Topological Quantum Computing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Protected edge modes without symmetry Michael Levin University of Maryland.
Advertisements

Quasiparticle Scattering in 2-D Helical Liquid arXiv: X. Zhou, C. Fang, W.-F. Tsai, J. P. Hu.
One-dimensional approach to frustrated magnets
Exploring Topological Phases With Quantum Walks $$ NSF, AFOSR MURI, DARPA, ARO Harvard-MIT Takuya Kitagawa, Erez Berg, Mark Rudner Eugene Demler Harvard.
Anyon and Topological Quantum Computation Beijing Normal university
Quantum “disordering” magnetic order in insulators, metals, and superconductors HARVARD Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu Perimeter Institute, Waterloo,
Topological Quantum Computing Michael Freedman April 23, 2009.
Gavin Brennen Lauri Lehman Zhenghan Wang Valcav Zatloukal JKP Ubergurgl, June 2010 Anyonic quantum walks: The Drunken Slalom.
Quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAHE) and the quantum spin Hall effect (QSHE) Shoucheng Zhang, Stanford University Les Houches, June 2006.
Non-Abelian Anyon Interferometry Collaborators:Parsa Bonderson, Microsoft Station Q Alexei Kitaev, Caltech Joost Slingerland, DIAS Kirill Shtengel, UC.
Twist liquids and gauging anyonic symmetries
Fractional topological insulators
Jordan-Wigner Transformation and Topological characterization of quantum phase transitions in the Kitaev model Guang-Ming Zhang (Tsinghua Univ) Xiaoyong.
Revealing anyonic statistics by multiphoton entanglement Jiannis K. Pachos Witlef Wieczorek Christian Schmid Nikolai Kiesel Reinhold Pohlner Harald Weinfurter.
Majorana Fermions and Topological Insulators
Theoretical Considerations and Experimental Probes of the =5/2 Fractional Quantized Hall State by Bertrand I. Halperin, Harvard University talk given at.
A new scenario for the metal- Mott insulator transition in 2D Why 2D is so special ? S. Sorella Coll. F. Becca, M. Capello, S. Yunoki Sherbrook 8 July.
P460 - many particles1 Many Particle Systems can write down the Schrodinger Equation for a many particle system with x i being the coordinate of particle.
Probing and Manipulating Majorana Fermions in SO Coupled Atomic Fermi Gases Xia-Ji Liu CAOUS, Swinburne University Hawthorn, July.
Topological Insulators and Beyond
Observation of neutral modes in the fractional quantum hall effect regime Aveek Bid Nature (2010) Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science,
Heavy Fermions Student: Leland Harriger Professor: Elbio Dagotto Class: Solid State II, UTK Date: April 23, 2009.
Germán Sierra Instituto de Física Teórica CSIC-UAM, Madrid Talk at the 4Th GIQ Mini-workshop February 2011.
From Bits to Qubits Wayne Viers and Josh Lamkins
Quantum Spin Hall Effect and Topological Insulator Weisong Tu Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Tennessee Instructor: Dr. George Siopsis.
F.F. Assaad. MPI-Stuttgart. Universität-Stuttgart Numerical approaches to the correlated electron problem: Quantum Monte Carlo.  The Monte.
Introduction to fractional quantum Hall effect Milica V. Milovanović Institute of Physics Belgrade Scientific Computing Laboratory (Talk at Physics Faculty,
@Nagoya U. Sept. 5, 2009 Naoto Nagaosa Department of Applied Physics
Germán Sierra IFT-CSIC/UAM, Madrid in collaboration with Ignacio Cirac and Anne Nielsen MPQ,Garching Workshop: ”New quantum states of matter in and out.
Dung-Hai Lee U.C. Berkeley Quantum state that never condenses Condense = develop some kind of order.
1 Topological Quantum Phenomena and Gauge Theories Kyoto University, YITP, Masatoshi SATO.
Berry Phase Effects on Electronic Properties
