Tools and Technologies for Mining Site Remediation Michele Mahoney US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Acknowledgements Doug Grosse, ORD Rob Weber, Region 7
Advertisements

DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP WATERSHED APPROACH TO FEDERAL LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PAUL M. LIN (202)
Felicia Barnett Ronald B. Landy USEPA Office of Research and Development Office of Science Policy Regional Science Program.
Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Management System Overview.
Reuse / Revitalization. What is Reuse / Revitalization? Restoring contaminated and potentially contaminated sites to productive use.
Voluntary Action Program – A Primer Martin Smith, Ohio EPA State and Federal Resources to Redevelop Blighted Properties Workshop.
SMARTe: Improving Revitalization Decisions Sustainable Management Approaches and Revitalization Tools – electronic (SMARTe) Leipzig Baldwinsville, NY.
Abandoned mine sites in the United States and Peru Comparing legal approaches focussing on sources of funding and the final stage in the cleanup process.
Overview of New EPA Superfund Groundwater Guidance and Tools
PREPARED WORKBOOK Kathy Castagna, EPA Region 1 Mark Lewis, CT DEEP John Podgurski, EPA Region 1 March 25, 2015.
Redevelopment of Former Industrial Lands in the Australian Capital Territory Toby Hobbs Coffey Geosciences, Australia NATO/CCMS Pilot Study June
Ecological Revitalization: Turning Contaminated Properties Into Community Assets Michele Mahoney EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.
Triad - Sources of Additional Information and Training NEWMOA Meeting Kathy Yager Technology Innovation Office US Environmental Protection Agency.
Green Remediation An Overview of the State of the Practice
Remediation schemes to mitigate the impacts of abandoned mines Brian Bone Environment Agency for England and Wales.
Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.
NRMRL Mining Activities Rocky Mountain Regional HSRC Briefing October 9, 2002 Trish Erickson, Acting ALD-Waste
THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
TIA Solid Waste Consultants, Inc.1 Presented by Miriam Zimms, Senior Consultant TIA Solid Waste Consultants, Inc. Tampa, Florida Pollution Prevention Conference.
The Austrian Adaptation Platform Sabine McCallum, 19 June 2013.
The Field Office Technical Guide and Other Technical Resources CNMP Core Curriculum Section 2 — Conservation Planning.
1 Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup Introduction Walter W. Kovalick Jr., Ph.D. Associate.
Biochemical Reactors for Treating Mining- influenced Water.
2011 ITRC Spring Membership Meeting Minneapolis, Minnesota April 6, 2011.
Ecological Revitalization and Reuse of Contaminated Sites Michele Mahoney, EPA 1.
Athens, June 5, 2006NATO CCMS Pilot Study1 Current Research Topics Dr. Anthimos Xenidis Lab. of Metallurgy National Technical University of Athens (NTUA)
Mining Remediation Technology Developments and Information Resources NATO Workshop: September, 2003 Walter W. Kovalick, Jr. Ph.D. Technology Innovation.
Bilateral Working Group 1 SMARTe: Improving Revitalization Decisions Ann Vega Brownfields Research Program Manager May 4, 2005 Clu-In Presentation for.
Bilateral Working Group SMARTe: Improving Revitalization Decisions Name Title Date Meeting Title.
EXPLORING RECREATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AT THE PICAYUNE WOOD TREATING SITE Michele Mahoney, EPA TIFSD.
1 Partners in Progress US EPA’s Memorandum of Understanding with Organizations Involved in Decentralized Wastewater Management April 29, 2008.
Social Benefits Improve public health of work force and community. Create more walkable, accessible, and livable neighborhoods by incorporating Smart Growth.
Green Infrastructure Considerations and Opportunities in Superfund Reuse Projects Michele Mahoney.
