Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

Complete Street Analysis of a Road Diet Orange Grove Boulevard Pasadena, CA Aaron Elias Engineering Associate Kittelson & Associates Bill Cisco Senior.
Metro Transit INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)
Bus Priority in Portland - Lessons Learned
The Downtown Seattle Bus Monitoring System Collecting and Analyzing Transit Travel Time Data Owen Kehoe, PE, PTOE King County Metro Transit : Seattle,
GIS Data in Real-Time Transit Management Systems 2011 GIS in Public Transportation Conference St. Petersburg, FL, September 14, 2011.
CITY OF MIAMI CITY OF MIAMI. Health District Traffic Study July 21, 2008 Miami Partnership.
Matt’s Schedule. Headway Variation Estimated Load vs. Passenger Movement.
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
SFMTA / SJSU Copartnership Kickoff 10 | 15 | 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SFMTA Municipal Transportation Agency Image: Historic Car number 1 and 162.
1 Reliability-Based Timepoint Schedules for Long Headway Transit Routes Peter G. Furth, Northeastern University with Theo H.J. Muller, Delft University.
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
WMATA Bus ITS Project Update Transit Signal Priority Briefing to the Traffic Signals and Operations Working Group April 21, 2005.
Geometry information from Liufang Ave. North in Beijing Green phase (s): 99,77,66,75,60 Dwell time distribution: N (30,9), N (27,7), N (24,6) Maximal bandwidth:
Transit Signal Priority Work Group Report 7/30/13
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
Mobile Transit Planning with Real Time Data Jerald Jariyasunant, Dan Work, Branko Kerkez, Eric Mai Systems Engineering Program, Dept. of Civil and Environmental.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Five-Year Mass Transit Fund Financial Forecast April 6,
TSP Must Fit Within An Overall Agency ITS Plan. Transit Priority Data Needs Vehicle Location –Speed Door & Lift Status –Predictions Passenger Counting.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
APTS – Fourth Day Miscellaneous Topics. Fleet Management Fixed Route versus Paratransit Operations versus Maintenance.
Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida Technology Session: 21 st Annual Transportation Disadvantaged Best Practices and.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Chun Wong, P.E. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation T3 Webinar.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Evolving TSP to meet the needs of the ITS community 1.
Evaluating Robustness of Signal Timings for Conditions of Varying Traffic Flows 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 16, 2013.
ITS for BRT Systems: How Does Boston’s Silver Line Compare With Other BRT Systems? Carol Schweiger, Assistant Vice President ITS Georgia Annual Meeting.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
Travel Speed Study of Urban Streets Using GPS &GIS Tom E. Sellsted City of Yakima, Washington Information Systems and Traffic.
1 Combined Arterial Performance Status Report Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory Maseeh College of Engineering and Computer Science Portland.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
TRB 88th Annual Meeting, Washington DC January, 2009 Huan Li and Robert L. Bertini Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting Washington, DC January.
Shri Vaishnav SM Institute of Management, Indore Department of Computer Science Minor Project : MCA 406 ( ) App For Transportation Presented by:
The Transit “T” Craig Lamothe UPA Transit Project Manager City of Minneapolis City of Lakes Innovative Choices for Congestion Relief.
US DOT Planning for Operations Initiative – An Update AASHTO SCOH Annual Meeting June 14-17, 2009 Manchester, NH Rick Backlund – FHWA Office of Operations.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Timetabling Components Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
1 Challenge the future Feed forward mechanisms in public transport Data driven optimisation dr. ir. N. van Oort Assistant professor public transport EMTA.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overcoming Multi-Jurisdictional Challenges Lessons Learned Implementing Bus Signal Priority.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP): Deployment Issues and R&D Needs as Identified by Practitioners Hallie Smith Brendon Hemily.
ITS Lab Members  Ph.D Student in Civil Engineering  Areas of Interest  Freeway Management and Operation  Transit Operation  Intelligent Transportation.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference Implementing a BRT Project: The Preliminary Steps 8:30 – 9:50 a.m. Frank SpielbergBMI-SG Incoming Chair, TRB.
1 Using Automatic Vehicle Location Data to Determine Detector Placement Robert L. Bertini, Christopher Monsere, Michael Wolfe and Mathew Berkow Portland.
Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
Using Signal Systems Data and Buses as Probes to Create Arterial Performance Measures Mathew Berkow, Michael Wolfe, John Chee, Robert Bertini,
TDTIMS Overview What is TDTIMS? & Why Do We Do It?
1 NATMEC 2008 Christopher Monsere Robert L. Bertini, Mathew Berkow, and Michael Wolfe Intelligent Transportation Systems Laboratory Maseeh College of Engineering.
Prince William County Potomac River Commuter Ferry Study & Route Proving Exercise A Summary of Project Purpose and Results Presented by: Charles “Cody”
Transit Signal Priority: Managing Expectations Kevin N. Balke, Ph.D., P.E TransLink ® Research Center Director Texas Transportation Institute Transportation.
30th CAITR University of Western Australia December 12, 2008 Robert L. Bertini and Huan Li Conference for the Australian Institutes of Transport Research.
Abstract The City of Portland, in collaboration with TriMet (Portland’s regional transit service provider) and the Oregon Department of Transportation,
Overview of King County Transit Signal Priority Program T3 Webinar January 22, 2008.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
1 TRB 88 th Annual Meeting January 12, 2009 – TRB 88 th Annual Meeting Mathew Berkow, Robert L. Bertini, Christopher Monsere, Michael Wolfe, Portland State.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Photos by Susie Fitzhugh Bell Times Analysis Task Force Getting students to and from school safely January 22 nd 2015.
Analysis of current practices and procedures. WPS Transportation  Ensures the safe transport of almost 18,000 students  Since 2011 reduced the number.
Operations and Service Concept
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
Capital Trade-Offs Evaluated three major capital expenditure scenarios
Presentation transcript:

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation Research Board 83 rd Annual Meeting Workshop on Signal Control Priority for Transit Vehicles January 11, 2004

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data2 Project Partners

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data3 Increase person trips through selected traffic corridors while minimizing impacts on minor movements. Reduce transit running times. Improve transit schedule reliability: –Reduce running time variability. –Reduce excess time built into schedule to offset variability. Defer providing additional transit capacity. Tri-Met’s TSP Goals

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data4 Five traffic corridors now activated within the City of Portland. –180 signals activated. Now focusing on individual intersection “hot spots.” –Intersections analyzed for disproportionate delays to transit. –Anticipate approximately 120 additional intersections by early Project Status

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data5 TriMet AVL System Two Types of Data Collected Stops Data (Automatically Collected) - Information collected at each bus stop - Approximately 500,000 records per day Event Data (Operator Generated Data) - Special events at various locations - Approximately 25,000 records per day

6 Stops Data Bus Stop Location Actual Arrive Time Actual Leave Time Scheduled Time Dwell Door Opened Ons & Offs (APCs) Passenger Load Lift Usage Operator ID Maximum Speed Pass up Overload Traffic Delay Train/Bridge Delay Fare Evasion Graffiti/Vandalism Event Data

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data7 AVL System tracks bus location and schedule status. If conditions are met, bus emitter (Opticom) communicates priority request to signal. Signal controller then grants priority request. TriMet TSP Overview

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data8 Emitter Activation Conditions

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data9

10 Comparison of transit performance from before TSP activation to after. Relies on AVL: –Locational and temporal performance data is currently collected for all bus routes and at every bus stop. –Schedule adherence as well as travel time between stops can easily be determined. –Since distance between stops is known, gross speeds (i.e., including stops) can be calculated. Evaluation Methodology

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data11 Location & time bus starts and stops meeting TSP thresholds is also recorded. TSP analysis segments defined as bus stop pairs in the vicinity of one or more signalized intersections. –Performance in areas affected by signal(s) can then be analyzed. –Separate segments are necessary for each direction. –Means of incorporating TSP analysis into GIS. Evaluation Methodology

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data12 Intersection Analysis Route 4 – Division, SE 82nd Ave. & SE Division St.

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data13 Intersection Analysis Route 4 – Division, SE 82nd Ave. & SE Division St.

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data14 Trip-Level Analysis *Prior to Implementation of TSP.

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data15 Preliminary Results Travel time reduction of 2-3 minutes achieved after TSP implementation on Line 12, a high frequency trunk line. –Potential annual operating cost saving of $13,000. June 2002 schedule re-written to remove one bus on Line 4 due to travel time and variability reductions. –Estimated annual operating cost savings of $60,000. –Estimated one-time capital cost savings of $300,000.

Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data16 Any Questions? David T. Crout