Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Formative Assessment Initiative In 2008, Colorado Legislature passed Senate Bill titled Colorado Achievement Plan for Kids (CAP4K) Expand.
Advertisements

... and what it means for teachers of non-tested subjects Johanna J. Siebert, Ph.D. NAfME Symposium on Assessment June 24-25, 2012.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Introduction to Student Learning Objectives “SLOs 101” March 2012 Presentation developed by Cheryl Covell, TST BOCES Data Analyst & Heather Sheridan-Thomas,
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT4 Student Growth Measures - SLOs.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2 (REVISED FEBRUARY 2012)
September 5,  Be present  Demonstrate Active Listening  Help ensure a balance of voices  Respect time boundaries  Use electronics respectfully.
Annual Professional performance review (APPR overview) Wappingers CSD.
Group 3 Teachers: No Growth Model Classes
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Putting the Pieces Together…. Understanding SLOs.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 2: Selecting Appropriate Assessments 1.
Student Learning Objectives It’s Been a SLO Summer.
Aligning Priorities, Goals and Initiatives for School and Student Success Presenters: Dr. Regina Cohn Dr. Robert Greenberg January 2013.
Student Learning targets
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Evaluation Process for Teachers.
Physical Education SLOs: A Clarification of the State Education Department’s 8 Component SLO Template: Grades K-5 Presented By: Laura Shaw – Dows Lane.
SLOs 2012 Lansing Superintendent’s Conference Day October 5, 2012.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 1: December 2011.
Student Learning Objectives SLOs TST BOCES January 6, 2012.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives & the Assessments needed Mary Ann Luciano, Director.
Student Growth through Long-term Transfer Boone County Schools May 2014.
Student Learning Objectives: Considerations for Teachers of Career and Technical Education Courses Name Title Date 1 Copyright © 2014 American Institutes.
Regents Reform Agenda Update as of November 2012 C-A Teachers' Resource Center-- J. Robinson, director 1 A special thank you to Jill Robinson, Director.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Student Learning Objectives 101 Presented by: Angelique Johnson-Dingle Evidence Based Observations SLO CCLS State Provided Growth Measures Locally Selected.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR). What are the components of APPR? Teacher Evaluation –60 points (observation*/goal setting) –20 points (State.
Teacher Effectiveness Day 5. Housekeeping Parking Breaks and lunch Emergencies.
OCM BOCES Day 7 Lead Evaluator Training 1. 2 Day Seven Agenda.
Re-envisioning English Language Development and Native Language Literacy Office of ENL, World Languages and Bilingual Education
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
Western Suffolk BOCES Boot Camp Emma Klimek Eastern Suffolk BOCES 2012.
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES AND YOUR TEACHER EVALUATION NYSUT Education and Learning Trust NYSUT Field and Legal Services NYSUT Research and Educational.
Aligning Priorities, Goals and Initiatives for School and Student Success Presenters: Dr. Carl Bonuso Mr. Fred Cohen Dr. Valerie C. D’Aguanno Dr. Robert.
FEH BOCES Student Learning Objectives 3012-c.
New Developments in NYS Assessments. What is new? Required use of Standardized Scannable Answer Sheets for all Regents Exams starting in June 2012 Beginning.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2: January 2012.
Winter, 2012 Teacher Effectivensss Day 5. To download powerpoint:
Student Learning Objectives SLOs April 3, NY State’s Regulations governing teacher evaluation call for a “State-determined District-wide growth.
OCM BOCES Day 8 Lead Evaluator Training 1. 2 Taking Care of Business.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
ANALYSIS AND ATTRIBUTES OF APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENTS Coastal Carolina University.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Sample Science SLO’s Grades Student Growth Goal Setting Process (SLO’s) Y Central School District Science Points Grade Level/Subject.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Ms. Omentum 95 Students 3 sections of Grade 7 Life Science with 25, 23, 25, students respectively, 1 section of Grade 8 Physical Sciences with 22 students.
CCSS/APPR/SLO/LMA A Summary. A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty. ~ Winston Churchill.
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center *Please see caveat © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Student Learning Objectives OCM.
Best Practices in CMSD SLO Development A professional learning module for SLO developers and reviewers Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation: Writing SLOs August 2014 Presented by Aimee Kirsch.
Recognize how SLOs align the teacher and principal evaluation Develop a shared understanding of the purpose for using SLOs Become familiar with the SLO.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
New Developments in NYS Assessments
SLOs for Group/Team, School, BOCES Results
Teacher SLTs
Student Learning Objectives!
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Teacher SLTs
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Your SLO.
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
A student learning objective is an academic goal for a teacher’s students that is set at the start of a course. It represents the most important learning.
Presentation transcript:

Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING

What are SLOs? A SLO is an academic goal for students set at the start of the course Represents the most important learning of the year (course). Based on available prior student learning data. Specific and measurable. Aligned to CCLS and NYS Learning Standards

SLO: Two Applications REQUIRED: Growth when there is no state growth score All teachers other than 4-8 ELA and mathematics OPTIONAL: Locally selected measures of student achievement (encouraged)

SLOs… ARE NOT: The same as district goals The same as data- driven instruction Not an opportunity for free choice amongst a teacher’s favorite unit tests Easy BUT Are informed by district goals and priorities Reinforce DDI Require the use of evidence robust enough to match the scope of the content If set with rigor can contribute to higher student achievement

Coverage If less than 50% growth State-provided Growth Measure (including none) If any course has a NYS growth measure, at least 1 SLO must use it SLOs must cover the courses taught with the most students, combining until at least a majority of students covered If any of the largest courses have a State (non- growth) assessments, it must be used

Components Student population Learning Content Time Interval Evidence/Student Work Baseline Target HEDI point determination Rationale for choosing this target

Student Learning Objectives Decision Process

State Determines SLO process Identifies required elements Requires use of State test Provides training to NTs prior to Provides guidance, webinars & videos SLOs

State Determines SLO process Identifies required elements Requires use of State test Provides training to NTs prior to Provides guidance, webinars & videos SLOs District District goals & priorities Match requirements to teachers Define processes for before & after Identify expectations

State Determines SLO process Identifies required elements Requires use of State test Provides training to NTs prior to Provides guidance, webinars & videos SLOs District District goals & priorities Match requirements to teachers Define processes for before & after Identify expectations School LE & teacher collaborate LE approval Ensure security LE monitor and evaluation

State Determines SLO process Identifies required elements Requires use of State test Provides training to NTs prior to Provides guidance, webinars & videos SLOs District District goals & priorities Match requirements to teachers Define processes for before & after Identify expectations School LE & teacher collaborate LE approval Ensure security LE monitor and evaluation Teacher Works with colleagues & LE

Student Learning Objectives Grade by Grade

K-2 Teachers Might someday have a State-provided growth measure In the meantime SLO for ELA (literacy and writing) SLO for math Unless teacher focuses on a single subject area

Grade 3 Teachers Might someday have a State-provided growth measure In the meantime SLO for ELA (literacy and writing) SLO for math Must use state assessment Unless teacher focuses on a single subject area

4-8 ELA & Math Teachers Has a State-provided growth measure In the meantime SLOs not applicable

4-8 Science & SS Teachers Will likely have a State- provided growth measure in the future In the meantime SLO for each subject/assessment SLO must cover classes with the largest numbers of students until majority covered 4 & 8 science use State assessment Others must choose 3 rd Party test from list

To clarify: Must use a State- approved 3 rd party assessment 6-7 science 6-8 social studies 9-12 ELA, math, science & SS w/o Regents Must use State assessment 4 & 8 science Course w/ Regents NOT CLEAR

4-8 Other Subject Teachers Will not have a State growth measure Therefore, SLO for each subject/assessment SLO must cover classes with the largest numbers of students until majority covered

9-12 Regents Teachers Some will have a State-provided growth measure in the future as available In the meantime SLO for each subject/assessment SLO must cover classes with the largest numbers of students until majority covered Use Regents exam

9-12 Other “Core” Teachers Some will have a State-provided growth measure in the future as available In the meantime SLO for each subject/assessment SLO must cover classes with the largest numbers of students until majority covered

9-12 Other Teachers Will not have a State growth measure Therefore, SLO for each subject/assessment SLO must cover classes with the largest numbers of students until majority covered

Self-Contained Teachers Will use State-provided growth if more than 50% of students are covered by growth measure If <50% growth, SLO for ELA (literacy and writing) SLO for math Unless teacher focuses on a single subject area Use State assessment if available

Co-Teachers As applicable and possible, NYSED will track multiple teachers of record Common Branch SLO for ELA (literacy and writing) SLO for math Other subjects Set SLO for relevant area (use State assessment if available)