© Simon Trebst Interactions and disorder in topological quantum matter Simon Trebst University of Cologne Simon Trebst University of Cologne January 2012.
Correlated States in Optical Lattices Fei Zhou (PITP,UBC) Feb. 1, 2004 At Asian Center, UBC.
Introduction to even-denominator FQHE: composite fermions Tejas Deshpande Journal club: 11 November, 2014.
Topological Insulators and Topological Band Theory
Quantum Glassiness and Topological Overprotection Quantum Glassiness and Topological Overprotection Claudio Chamon DMR PRL 05, cond-mat/
1 The Topological approach to building a quantum computer. Michael H. Freedman Theory Group Microsoft Research.
Ady Stern (Weizmann) Papers: Stern & Halperin , PRL
Energy Levels Each energy level has a number called the PRINCIPAL QUANTUM NUMBER, n Each energy level has a number called the PRINCIPAL QUANTUM NUMBER,
Atoms in optical lattices and the Quantum Hall effect Anders S. Sørensen Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen.
F Matrix: F F F F F Pentagon Fusion rules: 1x1 = 0+1; 1x0 = 0x1 = 1; 0x0 = 0 Fibonacci anyon with topological “charge” 1.
Fractional Statistics of Quantum Particles D. P. Arovas, UCSD Major ideas:J. M. Leinaas, J. Myrheim, R. Jackiw, F. Wilczek, M. V. Berry, Y-S. Wu, B. I.
A quest for Pfaffian Milica V. Milovanović Institute of Physics Belgrade Scientific Computing Laboratory (Talk at Physics Faculty, Belgrade, 2010)
Kazuki Hasebe 14 – 19 Dec. Miami 2010, USA (Kagawa N.C.T.) Based on the works (2009,2010) with Daniel P. Arovas, Xiaoliang Qi, Shoucheng Zhang,
Disordering of a quantum Hall superfluid M.V. Milovanovic, Institute of Physics, Belgrade, Serbia.
The Puzzling Boundaries of Topological Quantum Matter Michael Levin Collaborators: Chien-Hung Lin (University of Chicago) Chenjie Wang (University of Chicago)
Basics of edge channels in IQHE doing physics with integer edge channels studies of transport in FQHE regime deviations from the ‘accepted’ picture Moty.
Chapter 4 Two-Level Systems, Spin. Two-level systems Let us start with the simplest non-trivial state space, with only two dimensions Despite its simplicity,
Entanglement and Topological order in self-dual cluster states Vlatko Vedral University of Oxford, UK & National University of Singapore.
Flat Band Nanostructures Vito Scarola
1 The 5/2 Edge IPAM meeting on Topological Quantum Computing February 26- March 2, 2007 MPA Fisher, with Paul Fendley and Chetan Nayak Motivation: FQHE:
Arnau Riera, Grup QIC, Dept. ECM, UB 16 de maig de 2009 Intoduction to topological order and topologial quantum computation.
From fractionalized topological insulators to fractionalized Majoranas
Fractional Berry phase effect and composite particle hole liquid in partial filled LL Yizhi You KITS, 2017.
Information-Theoretical Analysis of the Topological Entanglement Entropy and Multipartite correlations Kohtaro Kato (The University of Tokyo) based on.
Topological Insulators
Quantum Hall Fluids By Andrew York 12/5/2008.
QHE discovered by Von Klitzing in 1980
The Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom
Topological Order and its Quantum Phase Transition
D. Ferraro N. Magnoli M. Merlo
Charging and noise as probes of non-abelian quantum Hall states
Non- Abelian Quantum Hall States:
Topological Quantum Computing in (p + ip) Fermi Superfluids:
Topological quantum computing ▬ Toric code
Majorana Spin Diagnostics
Quantum Computing: the Majorana Fermion Solution
Ady Stern (Weizmann) The quantum Hall effects – introduction
Introduction to topological superconductivity and Majorana fermions
Presentation transcript:

Topological Quantum Computing Nick Bonesteel Florida State University F F R QIP 2016 Tutorial, Jan. 9, 2016

