Features needed in the “final” AliRoot release P.Hristov 26/10/2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

High Level Trigger (HLT) for ALICE Bergen Frankfurt Heidelberg Oslo.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
Outline  motivations  methods: ITS: TPC+ITS(-1 layer) tracks SPD: SPD standalone  tracklets  strategy with data  conclusions Studi di Efficienza dell’ITS.
Multiplicity analysis and dN/d  reconstruction with the silicon pixel detector Terzo Convegno Nazionale sulla Fisica di ALICE Frascati (Italy) – November.
HLT - data compression vs event rejection. Assumptions Need for an online rudimentary event reconstruction for monitoring Detector readout rate (i.e.
High Level Trigger – Applications Open Charm physics Quarkonium spectroscopy Dielectrons Dimuons Jets.
HLT & Calibration.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
ALICE HLT High Speed Tracking and Vertexing Real-Time 2010 Conference Lisboa, May 25, 2010 Sergey Gorbunov 1,2 1 Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies,
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.
The High-Level Trigger of the ALICE Experiment Heinz Tilsner Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik Universität Heidelberg International Europhysics Conference.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 April 2008.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
CMS pixel data quality monitoring Petra Merkel, Purdue University For the CMS Pixel DQM Group Vertex 2008, Sweden.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
Normal text - click to edit HLT tracking in TPC Off-line week Gaute Øvrebekk.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
HLT/AliRoot integration C.Cheshkov, P.Hristov 2/06/2005 ALICE Offline Week.
3/12/2003 ACAT03 - Giuseppe Lo Re Study of the K*(892) 0 signal in pp ALICE events Giuseppe Lo Re INFN-CNAF, Bologna (Italy) ACAT03, 12/3/2003.
Status of global tracking and plans for Run2 (for TPC related tasks see Marian’s presentation) 1 R.Shahoyan, 19/03/14.
1 Outline: Update on muon/dimuon AOD production (R. Arnaldi/E. Scomparin) Other ongoing activities: MUON correction framework (X. Lopez) MUON productions.
NEC' /09P.Hristov1 Alice off-line computing Alice Collaboration, presented by P.Hristov, CERN NEC'2001 September 12-18, Varna.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
Page 1 of 18 Bjorn S. Nilsen, ALICE November 16 ITS Software meeting ITS Alignment Status Plus other things By Bjørn S. Nilsen The Ohio State University.
ALICE Offline Week October 4 th 2006 Silvia Arcelli & Chiara Zampolli TOF Online Calibration - Strategy - TOF Detector Algorithm - TOF Preprocessor.
Javier Castillo 1 Muon Embedding Status & Open Issues PWG3 - CERN - 15/02/2011.
Quality assurance for TPC. Quality assurance ● Process: ● Detect the problems ● Define, what is the problem ● What do we expect? ● Defined in the TDR.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 July 2008.
FRANCESCO NOFERINI (INFN CNAF – INFN BOLOGNA) 08/12/2009 ALICE TOF - general meeting - F. Noferini - GRID and resonances GRID and  analysis in pp 1.
Massimo Masera, Andrea Dainese, Domenico Elia, Francesco Prino Offline Week – 15/11/2010 ITS offline status.
1 Reconstruction tasks R.Shahoyan, 25/06/ Including TRD into track fit (JIRA PWGPP-1))  JIRA PWGPP-2: Code is in the release, need to switch setting.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
V4-20-Release P. Hristov 21/02/ Changes: v4-20-Rev-14 #78385 Please port AliTPCPreprocessor.cxx Rev to Release #78344 Request to port changes.
Jet Production in Au+Au Collisions at STAR Alexander Schmah for the STAR Collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Hard Probes 2015 in Montreal/Canada.
AliRoot survey: Reconstruction P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)Offline week / CERN Status of the SPD Offline Domenico Elia (INFN Bari) Overview:  Response simulation (timing info, dead/noisy.
AliRoot survey: Calibration P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
Reconstruction tools for the study of short-lived resonances in ALICE pp collisions at the LHC startup 1.The ALICE 2.Short-lived resonances.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)ALICE Offline week / CERN Update on the SPD Offline Domenico Elia in collaboration with H. Tydesjo, A. Mastroserio Overview:
1 GlueX Software Oct. 21, 2004 D. Lawrence, JLab.
V4-19-Release P. Hristov 11/10/ Not ready (27/09/10) #73618 Problems in the minimum bias PbPb MC production at 2.76 TeV #72642 EMCAL: Modifications.
ALICE Offline Week – 22 Oct Visualization of embedding Matevz Tadel, CERN Adam Kisiel, Ohio State University.
I.BelikovWeekly Offline Meeting, CERN, 14 Sep Common track parameterization for the barrel detectors.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
January 2009 offline detector review - 2 nd go 1 ● Offline – Geometry – Material budget – Simulation – Raw data – OCDB parameters – Reconstruction ● Calibration.
V4-18-Release P. Hristov 21/06/2010.
Analysis Frame for MC data
Marian Ivanov TPC status report.
Developments of the PWG3 muon analysis code
Visualization of embedding
ALICE analysis preservation
Calibrating ALICE.
ALICE – First paper.
v4-18-Release: really the last revision!
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
AliRoot status and PDC’04
ALICE Offline Week, CERN
EMCal Offline Code Status: Introduction and tasks
HLT & Calibration.
TPC status - Offline Q&A
STAR Geometry and Detectors
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
BES III Software: Short-term Plan ( )
Presentation transcript:

Features needed in the “final” AliRoot release P.Hristov 26/10/2006

Simulation Updated geometry and materials for the installed detectors (“Geometry as built”) –Documentation –Reference to the drawings Generators –Final tests of –Replacement of PDF by LHAPDF –New generators?

