Year Seven Mission Fulfillment and Sustainability Report and Comprehensive Visit Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Advertisements

MSCHE Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2010 Mary Ellen Petrisko Linda Suskie.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Presented by Dr. Tanmay Pramanik Overview of On-Site Team Evaluation.
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Probe Process New Program Request Process Substantive Change February 1, 2012.
UMR’s Accreditation Self-Study. The Value of Accreditation  Institutional Reputation  Standard of Quality  Vehicle for Self Improvement  Transferability.
NWCCU Standards for Accredition The new process. Revised NWCCU Accreditation Standards New Standards: reduced from 9 to 5 Standard One--Mission, Core.
THE HLC SELF-STUDY PROCESS THE INFORMAL INTERVIEW: QUESTIONS FOR THE HALLWAY.
AccreditationEncore New Standards, New Thinking & Next Steps.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
The Year Three Report and Visit Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
Final Report Document. Format Title Page Executive Summary Table of Contents Introduction Mission Statement Main PDS items Brief justification of the.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
New Traditions: NWCCU Standards and Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
HLC and Me What does HLC stand for? Hydrocarbolyte Liquid Crystal Holy Living in Communion Her Left Cheek Hysterical Laughing Clown Whatever it is I don’t.
Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Washington State University Strategic Plan Overview and Implementation Process On web site at
Accreditation Briefing August NWCCU Full Scale Accreditation: Introduction Planning has begun for the 2010 Full Scale Accreditation Self Study and.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
 SACSCOC REAFFIRMATION FALL  OBJECTIVES: 1.List key facts related to the SACSCOC reaffirmation process. 2.Verbalize understanding of SACSCOC Principles.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
2006 BYU Reaffirmation of NWCCU Accreditation Executive Accreditation Committee February 12, 2006.
Accreditation Liaison Officer WorkshopFebruary 4, 2011 Accreditation Liaison Officer Workshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities DoubleTree.
Year Three Self-Evaluation WorkshopMarch 13, 2012 Year Three Self-EvaluationWorkshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) DoubleTree.
“ Serving Distant Learning Business Programs and Students,” RUSA/BRASS, ALA Atlanta, June 15, 2002 Marilyn Hankel, Associate Dean of Library Services University.
Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.  Standard Pathway - Required for all institutions granted initial accreditation, institutions in significant.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation WorkshopMarch 14, 2012 Year Seven Self-EvaluationWorkshop Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) DoubleTree.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Moving on to our Second Report! Due to NWCCU by Fall 2012.
ACCREDITATION by the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
THE VISIT. BASIC PRINCIPLES Peer Evaluation Standards-Based System Relationship to Standards: compliance; substantial compliance; or non compliance.
SPRING 2014 CONVOCATION. AGENDA Organizational Chart Revisions and Reporting Structure Key Elements to Turn Planning Into Action Accreditation.
NWCCU Workshop on Institutional Self Study1February 1-2, 2007 Workshop on Institutional Self Study Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission.
Northwest Accreditation. Sandra Elman Visit ( ) General Recommendations  pages maximum  3 major themes for all chapters (standards) Descriptive.
USF System Campus Master Plan Update Sarasota-Manatee.
UT Self Study All Criterion Teams Meeting Friday, November 13, :00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. SU 2582.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.
THE EVALUATION AND POST EVALUATION Evaluator Training Workshop November 4, 2014.
MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE Accreditation Self Study Report 2011 presented by Rebecca Teague, Accreditation Liaison Officer Steering & Standard Chair Committee.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Welcome The Mid-Cycle Evaluation Workshop. Background and History of MCE NWCCU emphasis on outcomes Review of Year Seven Self-Evaluations – Needing more.
THE VISIT Year Seven Self-Evaluation. BASIC PRINCIPLES Peer Evaluation Standards-Based System Relationship to Standards: compliance; substantial compliance;
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
MSJC Accreditation Classified Professional Day – March 22,2017
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Year One/Year Three Self Evaluation Workshop
YEAR ONE SELF-EVALUATION REPORT
“The Visitors are Coming” – Accreditation 401
Accreditation Pathway
Accreditation Summary
NWCCU update February 13, 2018.
Faculty Serving on Visiting Teams
University Community Briefing
A primer for the April 2019 visit
What is it? What is required? What is the Chair’s Role?
Final Year Project Structure
Reaccreditation and Illinois
Fort Valley State University
Presentation transcript:

Year Seven Mission Fulfillment and Sustainability Report and Comprehensive Visit Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)

“The Five Standards for Accreditation build upon each other in a recursive cycle of continuous improvement”… and “collectively provide a framework for continuous improvement.” (NWCCU Standards Introduction)

The Year Seven Comprehensive Report and visit constitutes the culmination of this cycle, the final presentation of this framework for improvement as well as a demonstration of its effectiveness.

1. Title page 2. Table of Contents 3. Institutional Overview 4. Basic Institutional Data Form

5. Preface, including update on institutional changes and response to issues previously requested by the Commission 6. Updated Chapter One: Mission, Core Themes and Expectations; Executive summaries of ERs 2 and 3 7. Updated Chapter Two: Resources and Capacity; Executive summaries of ERs 4- 21

8. Chapter Three: Institutional Planning (Standard 3.A) 9. Chapter Four: Core Theme Planning, Assessment and Improvement a. Executive Summaries of ERs 22 and 23 b. Core Theme One 1)Standard 3.B Core Theme Planning 2)Standard 4.A Assessment 3)Standard 4.B Improvement c. Core Theme Two – etc.

10. Chapter Five: Mission Fulfillment, Adaptation and Sustainability a. Executive Summary of ER 24 b. Standard 5.A Mission Fulfillment c. Standard 5.B Adaptation and Sustainability 11. Conclusion

1. Chair: 1.A Mission; 1.B Core Themes; 2.A Governance; 3.A Institutional Planning; 5.A Mission Fulfillment; 5.B Sustainability; Eligibility Requirements Evaluator: 2.C Education Resources (shared); First Core Theme (3.B Core Theme Planning; 4.A Assessment; 4.B Improvement) 3. Evaluator: 2.C Education Resources (shared); Second Core Theme (3.B Core Theme Planning; 4.A Assessment; 4.B Improvement)

4. Evaluator: 2.C Education Resources (shared); Third Core Theme (3.B Core Theme Planning; 4.A Assessment; 4.B Improvement) 5. Evaluator: 2.B Human Resources; 2.D Student Services; Third Core Theme (3.B Core Theme Planning; 4.A Assessment; 4.B Improvement) 6. Evaluator: 2.E Library and Information Services 7. Evaluator: 2.F Financial Resources; 2.G Physical and Technological Infrastructure

 Opening Breakfast  Chair meets with President/CEO  Chair meets with Governing Board representatives  Staff, Student and Faculty For a  Exit Interview

 Commission makes hotel reservations. The Institution will be asked to recommend a hotel but all arrangements are made by NWCCU staff  Evaluators make their own travel arrangements  Institution provides transportation to and from airport

 Institution provides transportation between hotel and campus  Institution provides transportation to nearby remote sites as necessary  Campus interviews, etc. are best arranged through communication between Chair and ALO

 Report is submitted (by Committee Chair) to Institution CEO for correction of errors of fact (Institution has five business days to respond)  Finalized report is submitted (by NWCCU) to institution which has the opportunity to provide a written response

 CEO, Committee Chair and (optional) selected institutional representatives meet with Board of Commissioners (January or July) for sixty minutes  Commission President informs institution of Commission action