Hard Disk Drive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_disk_drive

Magnetic Order A spin-1/2 particle: “spin up” “spin down”

Magnetic Order A spin-1/2 particle: “spin up” “spin down” = 0

Magnetic Order A spin-1/2 particle: “spin up” “spin down” = 1

Another Kind of Order A valence bond:

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: Use periodic boundary conditions

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: 3 1 1 1

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: Odd 3 1 1 1

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: Odd 3 1 3 1

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: Odd 3 1 3 1

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: Odd 3 1 3 1

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: Odd 3 1 1 1

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: Quantum superposition of valence-bond states. A “spin liquid.” Odd

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: Even 2 2 2

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: Even 2 2

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: Even

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: |0 Odd 3 1 3 1

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: |0 Odd

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: |1 Even 2 2

Another Kind of Order A valence bond: |1 Even

Is it a 0 or a 1?

Is it a 0 or a 1?

Is it a |0 or a |1 ?

Is it a |0 or a |1 ?

Is it a |0 or a |1 ?

Topological Order (Wen & Niu, PRB 41, 9377 (1990)) Conventionally Ordered States: Multiple “broken symmetry” ground states characterized by a locally observable order parameter. magnetization magnetization Nature’s classical error correction Topologically Ordered States: Multiple ground states on topologically nontrivial surfaces with no locally observable order parameter. odd even Nature’s quantum error correction

Conventional Order: Excitations

Conventional Order: Excitations

Conventional Order: Excitations Magnon = one spin flip: Total Sz changes by +1

Topological Order: Excitations

Topological Order: Excitations

Topological Order: Excitations Breaking a bond creates an excitation with Sz = 1

Topological Order: Excitations Breaking a bond creates an excitation with Sz = 1

Topological Order: Excitations Breaking a bond creates an excitation with Sz = 1

Fractionalization Sz = 1 excitation fractionalizes into two Sz = ½ excitations

Fractional Quantum Hall States Electrons B A two dimensional gas of electrons in a strong magnetic field B.

Fractional Quantum Hall States Quantum Hall Fluid B An incompressible quantum liquid can form when the Landau level filling fraction n = nelec(hc/eB) is a rational fraction.

Charge Fractionalization Quasiparticles (charge = e/3 for n = 1/3) Electron (charge = e) When an electron is added to a FQH state it can be fractionalized --- i.e., it can break apart into fractionally charged quasiparticles.

Topological Degeneracy As in our spin-liquid example, FQH states on topologically nontrivial surfaces have degenerate ground states which can only be distinguished by global measurements. Degeneracy For the n = 1/3 state: 1 3 9 … 3N 1 N 2

“Non-Abelian” FQH States (Moore & Read ‘91) Fractionalized quasiparticles Essential features: A degenerate Hilbert space whose dimensionality is exponentially large in the number of quasiparticles. States in this space can only be distinguished by global measurements provided quasiparticles are far apart. A perfect place to hide quantum information!

Exchanging Particles in 2+1 Dimensions 1 time dimension 2 space dimensions Particle “world-lines” form braids in 2+1 (=3) dimensions

Exchanging Particles in 2+1 Dimensions Clockwise exchange Counterclockwise exchange Particle “world-lines” form braids in 2+1 (=3) dimensions

Many Non-Abelian Anyons f Y i Y = f time i Y

Many Non-Abelian Anyons f Y i Y = f time i Y

Robust quantum computation? Many Non-Abelian Anyons f Y i Y = f time i Y Matrix depends only on the topology of the braid swept out by anyon world lines! Robust quantum computation? Kitaev, ‘97 ; Freedman, Larsen, and Wang, ‘01

Possible Non-Abelian FQH States J.S. Xia et al., PRL (2004).

