IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR: BP#1, SH#1, SHVS#1/LFL, SC#1+SC#2, BeWind.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1. N. Souchlas BNL (Oct. 5, 2010)
Advertisements

Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
IDS120j WITH/WITHOUT GAPS SH#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/14/2012) 1.
Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,
24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NF/IDS Hg Vessel Layout 30 Jun 09 Cryostat 2 Front Drain Mercury Vessel Concept Matthew F. Glisson.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
IDS120h: Be WINDOW DETAILED CALCULATION, SHIELDING VESSELS, RESULTS FOR DIFFERENT GLOBAL STEPS Nicholas Souchlas (9/20/2011) 1.
Energy Deposition of 4-MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Meeting, Feb. 9, 2010.
MC/NF TARGET SHIELDING STUDIES. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/29/2010)‏ 1.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.
Preliminary Analysis of the Target System Magnets 1.Version with a 6-T copper magnet insert 2.Version with a 6-T high-temperature superconductor insert.
May 17-19, 2000 Catalina Island, CA Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting 1 Target Support Facility for a Solid Target Neutrino Production.
Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Mar. 9, 2010 (Update of talk on Feb. 9, 2010)
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NMFCC Friday Meeting 10 Apr 2009 Neutrino Factory Nozzle Layouts V.B. Graves NFMCC Friday Meeting.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010.
Comparison of Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jun. 29, 2010.
Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Apr. 20, 2010.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 3. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/28/2010)‏
IDS120h POWER DEPOSITION AND Hg POOL STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas (7/26/2011) 1.
STUDY II: m1507 vs. m1510 IDS120f: m1507/MCNP vs. M1510/MCNP vs. FLUKA IDS120f vs. IDS20g GEOMETRY IDS90f: B10/B11 SHIELDING RING(S) STUDIES Nicholas Souchlas.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.
SUPERCONDUCTING SOLENOIDS - SHIELDING STUDIES 1..
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
Energy deposition for intense muon sources (chicane + the rest of the front end) Pavel Snopok Illinois Institute of Technology and Fermilab December 4,
IDS120j WITHOUT GAPS AND WITH MAXIMUM SIZE GAPS ( aka ''NIGHTMARE'' CASE SCENARIO ) SC#4, SC#7 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS. Nicholas Souchlas,
20to2T5m100cm Images Van Graves February 13, 2014.
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS EFFECTS OF Be WINDOW WATER.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET. (From STUDY II to IDS120f geometries) NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL)‏ ‏ 1.
DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET STATION. Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012) 1 DEPOSITED POWER STUDIES FOR THE MC/NF TARGET.
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
IDS120j WITH GAPS SC#3 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS WITH MAX GAPS SC#3, SC#4 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS, DP AND SC TOTAL DP WITH VARYING.
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. BP#1(STST/W), SH#1, BeWindow,SC#8.
Target Magnets & Shielding Bob Weggel Particle Beam Lasers, Inc. Magnet Optimization Research Engineering, LLC. March 5,
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE mars1510 ( DESKTOP ) vs. mars1512 ( PRINCETON CLUSTER ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/28/2012) 1.
Collimator and beamline heating External Review of the LHC Collimation Project CERN Wed 30/6/2004.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Meson Production of Carbon Target at 3 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies 17/18/13.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
Chicane shielding and energy deposition (IPAC’13 follow-up) Pavel Snopok IDS-NF phone meeting June 4, 2013.
Meshed with no iron for comparison Used Willy’s conceptual design for iron pieces Not optimized in any way Used thin and thick pieces Compared fields (BMOD.
Multiprocessing/MARS15(2012)/Princeton Cluster (IDS120j w/t Resistive Magnets: New Hg Module) X. Ding UCLA (4/11/2013)
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS MODIFYING Hg MODULE Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/1/2012) 1.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
IDS120i GEOMETRY. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. Hg vs. Ga DEPOSITED POWER DISTRIBUTION. (using Ding's optimized parameters)
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BEAM PIPE BEYOND FIRST CRYOSTAT ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BP#2 WITHIN FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc.
Neutrino Factory Target Vessel Concept Update V. Graves Target Studies EVO June 12, 2012.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review (Update Aug 12) Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
Ids120h_side. ids120h_top ids120h_iso ids120h_end.
Target On axis field [scale /20 T] Target Magnets Decay-Channel Triplets Taper magnets.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR IDS80 (NO IRON PLUG/YOKE), ADDING SHIELDING IN 75 TO 80 cm (WC/H 2 O, B, Cd). NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL) Dec. 14, 2010‏ ‏ 1.
ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM
IDS120h: PROTON P0-P14 TRAJECTORY FOOTPRINT
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE
1 Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/15/2011)
1 Nicholas Souchlas (PBL) (MAP CONFERENCE SLAC 2012)
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
Presentation transcript:

IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR: BP#1, SH#1, SHVS#1/LFL, SC#1+SC#2, BeWind. Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/20/2012) 1

IDS120j GEOMETRY, NO RESISTIVE COILS: WITH 20 cm GAPS *********************************************************** # SIMULATIONS USING LOWEST GRADE W BEADS IN SHIELDING ( OF 15.8 g/cc ) AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES FOR : # BP#1, SH#1 ( LIMITED IN THE FIRST 1 cm TUBE VOLUME ), # SHVS#1/LFL ( LIMITED IN THE FIRST INNER 2 cm FLANGE VOLUME ) # Be WINDOW # SC#1 + SC#2 ( LIMITED IN THE “HOT” REGION ) *********************************************************** >SIMULATIONS CODE: mars1512 ( USING MCNP CROSS SECTION LIBRARIES ) >NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF: MeV >SHIELDING: 60% W + 40% He ( WITH STST VESSELS) >PROTON BEAM POWER: 4 MW >PROTON ENERGY: E = 8 GeV >PROTON BEAM PROFILE: GAUSSIAN, σ x = σ y = 0.12 cm >EVENTS IN SIMULATIONS : N p = 500,000 ( OR 4x500,000 FOR SC#1+2) 2 IDS120j GEOMETRY, NO RESISTIVE COILS: WITH 20 cm GAPS *********************************************************** # SIMULATIONS USING LOWEST GRADE W BEADS IN SHIELDING ( OF 15.8 g/cc ) # BP#2 SEGMENTATION STUDIES WITHIN THE FIRST CRYOSTAT AND RIGHT FLANGE OF Hg POOL INNER VESSEL. *********************************************************** >SIMULATIONS CODE: mars1512 ( USING MCNP CROSS SECTION LIBRARIES ) >NEUTRON ENERGY CUTOFF: MeV >SHIELDING: 60% W + 40% He ( WITH STST VESSELS) >PROTON BEAM POWER: 4 MW >PROTON ENERGY: E = 8 GeV >PROTON BEAM PROFILE: GAUSSIAN, σ x = σ y = 0.12 cm

IDS120j: REPLACING RESISTIVE MAGNETS AND FILLING UPPER HALF OF Hg POOL WITH SHIELDING. GENERAL OVERVIEW (LEFT), POOL REGION DETAILS (RIGHT). [20 cm GAPS] SH#1 SH#1A SH#2 SH#1A Hg POOL SH#4 SH#3 Hg POOL SH#1 2 cm THICK STST OUTER TUBE CRYO#1 CRYO#4 CRYO#3 CRYO#2 2 cm THICK STST BEAM PIPE BEAM PIPE EXTENDS HALF WAY UPSTREAM TO THE POOL SH#1 10 cm THICK STST RIGHT FLANGE Hg POOL STARTS ~ 85 cm AND EXTENDS ALL THE WAY TO THE END OF THE FIRST CRYOSTAT ~ 370 cm. 3 SHVS WALLS, Hg POOL VESSEL DOUBLE WALLS, Be WINDOW, He GAP IN Be WINDOW AND IN HG POOL HAVE NOMINAL VALUES FOR THEIR THIKNESS. STRESS FORCES ANALYSIS AND LOCAL DPD DISTRIBUTION WILL BE USED TO DETERMINE THEIR VALUES.

IDS120j: WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS. DETAILS OF THE DOUBLE STST Hg POOL VESSEL (LEFT, MIDDLE) AND THE DOUBLE Be WINDOW (RIGHT). [20 cm GAPS] 2 cm THICK STST INNER Hg POOL VESSEL WITH 1 cm He GAP FOR COOLING. TWO 0.5 cm THICK Be WINDOWS AT THE END OF CRYO#1 WITH 0.5 cm He GAP BETWEEN THEM FOR COOLING. 10 cm THICK STST RIGHT / LEFT FLANGE OF SHVS#4, SHVS#1 / SHVS#2 WITH 20 cm GAP BETWEEN THEM. 4

