Consolidation of the Booster Injection Quadrupole Magnets (part 2) A. Aloev 14 th February 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Advertisements

Quadrupole Magnetic Design for an Electron Ion Collider Paul Brindza May 19, 2008.
Twin Solenoid Twin Solenoid - conceptual design for FCC-hh detector magnet - Matthias GT Mentink Alexey Dudarev Helder Pais Da Silva Leonardo Erik Gerritse.
Review of the mechanical design of the final focusing region of the HIF Point Design T. Brown ARIES Project Meeting January 8, 2003.
Fall 2008 Physics 121 Practice Problem Solutions 13 Electromagnetic Oscillations AC Circuits Contents: 121P13 - 2P, 3P, 9P, 33P, 34P, 36P, 49P, 51P, 60P,
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 33 Inductance, Electromagnetic Oscillations, and AC Circuits.
Magnet designs for Super-FRS and CR
Bias Magnet for the Booster’s 2-nd Harmonic Cavity An attempt to evaluate the scope of work based of the existing RF design of the cavity 9/10/2015I. T.
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
Author CERN – Geneva – CH Jacques.Dutour 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 1 / 16 MQW magnets:
SuperB Meeting, May 2008 Status of the magnetic design of the first quadrupole (QD0) for the SuperB interaction region S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole.
CEA DSM Irfu - F. KIRCHER - [Seoul Workshop, Feb 16-18, 2009] 1 ILD detector magnet: LoI version F. Kircher, O. Delferrière CEA Saclay, DSM/Irfu/SACM.
Liesbeth Vanherpe, Olivier Crettiez, Alexey Vorozhtsov, Thomas Zickler Quadrupole Electro-magnets for Linac4 at CERN ATS Seminar, CERN, July 11, 2013.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
Eddy current modelling for ILC target ILC meeting 31 st Jan- 3 rd Feb 2007 IHEP-Beijing James Rochford.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
LARP Collaboration Meeting, April 26-28, 2006Gian Luca Sabbi HQ Design Study (WBS ) LARP Collaboration Meeting April 26-28, 2006 N. Andreev, E.
New options for the new D1 magnet Qingjin Xu
Proposed Conventional Sextupole for Installation at A0 Introduction (Dean Still) Reasons for installation- Reduce I in S6 feeddown sextupole circuit at.
Update on Q4 DSM/IRFU/SACM The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Reducing the Iron in the Endcap Yoke of CLIC_SiD Benoit Curé, Konrad Elsener, Hubert Gerwig, CERN CERN, June 2014 Linear Collider Detector Magnet Meeting.
Case study 1 : Quadrupole for Hi-Lumi LHC upgrade CAS Erice 2013 Group 1B A. Shornikov, T. Spina, Y. Arimoto, P. V. Gade, K. Brodzinski.
Cosine-theta configurations for S.C. Dipole Massimo Sorbi on behalf of: INFN LASA & Genova Team Giovanni Bellomo, Pasquale Fabbricarore, Stefania Farinon,
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
Linac4 Tech. Design Committee 10 th October 2006 Thomas Zickler AT/MEL/MI/tz 1 Magnets for Linac4 Th. Zickler CERN 6 th Linac4 Technical Design Committee.
Linac4 MAC 29 th January 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 Magnets for Linac4 Th. Zickler CERN Linac4 Machine Advisory Committee 28 th - 30 th January.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 30 Inductance, Electromagnetic Oscillations, and AC Circuits.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015.
September 27, 2007 ILC Main Linac - KOF 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Magnet group.
MSE Pulsed Septum for g-2 and Mu2e Design Review A. Makarov 2/11/2016.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS multiplet field.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS magnet configurations.
New Magnet Design for FCC- ee Attilio Milanese, CERN 26 Oct presented by Frank Zimmermann.
A new QF1 magnet for ATF3 Alexey Vorozhtsov
Iranian Light Source Facility, IPM, P.O. Box , Tehran, Iran
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
One plane dipole corrector for the CLIC MBQ TYPE 1
Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team:
PANAGIOTIS FARANTATOS(TE/MSC-MNC)* WP3, ESR 4: New Magnet
Test of a Permanent Magnet Quadrupole Placed in a Dipole Field
Iron-free high current pulsed air-core coil quadrupoles
WORK IN PROGRESS F C C Main Quadrupoles FCC week 2017
Magnetic System Overview Solenoid and Anti-DID
HO correctors update Massimo Sorbi and Marco Statera
6th BINP-FAIR-GSI Workshop,
Alexander Kalimov, State Polytechnic University, St.-Petersburg
Preliminary Magnetic Analysis of the CCT Magnet for HL-LHC
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
Magnetic System Overview Solenoid and DID
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Pierre-Alexandre Thonet
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
III. Correction Dipoles MDG Accessories for all Magnets V. Summary
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Fusan Chen, Wen Kang, Mei Yang*
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Q4 development M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet, E. Todesco
INTRODUCTION OF ELECTRICAL MACHINES
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
CEPC Final Focus Superconducting Quadrupole and Anti-solenoid Magnets
Lab: AC Circuits Integrated Science II.
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

