S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sander Klous on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Real-Time May /5/20101.
Advertisements

TRT LAr Tilecal MDT-RPC BOS Pixels&SCT 1 The Atlas combined testbeam Thijs Cornelissen, NIKHEF Jamboree, Nijmegen, December 2004.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
Current status of LVL1 Muon-Endcap Trigger simulation Tadashi MAENO ( CERN ) for the developers of TGC simulation code TDAQ-week in LISBON ( 23th Oct.
Report from the Muon Trigger WG Aleandro Nisati On behalf of the Muon Trigger Slice Community Muon Week, April 18° 2007.
20 Feb LVL1 muon trigger simulation meeting1 the OO codes for endcap muon trigger simulation Hisaya Kurashige KOBE Univ.
Stefania.Spagnolo, Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce CERN, Nov. 2006, ATLAS Trigger and Physics week Muon Event Filter Stefania Spagnolo Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce.
ATLAS Muon test beam, E. Etzion, NSS System Test of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer in the H8 Beam at the CERN SPS Erez Etzion (Tel Aviv University),
New muon EF trigger with offline supertools Sergio Grancagnolo INFN Lecce & Salento University.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
1 Raw Event : ByteStream implementation Muon Workshop, April 2002 A. Nisati, for the Muon Trigger group.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
The digitization procedure occurs separately for each Muon technology, MDT, CSC, RPC and TGC. Here the main steps of each MuonHits to Muon Digits conversion.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
The Pixel Detector ByteStream Converter M.Cobal (1), L. Santi (2) (1) University of Udine and INFN Trieste, Italy (2) University of Trieste and INFN Trieste,
Requirements for a Next Generation Framework: ATLAS Experience S. Kama, J. Baines, T. Bold, P. Calafiura, W. Lampl, C. Leggett, D. Malon, G. Stewart, B.
1 Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) and the HLT.
1 Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) and the HLT.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
Gnam Monitoring Overview M. Della Pietra, D. della Volpe (Napoli), A. Di Girolamo (Roma1), R. Ferrari, G. Gaudio, W. Vandelli (Pavia) D. Salvatore, P.
Trigger Requirements first thoughts from Alessandro Di Mattia, Giovanni Siragusa, Sergio Grancagnolo, Andrea Ventura, Michela Biglietti, Diana Scannicchio.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=10 31 cm -2 s -1 Sergio Grancagnolo on behalf of the Muon Trigger software group.
ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 B-Physics Trigger Working Group Status Report
24/06/03 ATLAS WeekAlexandre Solodkov1 Status of TileCal software.
Progress report on Muon Reconstruction based on Kalman filter Y. Fisyak, BNL.
Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.
AMB HW LOW LEVEL SIMULATION VS HW OUTPUT G. Volpi, INFN Pisa.
Navigation Timing Studies of the ATLAS High-Level Trigger Andrew Lowe Royal Holloway, University of London.
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
1 Moore Packages, Repackaging and Design Status Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Gabriella Cataldi INFN/Lecce.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
Muon Reconstruction with Moore and MuonIdentification The Moore/MUID group Atlas Physics Workshop Athens, May 2003.
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
Muon Event Filter Status Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the muon EF working group INFN Lecce & Salento University.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
FTKSim Status and plans FTK Meeting 07/13/2006 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, P. Giannetti.
Claudio Grandi INFN-Bologna CHEP 2000Abstract B 029 Object Oriented simulation of the Level 1 Trigger system of a CMS muon chamber Claudio Grandi INFN-Bologna.
4/9/2007RPC converter1/18 RPC bytestream converter: Brainstorming a summary of discussions involving M.Bianco, G.Cataldi, G.Chiodini, E.Gorini, A.Guida,
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
Trigger LVL1/LVL2 Makers. CERN, december 2001 Gabriella Cataldi-INFN Lecce Trigger (Level 2) Makers: MooiPatTrackSegmentMaker MooiPatTrackMaker MooTrigClusters.
A Level-2 trigger algorithm for the identification of muons in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Alessandro Di Mattia on behalf of the Atlas TDAQ group Computing.
Moore/MUID validation with The MOORE group.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Ivo van Vulpen Summary ATLAS Trigger and Physics week November 2006
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
Status of Digitization, Testbeam Simulation, and Production ATLAS Muon Week -CERN, February 18th 2005 Daniela Rebuzzi – Pavia University and INFN.
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
4 Dec., 2001 Software Week Data flow in the LArG Reconstruction software chain Updated status for various reconstruction algorithm LAr Converters and miscellaneous.
Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.
Muon identification in ATLAS Peter Kluit (NIKHEF).
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=1031
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
Barrel RPC Conditions Database
A new algorithm for the LVL1muon Trigger simulation
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Muon Trigger Software Status
integration in HLT-status and prospects
Moore LVL2 interface and Moore status
M.Biglietti (Univ. Naples and INFN Naples)
Presentation transcript:

S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress

Moore for H8 test-beam ByteStream format implemented in read out classes: easier to move eventually to different formats MDT and RPC ROD data decoding as in HLT converters - The converters are filling the new muon EDM Code usable by everyone, upgrades following Athena releases Ntuples for the analysis Conditions data as calibrations (from Calib) and electronic mappings Athena services available to all algorithms (MuonTBCalibrationSvc, MuonTBCablingSvc) Initialized from plan ASCII files (located in the Athena repository) First tests being performed using the I nterval O f V alidity Service (see dedicated talk by Katharina Mair (Calibration and Alignement session on Wednesday afternoon14:00)

