ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ring Dampers and Gold Barrel Coatings -to control parametric instabilities Chunnong Zhao on behalf of Gingin facility, ACIGA/UWA.
Advertisements

Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
G v1Advanced LIGO1 Status of Ground-Based Gravitational-wave Interferometers July 11, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory Astrod 5, Bangalore,
Overview of ACIGA high performance vibration isolator Jean-Charles Dumas Eu-Jeen Chin Chunnong Zhao Li Ju David Blair.
The Threat of Parametric Instabilities in Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Detectors Li Ju Chunnong Zhao Jerome Degallaix Slavomir Gras.
Status of the LIGO Project
Thermal Compensation NSF David Ottaway LIGO Laboratory MIT.
Thermal Compensation Review David Ottaway LIGO Laboratory MIT.
LIGO-G W 2005 CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection 1 High-Power Stabilized Lasers and Optics of GW Detectors Rick Savage.
Overview of Advanced LIGO March 2011 Rencontres de Moriond Sheila Rowan For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems Design & Interferometer Sensing & Optics Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 13 Meeting, 5 June 2003.
GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
1 G Mike Smith Gravitational Waves & Precision Measurements.
What are GW’s ?? Fluctuation in the curvature of space time, propagating outward form the source at the speed of light Predicted by Einstein’s GTR Gravitational.
Status of LCGT and CLIO Masatake Ohashi (ICRR, The University of TOKYO) and LCGT, CLIO collaborators TAUP2007 Sendai, Japan 2007/9/12.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
Proposal to extend current AIGO High Optical Power research facility to a 5km advanced interferometer. D G Blair on behalf of ACIGA LIGO-G Z.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
Status of the Advanced Virgo detector F. Piergiovanni on behalf of The Virgo Collaboration GWPAW, Osaka, 06/17/2015.
LIGO- G M Status of LIGO David Shoemaker LISA Symposium 13 July 2004.
1 LIGO and GEO Developments for Advanced LIGO Sheila Rowan, Stanford University/Univ. of Glasgow on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Annual.
Thermal Compensation: The GEO and LIGO experience and requirements for advanced detectors Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT On behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
Optomechanical Devices for Improving the Sensitivity of Gravitational Wave Detectors Chunnong Zhao for Australian International Gravitational wave Research.
07. July 2004 Andreas Freise Status of VIRGO A. Freise For the Virgo Collaboration European Gravitational Observatory.
Sapphire Test Masses ACIGA/UWA High lights of research at UWA Alternative approach to suspensions High power test facility Cryogenic applications Mark.
1 Large Aperture Dielectric Gratings for High Power LIGO Interferometry LSC/Virgo Meeting, Baton Rouge March 19-22, 2007 Optics Working Group Jerald A.
GEO600 Detector Status Harald Lück Max-Planck Institut für Gravitationsphysik Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik, Uni Hannover.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Precision Interferometry Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
DFG-NSF Astrophysics Workshop Jun 2007 G Z 1 Optics for Interferometers for Ground-based Detectors David Reitze Physics Department University.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
Parametric Instabilities and Control Li Ju ( 鞠莉), Chunnnong Zhao, David Blair Jiayi Qin, Qi Fang, Carl Blair, Jian Liu University of Western Australia.
LSC August G Z Gingin High Optical Power Test Facility (AIGO) 1 High Optical Power Test Facility - Status First lock, auto-alignment and.
An Off-Axis Hartmann Sensor for Measurement of Wavefront Distortion in Interferometric Detectors Aidan Brooks, Peter Veitch, Jesper Munch Department of.
LCGT Technical Review Suspension Point Interferometer for Parasitic Noise Reduction and an Additional IFO S.Miyoki (ICRR, Univ. of TOKYO)
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
LIGO LaboratoryLIGO-G R Coatings and Their Influence on Thermal Lensing and Compensation in LIGO Phil Willems Coating Workshop, March 21, 2008,
Chunnong Zhao for ACIGA
Initial and Advanced LIGO Detectors
AdV Thermal Compensation System Viviana Fafone AdV/aLIGO joint technical meeting, February 4, 2004.
Parametric Instabilities In Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Detectors Li Ju Chunnong Zhao Jerome Degallaix Slavomir Gras David Blair.
The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.
LIGO-G W LIGO Detector Commissioning Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Elba 2006 Suppressing Parametric Instabilities Li Ju, Slawek Gras, Pablo Barriga, Chonnong Zhao, Jerome Degallaix, David Blair, Yaohui Fan, Zewu Yan University.
Sapphire for the LCGT project Eiichi Hirose ICRR, University of Tokyo Kyohei Watanabe, Norikatsu Mio PSC, University of Tokyo GT Advanced Technology, Sep.
Advanced LIGO Status Report
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
17/05/2010A. Rocchi - GWADW Kyoto2 Thermal effects: a brief introduction  In TM, optical power predominantly absorbed by the HR coating and converted.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Thermal Compensation System TCS V. Fafone for the TCS Subsystem.
Hartmann Wavefront Sensing for the Gingin Experiment Aidan Brooks, Peter Veitch, Jesper Munch Department of Physics, University of Adelaide LSC, LLO Mar.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
Lessons from CLIO Masatake Ohashi (ICRR, The University of TOKYO) and CLIO collaborators GWADW2012 Hawaii 2012/5/16.
1 The status of VIRGO E. Tournefier LAPP(Annecy)-IN2P3-CNRS Journées SF2A, Strasbourg 27 juin – 1er juillet 2005 The VIRGO experiment The commissioning.
High Frequency Parametric Instabilities in AdvLIGO and Methods for their Control David Blair, Chunnong Zhao, Ju Li, Slawomir Gras, Pablo Barriga and Jerome.
LIGO-G v1 Advanced LIGO Gravitational Waves: New Frontier Seoul, South Korea 16 January 2013 David Shoemaker.
Thermal compensation issues: sensing and actuation V. Fafone University of Rome Tor Vergata and INFN ASPERA Technological Forum – EGO October, 2011.
Yoichi Aso Columbia University, New York, NY, USA University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan July 14th th Edoardo Amaldi Conference on Gravitational Waves.
Thermal Compensation NSF
LIGO Scientific Collaboration
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
Status of Interferometers and Data Analysis
Gingin Advisory Committee Meeting 08 Dec 2009
LIGO/Caltech and University of Western Australia
Thermal lensing and the Gingin test 1
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Thermal lensing and the Gingin test 1
Presentation transcript:

