HOW DO PATENTING AND LICENSING AFFECT RESEARCH? JOAN S. LEONARD VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE The National Academies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COMMERCIALIZATION AS A TENURE CRITERION: A POWERFUL INCENTIVE FOR FACULTY INVENTORS Stephen W.S. McKeever Vice President for Research and Technology Transfer.
Advertisements

Summary Slide Management of Intellectual Property Rights Enterprises, R&D Organizations and Universities Wayne H. Watkins - University of Akron.
VCOM Conflict of Interest Policy Overview of Financial Conflict of Interest Related to Research December 4, 2013.
1 UMass Dartmouth Conflicts of Interest Policies UMass Dartmouth Liz Rodriguez February 17, 2011.
Personal financial benefit or economic interest from one’s position that may inappropriately: influence the employee’s judgment compromise the employee’s.
Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia,
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980: Policy Model for Other Industrial Economies? David C. Mowery Haas School of Business U.C. Berkeley & NBER Bhaven N. Sampat University.
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
Industry – University Transactions: Rights to Future Intellectual Property Varda N. Main Director, Technology Licensing Rochester Institute of Technology.
Charles D. Smith, Ph.D. April, 2012.
HEADING GOES HERE IN RED UNIVERS CONDENSED BOLD ALL CAPS.
So you’ve invented something? A Guide for UMass Faculty, Researchers and Students.
Conflicts of Interest in Research: Policies and Regulations Marie Barron, M.A., COI Program Specialist Rick Lyons, M.D., Ph.D., COI Committee C Chair.
Conflict of Interest and Technology Transfer Sherrie Settle Assistant Director, Research Compliance Program Institutional Conflict of Interest Officer.
Technology Transfer at UIC © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Presentation to the Software Commercialization Symposium April.
Industrial Partnerships & Technology Transfer Keeping Your Name Out Of The Gossip Columns Of Nature and Science BC Cancer AgencyJ. D. Litster March 24,
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
University Investigators and Small Biotech Companies Jane Shelby, PhD Bozeman, Montana Funding and Regulatory Consultant Biotech Industry Executive Director.
Title here Taking Discoveries from Lab Bench to the Marketplace Technology Transfer 101:
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) and the Office of Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (OIPTT) Kenneth Kirkland, Executive.
Financial Conflict of Interest
Why Museums Need An IP Policy Rina Elster Pantalony, Legal Counsel The Canadian Heritage Information Network
Entrepreneurial Professors and Secrecy in Science: Variations and Impact Karen Seashore Louis University of Minnesota Eric G Campbell Harvard University.
AVOIDING CONFLICT IN FACULTY CONSULTING Judith L. Curry Associate General Counsel NC State University December 2, 2011.
Technology Transfer at Rice
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
Research Compliance Presented by Research and Graduate Studies Elizabeth Peloso.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
NOVEMBER 13, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION XI OF APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Research Sponsored by Industry – Putting an Agreement in.
MTA Sharing Research Materials in Academia AKA: Everything you could want to know about Materials Transfer Agreements.
Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus
1 Conflict of Interest: A Tricky Issue for Universities Karen Hersey, Professor Franklin Pierce University Nonprofit Technology Transfer Course November.
The Need for Training on Team and Meeting Management to Enhance Capacity for Team Science Kady Nearing, Senior Evaluator The Evaluation Center Colorado.
Government Funded Inventions Mark L. Rohrbaugh, Ph.D., J.D. Acting Director Office of Technology Transfer National Institutes of Health.
IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Santiago, October 21 – 24, 2013.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
NIH Funding Recipient Responsibilities February, 2004 Office of Technology Transfer Office of the Director National Institutes of Health.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
Working with Industry: Culture and Expectations Jim Capistran November 18, 2010.
Special Railways Phase III Proposed approach to regulatory changes Jakarta 16 May 2011.
Research at UMR Serving the needs of Missouri and our Nation Wayne Huebner Interim Vice Provost for Research University of Missouri-Rolla Rolla, MO
Copyright © Harvard Medical School. All Rights Reserved. Outside Activity Report: What Do I Need to Report?
1 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel March 2012 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel Patenting Biotech: Strategies and Tips.
The structure of an IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Sofia, Bulgaria November 25 and 26, 2015.
Crisis And Conflict Management. Conflicts of Interest Lecture 20 2.
Industry’s Perspective on Industry-University Intellectual Property External Research Directors Network Industrial Research Institute, Inc. April 17, 2001.
Technology Transfer in The United States Paul Zielinski Director, Technology Partnerships Office, National Institute of Standards and Technology Chair,
Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind Journal of.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
The IOM Template Project: Material Transfer Agreements and Clinical Trial Agreements Presentation to the IOM Forum on Drug Discovery, Development and Translation.
Management of Conflicts of Interest Mission Critical in Entrepreneurial Universities Dr. Bill Hunt, Professor Bioengineering, and Microelectronics/Microsystems.
Michael Scian, MBA, JD Assistant Director of Compliance University of Florida.
Shared Intellectual Property CHALLENGES OF ACADEMIA COLLABORATING WITH INDUSTRY Per Mercke and Sara Ljung.
So you’ve invented something?
IRB Open House Conflicts of Interest and Financial Conflicts of Interest in Research May 19, 2017 Office of Policy Coordination, Division of Outside.
Universities and the Commercial World
Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind
Novosibirsk State University
Roles and Perspectives in Science Collaboration – the view of the high-tech industry Dr. Peter Kurz Agilent Technologies International Sàrl Morges 25 April.
Taking Discoveries from Lab to Marketplace
Partnering with Business and Industry
University & Industry Collaborative IP Development
Engineering Noontime Session March 18, :00-1:00 PM
Disclosure of conflicts of interest – explanation
Disclosure of conflicts of interest
Disclosure of conflicts of interest
Presentation transcript:

HOW DO PATENTING AND LICENSING AFFECT RESEARCH? JOAN S. LEONARD VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE The National Academies Workshop on Academic IP April 17, 2001

SUMMARY POINT 1 HHMI is committed to science- driven, cutting-edge research AND the translation of its discoveries into useful products and services

SUMMARY POINT 2 Industry’s reliance on patenting and exclusive licensing can affect the research autonomy of academic investigators who seek to use industry materials in their research

SUMMARY POINT 3 Patenting and licensing strategies of academic institutions may affect the research autonomy of inventors whose inventions are being commercialized

SUMMARY POINT 4 Maintaining a thoughtful balance between nurturing science-driven fundamental research and facilitating the translation of research results into useful products and services requires a commitment of time and resources

HHMI -- WHAT WE DO Largest private research philanthropy in the United States Collaborative relationships with academic research institutions Committed to basic cutting-edge research Employ investigators for renewable term appointments 350 investigators at 70 institutions

HHMI -- HOW WE WORK  Identify exceptionally creative scientists  Provide stable, long-term funding  Encourage innovation, risk-taking in fundamental biomedical research  Minimize non-scientific influences in the laboratory; no corporate sponsorship

DUAL AFFILIATIONS Investigators remain faculty members of host institution Subject to IP, COI policies of both institutions All agreements with industry subject to HHMI’s prior review and approval Coordination with host institution

HOW DO INDUSTRY’S PATENTING AND LICENSING AFFECT ACADEMIC RESEARCH?

ISSUE: MATERIALS PROVIDED BY COMPANIES When providing materials, companies must protect exclusivity of patent positions and proprietary information and retain control of development of the company’s own research programs RESULT: claim of exclusive control over recipient’s downstream research

HHMI MTA POLICIES No grants of ownership in research results No grants of exclusive licenses in MTA; time-limited options only Preserve freedom to publish

POTENTIAL HAZARDS A grant of exclusive option rights in future inventions can inhibit the scope or direction of the ongoing research program impede the investigator’s ability to distribute the fruits of research to colleagues interfere with research collaborations

OTHER COSTS The need to negotiate each agreement leads to Delays in research program Administrative costs

RESULT -- COMPROMISE Investigator obtains valuable reagent BUT May experience limitations downstream

HOW DOES ACADEMIC PATENTING AND LICENSING AFFECT RESEARCH?

ISSUE: START-UP COMPANIES Pressure to form start-up companies comes from –Academic administrators –Governments –Investigators

START-UP ISSUES Independence of research may be compromised if Company makes excessive claims on investigator Investigator experiences divided attention, blurring of commitments, or conflict of interest Lab may be or be perceived as extramural research facility for company

HHMI POLICIES: CONSULTING Investigator may not –hold more than 5% of company stock –consult for more than 36 days per year – serve on company’s board of directors – perform or direct company’s research – collaborate with or receive research funding from company –give company preferential access to HHMI research

HHMI POLICIES: LICENSING HHMI limits the grant of license rights in future research to the claims described in the patent application and the claims of CIPs that are directed to the subject matter specifically described in the patent application

BENEFITS OF POLICIES All parties must focus on policy requirements through discussion and negotiation of agreements Review and approval of agreements before consulting begins means ground rules are established in advance Investigator’s dual roles are defined and delimited

RESULT -- COMPROMISE Translational work by start-up can go forward BUT Investigator’s relationship to company is defined and constrained

CONCLUSION Patenting and licensing are essential to translate discoveries into useful products and services Patenting and licensing create incentives that can affect the autonomy and focus of academic research Maintaining a balance between the two requires investment of time and resources