Ntuples are intended as an analysis tool for MDT and RPC, and reconstruction Example: comparison between MDT track segment extrapolation on RPC planes and RPC hits position (from MOORE reconstruction) Moore - H8 test-beam (I)

Moore - H8 test-beam (II) MOORE MDT segments reconstruction (calibrations from Calib) For the full 3-dim reconstruction the standard MOORE ntuple can be used Chambers misalignments 180 GeV beam Barrel sagitta Angle between segments reconstructed in BIL and BML station Angle between segments reconstructed in BIL and BOL station Angle between segments reconstructed in BML and BOL station

TrigMoore: Implementation of MOORE/MuID in the framework of High Level Trigger at the Event Filter stage. Wrapped Strategy- Allows to execute the offline reconstruction chain from the online environment, reconstructing the event by accessing at all the Spectrometer data. The implemented chain is composed by Moore and MuidStandAlone performing an extrapolation of tracks reconstructed by MOORE to the interaction point. Seeded Strategy – Uses the hypotesys formed at the previous stage in the trigger process, accessing only to subdetectors data that are of interest for the selected trigger regions. (By now only regions selected by the LVL1 trigger have been used). Moore in HLT- TrigMoore

Moore in HLT- a contact point between offline and online. Main ideas The algorithms operating in the High Level Trigger at the Event Filter stage should not operate only in a general purpose mode (reconstructing the event in full scan) but should be able to operate starting from hypothesys formed in the previous stages of the triggering process. Avoid the code duplication! Only the seeding has an ``ad hoc’’ implementation for the online environment. RecMuonRoI (  ±     ±   ) RegionSelector Hash offline IDs DigitsCollection (RPCs and MDTs) RPCDigitContainer MDTDigitContainer TDS (ZEBRA) MooMakePhiSegmentSeeded MooMakeRZSegmentSeeded PhiSegmentContainer RZSegmentContainer (TDS) MooMakeRoads MooMakeTracks Tracks MooHLTAlgo decision

TrigMoore timing tests (I) Atlas pcatr machine (2.4GHz) Atlas pcatr machine (2.4GHz) OPT build OPT build Timing package: TrigTools/TrigTime Timing package: TrigTools/TrigTime Strategies Seeded/wrapped Strategies Seeded/wrapped Conservative approach (i.e. data access and data preparation are included) Timing test performed on release DC1 single Muons execution times TailsTails

TrigMoore timing tests(II) DC1 single Muons execution times Timing test performed on release The use (from ATLAS release 6.6) of Compact Identifiers and the changes introduced in the fitter can influence the timing In the table the average and rms is calculated on the events left after rejecting 5% of the events included in the high execution time tail In the table the average and rms is calculated on the events left after rejecting 5% of the events included in the high execution time tail Wrapped, Full event Reconstruction Seeded: Access only the RoI from the LVL1 p T (GeV/c) (msec) rms (msec) (msec) rms (msec) X X Single Muons + Pile up

TrigMoore timing efficiency A time efficiency has been defined as the ratio between the number of reconstructed tracks in one second and the total number of reconstructed tracks A time efficiency has been defined as the ratio between the number of reconstructed tracks in one second and the total number of reconstructed tracks DC1 single Muons Average on events with time<1sec Mean time almost constant over Pt Wrapped mode times rather similar

Wrapped strategy |  | < 1.05 Strategy seeded |  | < 1.05 Strategy wrapped |  | < 1.05 Efficiency for the reconstruction of single Muons sample in wrapped strategy (event scan). This is equivalent to the execution of the offline version of the code. The analysis has been restricted to the barrel region in order to be directly compared with the seeded strategy. (LVL1/LVL2 restricted to the barrel) Resolution in wrapped and seeded strategy.

Present and Future work on TrigMoore. TrigMoore in release towards Migration to gcc3.2 accomplished Wrapped strategy (working) Seeded strategy (MOORE not started-investigating) When running in the main release more general changes have to be considered (e.g. Compact Identifiers- Id Helpers- changes in the fitter). Those changes effect the MOORE execution time. Timing table has to be evaluated once again and the optimization of the time consuming algorithmic part has to be accomplished Implementation of the complete Muon slice Read LVL2 output results Efficiency curves and trigger rates Calculation of efficiency curves and trigger rates using single muons sample Calculation of efficiency curves and trigger rates using realistic event samples EventFilter Selection on Physic samples RPC bytestream converters Full online implementation of TrigMoore- The data access via ByteStream has not been considered up to now from MOORE. Also in this case we expect a change in the timing performance.

Moore and the CSC s Moore can now understand the CSC  strips, but we don’t have data with properly simulated CSCs  digits (only specially simulated samples have been used) The current version of MOORE does not give better results with the old data since in these data the CSC  digits don’t have the charge information

Conclusions … for more information: Moore as Event Filter in the ATLAS High Level Trigger ATL-SOFT , ATL-DAQ Track reconstruction in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer with MOORE ATL-SOFT