Simulation I Particle transport –FLUKA –Geant4? Hits => uniform volume identification (raw, digits, clusters) Digits –Event embedding Magnetic field: new map Additional effects: ExB, space charge, etc. Use cases: interaction types –P-P min. bias –Beam - gas –Cosmic rays –Pb-Pb Use cases: field –0, 0.2, 0.5 T Use cases: beam displacement Use cases: CMS energy (0.9,…,14TeV)

Alignment Completed transition to symbolic volume names Treatment of survey data Treatment of support structures (space frame) Alignment procedures (cosmic rays, tracks with/without field, detector overlaps, etc.)

Calibration Detectors –Final version of the requirements Data size in FES, OCDB and reference –Online calibration algorithms (existing examples: SPD and T0-TOF combined time zero calibration) SHUTTLE Preprocessors –Detector calibration algorithms –Data ROOTification (detectors) File Exchange Server –File system definition (DAQ done, DCS & HLT started) –Online framework (DAQ in progress, DCS & HLT started) –Parameters evaluation (detectors) HLT access to condition parameters

Raw data Final version of the raw data (tested with the real detector) + DDL/equipment mapping, geometrical mapping within a DDL, etc. Possibility to process all the existing combinations (LDC only, LDC + GDC, with/without header extension, with/without equipment header, etc.) No simulation information is used during the processing (no galice.root, etc.) Safe treatment of corrupted events/files Raw2SDigits functionality for embedding Raw data visualization

Offline commissioning: Summary readiness chart Align-aware simu & reco –Simulation and reconstruction take into account the real position of the detecting elements read from files that “correct” the geometry Alignment algorithms –Determine the “residual” alignment from RAW data Align data input –Read the alignment data from the surveyer files Calib-aware simu & reco –Detector response can be “corrected” via parameters read from calibration files (de)calibration –Calibration files can be read to correct ideal detector response Offline algorithms –Calibration constants are calculated from RAW during reconstruction Calib. proced. in ECS –Calibration procedures are controlled by ECS Online algorithms –Calibration constants are calculated from RAW online prior to reconstruction Trigger –Trigger input to CTP can be calculated from simulated RAW

Reconstruction Factorization of the reconstruction features. Reconstruction conditions in CDB Beam-beam pile-up removal in TPC Beam-gas pile-up removal in TPC Electron PID with the TRD Bremsstrahlung corrections Monitoring of the reconstruction quality TRD tracking using tracklets. Transformation Local -> Global for all the clusters( related to the uniform volume identification) Material budget via TGeo (ITS) Detector inefficiencies and mismatches in the Bayesian PID

Analysis: main requirements (PB) Event selection: tags, bookkeeping for normalization Track selection: general cuts, primaries, secondaries AOD: base class, standardization, content, hierarchy of AOD's, MC information with AOD Trigger efficiency (detector, selection) corrections Efficiencies (detector, reconstruction) corrections Acceptance corrections (resolution, boundary effects, vertex smearing)

Analysis: proposals from the PWGs Classes that deal with the PID: –Classes that return a list of pions, kaons, protons by defining several initial conditions Class for Event Mixing: –TSelector issue Class for Shuffling (rotations, reflections, etc. within one event) Macros to generate quality check plots (Vertex, tracking, pid, ITS, TPC...) Comparison macros for data quality checks (kinematics + ESD) High pT barrel tracking –Optimized set of quality cuts –Efficiency and fake track rate Embedding

Analysis: proposals from the PWGs Jet Analysis: Modified jet structure in central PbPb collisions compared to reference: pp, pA, peripheral PbPb Needs reconstruction under same conditions –Possibility to reconstruct jets produced in pp events inside a realistic PbPb background ESD+ESD ESD+Kine Early analysis might need frequent loop over ESDs. –Maybe only possible for a fraction of the data –Provide mechanism to equilibrate the statistics over the full pT spectrum

Analysis framework Provide easy-to-use tools to allow data analysis in a coherent way Suitable for analysis ranging from simple to very complex tasks in a distributed environment Allow splitting complex analysis tasks in independent functional blocks possibly usable by other analysis

ESD and AOD “Final” ESD classes: –Content? –Functionality? AOD needs extensive development and tests –The existent classes need complete revision –New classes

Visualization Finalize basic visualization atoms (boxes, quads, discs with different color / size / markup). Positioning of detector elements for 3D view. Steering of 2D displays, selection of modules, navigation, interaction Specific visualization of detectors

Visualization (PB) Debugging of the reconstruction: visual scanning –inspect by eye real/simulated data –one-to-one comparison with MC truth –check not found objects and why Interactive reconstruction of tracks and vertices Interactive analysis

Technical requirements Resources –CPU time: to be reduced –Memory (resident and virtual): to be reduced –Data size: RAW: all features like zero suppression, compression, etc. to be included ESD: packing, usage of Double32_t, etc. Backward compatibility: to be maintained from the “final” release on