RSVP-TE Extensions to Establish Associated Bidirectional LSP MPLS/CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-01 Fei.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
APNOMS03 1 A Resilient Path Management for BGP/MPLS VPN Jong T. Park School of Electrical Eng. And Computer Science Kyungpook National University
Advertisements

CCAMP WG, IETF 80th, Prague, Czech Republic draft-gonzalezdedios-subwavelength-framework-00 Framework for GMPLS and path computation support of sub-wavelength.
RSVP-TE Extensions for SRLG Configuration of FA
MPLS-TP BFD for CC-CV proactive and RDI functionalities
LDP extensions for Explicit Pseudowire to transport LSP mapping draft-cao-pwe3-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-02.txt Mach Chen Wei Cao.
IETF 77, Anaheim, March 21-26, 2010Page - 1 Requirements for Path Ownership Transfer between Management Plane and Control Plane in a MPLS-TP network draft-bao-mpls-tp-path-transfer-reqs-00.txt.
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching: An Overview of Signaling Enhancements and Recovery Techniques IEEE Communications Magazine July 2001.
1 68th IETF, Prague, March 2007 Graceful Shutdown in MPLS Traffic Engineering Networks draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-02.txt Zafar Ali
1 Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-tsaad-ccamp-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-05 Author.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Understanding MPLS TE Components.
Draft-chen-i2rs-mpls-ldp-usecases-00/ draft-huang-i2rs-mpls-te-usecase-00 IETF 88 I2RS1 Use Cases for an Interface to MPLS Protocol draft-chen-i2rs-mpls-ldp-usecases-00/
draft-kompella-mpls-rmr Kireeti Kompella IETF 91
Control and Traffic Management Paper: Banerjee et al.: ” Generalized multiprotocol label switching: an overview of signaling enhancements and recovery.
1 Multipoint Ethernet Connection Protection
Draft-ni-l3vpn-bgp-ext-sd-co-lsp-00IETF 87 L3VPN1 BGP Extensions for Setup Service-Driven Co-Routed LSP in L3VPN draft-ni-l3vpn-bgp-ext-sd-co-lsp-00 Hui.
MPLS TP MIBs and Extensions draft-vkst-mpls-tp-te-mib-00.txt Sam Aldrin Tom Nadeau Venkatesan Mahalingam Kannan Sampath.
66th IETF Montreal July 2006 Requirements for delivering MPLS services Over L3VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-01.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI, Editor.
IETF68 CCAMP1 GMPLS Control of Ethernet Forwarding Don Fedyk Loa Andersson
LSP-Ping and BFD encapsulation over ACH draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-bfd-procedures Nitin BahadurRahul Aggarwal Dave WardTom Nadeau Nurit SprecherYaacov.
1 RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Bidirectional LSPs draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-06 Author list: Fei Zhang, ZTE
IETF 68, MPLS WG, Prague P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-01.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal.
MPLS and Traffic Engineering Ji-Hoon Yun Computer Communications and Switching Systems Lab.
P2MP MPLS-TE FRR with P2MP Bypass Tunnel draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-00.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal (Juniper) IETF 67, MPLS WG,
Draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming-00 74th IETF San Francisco March Advice on When It is Safe to Start Sending Data on Label Switched Paths.
Diagnostic test for MPLS transport profile draft-flh-mpls-tp-oam-diagnostic-test-01 IETF78, Maastricht, 25th-30th, July, 2010 Feng Huang ( Alcatel Lucent)
Slide 1 MPLS-TP Linear Protection / Author / RTP IE Fixed CET I insert classification level © Nokia Siemens Networks MPLS-TP Linear Protection.
63nd IETF Paris August 2005 LSP Stitching with Generalized MPLS TE draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-stitching-01.txt Arthi Ayyangar
Slide 1 Tunnel OAM/ Nurit Sprecher / October 2010 Nokia Siemens Networks / CTO IE PTE I insert classification level © Nokia Siemens Networks Tunnel OAM.
IETF 66 L1VPN Basic Mode Draft draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-00.txt Don Fedyk (Editor) Yakov Rekhter (Editor)
Application of PWE3 to MPLS Transport Networks
IETF-69th Chicago1 Extensions to GMPLS RSVP-TE for Bidirectional Lightpath with the Same Wavelength draft-xu-rsvpte-bidir-wave-00 Sugang Xu, Hiroaki Harai,
Support Shared Mesh Protection in MPLS-TP IETF 83 March, 2012 Ping Pan, Rajan Rao, Biao Lu (Infinera) Andrew G. Malis (Verizon) Luyuan Fang (Cisco) Fatai.
1 IETF-81, MPLS WG, Quebec City, Canada, July, 2011 draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-06.txt MPLS WG IETF-81 Quebec City, Canada July, 2011.
1 MPLS-TP BFD for CC- CV proactive and RDI functionalities draft-asm-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv-02 MPLS WG, 77th IETF - Anaheim.
Support Shared Mesh Protection in MPLS-TP March 27, 2011 Ping Pan (Infinera) Sam Aldrin (Huawei) Luyuan Fang (Cisco)
Framework for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-05 CCAMP WG, IETF 82 nd Taipei.
MPLS-TP - 77th IETF1 MPLS-TP Control Plane Framework draft-abfb-mpls-tp-control-plane- framework-02.txt Contributors: Loa Andersson Lou Berger Luyuan Fang.
IETF-70th Vancouver1 Extensions to GMPLS RSVP-TE for Bidirectional Lightpath with the Same Wavelength draft-xu-rsvpte-bidir-wave-01 Sugang Xu, Hiroaki.
RSVP-TE Extensions to Notification for Shared Mesh Protection CCAMP WG, IETF 81th draft-he-ccamp-notification-shared-mesh-protection-00 Wenjuan He
(Slide set by Norvald Stol/Steinar Bjørnstad
1 Requirements for Very Fast Setup of GMPLS LSPs draft-malis-ccamp-fast-lsps-01 Andrew G. Malis Ronald A. Skoog Haim Kobrinski George Clapp John E. Drake.
1 Ping and Traceroute for GMPLS LSPs in Non-Packet Switched Networks draft-ali-ccamp-gmpls-lsp-ping-traceroute-01.txt Zafar Ali, Roberto Cassata (Cisco.
Draft-jounay-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements-01.txt IETF 70 PWE3 Working Group Vancouver, December 2007 F. Jounay, P. Niger, France Telecom Y. Kamite, NTT Communications.
Draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00IETF 84 MPLS: 30 July Ingress Protection for RSVP-TE p2p and p2mp LSPs draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00.
APS-based MPLS-TP linear protection draft-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching-07.txt IETF 87th,July 28 – July 28 - August 2, 2013 Presenter : Hui.
Entropy Labels in MPLS Forwarding draft-kompella-mpls-entropy-label-02
1 77th IETF, CCAMP WG, Anaheim, CA, USA March 2010 Signaling RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs in an Inter- domain Environment draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-03.txt.
66th IETF, Montreal, July 2006 PCE Working Group Meeting IETF-66, July 2006, Montreal A Backward Recursive PCE-based Computation (BRPC) procedure to compute.
Label Distribution Protocols LDP: hop-by-hop routing RSVP-TE: explicit routing CR-LDP: another explicit routing protocol, no longer under development.
LSP-Ping extensions for MPLS-TP draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-extensions-01 Nitin Bahadur Sami Boutros Rahul Aggarwal Eric Gray 1IETF 77 MPLS WG IETF 77,
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt GMPLS RSVP-TE extensions for OAM Configuration IETF-81 Quebec.
RSVP-TE Signaling Extension for Explicit Control of LSP Boundary in MRN/MLN draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-01.txt draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-01.txt.
Precision Time Protocol over MPLS draft-ronc-ptp-mpls-00.txt PWE3 WG IETF Chicago 2007 Ron Cohen
The Application of the Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS & GMPLS draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-01.txt.
82 nd Taipei Protection Mechanisms for LDP P2MP/MP2MP LSP draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections-00.txt Quintin Zhao, Emily Chen, Huawei.
1 RSVP-TE Extensions For Fast Reroute of Bidirectional Co-routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-00.txt Author list: Mike Taillon
Requirements for the Resilience of Control Plane in GMPLS (draft-kim-ccamp-cpr-reqts-00.txt) Young Hwa Kim CCAMP WG (59 th IETF) Apr.04,
GMPLS extensions to communicate latency as a Traffic Engineering performance metric draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-00.txt draft-wang-ccamp-latency-te-metric-00.txt.
RSVP-TE Extensions to Realize Dynamic Binding of Associated Bidirectional LSP CCAMP/MPLS WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-01.
Draft-li-mpls-serv-driven-co-lsp-fmwk-03IETF 90 MPLS1 A Framework for Service-Driven Co-Routed MPLS Traffic Engineering LSPs draft-li-mpls-serv-driven-co-lsp-fmwk-03.
RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Co-routed Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) draft-gandhishah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-01 Author list: Rakesh.
Presenter: Jeffrey Zhang
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-06 Authors: Mike Taillon.
draft-sitaraman-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-00
DetNet Information Model Consideration
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-01
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
János Farkas, Balázs Varga, Rodney Cummings, Jiang Yuanlong
Presentation transcript:

RSVP-TE Extensions to Establish Associated Bidirectional LSP MPLS/CCAMP WG, IETF 81th, Quebec draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-01 Fei Zhang Ruiquan Jing Fan Yang Weilian Jiang

Definition  Associated bidirectional path: The forward and backward directions are setup, monitored, and protected independently. [RFC5654][RFC5654]  Co-routed bidirectional path: A path where the forward and backward directions follow the same route (links and nodes) across the network. Both directions are setup, monitored and protected as a single entity. [RFC5654][RFC5654]  A point-to-point co-routed bidirectional LSP is a point-to-point associated bidirectional LSP with the additional constraint that its two unidirectional component LSPs in each direction follow the same path (in terms of both nodes and links). [RFC5960] [RFC5960] Indicating that a co-routed bidirectional LSP is a special case of associated bidirectional LSP

Requirements  R7 MPLS-TP MUST support associated bidirectional point-to-point transport paths.  R11 The end points of an associated bidirectional transport path MUST be aware of the pairing relationship of the forward and reverse paths used to support the bidirectional service.  R12 Nodes on the path of an associated bidirectional transport path where both the forward and backward directions transit the same node in the same (sub)layer as the path SHOULD be aware of the pairing relationship of the forward and the backward directions of the transport path.  R14 MPLS-TP MUST support bidirectional transport paths with asymmetric bandwidth requirements.  R50 The MPLS-TP control plane MUST support establishing all the connectivity patterns defined for the MPLS-TP data plane (i.e., associated bidirectional P2P) including configuration of protection functions and any associated maintenance functions.  Conclusion: all these requirements are not relevant with the sequence of establishment

Discussion  What is the meaning of setting up independently? One direction can not trigger the setting up of the reverse direction? (MS-PW is a case that one direction triggers another direction) Or it just means that there are two signaling procedures?

Next Steps  We would like to hear opinions from WG