PETS TESTING ANALYSIS 4 th X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting 3 rd May 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for CLIC collaboration.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

3 GHz SICA: Breakdown measurement in CTF Alexey Dubrovskiy CLIC Workshop January 29, 2013.

Advertisements

Breakdown Rate Dependence on Gradient and Pulse Heating in Single Cell Cavities and TD18 Faya Wang, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen May 1, 2010.

11/27/2007ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop Mike Neubauer 1 RF Power and Cooling Requirements Overview from “Main Linac Power and Cooling Information”

5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program. May 2011 Review of waveguide components development for CLIC I. Syratchev,

Automatic Conditioning J. Alberto Rodriguez. Outline Purpose of an automatic conditioning system General overview Fast signals Long term access to data:

Structure testing and RF tests stands Jan Kovermann CERN On behalf of the CLIC structure test team.

High gradient test results from X-BOX1 Ben Woolley XBOX Team CERN, Switzerland February 2014.

Development of an X-band Dielectric PETS C. Jing, Euclid Techlabs / ANL HG Workshop, May

Report from KEK High gradient study results from Nextef (+ other related activities) LCWS2011, Granada Sep. 27, 2011 T. Higo.

CTF3 Laser Status Massimo Petrarca CLIC January

Recent 30 GHz CTF2 M. Gerbaux, S. Döbert, Jan Kovermann, R. Zennaro.

1 X-band Single Cell and T18_SLAC_2 Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen Jul

Working Group 1: Microwave Acceleration Summary 10 July 2009.

High-gradient Experiments with Narrow Waveguides Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Noboru Kudo, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda, Mitsuo Akemoto,

R. Corsini, CLIC Project Meeting - 24 th May 2013 CTF3 1 CTF3: Highlights of the 1 st run R. Corsini for the CTF3 Team 1.

Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.

High power RF capabilities From Two 50 MW Klystrons Variable iris Variable Delay line length through variable mode converter Gate Valves Two experimental.

Walter Wuensch CLIC project meeting, 31 March 2015 Accelerating structure program: design and testing.

CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.

Test Facilities Sami Tantawi SLAC. Summary of SLAC Facilities NLCTA (3 RF stations, one Injector, one Radiation shielding) – Two 240ns pulse compressor,

HIGH RF POWER TESTING FOR THE CLIC PETS International Workshop on Linear Colliders 20 th October 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for the CLIC team with.

30 GHz waveguide line modification towards 12 GHz.

R&D proposals for EuCard 2 EuCard2, April 21Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  SRF basic research (W. Weingarten)  CTF3 and CTF3+, possible infra - structure for.

J. Haimson and B. Mecklenburg Haimson Research Corporation FG02-05ER84362 Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy SBIR Grant.

Test Facilities and Component Developments Sami Tantawi SLAC May 15, 2008.

TBL as a 12 GHz power source, overview and first results from commissioning IWLC 2010 workshopSteffen Döbert, BE-RF  Current status of TBL  Status of.

Analysis of TBTS high-gradient testing and breakdown kick measurements Overview of on-going studies Preliminary results 2012 Feb. 291 RF structure development.

An RF & High-Speed Acquisition Systems for High-Gradient Tests at CLIC Test Facility Raquel Fandos.

CLIC meeting, Prospects for developing new tubes I. Syratchev, CERN.

Recent High-gradient test result at KEK Linear Collider Workshop 2012 Arlington, Texas (WebEx) 25 October, 2012 Toshi Higo and X-band group of KEK.

Two-beam Test Stand Status and Results Roger Ruber & Igor Syratchev for the TBTS team.

PBG Structure Experiments, AAC 2008 Photonic Bandgap Accelerator Experiments Roark A. Marsh, Michael A. Shapiro, Richard J. Temkin Massachusetts Institute.

Recent high-gradient results, rf testing, places and plans Steffen Döbert, CLIC Workshop, Test facilities High gradient results Future testing.

J.L. Navarro (CERN), for the CLIC/CTF3 collaboration.

Summary of progress towards CLIC goals and next steps for structure testing 6 th X-band collaboration workshop, April 18 th- 20 th 2012 Steffen Döbert,

KEK workshopWalter Wuensch18 April 2012 Status and objectives of the CLIC X-band and high- gradient activity.

Jose Alberto Rodriguez.  Describe how we currently characterize structures at CTF3  Describe how we want to improve the characterization  Learn from.

EnEfficient RF Sources Workshop. June 2014 I. Syratchev X-band high RF power testing activity at CERN I.Syratchev.

High gradient study at KEK CLIC08, Oct , 2008 T. Higo.

Modulators for DB klystrons: requirements and plans for developments Serge Pittet, David Nisbet TE EPC.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Kirk Davis.

KCS and RDR 10 Hz Operation Chris Adolphsen BAW2, SLAC 1/20/2011.

TD18 High Power Test Results Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen May 3, 2010.

W. Wuensch CLIC project meeting High-power rf structure testing.

ON/OFF news. Reflected Transmitted Stroke 8.0 mm RF power, dB Piston position (gap width), mm ON OFF Compact design of the high RF power variable (mechanically)

Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda Accelerator Laboratory, KEK.

Some Results and Analysis from CTF3 1HG2012-April-18 Some Results and Analysis from CTF3 W. Farabolini - A. Palaia.

Comparison of breakdown behavior between klystron and beam driven structure W. Farabolini With the support of J. Kovermann, B. Woolley, J. Tagg 1HG2013.

Review of the rf working group of the ICFA Mini Workshop on Novel Accelerators and Colliders which was associated with the Bob Siemann Memorial Symposium.

Some information from Nextef For poster session in IWLC T. Higo.

High gradient test results from X-BOX1 Ben Woolley XBOX Team CERN, Switzerland December 2013.

