Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, 2006 9 th Eastern Gravity Meeting G060669-00-R.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dennis Ugolini, Trinity University Bite of Science Session, TEP 2014 February 13, 2014 Catching the Gravitational Waves.
Advertisements

Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
LIGO-G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
G v1Advanced LIGO1 Status of Ground-Based Gravitational-wave Interferometers July 11, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory Astrod 5, Bangalore,
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish 5 June 2000 Gravitational Waves: A Challenge to Theoretical Astrophysics Trieste, 5-9 June 2000.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
The LIGO Project ( Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) Rick Savage – Scientist LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G M Status of LIGO Barry Barish PAC Meeting Caltech 3-June-04 Upper limits on known pulsar ellipticities.
G M LIGO Laboratory1 Overview of Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker PAC meeting, NSF Review 5 June 2003, 11 June 2003.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Design for Advanced LIGO Phil Willems NSF Review, Oct , 2002 MIT.
Overview of Advanced LIGO March 2011 Rencontres de Moriond Sheila Rowan For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Advanced LIGO project status: getting ready to listen to the universe Giacomo Ciani for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO- G
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
LIGO and Advanced LIGO: Technical Issues Dave Ottaway (for LIGO Scientific Community) LIGO Lab Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts.
G R 1 Ground-based GW interferometers in the LISA epoch David Shoemaker MIT LIGO 20 July 02.
Advanced LIGO: our future in gravitational astronomy K.A. Strain for the LIGO Science Collaboration NAM 2008 LIGO-G K.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
March 17, 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1/12 Virgo Status B. Mours.
LIGO- G M Status of LIGO David Shoemaker LISA Symposium 13 July 2004.
LIGO-G Opening the Gravitational Wave Window Gabriela González Louisiana State University LSC spokesperson For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
GEO600 Detector Status Harald Lück Max-Planck Institut für Gravitationsphysik Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik, Uni Hannover.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Precision Interferometry Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker NSF LIGO Review 23 October 2002.
G R 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO March 2006.
David Shoemaker Aspen 3 February 03
LIGO-G Z Guido Mueller University of Florida For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration ESF Exploratory Workshop Perugia, Italy September 21 st –23.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Detectors
G R LIGO Laboratory1 The Future - How to make a next generation LIGO David Shoemaker, MIT AAAS Annual Meeting 17 February 2003.
International Gravitational Wave Network 11/9/2008 Building an Stefan Ballmer, for the LIGO / VIRGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO G
ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility
Advanced LIGO Status Report
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
The Status of Advanced LIGO: Light at the end of the Tunnels Jeffrey S. Kissel, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April APS Meeting, Savannah, GA April.
G R Interferometer Sensing & Control P Fritschel 8 Oct 02.
LIGO-G D Pursuing Gravitational Wave Astrophysics with LIGO Peter Fritschel LIGO/MIT University of Maryland Gravitation Group Seminar, 27 April.
The LIGO gravitational wave observatories : Recent results and future plans Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - on behalf of the LIGO.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
LIGO-G Z LIGO’s Thermal Noise Interferometer Progress and Status Eric D. Black, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, and Shanti Rao (Caltech) Seiji Kawamura.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
LIGO G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
Optical Coatings for Gravitational Wave Detection Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration - August.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
THE NEXT GENERATIONS OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS (*) Giovanni Losurdo INFN Firenze – Virgo collaboration (*) GROUND BASED, INTERFEROMETRIC.
Material Downselect Rationale and Directions Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Technology On behalf of downselect working.
Brett Shapiro for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Advanced Detector Status Report and Future Scenarios
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
The Search for Gravitational Waves with Advanced LIGO
THE NEXT GENERATION OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Mechanical Loss Measurements of Coated Substrates for Gravitational Wave Interferometry Thaddeus Baringer1, Gregory Harry1, Jonathan Newport1, Hannah Faire1,
Status of the LIGO Detectors
Jim Hough for the GEO collaboration
David Shoemaker AAAS Conference 17 February 2003
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Presentation transcript:

Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R

2 Gravitational waves predicted by Einstein Accelerating masses create ripples in space-time Need astronomical sized masses moving near speed of light to get detectable effect Two 4 km and 1 2 km long interferometers at 2 sites in the US Michelson interferometers with Fabry-Perot arms Optical path enclosed in vacuum Sensitive to strains around LIGO LIGO and Gravitational Waves Hanford WALivingston LA

3 Limiting Noise Sources Seismic noise at low frequencies (<40 Hz) Optics hang as pendula Vibration isolation between optics and outside Thermal noise in intermediate frequency range (40 Hz – 200 Hz) k B T energy in wire suspension Shot noise at high frequency (> 200 Hz) 10 W laser Optical cavities in arms Power recycling Sensitivity enough so detection of events possible, but perhaps not probable (?)

