Top 10 Legal Minefields A University Perspective October 8, 2009 Catherine Shea Associate University Counsel University of Colorado.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
G. Conti – Politecnico di Milano 2006 © 1/13 CRUI – WIPO 28 marzo 2006 Technology Transfer Office Setting up a license agreement: An Italian University.
Advertisements

The Federal Technology Transfer Process: Licenses and Cooperative Research and Development Agreements ADVANCED LICENSING INSTITUTE AT.
Negotiating Technology License Agreements Tamara Nanayakkara.
Clinical Trial Agreements
Institutional Controls Pamela Elkow and Richard Fil.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Contracting & Research Services (CRS)
 These materials are public information and have been prepared for entertainment purposes only to contribute to the fascinating study of intellectual.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Contract Negotiation Thomas E. Walsh, Ph.D. Director, Sponsored Research & Compliance, University of Florida Research Administration Training Series November.
CONFIDENTIAL © 2012 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of.
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
Fosterswift.com PROTECTING AGAINST THE UNKNOWN : How to Successfully Review IT Contracts to Increase Your Rights and Avoid Potential Liability Samuel Frederick.
LICENSING “One Way of Putting Your I.P. to Work for Your Organization” Inventing and Patenting Seminar May 16, 2001.
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
 Freedom of Information Act General Background. Access to Army Records. Exemptions. Exclusions. Procedural Rules for Processing FOIA Requests for Army.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Matthew L. Harvey Office of General Counsel Illinois Commerce Commission.
Getting Started - Corporate Formation, Founder and Funding Considerations By: Gordon Empey, Special Counsel Cooley Godward Kronish LLP From Invention to.
Navigating and Negotiating Contracts Presented by Krista L. Newkirk, Associate General Counsel.
Key Issues in Collaborations with Industry
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
1 Technology Transfer Seminar Series Patent Licensing : A Pathway to Commercialization Karen Hersey Senior Counsel for Intellectual Property, MIT. Ret.
Ownership of Intellectual Property: Textbooks and Inventions Frank Lancaster UT Office of the General Counsel Presented at The University of Tennessee.
Technology Transfer Commercial Opportunities in Research J. Heidjer Staecker Partner.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
AGENCY IN LIBYA OVERVIEW.  In1971, the Agency Law permitted the Libyan nationals to carry out activities of commercial agency  In 1975, the Libyan government.
Best Practices: “IPR in Successful University-Industry Collaborations” Disputes relating to University Inventions Tal Band, Adv. Senior Partner S. Horowitz.
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND GOVERNMENT LICENSING ISSUES Jacob N. (Jesse) Erlich, Partner Perkins, Smith & Cohen, LLP Boston, Massachusetts August 10, 2005.
Commercialization of Intellectual Property by Bob Reader Vice President, Licensing National Institute for Strategic Technology Acquisition and Commercialization.
Technology Transfer at Rice
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
Contracts: Negotiations and Key Elements Belinda Vandersluis Operations Director, NCIC CTG.
Aerospace Industries Association Intellectual Property Committee Fall 2009 meeting SMC Enabling Clause Holly Emrick Svetz (703)
University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NEGOTIATING TECHNOLOGY LICENSING AGREEMENTS organized by The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in cooperation with.
Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty to Warn in School Guidance Services March 2006 Disclaimer - While the information in these slides are designed to reflect.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 11 The Instructional.
What is Intellectual Property ? Patents- protection of technology Trademarks- protection of domain names and product identity Copyrights- protection of.
Legal Document Preparation Class 2Slide 1 Elements of a Contract to be Considered in Drafting The writing should clearly indicate the presence of an offer.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
Contract Models for Virtual Teaching Helsinki University Porthania III 24 October 2001 Kristiina Harenko Attorneys at Law Borenius & Kemppinen Oy.
Legal Issues Related to Research at NC State David E. Broome, Jr. Senior Associate General Counsel NC State University 27 March 2002.
University Negotiations with Industry Bobby C. McQuiston The University of Texas at Austin.
Navigating the University Technology Transfer August 23, 2012 Christopher Moulding Sr. Manager, Technology Advancement and Licensing I’ve got an idea…now.
Custom Software Development Intellectual Property and Other Key Issues © 2006 Jeffrey W. Nelson and Iowa Department of Justice (Attach G)
1 Contracts — Ten Steps to a Better Contract American Chamber of Commerce Executives Presented by George E. Constantine, III, Esq. Venable LLP Washington,
“Win-Win” LicensingAgreement: Negotiating and Drafting Strategies “Win-Win” Licensing Agreement: Negotiating and Drafting Strategies August 12 – 14, 2008.
Legal Issues. Overview Standard Contract Terms of Social Networking Sites Government Content on a Third-Party Site Competitive Procurement Issues First.
World Intellectual Property Organization DCPPS 1 presented by Mr. Vladimir Yossifov WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, April 14 to 15, 2011 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY The U.S. Bayh- Dole Act Av. Uğur Aktekin The U.S. Bayh-
Getting to “Yes” in University IP Licensing: Mock Negotiation Workshop October 25, 2012 Presented by Jim Singer Brienne Terril.
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
Intellectual Property Basics: What Rules Apply to Faculty, Staff, and Student Work Product? Dave Broome Vice Chancellor and General Counsel October 15,
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
ANATOMY OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT. Licensor, Licensee and Licensed Property Title to the Intellectual Property being licensed Written agreement Licensing.
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
Data protection—training materials [Name and details of speaker]
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
Regulation Highlights Kimberly Heifetz May 15, 2012.
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
Customer Contracting/Licensing Obstacles & Pitfalls By: Mark E
Lecture 28 Intellectual Property(Cont’d)
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
Customer Contracting/Licensing Obstacles & Pitfalls
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
The Bayh–Dole Act: Where Are We Today?
Presentation transcript:

Top 10 Legal Minefields A University Perspective October 8, 2009 Catherine Shea Associate University Counsel University of Colorado

Overview What Terms Really Matter Federal Requirements Standard State University Provisions Standard University Provisions Proper Care and Feeding of Your Lawyer

#1 Knowing What Terms Really Matter University wants the licensee to succeed University templates reasonable starting point Start up companies – Patent prosecution costs – Insurance When do you have to have it What types and what limits are reasonable – Diligence Terms – Create opportunity to seek relief on breach terms

#1 Knowing What Terms Really Matter (cont’) Start up companies – Patent prosecution costs – Insurance When do you have to have it What types and what limits are reasonable – Diligence Terms – Create opportunity to seek relief on breach terms Who is really negotiating – Potential “sublicensee” – Major investor – Inventor

Federal Requirements The Bayh-Dole Act Before the Act, – Government held patents – Would license on non-exclusive basis – Inventions rarely developed into commercial products After the Act – Grantee can hold patent – License at its discretion – Preference for small business – Substantial U.S. manufacturing, if exclusive in U.S. – U.S. Government royalty free rights – March In Rights, if licensee not developing or significant national need

Federal Requirements The Bayh-Dole Act #2 Practical Implications of Bayh-Dole - March-in Rights Because the patent holder is not taking effective steps to achieve practical application of the invention, To alleviate health or safety needs which are not reasonably satisfied by the patent holder, To meet requirements for public use specified by federal regulations not reasonably satisfied by the patent holder; or Because an exclusive licensee has failed to give preference to U.S. manufacturing where that would be required. 35 U.S.C. 203

Federal Requirements The Bayh-Dole Act #2 Practical Implications of Bayh-Dole (con’t) Substantial Manufacturing in the U.S. anufacturing.htm Assignment of Intellectual Property requires government approval Time consuming but usually a positive outcome

Standard State University Provisions Preservation of Governmental Immunity Tax Exempt No endorsement of products, use of names – State ethics laws governing public entities, officials, and employees May affect activities of University employee who is also a company employee – Tax laws barring commercial activity by not for profit entities

Standard State University Provisions #3 State Open Records Act – Many open records acts have statutory exceptions for company proprietary data – In practice (unless criminal activity), university will want to consult with licensee before releasing any documents – Negotiate clauses to protect company information Is the Agreement itself confidential? What reports are confidential? What is the open records act procedure?

Standard State University Provisions #4 Inherently Governmental Authority – Patent Prosecution – Patent Enforcement – Assignment – No binding arbitration

Standard University Terms #5 Full indemnification of University (and co- owner) – Defense costs Reservation of Rights – internal research purposes, other sponsors? Mandatory Sublicensing

Standard University Terms Sublicensing Flow-down provisions – Indemnification, insurance, warranties #6MedImmune Provisions If licensee challenges the licensed patent – Triple royalty payments – Termination – Notice prior to bringing such action Question: is this approach legal?

Standard University Terms #7No warranties #8 University Conflict of Interest Rules – Heightened congressional and federal scrutiny – Company reporting on consultants – Lower thresholds for conflicts, e.g., any ownership level in private company Choice of Law

Standard University Terms #9 Knowing what other agreements are in place – Confidentiality Agreement Subject matter and term – Sponsored Research Agreements Joint Inventions, other sponsors, other inventors – Consulting Agreements Conflict with university rules – Material Transfer Agreements Third Party Access to Licensed Technology, publication rights

#10 Managing your lawyer When to bring in the lawyer Educating the lawyer on the deal Keeping the negotiations on track – Timing – Relearning the deal – Raising new issues in second, third review – Business comments

Questions?