Push-In, Pull-Out Teachers As applicable and possible, NYSED will track multiple teachers of record with dosage If no State-provided measure SLO for subject area focus Or use group/team measure on State assessment Or collaborate with classroom teacher

Resource Teachers If aligned to a content area, SLO would be for that content area If no State-provided measure is appropriate Consider group measures Consider collaborative SLO goal-setting with a classroom teacher

NYSESLAT Teachers Use growth measures if 50% or more students in teachers load take State ELA assessment (or NYSED might have growth measures in future) If this is the ELA teacher and with 10 or more students, SLO with NYSESLAT as evidence Or Teacher is ESL specialist and NYSESLAT is most appropriate, use for SLO

NYSAA Teachers Use growth measures if 50% or more students in teachers load take State assessments IF SLO requires subject/grade, SLO using NYSAA performance assessment as evidence Additional SLOs for other subject areas taught

All Teachers SLOs an option (or use school-wide) Same SLO ingredients are required District must set targets in advance of administration (HEDI points) Ineffective (0-2 points) Developing (3-11 points) Effective (12-17 points) Highly Effective (18-20 points) Districts may align growth and local achievement

Lead Evaluator Role As defined by district, works with teachers on the setting of the SLOs Monitors, assesses Awards points within bands defined in the SLO

Population Honors Spanish II Class; all 30 Students Learning content New York State Learning Standards for Languages Other than English (LOTE) Interval School Year (1 year) Evidence 1.Spanish I summative assessment results from my students My district uses a district-wide diagnostic assessment, which will be administered at the beginning of the school year 3.My district uses a district-wide summative assessment, which will be administered at the end of the school year Baseline 1.All students had Spanish I results that demonstrated scores of proficient or higher in all basic vocabulary and grammar 2.Scores ranged from 6%-43% on the diagnostic assessment, which my district uses as a baseline for all Spanish II students Target(s) and HEDI scoring 1.80% of students will demonstrate mastery of at least 75% of the Spanish II learning standards, as measured by the district’s summative assessment in May 2011 Highly Effective (18-20 points) Effective (12-17 points) Developing (3-11points) Ineffective (0-2 points) % of students demonstrate mastery of 75% of the Spanish II learning standards 78-85% of students demonstrate mastery of 75% of the Spanish II learning standards 66-77% of students demonstrate mastery of 75% of the Spanish II learning standards 65% or less of students demonstrate mastery of 75% of the Spanish II learning standards Rationale Previous work in Spanish I focused on working with basic vocabulary and grammar, and building preliminary oral skills. The diagnostic assessment is heavily focused on more advanced writing and reading skills, which are essential components of the Spanish curriculum. Spanish II requires students to build on their learning from Spanish I in order to acquire mastery in these areas and to be prepared for Spanish III. Since all of my students completed Spanish I having achieved basic proficiency levels, I am confident they will achieve 80% mastery or above on at east 75% of the Spanish II materials.

Population 9-12 Living Environment (40 students) Learning content New York State Learning Standards for Living Environment Interval School Year (1 year) Evidence 1.My district uses a district-wide diagnostic assessment, which will be administered at the beginning of the school year 2.Living Environment Regents Exam results administered at the end of the school year Baseline 1.Class average was 65% on the pre-assessment. The lowest was 45% and the highest was 85%. Target(s) and HEDI scoring 1.75% of students, with 80% or greater attendance, will demonstrate mastery of at least 65% on the Living Environment Regents exam. Highly Effective (18-20 points) Effective (12-17 points) Developing (3-11points) Ineffective (0-2 points) % of students demonstrate mastery of 65% on the Living Environment Regents exam. 75% of students demonstrate mastery of 65% on the Living Environment Regents exam % of students demonstrate mastery of 65% on the Living Environment Regents exam. 49% or less of students demonstrate mastery of 65% on the Regents exam. Rationale Previous work in Spanish I focused on working with basic vocabulary and grammar, and building preliminary oral skills. The diagnostic assessment is heavily focused on more advanced writing and reading skills, which are essential components of the Spanish curriculum. Spanish II requires students to build on their learning from Spanish I in order to acquire mastery in these areas and to be prepared for Spanish III. Since all of my students completed Spanish I having achieved basic proficiency levels, I am confident they will achieve 80% mastery or above on at east 75% of the Spanish II materials.