BP#1 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES. 5

X CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION < r < 11.0 cm dr = 1.0 cm N r = 1 bins < z < 0.0 cm dz = 10.0 cm N z = 10 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 120 ''pieces'' ONLY THE FIRST 1 cm TUBE VOLUME OF THE 2 cm STST THICK BP#2 WAS USED. 6 IDS120j: yz ( LEFT ) AND yx ( RIGHT ) CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#1 SEGMENTATION. y z

7

SUM OF DP FROM 120 PIECES : kW DP FROM REST OF BP#1 : kW TOTAL DP IN BP#1 : kW BP#1 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # ~ 100 kW ( 223 kW --> 322 kW ) MORE POWER IS DEPOSITED IN BP#1 ( 2 cm THICK, 100 cm LONG, STST BEAM PIPE ) AROUND THE TARGET REGION WITHOUT THE RESISTIVE MAGNETS. THIS IS DUE TO THE DIFFERENT MAGNETIC FIELD PROFILE IN THAT REGION AS WELL AS DUE TO THE DIFFERENT INTERACTION CROSS ANLGE BETWEEN Hg JET AND PROTON BEAM. FINALLY THIS IS ALSO DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE BEAM PIPE VOLUME IS ALSO LARGER SINCE THE INNER RADIUS OF THE PIPE HAS INCREASED FROM 7.5 cm TO 10 cm WIHOUT THE RESISTIVE MAGNETS. # LOWEST DP IS EXPECTED ALONG THE + y DIRECTION WHILE MOST OF THE DP IS BETWEEN 255 AND 285 DEGREES ( - y DIRECTION ). ALONG THE AXIAL DIRECTION MOST OF THE ENERGY IN THE PIPE IS CONCENTRATED IN THE REGION ~ [ – 50, 0.0 ] cm. # DPD ( max) ~ 8.5 W/g APPEARS TO BE AT ( r, z, phi ) = ( 10.5 cm, -25 cm, 255 deg). THAT IS ABOUT 2-3 W/g LESS THAN THE PEAK DPD IN BP#1 WITH THE RESISTIVE COILS PRESENT. 8

BP#1 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES. SH#1 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES. 9

X CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION < r < 11.0 cm dr = 1.0 cm N r = 1 bins < z < 0.0 cm dz = 10.0 cm N z = 10 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 120 ''pieces'' ONLY THE FIRST 1 cm TUBE VOLUME OF THE 2 cm STST THICK BP#2 WAS USED. 6 IDS120j: yz ( LEFT ) AND yx ( RIGHT ) CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#1 SEGMENTATION. y z IDS120j: yz ( LEFT ) AND yx ( RIGHT ) CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE SH#1 SEGMENTATION < r < 14.0 cm dr = 1.0 cm N r = 1 bins < z < 0.0 cm dz = 10.0 cm N z = 9 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 108 ''pieces'' ONLY THE FIRST 1 cm TUBE VOLUME OF THE SH#1 WAS USED. 10