4 Current LIGO Noise Present noise at design value in all three interferometers  Some excess noise < 50 Hz  Noise reduction during breaks Currently taking data  Will collect 1 years worth of triple coincidence  Began in November 2005  Extensive data analysis ongoing Hanford 4 K sensitivity  Neutron star inspirals 14.5 Mpc  10 M O black hole inspirals to 50 Mpc  Stochastic background  Crab pulsar   Sco X-1 

5 Advanced LIGO Overview LIGO infrastructure designed for a progression of instruments  Nominal 30 year lifetime All subsystems to be replaced and upgraded  More powerful laser  Larger core optics  More aggressive seismic isolation 10 Hz100 Hz1 kHz Initial LIGO Advanced LIGO  Quantum noise limited in much of band  Signal recycling mirror for tuned response  Thermal noise in most sensitive region  About factor of 10 better sensitivity  Expected sensitivity  Neutron star inspirals to about 175 Mpc  10 M O black hole inspirals to 775 Mpc  Stochastic background  Crab pulsar   Sco X-1 

6 Laser and Optics 180 W end-pumped Nd:YAG rod injection locked needed  Backup efforts in slabs & fiber lasers Frequency stabilization  10 Hz/Hz 1/2 at 10 Hz required Development at Max-Planck Hannover, Laser Zentrum Hannover Silica chosen as substrate material  Improved thermal noise performance from original anticipation  Some concerns about unknowns with sapphire (absorption, construction,…) Coatings dominate thermal noise & optical absorption  Progress reducing  with doping  See talk by Matt Abernathy

7 Seismic Isolation and Suspensions Active isolation in large chambers  High-gain servo systems, two stages of 6 degree-of-freedom each  External hydraulic actuator pre-isolator  Extensive tuning of system after installation Hydraulic pre-isolator installed at Livingston  Increases initial LIGO duty cycle  Exceeds advanced LIGO requirements Adopt GEO 600 silica suspension design  Multi-stage suspension, final stage fused silica  Ribbons baseline design, fibers as fallback Quadruple pendulum design chosen  Ribbons silicate bonded to test mass  Leaf springs (VIRGO origin) for vertical compliance Laser fiber/ribbon drawing apparatus developed  Welds being characterized for strength/Q etc.

8 Readout Dual recycled (signal & power) Michelson with Fabry-Perot arms  Offers flexibility in instrument response  Can provide narrowband sensitivity  Critical advantage: can distribute optical power in interferometer as desired  Output mode cleaner DC rather than RF sensing  Offset ~ 1 pm at interferometer dark fringe  Best signal-to-noise ratio  Simplifies laser, photodetection requirements  Perfect overlap between signal & local oscillator  Easier to upgrade to quantum non- demolition in future

9 Advanced LIGO Project Status National Science Board (NSB) endorsed Advanced LIGO proposal in October 2004  Contingent upon integrated year of observation with Initial LIGO National Science Foundation & Presidential Budget for 2006 includes Advanced LIGO  One of 3 new projects to start in next 3 years  October 2007 start date Shut down first initial LIGO interferometer mid 2010  Finish installing 3 rd interferometer end 2013 NSF review of costs, manpower & schedule in June 2006  Fresh analysis  updates of technology  Current best estimates comparable with NSB-approved costs

10 Conclusions  Initial LIGO working as designed  Upper limits on gravitational wave sources  Working towards a confirmed detection  Advanced LIGO will have ~ 10 X sensitivity of initial LIGO  1000 X rate for homogeneously distributed sources  Detection of events probable  Laser will have 180 W of power  Fused silica substrates for core optics  Coating crucial and still under development  Fused silica ribbon suspensions  More aggressive seismic isolation  DC readout of dual-recycled configuration  Budget situation hopeful for 2007 start  No check in hand yet