Davide Franco – NOW 2004 11 C measurement and the CNO and pep fluxes in Borexino Davide Franco NOW2004 Conca Specchiulla 11-17 September 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The SNO+ Experiment: Overview and Status
Advertisements

Riunione Settembre 2007 Gruppo 2 Inizio presa dati 2007: Auger, Borexino, Agile, Pamela Rivelatore on 2008: Gerda, Icarus, Opera,Warp, Glast, Antares,
1 Calor02 Pasadena (USA) March 2002Lino Miramonti - University and INFN Milano Borexino: A Real Time Liquid Scintillator Detector for Low Energy.
Status of XMASS experiment Shigetaka Moriyama Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo For the XMASS collaboration September 10 th, 2013.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Indiana, Frascati, Gran Sasso, L’Aquila, Lecce, Michigan, Napoli, Pisa, Roma.
First real time 7 Be solar detection in Borexino Davide D’Angelo INFN Sez. Milano On behalf of the Borexino Collaboration.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
DMSAG 14/8/06 Mark Boulay Towards Dark Matter with DEAP at SNOLAB Mark Boulay Canada Research Chair in Particle Astrophysics Queen’s University DEAP-1:
Recent results from Borexino
Activity for the Gerda-specific part Description of the Gerda setup including shielding (water tank, Cu tank, liquid Nitrogen), crystals array and kapton.
Prototype of the Daya Bay Neutrino Detector Wang Zhimin IHEP, Daya Bay.
Stockholm, May 2-6, 2006 SNOW Sub-MeV solar neutrinos: experimental techniques and backgrounds Aldo Ianni Gran Sasso Laboratory, INFN.
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
Results and Future of the KamLAND Experiment
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
Honolulu 16/Dec/2005 Marco G. Giammarchi, Infn Milano Geoneutrinos in Borexino Marco G. Giammarchi & Lino Miramonti Dip. di Fisica dell’Universita’ and.
Neutrinos as Probes: Solar-, Geo-, Supernova neutrinos; Laguna
Low-energy neutrino physics with KamLAND Tadao Mitsui (Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku U.) for the KamLAND collaboration Now2010, Grand Hotel.
Solar Neutrinos Perspectives and Objectives Mark Chen Queen’s University and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)
Status of the BOREXINO experiment Hardy Simgen Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik / Heidelberg for the BOREXINO collaboration.
Emanuela Meroni Univ. & INFN Milano NO-VE April 15-18, 2008 Borexino and Solar Neutrinos Emanuela Meroni Università di Milano & INFN On behalf of the Borexino.
KamLAND : Studying Neutrinos from Reactor Atsuto Suzuki KamLAND Collaboration KEK : High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Using Reactor Anti-Neutrinos to Measure sin 2 2θ 13 Jonathan Link Columbia University Fermilab Long Range Planning Committee, Neutrino Session November.
Neutron Monitoring Detector in KIMS Jungwon Kwak Seoul National University 2003 October 25 th KPS meeting.
Neutron scattering systems for calibration of dark matter search and low-energy neutrino detectors A.Bondar, A.Buzulutskov, A.Burdakov, E.Grishnjaev, A.Dolgov,
SNS2 Workshop August 28-29, 2003 Richard Talaga, Argonne1 Calibration of the OMNIS-LPC Supernova Neutrino Detector Outline –OMNIS Experiment and Detectors.
Yasuhiro Kishimoto for KamLAND collaboration RCNS, Tohoku Univ. September 12, 2007 TAUP 2007 in Sendai.
Present and future detectors for Geo-neutrinos: Borexino and LENA Applied Antineutrino Physics Workshop APC, Paris, Dec L. Oberauer, TU München.
LSc development for Solar und Supernova Neutrino detection 17 th Lomonosov conference, Moscow, August 2015 L. Oberauer, TUM.
G. Testera (INFN Genoa- Italy ) on behalf of the Borexino collaboration Low energy solar neutrino signals in Borexino Kurchatov Inst. (Russia) Dubna JINR.
M. Misiaszek (Institute of Physics, Jagellonian U., Krakow) on behalf of the Borexino Collaboration Results from the Borexino experiment Kurchatov Inst.
Walid DRIDI, CEA/Saclay n_TOF Collaboration Meeting, Paris December 4-5, 2006 DAPNIA Neutron capture cross section of 234 U Walid DRIDI CEA/Saclay for.
CTF and low background facility at Gran Sasso A. Ianni a, M. Laubenstein a and Y. Suvorov a a INFN, Gran Sasso Laboratory, Assergi (AQ), Italy The Counting.
Counting Electrons to Measure the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy J. Brunner 17/04/2013 APC.
LoNu Workshop R. B. Vogelaar October 14, 2006 Extraordinary Neutrino Beam Free of Charge For NEUTRINO PHYSICS: WELL DEFINED HIGHEST FLUX (~10 11 cm -2.
1 IDM2004 Edinburgh, 9 september 2004 Helenia Menghetti Bologna University and INFN Study of the muon-induced neutron background with the LVD detector.
Data Processing for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Aksel Hallin Queen’s, October 2006.
VIeme rencontres du Vietnam
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment R. D. McKeown Caltech On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration CIPANP 2009.
CTF at Gran Sasso (overview of the hardware) Richard Ford (SNOLAB) (who has not been in the collaboration since 2004) March 19 th 2010.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Karsten Heeger Beijing, January 18, 2003 Design Considerations for a  13 Reactor Neutrino Experiment with Multiple Detectors Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence.
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
N eutrino O scillation W orkshop Conca Specchiulla, September 11 th 2006 Michael Smy UC Irvine Low Energy Challenges in SK-III.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Case Western Reserve University.
Current status of XMASS experiment 11 th International Workshop on Low Temperature Detectors (LTD-11) Takeda Hall, University of Tokyo, JAPAN 8/1, 2005.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
The COBRA Experiment Jeanne Wilson University of Sussex, UK On behalf of the COBRA Collaboration TAUP 2007, Sendai, Japan.
1 LTR 2004 Sudbury, December 2004 Helenia Menghetti, Marco Selvi Bologna University and INFN Large Volume Detector The Large Volume Detector (LVD)
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
1 Status and background considerations of XMASS experiment Yeongduk Kim Sejong University for the XMASS collaboration LRT2006 Oct. 3, 2006.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
Results from Borexino Davide Franco CNRS-APC NOW 2012 September 9-16, 2012.
Second Workshop on large TPC for low energy rare event detection, Paris, December 21 st, 2004.
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
1 Work report ( ) Haoqi Lu IHEP Neutrino group
Aldo Ianni for the Borexino collaboration 12th International Workshop on Next Generation Nucleon Decay and Neutrino Detectors Zurich, 7 th Nov 2011.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Neutron and 9Li Background Calculations
Solar & Supernova Neutrinos Detection Methods and Prospects
Solar neutrino detection in Borexino
Calibration, Simulations, and “Remaining” Issues
Search for sterile neutrinos with SOX: Monte Carlo studies of the experiment sensitivity Davide Basilico 1st year Workshop – 11/10/17 Tutors: Dott. Barbara.
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
Presentation transcript:

Davide Franco – NOW C measurement and the CNO and pep fluxes in Borexino Davide Franco NOW2004 Conca Specchiulla September 2004

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Detector status Borexino Physics: an update Background issues & goals, projected sensitivity 11 C measurement in CTF Borexino potential in CNO and pep Outline

Davide Franco – NOW , August 11th The Judicial Authority removed the seal from the Borexino equipments, from the whole Hall C and from the nearby tunnels LNGS hydraulic system is under restructuring for safety compliance. Thus, in agreement with the laboratory Directorate, the resuming of operations involving liquid is deferred until a careful review of the status of the systems will be completed.

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Borexino at a glance Electron scattering in organic liquid scintillator Scintillator 300 tons PC+PPO (1.5 g/l); 100 tons of fiducial mass Two buffers 900 tons PC+quencher; water 2200 tons 2200 PMTs, optical coverage 30% Muon flux 1/m 2 /h; 250 keV analysis threshold ( 14 C)

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Events/1 years/100 tons/13 keV Energy(MeV) 7 Be- n 238 U Other- n 232 Th Borexino MC Spectrum Assuming: 1 year statistics Neutrino window (0.25 – 0.8 MeV) BP2000+LMA (no LUNA) 238 U & 232 Th ~ g/g Secular equilibrium Total

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Status what is done: Structures: finished Purification plants: completed Inner PMTs: installed and tested Electronics: commisioned and calibrated Installation and test of the Muon Veto: completed what remains to be done: Water filling: needs 3 months Scintillator and buffer filling: needs 6 months