Sustaining Sustainability: What Happens After Building Handover Presented by: Caecilia Gotama P.E., A.P., Principal Gotama Building Engineers.
Office Managers US EPA New England Susan Studlien, Director Office of Site Remediation and Restoration Stephen Perkins, Director Office of Environmental.
Mid-Atlantic Regional Council on the Ocean (MARCO) Presented to the 62 nd Annual Interstate Seafood Seminar Bob Connell New Jersey Department of Environmental.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
Ecological Revitalization of Contaminated Properties March 19, pm EST 1.
1 Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Site LTS&M Planning LTS&M Conference Grand Junction, CO November 16, 2010 Donald Metzler U.S.
1 SMARTe’s Site Characterization Tool Ann Vega, USEPA, Office of Research and Development Kelly Black, Neptune and Company, Inc. Demonstration to ITRC.
EPA’s Enforcement Perspective on Superfund Site Reuse Hollis Luzecky Office of Site Remediation Enforcement, U.S. EPA.
Implementing Greener Cleanups through ASTM's Standard Guide Webinar Introduction November 17, Carlos S Pachon Superfund Program US Environmental.
Greener Cleanups in the Region 10 PCB Program Michelle, Mullin R10 PCB Coordinator Clu-In Webinar November 17, 2015.
Argonne National Laboratory Experience and Perspectives on Environmental Remediation Karen P. Smith Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Presentation to Association Municipalities of Ontario Implementation of Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices Ministry of the.
The Truth about Ecological Revitalization - Case Studies and Tools to Improve your Cleanups Tom Bloom, EPA Region 5 Community Involvement with Ecological.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
ASTM’s Standard Guide for Greener Cleanups: Show me how it works! Deb Goldblum, Region 3 RCRA Clu-In Webinar November 17, 2015.
Ecological Revitalization Tools and Resources Michele Mahoney EPA OSRTI.
Coeur d’Alene Basin TLG Repository PFT meeting December 9, 2003.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  Founded by U.S. government (under Richard Nixon) in 1970  William Ruckleshaus was first EPA administrator  a.
Building Capacity: Responding to SEA Consultation Lucia Susani Environmental Assessment Policy and Process Manager Environment Agency of England and Wales.
SUSTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL (SEC) INITIATIVE Providing resources for applying ecosystem services in public land & water management.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
East St. Louis “Biosolid” Lead Remediation Project Project Sponsor: Southwestern Illinois RC&D, Inc. Funding Provided by: USDA-NRCS Technical Assistance:
The Truth about Ecological Revitalization – Case Studies and Tools to Improve your Cleanups Michele Mahoney Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology.
RE-Powering America’s Land: Siting Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land, Landfills and Mine Sites.
Introduction to Ecological Revitalization Michele Mahoney, TIFSD.
111 Area-Wide Planning, Superfund Sites, Environmental Justice and Green Infrastructure: Tying it All Together in the Freeport Community Planning Project.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services William A. Suk, Ph.D., M.P.H. Director, Superfund Research Program Chief, Hazardous.
Applying Remediation Technologies in a Green World Moderated by: Daniel M Powell, Branch Chief U.S Environmental Protection Agency Office of Superfund.
Green and Sustainable Remediation (GSR) Overview
RIMCON PROVIDES NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONSULTING TO THE MINING AND AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES INCLUDED ARE ZEOLITE AND OTHER INDUSTRIAL MINERAL-BASED.
The Prepared Process: The Next Generation
Ecological Revitalization at Mining Sites
Team Lead, Greener Cleanups
Ecological Revitalization – Tools to Promote Pollinator Protection
Presentation transcript:

Tools and Technologies for Mining Site Remediation Michele Mahoney US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation 1

Overview  Technology Assessment Branch  Mining Website   Mining Webinar Series  MIW Treatment Technologies

 Demonstrates and promotes the use of new and innovative treatment technologies for more cost effective cleanups  Assesses and communicates to site managers state-of-the-art remedy technology information  Provides site-specific support through five Technical Support Centers and staff consultation Technology Assessment Branch

Mining Website: CLU-IN Mining Sites Focus Area

CLU-IN Mining Sites Focus Area  Launched in 2012 (  Maintained on CLU-IN: Contaminated Site Cleanup Information (  Goal: develop a source of information on site assessment, characterization, cleanup, and revitalization technologies & training opportunities  Initial focus: abandoned mine lands  Today: current and former (i.e., active, closed and abandoned) sites

 Target audience: site managers, regulatory agencies, consultants, general public  Spotlight, overview, and RSS feed  Case studies  Characterization  Revitalization and reuse  Resources and links  Conference proceedings and presentations  Training and events CLU-IN Mining Sites Focus Area

 Spotlight and overview  RSS feed CLU-IN Mining Sites Focus Area

 Case studies  Successful remediation and revitalization efforts  Grouped by mining site type  Hardrock  Coal  Uranium CLU-IN Mining Sites Focus Area

 Characterization  Cleanup technologies (adapted from ITRC)  Mining solid waste  Mining-influenced water  Both media  Revitalization and reuse CLU-IN Mining Sites Focus Area

 Resources & links  Conference proceedings and presentations  Training & events CLU-IN Mining Sites Focus Area

CLU-IN Mining Webinar Series

 Launched in June 2012  Complements CLU-IN Mining Sites Focus Area  Held quarterly  Goal: technology transfer resource and additional information source on innovative technologies and approaches for mine waste and MIW treatment CLU-IN Mining Webinar Series

 Six webinars held since the launch  Example topics:  EPA resources and training opportunities  Overview of the Global Acid Rock Drainage (GARD) Guide  Impact of soil restoration at mine sites on ecosystem function and services  Using biosolids and coal combustion products for soil remediation at mining sites CLU-IN Mining Webinar Series

 Case studies and field applications at different types of mining sites and mine waste/MIW  1050 attendees total (average 175 per webinar)  Environmental, engineering, and mining professionals – government, consulting firms, academia, natural resource exploration industries CLU-IN Mining Webinar Series

 Next webinar: December 17, 2014   Updates and archived mining webinars: CLU-IN Mining Webinar Series

2014 EPA Reference Guide  Compilation of MIW treatment technologies  For regulators, site owners and operators, and other stakeholders

Document Development  EPA National Mining Team  External Stakeholders

Document Objectives  Identify and describe MIW treatment technologies  Support selection of appropriate and cost-effective treatment technologies  Inform decision makers on up to date and available treatment technologies 19

Long-term Goal  Support development of technologies  Low energy needs  Low costs  Low maintenance

MIW  MIW: water whose composition has been affected by mining or mineral processing  Includes acid rock drainage, neutral and alkaline waters, mineral processing waters and residual waters  Affects over 10,000 miles of receiving waters in the United States

Treatment Considerations  Available land surface and its topography  System longevity  Maintenance needs  Flow rate and strength  Site accessibility and remoteness  Availability of power sources  Performance criteria  Design, capital and operation costs  Maintenance costs  Local climate impacts on system effectiveness

Reference Guide Content  16 Technology Narratives  7 passive  9 active  31 Technology Summaries

Summary Table Snapshot 24

Reference Guide Content  Treatment technologies  Contaminants treated  Pre-treatment requirements  Costs  Long-term maintenance needs  System performance

Reference Guide Content  System costs  Example sites  Data gaps and research needs  Resources for more information on each technology

Technologies  Anoxic limestone drains  Successive alkalinity producing systems  Aluminator  Constructed wetlands  Biochemical reactors

Technologies  Phytotechnologies ( )  Permeable reactive barriers  Fluidized bed reactors  Reverse osmosis  Zero valent iron

Technologies  Rotating cylinder treatment systems  Ferrihydrite adsorption  Electrocoagulation  Ion exchange  Biological reduction  Ceramic microfiltration

Anticipated Outcomes  Supplement and complement existing reference materials  Identify promising technologies and best practices  Determine data needs  Develop pilot projects  Present information publically 30

For More Information  Reference Guide: in.org/download/issues/mining/Reference_ Guide_to_Treatment_Technologies_for_MIW. pdfhttp:// in.org/download/issues/mining/Reference_ Guide_to_Treatment_Technologies_for_MIW. pdf  Characterization, Cleanup and Revitalization of Mining Sites:

Contact   Michele Mahoney  US EPA OSWER TIFSD TAB  