RF phase & amplitude stability of the CTF klystrons By Dubrovskiy Alexey 4 February 20091CLIC beam physics meeting And thanks to Frank Tecker and Daniel.

Update on PETS experiments (Igor for the CLIC collaboration)

X-Band Test Stands: Conditioning and Operational Algorithms Joseph Tagg National Instruments Switzerland.

2010 TESTING PROGRAM AND RESULTS FOR THE CLIC PETS X-BAND WORKSHOP ON RF STRUCTURES, BEAM DYNAMICS AND SOURCES 2 nd December 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti.

TBL experimental program, evolution to RF power testing in TBL ACE 2011, February 2-3Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  Current status of TBL  Experimental program.

Prospects for developing new tubes

Multi-stage pulse compressor

News from TBTS International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders,

CLIC RF Structure Development Mtg, Alexey Dubrovskiy and CTF team

Application of moderate (5 MW) X-band power sources for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program and other projects I. Syratchev, CERN.

Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.

Brief Review of Microwave Dielectric Accelerators

Review of rf structure test results

12 GHz High Power RF components requirements for CEA activities

CLIC Drive Beam Klystron Modulators

Recent high-gradient testing results from the CLIC XBoxes

CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3

3 GHz and 30 GHz Conditioning Programs

T18_VG2.4_Disk_#2 processing summary

Presentation transcript:

PETS TESTING ANALYSIS 4 th X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting 3 rd May 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for CLIC collaboration

OUTLINE The PETS should generate 133 MWx240ns pulses from the 12 GHz, 100 A drive beam and deliver this power to the main beam accelerating structure. Summary of the PETS processing ▫CERN - Beam driven  CTF3 ▫SLAC - Klystron driven (up to 300MW, 60Hz rep. rate)  High power processing performed by S. Tantawi, J. Lewandowski, A. Vlieks, J. Zelinski, V. Dolgashev with great support from the SLAC klystron Lab.

SLAC – Experiment layout ASTA. General purpose test stand. Allows to process diverse high RF power equipment at X-band. The facility can provide pulse length and power level very flexibly. CLIC PETS RF power in the ASTA compressed arm

Energy Average power Peak power CLIC target Cumulative breakdowns # 240 ns 130 ns OCT-NOV 2009 PROCESSING RESULTS

Getting a ‘flat’ pulse

Breakdowns “sifting” criteria Events with no dark current bursts (azure) but high reflection (green). We assume that the channels were not properly calibrated. These events appeared only at the very beginning of the processing period. The dark current burst appear after the RF pulse (no pulse shortening). This kind of event will be practically CLIC-undetectable and will not affect the acceleration. Cluster accident. In general the system should not allow such an event, thus we considered the cluster as a single breakdown b.d. 300 b.d. Missing energy is sensibly measurable for ~10% of the total breakdowns #.

(ASTA setting period) (flat pulse) Energy Average power Peak power CLIC target Mean av.=137 MW Mean peak=147.6 MW Typical ‘rectangular’ Pulse shape CLIC target 2x10 6 Total 3.4x10 6 Mean av.=112 MW Mean peak=118.6 MW NOV 2009

Zoom Cluster type: Breakdown occurs on next pulse Recovery type: Breakdowns start after RF down time (~20s) BreakdownPre-breakdown Input Output Reflected 240 ns Current monitor BREAKDOWN STATISTICS Average Raw data are recorded approximately every 1s. Breakdown event acquisition. Threshold exceeded in the current monitor and/or reflected signal channel. Breakdown recovery. RF power is kept down for ~20s. Vacuum trip recovery. Power is slowly (~30 sec) ramped up towards the former level. Raw data from the diodes Total: 28 BD

Cluster#1 (6 BD)Cluster#2 (3 BD) Accident #1 Accident #2 RF power ramp PETS vacuum trip System vacuum down time ~ 10min Cluster 1 (6 BD) Cluster 2 (3 BD) Zoom Cluster#1 (6 BD) System vacuum down time ~10m Recovery type (8 BD) ~20s RF down time ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION 1. Breakdowns cluster  accident. Sharp increase of missing energy. 2. Hypothesis: clustered breakdowns initiate the pressure build-up in the PETS  klystrons are tripped by vacuum interlocks. It takes ~10m to recover. 3. RF power ramping. During this period (Recovery type) the RF power is tripped for ~20 s after each breakdown and is restarted from the previous level (is vacuum in the PETS still high?). Recovery breakdowns occurred only after cluster event and were not observed after individual breakdown and thus may be considered as a part of the accident. For the breakdown statistic: this type of accident should count as a single event with parameters attributed to the first breakdown in a cluster. Pre-pulse Average

TRANSMITTED PULSES CURRENT MONITOR A grand total of 8 breakdowns was found. We may exclude the events where the current appears after the RF signal (Pulses 2, 7). Pulses 4, 5 could be removed too, since they belong to the high power level group (+10%). 1,3,6 and 8 are the remaining breakdowns; 1,3, 8 have very little missing energy ~ 1% and are not CLIC-detectable; however we should treat them as a breakdown. First in a cluster#1 First in a cluster#

CONCLUSIONS The impact that accidents have on the tests affects reliability  different processing approaches? Reprocess pulse length, rather than amplitude? Increase recovery time after vacuum tripping? The in-depth study concerning the November ‘flat-pulse processing’ highlighted 4 breakdowns over 15 hours at ~ 137 MW and 260 ns pulses  ~ 1.2x10 -6 BD/PETS/ pulse. At 112 MW and 260 ns, there were no breakdowns registered in 10 hours.  BDR < 4.6x10 -7 /PETS/ pulse (design: <3x10 -7 ). The new PETS has been built and running it equipped with damping material is what comes next.