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Events/3years/100 tons/0.05 MeV NW-1NW-2 n -spectrum in Borexino LMA –BP2004 – LUNA 3 years statistics 100 tons Source Number of events in 3 y NW-1NW-2 7 Be pep pp B8B N O All NW-1 = 0.25 – 0.8 MeV ( 7 Be) NW-2 = 0.8 – 1.4 MeV (pep & CNO)

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Borexino Physics Goals (1) Real time observation of low energy neutrinos: only 1/2000 of solar flux measured in real time so far... Surprises at low energy? 7 Be measurement improves the determination of the total solar luminosity Theoretical uncertainty of SSM on 7 Be is 12% (BP04) Large experimental uncertainty of 7 Be flux: ( ) F ( 7 Be) theory (BP04) ~ 30 ev/day above threshold Well positioned from statistical point of view: –11000 ev in 1 yr (1%) –22000 ev in 2 yrs (0.7%) –44000 ev in 4 yrs (0.5%) Accuracy of Borexino measurement most likely determined by background and systematics MSW-LMA scenario signal & projected sensitivity

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Borexino Physics Goals (2) Geo anti-neutrinos (20 events/yr expected) Probe the transition matter- vacuum oscillation, expected (2-3 MeV) in favoured MSW-LMA Neutrinos from Super Novae (electronics improved) New results on background 1-2 MeV: opportunity for pep+CNO observation

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Background Background from long-lived isotopes – 238 U, 232 Th : feasibility of ~ g/g achieved in CTF 14 C: feasibility of 14 C/ 12 C ~ achieved in CTF Noble gases ( 85 Kr, 39 Ar) (removable with LAK nitrogen): –Search commercial LN 2 with specs: achieved! –<1 c/d for each source in the FV Radon daughters ( 210 Bi- 210 Po- 210 Pb) removal still in progress: –Helps vessel built in clean conditions –Further testing needed in CTF Cosmogenic Background – Fast decaying background removed by tagging with muon – CNO-pep NW: 11 C problem

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 The 11 C problem in the CNO-pep NW Expected n -rate in Borexino in 100 ton (BP LUNA + LMA) in the energy range [0.8 – 1.4] MeV: pep- n : 0.9 c/d CNO- n : 0.6 c/d Internal background in [0.8 – 1.4] MeV: g/g U, Th In situ production muon-induced 11 C: 7.5 c/d in the range [0.8 – 1.4] MeV required reduction factor > 10 Goal: tagging and removing 11 C event by event!!!

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 m -induced 11 C: the net reaction t ~ 30 min!!! E  [1.02 – 1.98] MeV t ~ 200  s E g = 2.2 MeV = 320  4 stat syst. LNGS (3600 mwe) m n g 11 C ( b + )

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 The Counting Test Facility ~ 4 tons of scintillator 100 PMTs Buffer of water Muon veto Vessel radius: 1 m CTF is a small scale prototype of Borexino. It is devoted to the study of the background in the scintillator and to the purification system tests of Borexino.

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Isotopesc/d ( * ) in the full energy range in CTF 11 C 0.54  Be (1.3  0.1) x Be< C (7.3  0.8) x Li (2.5  0.6) x He (3.7  0.1) x B8B (4.0  0.7) x C9C (2.8  0.9) x Li + 8 He (1.3  0.2) x (*) T. Hagner et al., Astr. Part. Phys. 14 (2000) Muon-induced contaminants in CTF Scaling to CTF, 11 C represents 80% of all the muon-induced contaminants and more than 99% in the pep- n energy window CERN (*) : cross sections measured with  -beams of 100 and 190 GeV on 12 C target

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Strategy in CTF 1.Tagging cosmic muons with the muon veto: , crossing the scintillator, fires the detector cut on the number of photoelectrons detected by the muon-veto ( e  ~ 1) 2.Tagging  2.2MeV from the neutron capture: for each tagged , a temporal gate of [1  s - 2ms] is opened cut: E  > 1.8 MeV   and  neutron (spill-in/spill-out effect) have been evaluated via Monte Carlo 3.Collecting data sample with the 11 C events: after each  2.2MeV a temporal gate of 300 min (10 x  ) in the [1.10 – 1.65] MeV energy window (  energy = 0.82 ) Radial cut:  r has been evaluated via Monte Carlo m n g 11 C ( b + )