11

SUM OF DP FROM 120 PIECES : kW DP FROM REST OF BP#1 : kW TOTAL DP IN BP#2 : kW BP#2 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # ~ 100 kW ( 223 kW --> 322 kW ) MORE POWER IS DEPOSITED IN BP#1 ( 2 cm THICK, 100 cm LONG, STST BEAM PIPE ) AROUND THE TARGET REGION WITHOUT THE RESISTIVE MAGNETS. THIS IS DUE TO THE DIFFERENT MAGNETIC FIELD PROFILE IN THAT REGION AS WELL AS DUE TO THE DIFFERENT INTERACTION CROSS ANLGE BETWEEN Hg JET AND PROTON BEAM. FINALLY THIS IS ALSO DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE BEAM PIPE VOLUME IS ALSO LARGER SINCE THE INNER RADIUS OF THE PIPE HAS INCREASED FROM 7.5 cm TO 10 cm WIHOUT THE RESISTIVE MAGNETS. # LOWEST DP IS EXPECTED ALONG THE + y DIRECTION WHILE MOST OF THE DP IS BETWEEN 255 AND 285 DEGREES ( - y DIRECTION ). ALONG THE AXIAL DIRECTION MOST OF THE ENERGY IN THE PIPE IS CONCENTRATED IN THE REGION ~ [ – 50, 0.0 ] cm. # DPD ( max) ~ 8.5 W/g APPEARS TO BE AT ( r, z, phi ) = ( 10.5 cm, -25 cm, 255 deg). THAT IS ABOUT 2-3 W/g LESS THAN THE PEAK DPD IN BP#1 WITH THE RESISTIVE COILS PRESENT. 8 SUM OF DP FROM 108 PIECES : kW DP FROM REST OF SH#1 : kW TOTAL DP IN SH#1 : kW SH#1 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # ~ 365 kW ( 897 kW --> 1262 kW ) MORE POWER IS DEPOSITED IN SH#1 VOLUME AROUND THE TARGET REGION WITHOUT THE RESISTIVE MAGNETS. LIKE BEFORE FOR THE BP#1 THIS IS DUE TO THE DIFFERENT MAGNETIC FIELD PROFILE IN THAT REGION AS WELL AS DUE TO THE DIFFERENT INTERACTION CROSS ANLGE BETWEEN Hg JET AND PROTON BEAM. THE ORIGINAL SH#1 VOLUME ON ONE HAND HAS BEEN REDUCED DUE TO THE INCREASE OF THE IR OF THE BEAM PIPE THERE, ON THE OTHER HAND THERE IS AN INCREASE SINCE SHIELDING MATERIAL NOW OCCUPIES THE RESISTIVE MAGNETS VOLUME. # LOWEST DP IS EXPECTED ALONG THE + y DIRECTION WHILE MOST OF THE DP IS BETWEEN 255 AND 285 DEGREES ( - y DIRECTION ). ALONG THE AXIAL DIRECTION MOST OF THE ENERGY IN THE SHIELDING IS CONCENTRATED IN THE REGION ~ [ – 40, 0.0 ] cm. # DPD ( max) ~ 5.6 W/g APPEARS TO BE AT ( r, z, phi ) = ( 13.5 cm, -15 cm, 255 deg). THAT IS ABOUT W/g LESS THAN THE PEAK DPD IN SH#1 WITH THE RESISTIVE COILS PRESENT. 12

BP#1 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES. 5 SHVS#1 LEFT ( UPSTREAM ) FLANGE AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES. 13

X CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION < r < 11.0 cm dr = 1.0 cm N r = 1 bins < z < 0.0 cm dz = 10.0 cm N z = 10 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 120 ''pieces'' ONLY THE FIRST 1 cm TUBE VOLUME OF THE 2 cm STST THICK BP#2 WAS USED. 6 IDS120j: yz ( LEFT ) AND yx ( RIGHT ) CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#1 SEGMENTATION. y z 14 5 cm THICK STST SHVS#1 FLANGE IDS120j: yz ( LEFT ) AND yx ( RIGHT ) CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE SHVS#1 LEFT ( UPSTREAM ) FLANGE SEGMENTATION < r < 48.0 cm dr = 9.0 cm N r = 4 bins < z < cm dz = 2.0 cm N z = 1 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 48 ''pieces'' ONLY THE FIRST ( INNER) 2 cm OF THE FLANGE VOLUME OF THE SHVS#1 WAS SEGMENTED.

15

SUM OF DP FROM 120 PIECES : kW DP FROM REST OF BP#1 : kW TOTAL DP IN BP#1 : kW BP#1 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # ~ 100 kW ( 223 kW --> 322 kW ) MORE POWER IS DEPOSITED IN BP#1 ( 2 cm THICK, 100 cm LONG, STST BEAM PIPE ) AROUND THE TARGET REGION WITHOUT THE RESISTIVE MAGNETS. THIS IS DUE TO THE DIFFERENT MAGNETIC FIELD PROFILE IN THAT REGION AS WELL AS DUE TO THE DIFFERENT INTERACTION CROSS ANLGE BETWEEN Hg JET AND PROTON BEAM. FINALLY THIS IS ALSO DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE BEAM PIPE VOLUME IS ALSO LARGER SINCE THE INNER RADIUS OF THE PIPE HAS INCREASED FROM 7.5 cm TO 10 cm WIHOUT THE RESISTIVE MAGNETS. # LOWEST DP IS EXPECTED ALONG THE + y DIRECTION WHILE MOST OF THE DP IS BETWEEN 255 AND 285 DEGREES ( - y DIRECTION ). ALONG THE AXIAL DIRECTION MOST OF THE ENERGY IN THE PIPE IS CONCENTRATED IN THE REGION ~ [ – 50, 0.0 ] cm. # DPD ( max) ~ 8.5 W/g APPEARS TO BE AT ( r, z, phi ) = ( 10.5 cm, -25 cm, 255 deg). THAT IS ABOUT 2-3 W/g LESS THAN THE PEAK DPD IN BP#1 WITH THE RESISTIVE COILS PRESENT. 8 SUM OF DP FROM 48 PIECES : 0.17 kW DP FROM REST OF SHVS#1/LFL : kW TOTAL DP IN SHVS#1/LFL: kW SH#1 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # DPD ( max) ~ mW/g APPEARS TO BE AT ( r, z, phi ) = ( 16.5 cm, -96 cm, 105 deg). THAT IS ALONG THE + y ( UPPER HALF ) REGION OF THE FLANGE. VERY SMALL VARIATION IN OTHER DIRECTIONS. # DPD FOR LARGER r IS MUCH SMALLER AND THERE IS SMALL BUMP FOR “PIECES” CLOSE TO THE + y DIRECTION AND VERY SMALL FLUCTUATION FOR THE REST OF THE ANGLES. 16

