Examples of deficiencies in submitted data Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bioavailability Bioavailability means the rate and extent to which the active substance is adsorbed from a pharmaceutical product and become available.
Advertisements

Design of Bioequivalence Studies Alfredo García – Arieta, PhD
Converting Pharmacokinetic Data to the PP and PC Domains
Presentation of BE data in a product dossier Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Kamal K. Midha C.M., Ph.D, D.Sc College of Pharmacy and Nutrition,
Sample size optimization in BA and BE trials using a Bayesian decision theoretic framework Paul Meyvisch – An Vandebosch BAYES London 13 June 2014.
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Statistical Considerations for Bioequivalence.
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence.
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Introduction into the workshop Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Artemisinin combined medicines, Kampala, February |1 | Training workshop on regulatory requirements for registration of Artemisinin based combined.
WHO Prequalification Program Workshop, Kiev, Ukraine, June 25-27,2007.
Regulatory requirements for BE and Existing Guidelines
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Validation of Analytical Methods Used For Bioequivalence.
Biowaivers Drs. Jan Welink
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Qian H. Li, Lawrence Yu, Donald Schuirmann, Stella Machado, Yi Tsong
Tanzania, August, 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Guidelines and Tools available TRS 937 and BTIF (Bioequivalence Trial Information Form)
1 MARKETING AUTHORIZATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PRODUCTS: A MANUAL FOR DRUG REGULATORY AUTHORITIES.
Documentation of bioequivalence Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009.
Validation of Analytical Method
Bioequivalence Studies Dr Sanet Aspinall, PhD Managing Director AddClin Research Pretoria 20 March 2009.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Quality of Bioequivalence.
Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines Quality of BE Data Dr. Henrike Potthast Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable.
regulatory requirements
The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Drug substance or a finished (drug) product 80 to 120 % of the test concentration Content.
Prequalification project Drs. Jan Welink. * Note to applicants on the choice of comparator products for the prequalification.
Analytical considerations
OVERVIEW OF DACA BIOEQUIVALENCE REPORT EVALUATION Presented by Solomon Shiferaw 31Augst 2010.
Week 6- Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September Frequent Deficiencies Dr. Henrike Potthast
Case studies Saila Antila, PhD WHO consultant Training workshop on Pharmaceutical Quality, Good Manufacturing Practice & Bioequivalence, Kiev
Regulatory requirements Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
ACPS Meeting, October 19-20, 2004 BioINequivalence: Concept and Definition Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs, OPS, CDER,
Highly Variable Drugs – Bioequivalence Issues: FDA Proposal Under Consideration Barbara M. Davit, J.D., Ph.D. Deputy Director, Division of Bioequivalence.
Quality of Bioequivalence Data Alfredo García - Arieta Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Issues in Generic Substitution: Safety/Efficacy, Cost Savings and Supply Robert J. Herman, MD, FRCPC Professor, Department of Medicine University of Calgary.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September 2010 Artemisinin-based Products Dr. Henrike Potthast
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Statistical considerations Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
Center for Professional Advancement Generic Drug Approvals Course Bioequivalence & Bioavailability Michael A. Swit, Esq. Vice President.
Training Workshop: Training of BE Assessors Kiev, October 2009 Frequent Deficiencies Dr. Henrike Potthast Training workshop: Training.
Population Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Levosulpiride and Terbinafine in Healthy Male Korean Volunteers Yong-Bok Lee College of Pharmacy and Institute.
Area under the plasma concentration time curve. IMPORTANCE OF AUC Pharmacokinetics - measurement of bioavaibility absolute, relative Biopharmaceutics.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
Comparability of methods and analysers Nora Nikolac
Hypothesis Testing Errors. Hypothesis Testing Suppose we believe the average systolic blood pressure of healthy adults is normally distributed with mean.
Grade Statistics without Bonus with Bonus Average = 86 Median = 87 Average = 88 Median = 89 Undergraduates Average=88 MS Average=92.
Pre-qualification Program: Priority Medicines Interchangeability of Multi Source Drug Products SALOMON STAVCHANSKY, PH.D. ALCON CENTENNIAL PROFESSOR OF.
Using Product Development Information to Address the Bioequivalence Challenges of Highly-variable Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office.
Malaysia, EVALUTION OF DOSSIERS IN WHO- PREQUALIFICATION PROJECT MULTISOURCE TB-DRUGS Evaluation of bioavailability/bioequivalence data Based,
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence L 10,11.  Bioavailability is a measurement of the rate and extent (amount) to which the active ingredient or active.
Deficiencies in Bioequivalence dossiers Overview and Examples.
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
Exact PK Equivalence for a bridging study Steven Novick, Harry Yang (MedImmune) and Xiang Zhang (NC State) NCB, October 2015.
Milan Smid, MD, PhD Tutorial: WHO Prequalification Programme for Priority Medicines, Beijing, March, 2010 Demonstration of Bioequivalence.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Statistical Considerations.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
Blood Level Bioequivalence VICH GL 52 Chair: Marilyn N. Martinez, US FDA.
The First Conference for Medicines Regulatory Authorities In Sudan and Neighboring Countries Khartoum December 2014 Alain PRAT, Technical Officer,
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Tanzania, August 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Bioequivalence dossier requirements for the prequalification project WHO Training Workshop.
Statistics Unit Check your understanding…. Can you answer these? What does the standard deviation of a sample represent? What is the difference between.
Yahdiana Harahap, Agus Imam Bahaudin, Harmita
Selected Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetic Calculations
Bioequivalence trials: design, evaluation, regulatory requirements
Presentation transcript:

Examples of deficiencies in submitted data Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October |2 | GCP overview Bioanalytical part Critical deviations in %

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October |3 | GCP overview Bioanalytical part Major deviations in %

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October |4 | Deficiencies Overall: no bio-study submitted insufficient clinical data Test and Reference product outside the 90% confidence intervals Inadequate validation method of the bioanalysis no submission of dissolution test study design outliers GLP/GCP

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October |5 | Examples Subjects included: - subjects: normal healthy volunteers, male, years * report all demographic data * report all withdrawals from study and reasons why * protocol: handling! Exclusion only when: - subject had vomited shortly after intake of product - analytical problem subjects

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October |6 | Examples subjects Case: Report stated that 32 subjects were selected and included in the study.

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October |7 | Examples subjects Case: Exclusion of subjects (1). - protocol 28 subjects enrolled - PK data 24 subjects used as defined by protocol - two drop-outs (for personal reason) - 26 subjects completed the study - selection procedure replacements not defined!! - replacements subjects 25 and 27

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October |8 | Examples subjects Case: Exclusion of subjects (1). Subject 26:

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October |9 | Examples - number of subjects: 36 - used for statistical analysis: 35 - reason: low drug plasma levels in one subject calculated 90% CI: AUC 0-t 0.83 – 1.07 C max 0.82 – 1.04 Conclusion: Bioequivalent! subjects Case: Exclusion of subjects (2).

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples subjects Case: Exclusion of subjects (2). subject excluded!

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples - number of subjects: 36 - used for statistical analysis: 36 calculated 90% CI: AUC 0-t 0.76 – 1.03 C max 0.79 – 1.02 Conclusion: not bioequivalent! subjects Case: Exclusion of subjects (2).

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Blood sampling Adequate sampling times and period. - reliable estimation of Cmax - reliable estimation of extent of absorption (AUC) AUC 0-t / AUC inf > 80%

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: sampling scheme. Drug: literature reported t max 2 – 7 hours Blood sampling

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Case: t max. Blood sampling

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Elimination half-life

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Reference product Case: manufacturer. Protocol : Study report:

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Reference product Case: change manufacturing process. - normal crossover bioequivalence study - number of subjects 38 - Test: ethionamide 250 mg capsule - Reference: Trecator-SC 250 mg tablet - 90% CI: AUC 0-t 0.95 – 1.28 C max 1.02 – 1.51 Conclusion: Not bioequivalent!

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Reference product Case: change manufacturing process.

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Test product Case: formulation. Application: Studied:

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples - LOQ: 10 ng/ml, sampling period 96 hours - AUC 0-t : 639 +/- 258 ng.h/ml - AUC inf : /- 379 ng.h/ml - C max : 31 +/- 14 ng/ml Analytical method Case: LOQ (1).

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: LOQ (2). Analytical method

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Specificity/selectivity: Analytical method

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: stability (1). Analytical method

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: stability (2). Case: stability (3). Analytical method

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Results: Pharmacokinetic data - check PK results; also C-t curves - in line with to be expected - normal variability PK data

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Case: C max. PK data

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: C-t curves. PK data

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples - number of subjects: 24 - used for statistical analysis: 24 - non-parametric testing - reason: non normal distribution calculated 90% CI: AUC inf 0.98 – 1.23 C max 0.99 – 1.24 Conclusion: Bioequivalent! Case: testing. Statistical analysis

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: testing. Statistical analysis

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: testing. - number of subjects: 24 - used for statistical analysis: 24 - parametric testing !!!!!!!!!! - reason: detection of an outlier considered not acceptable calculated 90% CI: AUC 0-t 0.98 – 1.23 C max 1.01 – 1.38 Conclusion: Not bioequivalent! non parametric testing considered not acceptable! Statistical analysis

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples GCP/GLP criteria local market ≠ world market GLP fraud original data/documents not available

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: reanalysis statistical analysis could not confirm values obtained by applicant GCP/GLP

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: integration GCP/GLP

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: improper documentation GCP/GLP

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: manipulation GCP/GLP

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: manipulation GCP/GLP

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Examples Case: manipulation GCP/GLP

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Example Case: remarkable data GCP/GLP

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Example Case: integration (1) GCP/GLP

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Example Case: integration (2) GCP/GLP

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Example Case: falsified data GCP/GLP

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | Example Case: falsified data GCP/GLP

Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October | End Thank you for your attention