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 rate ~ 1.7 c/d in 3.7 tons Events/320 days/2.7 tons/45 keV Energy(MeV) Neutron capture n + p d +  2.2 MeV capture time ~ 200  s g 2.2MeV peak t = 211  14  s CoincidenceTime (10 2 ns) Events/320 days/3.7 tons/80  s Capture time m n g 11 C ( b + )

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Coincidence Time (min) Detection of in situ produced 11 C rate Effective data taking: 320 days Radial cuts arount the center of the detector ( r  [0.7 – 0.8] m) for avoiding optical effects at different medium interface Assuming a constant background B Fit function: From the fit:  = 29 ± 13 min m n g 11 C ( b + )

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Fixing t = 29.4 min r = 0.7 m (m r = 1.4 ton) T = 320 days Energy window [1.1 – 1.65] MeV: e en = 0.82 Result: 11 C rate in CTF Note: less than 1 event every 5 days m n g 11 C ( b + )

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 FLUKA has been already tested succesfully in muon-induced neutron production (LVD, etc) Simulation strategy: FLUKA: detector geometry vertical muon beam spread over the whole detector surface neutron tracking in scintillator and water CTF tracking code: tracking of  2.2MeV starting from the neutron capture position CTF reconstruction code: reconstruction of the center of mass of the  2.2MeV deposited energy Efficiencies: Monte Carlo Simulation

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Results from the MC (1) Events in water and in scintillator Neutron capture in scintillator and water 204 ± 2  s Good agreement with real data (211 ± 14  s)! Coincidence Time (100 m s) Number of events m n g 11 C ( b + ) Angular Distribution (cos q ) Energy Distribution (GeV)

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Results from the MC (2) Distance from neutron production position to (normalized spectra): neutron capture  2.2MeV center of mass Only internal events Distance (m) 82% (87%) of neutrons are contained in 1 m radius sphere with center in  2.2MeV center of mass (neutron capture position) Cumulative probability: Distance (m) % m n g 11 C ( b + )

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Efficiencies and final results Including the systematics due to: scintillator mass light yield: energy scale conversion R expected = 0.54 ± 0.06 c/d From MC:

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Implication in Borexino Software cut –spherical volume around the reconstructed  2.2 MeV Muon veto cut –cylindrical volume around the muon track How to reduce 11 C background: 11 C is removed blinding the intersection of the two volumes for C-lifetime Main challenge: keeping low the total dead volume x time Spherical cut around neutron capture Cylindrical cut around m -track Neutron production g 2.2 M eV m -track Scintillator

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Summarizing Distance (m) Assuming: n -signal (pep+CNO) rate: 1.5 c/d trace contaminants rate 0.6 c/d ( 238 U and 232 Th ~ g/g ) distribution of the distance covered by neutrons from FLUKA simulation expected 46 neutrons/day 100 tons of fiducial mass only the spherical cut

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Signal-to-backround ratio ~ 1 implies a loss of volume-time detector fraction ~ 5% Dead Volume-Time Fraction Signal/Background Ratio 5%1 20%1.2 50%1.5

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Conclusions and perspectives Borexino installation and test are completed => waiting for water/scintillator filling 11 C measurement in CTF is promising => Borexino has the potential to probe pep and CNO n s

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Spares

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 First-event analysis Selection of the first event following each  2.2 MeV in the energy range [1.1 – 1.65] MeV 1/l = lifetime, b = rate of random coincidence n event from 11 C ( a ) from other reaction (1- a ) real event false event

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 a= 0.31  0.08 t = 32  10 min a and t free a = 0.30  0.05 a free and t fix b is fixed to the measured rate in the temporal gate after 2 h of the  2.2 MeV detection in the same spherical cut centered in  2.2 MeV (0.75 m) in the 11 C energy window [1.1 – 1.65] MeV min

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Simulation in Borexino l = neutron mean free path e r = spatial efficiency t= 11 C life time e t = time efficiency Dead volume time fraction including the pile-up effect: R = radius of the sphere T = live-time of the detector N = number of detected g 2.2MeV events

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Neutron Energy Distribution m n g 11 C ( b + )

Davide Franco – NOW 2004 Neutron Angular Distribution m n g 11 C ( b + ) Neutron Energy vs Angular Distribution Forward scattered Backward scattered Energy (GeV) Angular Distribution (Cos  )

Davide Franco – NOW 2004