BP#1 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES. 5 SC#1+ SC#2 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES ( LIMITED TO “HOT” REGION). 17

X CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION < r < 11.0 cm dr = 1.0 cm N r = 1 bins < z < 0.0 cm dz = 10.0 cm N z = 10 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 120 ''pieces'' ONLY THE FIRST 1 cm TUBE VOLUME OF THE 2 cm STST THICK BP#2 WAS USED. 6 IDS120j: yz ( LEFT ) AND yx ( RIGHT ) CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#1 SEGMENTATION. y z 18 IDS120j: yz ( LEFT ) AND yx ( RIGHT ) CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE SC#1+2 SEGMENTATION < r < cm dr = 10.0 cm N r = 3 bins < z < cm dz = 20.0 cm N z = 12 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 432 ''pieces'' ONLY THE AREA WITH HIGHEST AVERAGE AZIMUTHAL DPD ( DETERMINED FROM MARS PLOTS ) WAS STUDIED.

19 IDS120j: DPD AZIMUTHAL VARIATION FOR “PIECES” IN SC#1+2 WITH r= 125 cm

SUM OF DP FROM 120 PIECES : kW DP FROM REST OF BP#1 : kW TOTAL DP IN BP#1 : kW BP#1 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # ~ 100 kW ( 223 kW --> 322 kW ) MORE POWER IS DEPOSITED IN BP#1 ( 2 cm THICK, 100 cm LONG, STST BEAM PIPE ) AROUND THE TARGET REGION WITHOUT THE RESISTIVE MAGNETS. THIS IS DUE TO THE DIFFERENT MAGNETIC FIELD PROFILE IN THAT REGION AS WELL AS DUE TO THE DIFFERENT INTERACTION CROSS ANLGE BETWEEN Hg JET AND PROTON BEAM. FINALLY THIS IS ALSO DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE BEAM PIPE VOLUME IS ALSO LARGER SINCE THE INNER RADIUS OF THE PIPE HAS INCREASED FROM 7.5 cm TO 10 cm WIHOUT THE RESISTIVE MAGNETS. # LOWEST DP IS EXPECTED ALONG THE + y DIRECTION WHILE MOST OF THE DP IS BETWEEN 255 AND 285 DEGREES ( - y DIRECTION ). ALONG THE AXIAL DIRECTION MOST OF THE ENERGY IN THE PIPE IS CONCENTRATED IN THE REGION ~ [ – 50, 0.0 ] cm. # DPD ( max) ~ 8.5 W/g APPEARS TO BE AT ( r, z, phi ) = ( 10.5 cm, -25 cm, 255 deg). THAT IS ABOUT 2-3 W/g LESS THAN THE PEAK DPD IN BP#1 WITH THE RESISTIVE COILS PRESENT. 8 IDS120j: DPD AZIMUTHAL VARIATION FOR “PIECES” IN SC#1+2 WITH r= 135 cm 20