Consolidation of the Booster Injection Quadrupole Magnets (part 2) A. Aloev 14 th February 2013

Introduction Quarter of the SMIT yoke Each coil consists of 54 turns of 2.7x3.0 mm copper conductor The coils can be installed through the aperture so it is possible to produce each lamination of the magnet in one piece Length of the yoke 400 mm Total length of the magnet 470 mm SMIT magnet The booster injection quadrupoles are to be consolidated due to mechanical degradation of the coils. We consider here a scenario for replacing the SMIT-type magnets (1969) with a new more compact pulsed air-cooled magnet design. Geometry of the new design

Electrical parameters Number of turns54 Peak current95.4 A RMS current7.8 A Peak current density11.8 A/mm 2 RMS current density1.0 A/mm 2 Total resistance of four coils0.5 Ω Total inductance32.5 mH Maximum voltage565 V Total dissipated power30.5 W Total power dissipated in the SMIT magnet 850 W These electrical parameters correspond to 1.04 T integrated gradient (the required value + 15% margin) With Maxidiscap extended power supply the new magnet can be pulsed up to 175 A

Characteristics of the magnetic field Peak current, A G, T/m ∫G, T Magnetic length, mm452 Normal relative integrated harmonics at r = 50 mm Integrated gradient homogeneity along x-axis and at r = 50 mm |B|, T∫ΔG/∫G, units (for I peak = 95.4 A)

New vs. SMIT (single units) New vs. TRIUMF (single units) Normal relative integrated harmonics at r = 50 mm Integrated gradient homogeneity along x-axis and at r = 50 mm Normal relative integrated harmonics at r = 50 mm Integrated gradient homogeneity along x-axis and at r = 50 mm

New vs. SMIT (stacks of four units) Bx = 4.3∙10 -7 T Bx = 3.5∙10 -7 T Bx = 0.5∙10 -4 T Bx = 1.6∙10 -4 T Field values in the centres of the quadrupoles at the midplane Magnetic field along the central axis of the quadrupoles

Harmonic analysis of the stacks Normal and skew relative integrated harmonics of the quadrupoles at r = 50 mm (with respect to the central axis) New (outer quad.)-56 μmSMIT (outer quad.)35 μm New (inner quad.)-12 μmSMIT (inner quad.)22 μm Offset of the “electromagnetic” axis (axis with ∫B x dz = 0) Normal and skew relative integrated harmonics of the quadrupoles at r = 50 mm (with respect to the electromagnetic axis)

Attempts to reduce the skew harmonics Option 1 – shielded coils Option 2 – connected yokes Normal relative integrated harmonics at r = 50 mm Skew relative integrated harmonics at r = 50 mm

Conclusion The field quality of the new design (max 0.4 unit at r = 50 mm) is much better than that of the SMIT (max 11 units at r = 50 mm) and TRIUMF (max 0.7 unit at r = 50 mm) The skew field harmonics in the stacks of four new magnets and in the stacks of four SMIT magnets are comparable New pulsed magnets are more compact and less power consuming than DC SMIT-type magnets and meet the requirements of both Maxidiscap and Maxidiscap extented power sources The installation of the new compact quadrupoles will require new power supplies and cabling (also in need of consolidation?)