Information-Centric Networks02c-1 Week 2 / Paper 3 Future Internet architecture: clean-slate versus evolutionary research –Jennifer Rexford, Constantine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Say NO to Multi-hop Wireless Networks Suresh Singh.
Advertisements

Saif Bin Ghelaita Director of Technologies & Standards TRA UAE
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate TNC Bruges, 22 May 2008 GÉANT2: The Good the Bad and the Ugly - What worked and what didn’t work? Robin G. Arak.
COS 461 Fall 1997 Routing COS 461 Fall 1997 Typical Structure.
Information-Centric Networks02b-1 Week 2 / Paper 2 Tussle in Cyberspace: Defining Tommorow’s Internet –David D. Clark, John Wroclawski, Karen R. Sollins.
1 Seminar on “Clean Slate Design for the Internet” Nick McKeown
Rhodes University - Department of Computer Science 1 Project Project: Re-establishing and improving the experimental VoIP link with the University of Namibia:
Watching the Waist of the Protocol Hourglass Steve Deering cisco.com TERENA Network Conf., Antalya Turkey May 2001.
The Future Internet: A clean-slate design? Nicholas Erho.
Four myths about GENI (and one recommendation) Constantine Dovrolis College of Computing Georgia Tech.
INTEGRATING NETWORK CRYPTOGRAPHY INTO THE OPERATING SYSTEM BY ANTHONY GABRIELSON HAIM LEVKOWITZ Mohammed Alali | CS – Dr. RothsteinSummer 2013.
1 In VINI Veritas: Realistic and Controlled Network Experimentation Jennifer Rexford with Andy Bavier, Nick Feamster, Mark Huang, and Larry Peterson
CS 268: Active Networks Ion Stoica May 6, 2002 (* Based on David Wheterall presentation from SOSP ’99)
1 GENI: Global Environment for Network Innovations Jennifer Rexford Princeton University
Internet Research Needs a Critical Perspective Towards Models –Sally Floyd –IMA Workshop, January 2004.
1 GENI: Global Environment for Network Innovations Jennifer Rexford On behalf of Allison Mankin (NSF)
IPv6 and Overlays EE122 Introduction to Communication Networks Discussion Section.
1 Future Internet Architectures: Toward an Architecture-Agnostic Architecture Jennifer Rexford Princeton University
Network Architecture (R02) #2 Evolution v. Revolution Jon Crowcroft,
Research direction Bob Briscoe Chief Researcher, BT Group Nov 2006.
Future Research Directions Jennifer Rexford Advanced Computer Networks Tuesdays/Thursdays 1:30pm-2:50pm.
CS 680 Internet Systems Research Sami Rollins Spring 2007.
CS 268: Future Internet Architectures Ion Stoica May 6, 2003.
The Future of Internet Research Scott Shenker (on behalf of many networking collaborators)
Network Virtualization Jennifer Rexford Advanced Computer Networks Tuesdays/Thursdays 1:30pm-2:50pm.
The Future of the Internet Jennifer Rexford ’91 Computer Science Department Princeton University
Building a Strong Foundation for a Future Internet Jennifer Rexford ’91 Computer Science Department (and Electrical Engineering and the Center for IT Policy)
A Scalable, Commodity Data Center Network Architecture.
Mobile Communication Congestion Exposure Scenario Version 01
1 CS : Cloud Computing, Systems, Networking, and Frameworks Fall 2011 (MW 1:00-2:30, 293 Cory Hall) Ion Stoica (
Scalable Server Load Balancing Inside Data Centers Dana Butnariu Princeton University Computer Science Department July – September 2010 Joint work with.
Information-Centric Networks02a-1 Week 2 / Paper 1 The Design Philosophy of the DARPA Internet Protocols –David D. Clark –ACM CCR, Vol. 18, No. 4, August.
Information-Centric Networks10b-1 Week 13 / Paper 1 OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks –Nick McKeown, Tom Anderson, Hari Balakrishnan, Guru.
1 CSE 5346 – Networks II: High Performance Networks.
How Emerging Optical Technologies will affect the Future Internet NSF Meeting, 5 Dec, 2005 Nick McKeown Stanford University
NATs and UDP Victor Norman CS322 Spring NAPT Suppose we have a router doing NAT: half is the “public side”, IP address ; other half is.
1 Evolving a Manageable Internet Tom Anderson University of Washington.
1 November 2006 in Dagstuhl, Germany
Internet Evolution and IPv6 Paul Wilson Geoff Huston APNIC.
Achieving good end-to-end service using Bill-Pay Cristian Estan, Aditya Akella, Suman Banerjee Univ. of Wisconsin - Madison.
MODEL-BASED SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES.  Models of software are used in an increasing number of projects to handle the complexity of application domains.
Enhance Security of IP Network using New Architecture of Address Validation Xiaodong Duan China Mobile.
Tufts Wireless Laboratory School Of Engineering Tufts University Paper Review “An Energy Efficient Multipath Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks”,
Concerns with Network Research Funding S.Floyd & R. Atkinson, Editors Internet Architecture Board draft-iab-research-funding-02.txt.
Information-Centric Networks Section # 3.2: DNS Issues Instructor: George Xylomenos Department: Informatics.
Evolving Toward a Self-Managing Network Jennifer Rexford Princeton University
Information-Centric Networks Section # 2.2: Internet Evolution Instructor: George Xylomenos Department: Informatics.
What comes next in Internet infrastructure: quality of service, IPv6, and more Brian E Carpenter Program Director, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM.
Information-Centric Networks Section # 13.2: Alternatives Instructor: George Xylomenos Department: Informatics.
Whats hot in networking? S. Keshav. Internet architecture Access Enterprise/campus/local ISP Wide area/backbone ISP.
Information-Centric Networks Section # 2.3: Internet Evolution Instructor: George Xylomenos Department: Informatics.
IPv6 - The Way Ahead Christian Huitema Architect Windows Networking & Communications
Roadmap to Next Generation Internet: Indian Initiatives Subbu C-DAC, India.
Section #7: Getting Data from Point A to Point B.
Service Level Agreements White Paper - A Summary Quality of Service Task Force The Open Group Presented by: Jon Saperia
Future Internet Research Activities in Korea Chong-kwon Kim Seoul National University.
Site Multihoming for IPv6 Brian Carpenter IBM TERENA Networking Conference, Poznan, 2005.
Services – a perspective on building applications Richard Swale ETSI TIPHON Wg1 chair VoIP Technologist BTexaCT ITU Workshop on IP Networking and Mediacom.
Computer Networks 0110-IP Gergely Windisch
Fabric: A Retrospective on Evolving SDN Presented by: Tarek Elgamal.
A Brief history of the Internet Name:Ziyun Wang. Introduction Internet history revolves around four distinct aspects. 1. the technological evolution that.
1 Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Special Topics in Computer Sciences Second Term 1433/1434 H Dr. Loai Bani Melhim.
Multicast in Information-Centric Networking March 2012.
4G Network Architectures
Internet Evolution and IPv6
The Stanford Clean Slate Program
Introducing Novell IPv6 Stack
Four myths about GENI (and one recommendation)
Global Collaboration on Future Network Standardization
Fixing the Internet: Think Locally, Impact Globally
Presentation transcript:

Information-Centric Networks02c-1 Week 2 / Paper 3 Future Internet architecture: clean-slate versus evolutionary research –Jennifer Rexford, Constantine Dovrolis –Communications of the ACM, Volume 53 Issue 9, Sep 2010 Main point –Should researchers focus on designing new architectures? Point: Jennifer Rexford –Or should they focus on improving the current Internet Counter-point: Constantine Dovrolis

Information-Centric Networks02c-2 Point: New network architectures The Internet has been hugely successful –A minimalist network with powerful endpoints –Easy to adopt new applications and link technologies Then why even consider clean-slate designs? –Evolutionary and clean-slate research are not at odds –Clean-slate can help guide Internet evolution –And maybe we do need a new Internet Plant the seeds of a new network Towards a networking discipline –Networking is far from a mature field –We do not really understand the Internet Example: the congestion collapse of 1987

Information-Centric Networks02c-3 Point: New network architectures How can we create a network science? –It is not enough to describe protocols We need laws and rules of thumb –It is not enough to study today’s Internet We need to understand networks in general –Only clean-slate can allow us test different theories New designs may offer solutions not feasible on the Internet –Clean-slate also requires experimental facilities Paper designs are not enough –What we need is continuous network research As in the early ARPANET Who could think of what it would become? We should not consider the Internet as the end of networking

Information-Centric Networks02c-4 Point: New network architectures Toward an Internet worthy of our trust –The Internet has many obvious shortcomings Pervasive security issues No support for mobile hosts and countless sensors Best-effort is a bad fit for IPTV Reliability is much lower than in telephony –Some are deeply rooted in its early design decisions Lack of security, coupling address and location –Clean-slate allows experiments in many directions Some may fail, some may be added to the Internet –Some clean-slate ideas are already proving useful OpenFlow adds programmability in the network –We should not assume that the Internet is the end This is what telcos thought about telephony!

Information-Centric Networks02c-5 Counter-point: Improve the Internet What is evolutionary research? –Understand Internet behavior and identify problems –Resolve issues under two constraints Backward compatibility Incremental deployment Clean-slate research is not new –Active networks, per-flow QoS, CLNP, XCP, Nimrod All have failed miserably –Even backwards compatible ideas have trouble They were not incrementally deployable IPv6, IP multicast, RSVP, IPsec, S-BGP –Evolutionary ideas are adopted though NATs, CDBs, caches, endpoint security

Information-Centric Networks02c-6 Counter-point: Improve the Internet Can emerging technologies replace entrenched ones? –Technical superiority is not enough –A valuable new service must be offered Which cannot be offered by the entrenched solution –Only this can justify the switching cost So clean-slate needs to show new applications –The “security” promises do not seem realistic –A new network will probably be buggier than the Internet! Deployment experiments are not enough –It is the business issues that killed good ideas The Internet itself was not a clean-slate design –It evolved slowly from circuit switching

Information-Centric Networks02c-7 Counter-point: Improve the Internet Is the Internet really ossified? –The Internet Protocol is very hard to change –But what is so bad about this? New applications are developed all the time New link technologies are adopted all the time Would these be possible with an evolving IP? An agenda for evolutionary Internet research –Measure and understand the Internet ecosystem –Mutate the design to avoid future problems We need more monitoring and measurement infrastructure We need an experimental wide area ISP –A lot has been achieved within the Internet framework Congestion control, queue management, traffic characterization