IDS120j: DPD AZIMUTHAL VARIATION FOR “PIECES” IN SC#1+2 WITH r= 145 cm 21

SUM OF DP FROM 432 PIECES : kW DP FROM REST OF SC# kW TOTAL DP IN SC#1+2 : kW SC#1+2 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # ~ 0.26 kW ( kW --> kW ) DECRASE IN THE SC#1+SC#2 DEPOSITED POWER WITOUT THE RESISTIVE COILS. # DPD ( max) ~ mW/g APPEARS TO BE AT ( r, z, phi ) = ( 125 cm, -25 cm, 285 deg). # OVERALL LOWEST DP IS EXPECTED ALONG THE + y DIRECTION AND MAXIMUM DP IN THE LOWER HALF OF THE COILS. FOR THE INNER RADIUS “PIECES” THE PEAK DPD ~ 0.03 mW/g ~ [ - 40, 60 ] cm z- REGION, FOR THE MIDDLE RADIUS “PIECES THE PEAK DPD ~ mW/g ~ [ - 20, 60 ] cm z- REGION, FOR THE OUTER RADIUS “PIECES THE PEAK DPD ~ 0.01 mW/g ~ [ - 20, 20 ] cm z- REGION. 22

BP#1 AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES. 5 Be WINDOW AZIMUTHAL DPD DISTRIBUTION STUDIES. 23

X CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#2 SEGMENTATION < r < 11.0 cm dr = 1.0 cm N r = 1 bins < z < 0.0 cm dz = 10.0 cm N z = 10 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 120 ''pieces'' ONLY THE FIRST 1 cm TUBE VOLUME OF THE 2 cm STST THICK BP#2 WAS USED. 6 IDS120j: yz ( LEFT ) AND yx ( RIGHT ) CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE BP#1 SEGMENTATION. y z 24 x φ=0 o y φ=90 o IDS120j: yz ( LEFT ) AND yx ( RIGHT ) CROSS SECTION WITH DETAILS OF THE Be WINDOW SEGMENTATION. 0.0 < r < 18.0 cm dr = 2.0 cm N r = 9 bins < z < cm dz = 20.0 cm N z = 1 bins 0.0 < φ < deg. dφ = 30 deg. N φ = 12 bins N tot = 108 ''pieces”

25

SUM OF DP FROM 120 PIECES : kW DP FROM REST OF BP#1 : kW TOTAL DP IN BP#1 : kW BP#1 DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: kW # ~ 100 kW ( 223 kW --> 322 kW ) MORE POWER IS DEPOSITED IN BP#1 ( 2 cm THICK, 100 cm LONG, STST BEAM PIPE ) AROUND THE TARGET REGION WITHOUT THE RESISTIVE MAGNETS. THIS IS DUE TO THE DIFFERENT MAGNETIC FIELD PROFILE IN THAT REGION AS WELL AS DUE TO THE DIFFERENT INTERACTION CROSS ANLGE BETWEEN Hg JET AND PROTON BEAM. FINALLY THIS IS ALSO DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE BEAM PIPE VOLUME IS ALSO LARGER SINCE THE INNER RADIUS OF THE PIPE HAS INCREASED FROM 7.5 cm TO 10 cm WIHOUT THE RESISTIVE MAGNETS. # LOWEST DP IS EXPECTED ALONG THE + y DIRECTION WHILE MOST OF THE DP IS BETWEEN 255 AND 285 DEGREES ( - y DIRECTION ). ALONG THE AXIAL DIRECTION MOST OF THE ENERGY IN THE PIPE IS CONCENTRATED IN THE REGION ~ [ – 50, 0.0 ] cm. # DPD ( max) ~ 8.5 W/g APPEARS TO BE AT ( r, z, phi ) = ( 10.5 cm, -25 cm, 255 deg). THAT IS ABOUT 2-3 W/g LESS THAN THE PEAK DPD IN BP#1 WITH THE RESISTIVE COILS PRESENT. 8 SUM OF DP FROM 108 PIECES : 4.1 kW DP FROM REST OF Be WIND. : 2.92 kW TOTAL DP IN Be WIND. : 7.0 kW Be WIND. DP WITHOUT SEGMENTATION: 7.57 kW # ~ 1.6 kW ( 5.95 kW --> 7.57 kW ) INCREASE IN THE Be WINDOW DEPOSITED POWER WITOUT THE RESISTIVE COILS. # DPD ( max) ~ W/g APPEARS TO BE AT ( r, z, phi ) = ( 1 cm, cm, 105 deg). # OVERALL MORE DP IS EXPECTED IN THE UPPER HALF OF THE WINDOW THAN IN THE LOWER HALF. PEAK VALUES OF DPD NEAR THE CENTER OF THE WINODW ARE OF THE ORDER OF ~ W/g IN THE UPPER HALF PIECES FOR A 0.5 cm THICK WINDOW. THE DPD IS OF THE ORDER OF TENTHS OF W/g WITHIN A 3 cm RADIUS FOR OTHER DIRECTIONS. 26