Possible Non-Abelian FQH States J.S. Xia et al., PRL (2004). = 5/2: Probable Moore-Read Pfaffian state. Charge e/4 quasiparticles are Majorana fermions. Moore & Read ‘91

Possible Non-Abelian FQH States J.S. Xia et al., PRL (2004). = 5/2: Probable Moore-Read Pfaffian state. Charge e/4 quasiparticles are Majorana fermions. Moore & Read ‘91 = 12/5: Possible Read-Rezayi “Parafermion” state. Read & Rezayi, ‘99 Charge e/5 quasiparticles are Fibonacci anyons. Slingerland & Bais ’01 Universal for Quantum Computation! Freedman, Larsen & Wang ’02

Enclosed “charge”

1

1

1

?

0 or 1

1

2 dimensional Hilbert space 1 2 dimensional Hilbert space

Need to measure all the way around both particles to determine what state they are in ? Quantum states are protected from environment if particles are kept far apart

1

1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1

3 dimensional Hilbert space 1 1 1 3 dimensional Hilbert space

3 dimensional Hilbert space 1 1 1 3 dimensional Hilbert space

a 1 a can be 0 or 1

a 1 b 1 a can be 0 or 1 b can be 0 or 1

The F Matrix a 1 b 1 a can be 0 or 1 b can be 0 or 1

The F Matrix F

1

1 1

1 1

1 1 Equivalent to

1 1 Equivalent to F

F 1 1 1 Equivalent to F

F 1 1 1 1 Equivalent to F

F

F F STOP HERE!

F F STOP HERE!

F F F

F F F F

F F F F F

F

The Pentagon Equation F

The Pentagon Equation 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 b 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 F0b b 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 F0b b b b 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 F0b b b b 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 F0b b b b 1 b

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 F0b b b b 1 b 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 F0b b b b 1 b 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 F0b b b b 1 b 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 F0b Fb0 b b b 1 b 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 F0b Fb0 1 Top path Bottom path 1 1 b b b 1 b 1 1 1 1 F0b Fb0 b b b 1 b 1 1 Top path Bottom path

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 b 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F0b b 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F0b b b b 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F0b b b b 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F0b b b b 1 b 1 1

The Pentagon Equation 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F0b b b b 1 b 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation F01 1 F0b db,0 + db,1 F11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 b b b 1 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F0b db,0 + db,1 F11 b b b 1 b 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation F01 1 F0b db,0 + db,1 F11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 b b b 1 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F0b db,0 + db,1 F11 b b b 1 b 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation F01 1 F0b Fb1 db,0 + db,1 F11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 b b 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F0b db,0 + db,1 F11 Fb1 b b b 1 b 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation F01 1 F0b Fb1 db,0 + db,1 F11 Top path Bottom 1 F01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F0b db,0 + db,1 F11 Fb1 Top path Bottom path b b b 1 b 1 1 1

The Pentagon Equation F Unique unitary solution (up to irrelevant phase factors): Golden Mean

Hilbert Space Dimensionality

Hilbert Space Dimensionality “charge” Bratteli Diagram 1 N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Hilbert Space Dimensionality 1 States are paths in the fusion diagram “charge” 1 N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Hilbert Space Dimensionality 1 “charge” Here’s another one 1 N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Hilbert Space Dimensionality Hilbert space dimensionality grows as the Fibonacci sequence! Exponentially large in the number of quasiparticles (deg ~ f N), so big enough for quantum computing. Fibonacci Anyons “charge” 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Fibonacci anyon with topological “charge” 1 Fusion rules: 1x1 = 0+1; 1x0 = 0x1 = 1; 0x0 = 0 F Matrix: Pentagon F

Exchanging Particles in 2+1 Dimensions Clockwise exchange Counterclockwise exchange Particle “world-lines” form braids in 2+1 (=3) dimensions

The R Matrix a a

The R Matrix R a a

1

1 a

1 a

1 a Equivalent to a

1 a Equivalent to R a a

R 1 1 a a Equivalent to R a a

F

R F

R F F

R F F

R F F R

R F F R F

R F F R R F

The Hexagon Equation F R

The Hexagon Equation 1 1