JPS 2003 in Sendai 2003.3.28 Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phi-Psi, Feb.-Mar., 2006, S.Uehara1 Experimental studies of charmonia in two-photon collisions at Belle S.Uehara (KEK) for the Belle Collaboration e +
Advertisements

Recent Results on Radiative Kaon decays from NA48 and NA48/2. Silvia Goy López (for the NA48 and NA48/2 collaborations) Universitá degli Studi di Torino.
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Measurement of charmonia at mid-rapidity at RHIC-PHENIX  c  J/   e + e -  in p+p collisions at √s=200GeV Susumu Oda CNS, University of Tokyo For.
M.Mevius Open and hidden beauty production in 920 GeV proton –nucleus collisions at HERA-B M.Mevius DESY.
July 2001 Snowmass A New Measurement of  from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector  Analysis of 1997 Data Update of Previous Result Conclusions.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Sep/15/ Search for   e/ K.Hayasaka(Nagoya U.) Belle Collaboration.
Heavy Flavor Production at the Tevatron Jennifer Pursley The Johns Hopkins University on behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations Beauty University.
Search for LFV  decays involving     ’ at Belle Y. Enari, Belle collaboration Nagoya University.
1 Tau Workshop, Nara, Sept 14-17, 2004 M. Davier – ALEPH  Results ALEPH Results on  Branching Ratios and Spectral Functions Michel Davier Laboratoire.
Measurement of R at CLEO - Jim Libby1 Measurement of R at CLEO Jim Libby University of Oxford.
First Observation of B°  D*°         Decays Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang Syracuse University CLEO Plenary 05/11/01.
1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
Debora Leone Institut für Experimetelle Kernphysik Universität Karlsruhe on behalf of KLOE collaboration Measurement of the hadronic cross section at KLOE.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
Radiative Leptonic B Decays Edward Chen, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, David Hitlin Caltech BaBar DOE Presentation Aug 10, 2005.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
The Hadronic Cross Section Measurement at KLOE Marco Incagli - INFN Pisa on behalf of the KLOE collaboration EPS (July 17th-23rd 2003) in Aachen, Germany.
Resonances in decay for 400fb -1 DC Meeting April 10th, 2006 J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D.
Measurements of R Value and Hadronic Form Factors at BES Haiming Hu Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing Novosibirsk, Russian Feb. 27 – Mar.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Unfolding jet multiplicity and leading jet p T spectra in jet production in association with W and Z Bosons Christos Lazaridis University of Wisconsin-Madison.
ESFA/DESY LC Workshop 1 Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric Klaus Mönig and Jadranka Sekaric DESY - Zeuthen MEASUREMENT OF TGC IN e  COLLISIONS AT TESLA.
B c mass, lifetime and BR’s at CDF Masato Aoki University of Tsukuba For the CDF Collaboration International Workshop on Heavy Quarkonium BNL.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Monday Meeting, Apr. 18th Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS.
N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
Initial State Radiation and Inclusive Hadron Production at B A B AR Fabio Anulli University of Perugia, INFN – Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati On behalf.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
23 Septemberl 2008Tau081         decay at Belle Tau08; Novosibirsk, 22-25, September, 2008 Hisaki Hayashii Nara women’s University.
W Mass and Width at LEP2 Jeremy Nowell ALEPH / Imperial College London On behalf of the LEP collaborations.
2004 Fall JPS meeting (English version) K.Okada1 Measurement of prompt photon in sqrt(s)=200GeV pp collisions Kensuke Okada (RIKEN-BNL research center)
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with PHENIX at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Stony Brook University HotQuarks 2006 – May 18, 2006.
Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 1 Barbara Sciascia K  semileptonic decays Charged Kaon Meeting July, 29 th - LNF Single photon efficiency in KPM events.
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Current estimation of the background level Ken Sakashita ( Osaka University ) for the E391a collaboration 1.Overview/Motivation 2.4  data analysis 3.2.
Mitchell Naisbit University of Manchester A study of the decay using the BaBar detector Mitchell Naisbit – Elba.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
A High Statistics Study of the Decay M. Fujikawa for the Belle Collaboration Outline 1.Introduction 2.Experiment Belle detector 3.Analysis Event selection.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
E. Robutti Enrico Robutti I.N.F.N. Genova HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference July 17-23, Aachen, Germany Recent BABAR results in Charmonium and Charm Spectroscopy.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
1 Inclusive B → X c l Decays Moments of hadronic mass and lepton energy PR D69,111103, PR D69, Fits to energy dependence of moments based on HQE.
M. Martemianov, ITEP, October 2003 Analysis of ratio BR(K     0 )/BR(K    ) M. Martemianov V. Kulikov Motivation Selection and cuts Trigger efficiency.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
HADRON 2009, FloridaAnar Rustamov, GSI Darmstadt, Germany 1 Inclusive meson production at 3.5 GeV pp collisions with the HADES spectrometer Anar Rustamov.
ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Marta Calvi - Study of Spectral Moments… 1 Study of Spectral Moments in Semileptonic b Decays with the DELPHI Detector at LEP Marta.
Cross section of the process
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
e+e−→ J/ D(*)D(*) & ψ(4160) → DD
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Observation of non-BBar decays of (4S)p+p- (1S, 2S)
Presentation transcript:

JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation of 5. result Yukiko Hirano (Nara Women’s Uni., High Energy Physics Lab.) For the Belle collaboration Outline

JPS 2003 in Sendai Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ( ) ~  The prediction of Standard Model Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment : hadron largest error from Hadron vacuum polarization

JPS 2003 in Sendai and decay and decay the contribution of hadrom Vacuum polarization ( ) obtained from Experimental Data. difficult to obtain from first principle ! Cross section of Semi-Leptonic decay Hadron system decay is useful to determine the term, 73% from system

JPS 2003 in Sendai and decay Hadron Vacuum polarization term from 2 system ( ) Spectral function is measured in this experiment. mass square spectrum K(s) is known function.

JPS 2003 in Sendai Present status ; Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ( )  Exp. ・・・ measured by BNL (g-2) experiment. ( )  Theoretical prediction ・・・ new data (CMD-2) and data (ALEPH) ( ) base difference by agree within ・ Hadron Vacuum Polarization. term is different between and base predictions. ・ Cross check is important !

JPS 2003 in Sendai event selection Number of charged tracks : 2 or 4 All charge ( ) = 0 event vertex position : Separate the event into 2 hemisphere by the event axis. Event axis direction : Back Ground rejection (next slide) Physics trigger event selection criteria Event selection Data : accumulated from to at Belle. (corresponding to production.)

event selection (Back ground rejection)  Missing mass and Missing angle cut ( plot) about 1,300,000 events are remained. Missing angle Missing Mass(MM) Bhabha, and two photon rejection Hadron( ) rejection  Reject high-multiplicity event ( ) Missing Mass (GeV) Missing Angle MC Two photon BG Bhabha BG Data Missing Mass (GeV) Missing Angle

JPS 2003 in Sendai Event selection selection criteria * We do analysis each hemispheres. one charged track in hemisphere. one in the hemisphere. gamma condition : gamma-like shower shape : veto the additional gamma (with high momentum (more than 200 MeV/c))

JPS 2003 in Sendai signal signal Mass invariant mass distribution resolution of Signal region right : left : Side-band region 320,000 events. Side-band region are used for estimation of BG in signal region.

JPS 2003 in Sendai mass spectraum B.G. fraction sourceB.G. fraction non- B.G.( ) Two photon Feed across B.G. ( ) Total Clear peak of. is dominant. peak. is also included.

JPS 2003 in Sendai Unfolding acceptance Mass square resolution : 0.03 GeV 2 Acceptance include both the tau-pair and pipi0 selection. Acceptance and bin-by-bin migration effects are corrected via Singular-Value-Decomposition method.

JPS 2003 in Sendai Unfolded mass spectrum Red line : Breit Wigner fitting function ( and are included. )

JPS 2003 in Sendai Breit Wigner fitting form mass distribution Spectral function free parameter GS model is known that it can fit wilder mass region that the commonly used BW. Gounaris and Sakurai (G&S) Model

JPS 2003 in Sendai Fit Parameter BelleCLEOALEPH parameters : good agreement with previous Exp. parameters : Belle results are most precise. fit result and compare with previous Experiments

JPS 2003 in Sendai Evaluation of Evaluation of

JPS 2003 in Sendai Systematic error ( Ⅰ ) sourcevalue total External systematics ~Normalization factors~ Largest error from

JPS 2003 in Sendai Systematic error ( Ⅱ ) source comment B.G. estimationB.G. fraction non- BG hadron 2 photon Feed across BG Energy scale efficiency Minimum energy 80MeV – 200MeV non- BG Use side-band total Internal systematics 1.Non- BG. ・ estimated by B.G. MC. ・ control data sample are used for the calibration. 2. Feed-across ・ of measured Br. 3. Energy scale ・ uncertainty estimated from mass peak. 4. Selection ・ estimated from the uncertainty of side-band. 5. minimum energy

JPS 2003 in Sendai result Result of is … preliminary cf. ALEPH ( base) excluding common error Consistent within error

JPS 2003 in Sendai Backup slide

JPS 2003 in Sendai Analysis Data from Belle Unfolding (reject detector contribution) Spectral function measurement Calculation of the term hadron vacuum polarization event selection mass spectrum of Data decide mass spectrum Flow of this analysis

JPS 2003 in Sendai 2.Event selection Exp. Data Data reconstruction Monte Carlo simulation event selection event Belle detector Data taking system Raw Data Simulator of event production Detector simulation Used Data data accumulated from to at Belle data :

JPS 2003 in Sendai event selection There are few charged tracks in the event. decay to 1 charged track : about 85% decay to 3 charged tracks : about 15% decay 72%13% There are missing of momentum and mass because of neutrino ( ). missing

JPS 2003 in Sendai event selection (Back ground rejection)  Missing mass and Missing angle cut Then,we obtained about 1,300,000 event of. Missing angle Missing Mass(MM) Bhabha, and two photon rejection  clean Bhabha and mumu event rejection :  Low-multiplicity event : Hadron( ) rejection

JPS 2003 in Sendai Missing mass VS. Missing angle Data MC(tau) MC(Bhabha) MC(2photon)

JPS 2003 in Sendai Time dependence data at Belle detector Time dependence of event is stable within 0.5%.

JPS 2003 in Sendai Time dependence Time dependence of event is stable within 0.5%.

JPS 2003 in Sendai Momentum of and Good agreement between Data and MC.

JPS 2003 in Sendai Fitting result of Breit Wigner model K&S modelG&S model

JPS 2003 in Sendai Fitting result K&S G&S

JPS 2003 in Sendai Unfolding of invariant mass The observed distribution includes contribution of detector acceptance,and smeared. We can obtain true distribution by using Unfolding. About Unfolding Unfolding is carried out by Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) method.

JPS 2003 in Sendai Spectral function

JPS 2003 in Sendai Systematic detail 1 (1) BG estimation (two photon ) (2) BG estimation (hadron) Data MC (two photon) Two photon B.G. estimated by Data using control sample. Hadron BG contribution also estimated by Data using control sample.

JPS 2003 in Sendai Systematic detail2 (3) Energy scale (4) Gamma energy threshold (5) side-band subtraction 2% uncertainty of mass spectrum is assumed. Uncertainty of as gamma-threshold function. Use control sample of side-band.

JPS 2003 in Sendai Hadron Vacuum polarization and Data The term of hadron vacuum polarization

JPS 2003 in Sendai Data and Data Iso-spin 、 Cnserve of Vectro Current We can treat data as same condition as data. semi-Leptonic dacayc decay