nathanial Johnson, and Jerry Harrington Penn State University Acknowledgements: DOE-ARM and Dennis Lamb for many useful discussions.

Cloud tops can maintain narrow liquid layers if ice crystals remain small and updrafts are sufficiently strong (Rauber and Tokay, 1991) It is possible to maintain a mix of liquid and ice during ascent (Tremblay et al., 1996) Liquid topped arctic clouds that precipitate ice are possible if ice nuclei concentrations are small (Pinto, 1998, Harrington et al., 1999) and if ice nuclei are removed through sedimentation (Harrington and Olsson, 2001, Morrison et al., 2005). Why Can Liquid and Ice Persist in Mixed-Phase Clouds? Previous work has shown:

Glaciation Time-Scales Hence, time-scale for complete glaciation of mixed-phase clouds is important and depends on (at least): –Ice concentration and updraft velocity Since radiation affects the growth of drops, is there a similar influence on the Bergeron process? From Korolev and Isaac (2003) 1.6 min 16 min 160 min ~ 2.6 hrs

Radiatively Modified Ice Growth Method is that of Korolev and Isaac (2003) but add the radiative term for the growth of ice: Radiative Effect = E d Start with a simple box model –Integrate above equation numerically until a fixed amount of cloud liquid water content (LWC) is depleted.

Computing Radiative Influence Use simple, static adiabatic model of stratiform arctic cloud. Solar (SW) and infrared (LW) radiative heating computed via two-stream model (Harrington and Olsson, 2001)

Radiative Heating/Cooling of Crystals E d easily computed at each vertical level within the idealized cloud. LW Cooling: Increases rapidly while SW Heating increases more slowly with size. Net Effect: LW dominates at small sizes with cross-over to net heating at large sizes E d At Cloud Top Plate Crystals

Radiative Influences on Ice Supersaturation Cloud Top: Radiative cooling dominates, s ui increases to over 30% from ~ 15% Mid Cloud: SW heating dominates decreasing s ui to less than 15%. –When SW Heating becomes large enough  Crystals will actually sublimate Crystal Growth Crystal Sublimation Plate Crystals N i = 1 L -1 T top = -15 C  0 = 45 0

Radiative Influence on Glaciation Time-Scale No Radiation: Results similar to Korolev and Issac. LW Cooling: Drastic decrease in glaciation time –Positive feedback: Larger crystals, more cooling, etc. SW Heating: Reduces LW effect at cloud top. Initial LWC: 0.1 g m -3 Ni = 1 L -1 Plate Crystals

Radiative Influence on Glaciation Time-Scale LW Cooling drops off rapidly. –100 m below cloud top glaciation time-scales not at strongly impacted. Mid-Cloud: Since SW heating dominates, glaciation does not occur. –Crystals grow to radiatively limited sizes. Initial LWC: 0.1 g m -3 Ni = 1 L -1 Plate Crystals

Glaciation Time-Scale: Fixed Rates Crystals grow too large in box model –Fix ice growth rates at a particular size Small crystals, glaciation time is long  radiative influences don’t matter Larger crystals, glaciation times shorter (< 100min) so radiative influences quite important. No Radiation

Concluding Remarks Simple box model calculations suggest that radiative heating and cooling may substantially influence glaciation times. –LW cooling at cloud top may enhance crystal growth –SW heating (even when weak) may substantially increase mixed-phase cloud lifetimes (as long as   > 75 0 ) Computations with bin microphysical model tend to corroborate these results. Next plan to incorporate into parcel models, and LES, to test radiative influences on more realistically simulated clouds.

Stratiform Arctic Mixed-Phase Persistence In the Arctic: Mixed- phase clouds occur throughout the year. Ice nuclei  ice concentration (& size) Important for mixed-phase longevity (Pinto, 1998; Harrington et al., 1999; Morrison et al., 2005). LES-Derived Water Paths M-PACE Observations

Radiative Influence on Glaciation Time-Scale LW Cooling and SW Heating using spheres: Results similar to those for plates. Spheres Initial LWC: 0.1 g m -3 Ni = 1 L -1 Cloud Top