ACIGA High Optical Power Test Facility Chunnong Zhao for ACIGA

Contents Status of High Optical Power Test Facility (HOPTF) Planned Experiments

ACIGA Australia Consortium for Interferometric Gravitational Astronomy Primary Institutions: University of Western Australia University of Adelaide Australian National University Affiliate Institutions: Monash University CSIRO-Optics

AIGO Location AIGO is located 90km north of Perth in Western Australia

HOPTF Configuration South arm 10m Mode cleaner Injection locked laser Pre-stabilisation cavity - ITM Power recycling Detection bench Injection bench East arm ETM

Central Station

Laser Room High power laser clean room near Class 100.

Objectives of ACIGA HOPTF Investigating problems associated with high optical power GW detectors Thermal lensing and compensation Parametric instabilities and control Low noise 80m base line advanced interferometer Demonstrate noise performance of high power interferometers Evaluate thermal compensation Determine noise limit set by the control of parametric instabilities Advanced gravitational wave interferometer detector AIGO — the Southern Hemisphere link in the global network

First Problem: Thermal Lensing Absorption in mirror substrate and coating creates thermal gradient Thermal gradients distort refractive index of substrate  lens effect Thermal expansion changes mirror curvature  lens effect Power Absorbed Substrate = 1W 4 kW Power Loss and Reduced Sensitivity Simulation: Jerome Degallaix

ACIGA’s high optical power facility 100W input power Up to 500kW circulating power with power recycling Sapphire test mass Fused silica thermal compensation plate

HOPTF Test 1: Reverse Substrate Placement of the ITM Sapphire substrate inside the cavity 50ppm/cm absorption ~80m Input Test Mass a-axis Sapphire 100mm diameter 46mm thickness End Test Mass m-axis Sapphire 150mm diameter 80mm thickness

HOPTF Test 1: Cold Cavity Half-symmetric resonator Input Power: ~7W Cavity Waist size: ~8.7mm Cavity Waist Position: 0m Input Test Mass ROC =  End Test Mass ROC = 720m

HOPTF Test 1: Hot Cavity Power Intra-Cavity: ~4.4kW Cavity Waist Size: ~6.6mm Cavity Waist Position changed: 47m Input Test Mass ROC = 410m Absorbed Power = ~2W End Test Mass ROC = 721m Thermal Gradient: Jerome Degallaix

Thermal compensation Fused Silica Compensation Plate Input Test Mass ROC = 410m Absorbed Power = ~2W End Test Mass ROC = 721m Thermal Gradient: Jerome Degallaix

HOPTF Test 1: thermal compensation Power Intra-Cavity: ~4.4kW Cavity Waist Size: ~6.6mm Cavity Waist Position: 47m Heat the Fused Silica Compensation Plate Input Test Mass ROC = 410m Absorbed Power = ~2W End Test Mass ROC = 721m Thermal Gradient: Jerome Degallaix

HOPTF Test 1: Thermal compensation Power Intra-Cavity: ~5kW Cavity Waist Size: ~8.7mm Cavity Waist Position: 0m Fused Silica Compensation Plate Input Test Mass ROC =  Thermal Gradient: Jerome Degallaix

10 W injection locked laser developed by Adelaide installed The 80-meter cavity has been locked to the laser

HOPTF Test1 Simple Suspension with sapphire ITM Simple Suspension with sapphire ETM

Measured beam size after the ETM as a function of the heating power to the CP Compensation plate ITM ETM Input laser beam

Next Step of Thermal Lensing Experments Input full power into the 80-meter cavity Detect the wavefront distortion using the Hartmann sensor installed HOPTF Test 2 HOPTF Test 3

HOPTF Test 2 TEST 2: ITM substrate is outside the high power cavity Optical distortion will be dominated by the absorption in the HR coatings on the ITM and ETM 50W 100kW ~80m Input Test Mass a-axis Sapphire 100mm diameter 46mm thickness ROC =  End Test Mass m-axis Sapphire 150mm diameter 80mm thickness ROC = 720m

HOPTF Test 3 TEST 3: Power Recycling Mirror to increase the power inside the cavity Fused Silica Compensation Plate 50W 4kW 200kW ~8m ~72m ITM Sapphire ROC = 4km PRM Fused Silica ROC = 5.8km ETM Sapphire ROC = 720m

Second Problem: Parametric Instabilities (PI) PI depends on a product of: Optical Q-factor Mechanical Q-factor HOM Q-factor Optical Cavity Power

Gingin HOPTF Prediction Acoustic Mode 160kHz Optical mode, LG41 Overlap Factor  = 0.174

Gingin HOPTF Prediction HOPTF 80m cavity should observe parametric instability if sapphire test mass Q-factor is 2x108. 0.1 1 10 100 718 719 720 721 722 Radius of Curvature (m) Highest R of all acoustic modes

What do we expect to see R=1 Q= infinity Unstable R=0.1 ~10% increase in Qm Detectable R=0.01 ~1% increase in Qm Hard to detect First goal: detect modes, measure Q, predict R

Laser frequency control How can we do Capacitor Actuator 10W Laser Pockels Cell 80-meter suspended cavity PMC Pockels Cell Cavity Control 162 kHz local oscillator Local Oscillator Mixer Band Pass Filter Reference Cavity Laser frequency control

Expected at HOPTF Current set up (internal substrate, magnets glued on): F=1000, 5W into cavity: DQ=1% if Q=107, DQ=10% if Q=108 Test 2: (external substrate) F=2000, DQ=7% if Q=107, DQ ~ 40% if Q ~ 5. 107. East Arm PI Test: (capacitive actuation), Q=108, R>1 at 10W input power

Advanced Vibration Isolation 2 stages of ultralow frequency horizontal pre-isolation vertical ultralow frequency pre-isolation self damping Euler springs Best isolation system in the world!

UWA Vibration Isolation and Suspension System Inverse Pendulum (Horizontal) 0.05 Hz LaCoste (Vertical) 0.5Hz Roberts Linkage (Horizontal) 0.05 Hz 3.2m 4 horizontal Self-damped pendulum stages (~0.6Hz) 4 Vertical Euler Springs stage (~0.6Hz) Test mass

AIGO Future—long base line detector East-end Station N East Fabry-Perot Cavity M3 Mode Cleaner Power Recycling Cavity South-end Station Beam Splitter M1 M2 100W PSL Nd:YAG laser l = 1064nm South Fabry-Perot Cavity Signal Recycling Mirror Main Building To Detector Bench