Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QEP BASICS.
Advertisements

Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Instructor Teaching Impact. University Writing Program 150 sections of required writing courses per semester, taught by Instructors and GTAs 33 Instructors–
QEP Presentation 1 Attorney Wesley Bishop Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs (Faculty Affairs, TRIO, and QEP) Pamela E. Wanga, Ph.D. Associate.
WHAT THE BUSINESS OFFICER NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT SACS Presented by Gene Gooch McLennan Community College TACCBO June 2012 The information presented is authorized.
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
David S. Adegboye, Ph.D. Professor of Biology Associate Vice-Chancellor for Academic Affairs & Accreditation Liaison Officer Presented at the “Workshop.
Longwood University QEP QEP stands for Quality Enhancement Plan.
Standards 2.5, 3.3.1, & The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
UNA’S QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN RESEARCH LITERACY IMAGINE... INVESTIGATE... COMMUNICATE Building Success through Discovery.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) What is it, why do it, and what is ours? Faculty Senate – October 28, 2013 Clayton State University.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
SACS Reaffirmation Project Compliance Certification Team Leaders Meeting Friday, August 27, – 11:00AM 107 Main Building Jennifer Skaggs, Ph.D. SACS.
SACS Reaffirmation Robert B. Bradley October 2013 THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY 1.
Calculate This! Florence-Darlington Technical College’s Quality Enhancement Plan Susan Haley Debi McCandrew Florence, South Carolina April 29, 2011.
WRITING FOR THE REAL WORLD: STRENGTHENING WRITING AND CAREER KNOWLEDGE QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN (QEP) “ Do the Write Thing !”
SACS Reaffirmation Project Compliance Certification Team Orientation Compliance Certification Report Thursday, September 30, – 11:00AM 209 Main Building.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Five-Year Report on Hybrid Learning in Math Hubs By Bob Indrihovic & Pat Velicky Florence-Darlington Technical College.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
SACS-COC Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Plus Q & A CCPRO Conference, Greensboro, NC September 2011 Kimberly B. Lawing, Vice President of Institutional.
Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) 101 Del Mar College January 8, 2007 Loraine Phillips, Ph.D. Interim Assessment Director Texas A&M University.
What’s New in SACS Reaffirmation Ephraim Schechter September 23, 2004 Western Carolina University.
 SACSCOC REAFFIRMATION FALL  OBJECTIVES: 1.List key facts related to the SACSCOC reaffirmation process. 2.Verbalize understanding of SACSCOC Principles.
Presented to University Senate Deanna Sellnow & Kaveh Tagavi November 9, 2009.
SACS COC (Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges) Overview and Update.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Southern University At New Orleans 6400 Press Drive New Orleans, LA
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation by SACS Commission on Colleges.
SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 7/28/09 Academic Affairs Retreat Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
SACS Compliance Certification Orientation Meeting June 23, 2008.
SACS Reaffirmation Project Compliance Certification Team Orientation Overview Thursday, September 30, – 11:00AM 209 Main Building – Lexmark Public.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
Learn More, Earn More, Live More with CT. ATC’s QEP An Update from the Topic Focus and Development Plan Team College-wide Meeting, January 25 th, 2010.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
SACSOC ACCREDITATION AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS STUDENT AFFAIRS LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 17, Allan Aycock.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Wednesday, June 6, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS Accreditation.
Long-Range Planning Presentation to the Del Mar College Board Committee May 13, 2008.
October 15, 2015 QEP: PAST AND PRESENT AND FUTURE.
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
The Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP). SACS Principles of Accreditation Integrity Quality Enhancement.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
QEP Topic Reveal QEP Core & Implementation Teams December 2015.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Armstrong’s QEP Quality Enhancement Plan. QEP Steering Committee Nancy Remler, Chair – John Kraft, Andy Clark, Marilyn O’Mallon, Bob LeFavi, Mario Incorvaia,
Moving Successfully Toward SACS Reaffirmation: An Introductory Discussion Presenters Dr. Cathy Fleuriet Associate Vice President for Institutional Effectiveness.
Revised 2/19/07 Institutional Review Milestones FIU Reaffirmation of Accreditation by SACS (Leadership Orientation June 2008) Quality Enhancement Plan.
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
QEP Topic Selection Team Announcement and Invitation
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
4/16/07 SACS Reaffirmation Process Susan P. Himburg SACS Director of Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Here Today Here to Stay August 17, TJC’s Mission.
The New SACS All the Questions You Wanted to Ask about Accreditation, and Even Some You Didn’t…
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Call to Conversation: SACS Reaffirmation
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
From Here to QEP Presented to UCAPP, Senate Council, & Deans’ Council
CUNY Graduate School and University Center
Coastal Bend College’s Quality Enhancement Plan
Presentation transcript:

Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015

Gordon State College New Additions to the IE Website

enhancement-plan

Compliance Certification

Compliance Certification Update Fall2015 Continue preparation of CC text Four Sections 1.Principle of Integrity 2.Core Requirements (In order for an institution to maintain accreditation without sanction, we must maintain compliance with all Core Requirements. 3.Comprehensive Standards 4.Federal Requirements

Compliance Certification Update Fall2015 Designate and Charge the Mock Review Team Review Team begins evaluation of CC draft Complete CC draft Begin revisions as Mock Review Team produces feedback Document must be complete by March 1, 2016 Off-site Review conducted April 19-22

Compliance Certification Update

Summer 2016 Prepare Focus Report Plan for On-Site Visit

Compliance Certification Update On-Site Peer Review October 24-27, 2016

Quality Enhancement Plan ( QEP)

Planning and Developing the QEP Sufficient time is needed for investigation and discussion to be submitted in May 2016 Must be feasible and measurable Must be supported with funds Topic Selection is based on: – Core Requirement 2.12 – Core Requirement 2.5 – Comprehensive Standard 3.3.2

Specific SACSCOC Requirements: Core Requirement 2.12 The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that includes an institutional process for identifying key issues emerging from institutional assessment and focuses on learning outcomes and/or the environment supporting student learning and accomplishing the mission of the institution.

Specific SACSCOC Requirements: Core Requirement 2.5 – The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research- based planning and evaluation processes that (1) incorporate a systematic review of institutional mission, goals, and outcomes; (2) result in continuing improvement in institutional quality; and (3) demonstrate the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission.

Specific SACSCOC Requirements: Comprehensive Standard – The institution has developed a Quality Enhancement Plan that (1) demonstrates institutional capability for the initiation, implementation, and completion of the QEP; (2) includes broad-based involvement of institutional constituencies in the development and proposed implementation of the QEP; and (3) identifies goals and a plan to assess their achievement.

QEP GSC Reaffirmation Leadership Team was charged with providing oversight for the QEP 3 topics were submitted and reviewed by the Leadership Team They can be found on the IE webpage

Gordon State College QEP The topic with the most votes was: First Things First: Building Retention Through Core Skills But there was a problem using the word retention in the QEP so…

Gordon State College QEP First Things First: Increasing Mastery in Quantitative and Communication Skills

QEP Committee Needs a strong leader who understands the process. The QEP Team must be diverse, representing all areas of the college including students.

QEP Committee Our QEP Leader is: Dr. Anna Higgins Professor of English

QEP Committee Sub-committees may also be created to – Market the QEP – Keep a detailed budget – Develop an assessment plan – Review progress

Consensus among key constituency groups that the QEP, rather than being merely a requirement for reaffirmation of accreditation, can result in significant, even transforming, improvements in the quality of student learning. Broad-based institutional participation of all appropriate campus constituencies in the identification of the topic or issue to be addressed by the QEP. Careful review of research and best practices related to the topic or issue. Allocation of adequate human and financial resources to develop, implement, and sustain the QEP. Implementation strategies that include a clear timeline and assignment of responsibilities. A structure established for evaluating the extent to which the goals set for the plan are attained. An institution’s support of the QEP should be evident through:

What’s Next Step One: Selecting a Topic (Complete) Step Two: Defining the Student Learning Outcomes Step Three: Researching the Topic Step Four: Identifying the Actions to be Implemented Step Five: Establishing the Timeline for Implementation Step Six: Organizing for Success Step Seven: Identifying Necessary Resources Step Eight: Assessing the Success of the QEP Step Nine: Preparing the QEP for Submission

IE Website For more information go to: