26 Oct 2010PC 432 1 Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

1 Simulation Status/Plans Malcolm Ellis Sci Fi Tracker Meeting Imperial College, 10 th September 2004.
1 Progress report on Calorimeter design comparison simulations MICE detector phone conference Rikard Sandström.
MICE the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Emilio Radicioni, INFN EPS-HEP Aachen 2003.
Particle by Particle Emittance Measurement to High Precision Chris Rogers Imperial College/RAL 17th March 2005.
1 Scintillating Fibre Tracker Simulation Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Tuesday 9 th March 2004.
1 Emittance Calculation Progress and Plans Chris Rogers MICE CM 24 September 2005.
SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
1 September 09Mark Rayner – Emittance measurement by The TOFs1 Emittance measurement by the TOFs Via trace space reconstruction of individual muons. Complementary.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
Sci Fi Simulation Status Malcolm Ellis MICE Meeting Osaka, 2 nd August 2004.
1 PID status MICE Analysis phone conference Rikard Sandström.
1 Online data quality and monitoring M. Ellis Daresbury DAQ Meeting 31 st August 2005.
Online Reconstruction Update Linda R. Coney UCR Dec 17, 2009.
1 Statistics Toy Monte Carlo David Forrest University of Glasgow.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Reconstruction & a little about Online Monitoring Linda R. Coney 18 August, 2009.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.
1 Losses in the Cooling Channel Malcolm Ellis PID Meeting 1 st March 2005.
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
Beam Parameter Study - preliminary findings Tim Carlisle.
1Malcolm Ellis - Software Meeting - 31st May 2006 Data Challenge Requirements  First list of requirements, based on Yagmur’s document: u
1 Statistics David Forrest University of Glasgow.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
18 August 09Mark Rayner – Momentum measurement by The TOFs1 Momentum measurement by the TOFs A correction to an O(4 MeV/c) bias on the current muon momentum.
Chris Rogers, Analysis Parallel, MICE CM17 Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
Report on the Analysis Group & Plans V. Blackmore MICE VC 163 Thursday, 12 th December /11.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
MICE Step 1: First Emittance Results with Particle Physics Detectors Linda R. Coney EuCARD Meeting – 10 May 2011.
Software Status  Last Software Workshop u Held at Fermilab just before Christmas. u Completed reconstruction testing: s MICE trackers and KEK tracker.
MICE input beam weighting Dr Chris Rogers Analysis PC 05/09/2007.
Update Chris Rogers, Analysis PC, 13/07/06. State of the “Accelerator” Simulation Field model now fully implemented in revised MICE scheme Sanity checking.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
11 Nov 2008PC Analysis PC Schedule 2008 Tuesdays fortnightly 9 September  23 September  2 October  CM22  11 November  25 November 9 December.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
1M. Ellis - NFMCC - 31st January 2007 MICE Analysis.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Thursday 28th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
PID Detector Requirements for Emittance Measurement Chris Rogers, MICE PID Review, Thursday Oct 12.
Database David Forrest. What database? DBMS: PostgreSQL. Run on dedicated Database server at RAL Need to store information on conditions of detector as.
Field Modelling Tools in G4MICE MICE VC Chris Rogers 1st Feb 2006.
Analysis meeting: Beam momentum measurements using TOFs Tuesday, 22 January 2008 Slide 1 of 10 Beam momentum measurement using.
ch/~bdl/lepc/lepc.ppt 1 MICE Status and Plans Rikard Sandström Université de Geneve International Scoping Study CERN,
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November Beam characterization by the TOFs Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
MEASUREMENT OF EMITTANCE AND OTHER OPTICS QUANTITIES V. Blackmore 01/19.
(one of the) Request from MPB
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
TOF Emittance Emittance measurements with the TOFs Mark Rayner 4 December 2008.
MAUS Status and Plans Chris Rogers, ASTeC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Step IV Physics Paper Readiness
BDSIM for proton therapy gantry simulation
Global Track Matching and Fitting
MICE Analysis Status and Plans
C. Rogers, ASTeC Intense Beams Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Field-on measurement of multiple scattering
Why do we need to know the fields / map the magnets?
Step 1 Analysis: Progress Towards the Emittance Paper
TOF Software and Analysis Tools
MICE Collaboration Meeting Saturday 22nd October 2005 Malcolm Ellis
Using MICE to verify simulation codes?
Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick
How to turn on MICE Step IV
Presentation transcript:

26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My (reactive) comments/thoughts in red Monte Carlo (Simulation) * Model all MICE fields from target o Do we want to be able to model arbitrary 3d mesh for field map measurements? Prefer not to – but probably need to... Cooling Chan gets priority * Model all MICE geometry from target – really need to start so far upstream? o Provisional - plan CAD parser to take engineering model into G4MICE Suspect this would be difficult; needs the right CAD models & maybe help of designers / engineers ??? (& who pays for their time?) Do we really need all the detail that would give? o needs heavy intervention to add fields, make sure diffuser/proton absorber/etc is right (how much matters?) o Provisional * Model all detectors – in (no more than) sufficient detail * Custom dE/dx and Multiple Coulomb Scattering routines At least the ability / option to use these * Model spill structure (why?) and input beam distributions * Physics verification - automated and publicly available for each release (KS tests?) What are KS tests? Kolmogorov-Smirnov ??? *** Do we need formal Change Requests, e.g. if some model / implementation changes ??? o Need help/feedback from analysis group to let me know what is sufficient here

26 Oct 2010PC * RF background model How good a model do we have? Beam envelope pusher What about Turtle / Transport... for beamline? * Calculation of transfer matrix o For arbitrary electromagnetic field maps * Transport of particle trajectories * Transport of beam envelopes * Transport through material (with some simple model) * Optimiser Online analysis tools * Calculation of emittances, Twiss parameters * History plots o Twiss parameters vs run number, etc Date & time as/more useful as run number Anything that is calculated per run/hour/day – e.g. electron-tof peak versus time * Beam plots o phase space plots, amplitude plots, etc * Scriptable interface ??? * Tools to calculate mappings * Tools to do statistical weighting o Fancy image manipulation tools * Offline use

26 Oct 2010PC Reconstruction * Track position, momentum, time, track fit quality Errors, Error matrix RF phasing / time in first cavity (or something) o At arbitrary z-position (but mostly interested in inner plane of trackers) o With arbitrary collection of detectors (quite analysis-dependent) ???? With all operating detectors (i.e. those that exist & switched on!) * EM shower reconstruction for KL/EMR Muon range / energy from KL/EMR Particle ID PID from TOFs & Ckovs * Muon momenta / 4-vector from TOFs EventDisplay * Display hits + detector elements hit What’s the difference? * Display reconstructed and monte carlo (? Simulated ?) trajectories * Display beam envelopes Calibrations / Stabilities / Alignment / Survey measurements - Procedures for these Database / Epics interfaces and access RF diagnostics