Jaipur, India Feb 4-10 20081 title Recent Results from BRAHMS R. Debbe for the BRAHMS Collaboration Physics Dept. Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Results from BRAHMS experiment at RHIC Pawel Staszel Niels Bohr Institute for the BRAHMS Collaboration.
Advertisements

RHIC AGS Users Meeting 12 May BRAHMS Highlights Ramiro Debbe for the BRAHMS collaboration Physics Department.
High p T Suppression at Forward Rapidities Catalin Ristea Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen for the BRAHMS Collaboration XXXV International Symposium on.
June 17, 2003NN2003, Moscow, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute1 n100 AGeV AGeV Au+Au Ecm =  s  40 TeV THE LITTLE BIG BANG and search.
June 17, 2003NN2003, Moscow, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute1 n100 AGeV AGeV Au+Au Ecm =  s  40 TeV THE LITTLE BIG BANG and search.
Michael Murray1 Global Detectors Flavor Dynamics Michael Murray for BRAHMS C. Arsene 12, I. G. Bearden 7, D. Beavis 1, S. Bekele 12, C. Besliu 10, B. Budick.
Particle Production in p + p Reactions at GeV K. Hagel Cyclotron Institute Texas A & M University for the BRAHMS Collaboration.
Baryon-to-meson production in a wide range of baryo-chemical potential at RHIC Paweł Staszel, Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics Jagiellonian University.
Transverse and Longitudinal Dynamics at RHIC Paweł Staszel, Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics Jagiellonian University SQM 2007 Levo č a, 24–
Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur. Outline February 9, 2008Quark Matter Results –dN/dy –Stopping Results –dN/dy –Stopping Summary and discussion Experiment.
Baryon-to-meson production in a wide range of baryo-chemical potential at RHIC Paweł Staszel, Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics Jagiellonian University.
03/14/2006WWND2006 at La Jolla1 Identified baryon and meson spectra at intermediate and high p T in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions Outline: Motivation Intermediate.
1 Mar. 26 SQM2006 J.H. Lee (BNL) Recent Results from BRAHMS J.H. Lee Physics Department Brookhaven National Laboratory For the Collaboration March
Phases of matter in the BRAHMS experiment Paweł Staszel, Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics Jagiellonian University for the BRAHMS Collaboration.
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
Winter Workshop, Big Sky, February 121 Flemming Videbaek Physics Department, BNL What did we learn from 200 and 62 GeV pp collisions at RHIC ? A BRAHMS.
Identified and Inclusive Charged Hadron Spectra from PHENIX Carla M Vale Iowa State University for the PHENIX Collaboration WWND, March
J.H. Lee BNL Correlations Fest, June 2002, BNL HBT in BRAHMS.
H. Ito University of Kansas For the BRAHMS Collaboration The BRAHMS Institutions 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, U.S.A. 2 Institut de.
P + p at 200 GeV K. Hagel Cyclotron Institute, Texas A & M for the BRAHMS Collaboration The spectrometers Particle antiparticle ratios –  s dependence.
BRAHMS High p T Results from the BRAHMS Experiment Zhongbao Yin Department of Physics, University of Bergen for the BRAHMS Collaboration.
QM’05 Budapest, HungaryHiroshi Masui (Univ. of Tsukuba) 1 Anisotropic Flow in  s NN = 200 GeV Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions at RHIC - PHENIX Hiroshi Masui.
1 Nov. 15 QM2006 Shanghai J.H. Lee (BNL) Nuclear Induced Particle Suppression at Large-x F at RHIC J.H. Lee Physics Department Brookhaven National Laboratory.
BRAHMS 16. August 2004 ICHEP04 Beijing, Kina I.G.Bearden, Niels Bohr Institute 1 BRAHMS Particle Production at Forward Rapidities with BRAHMS I.G. Bearden,
Transverse dynamics at y=0 in BRAHMS Bjørn H. Samset Transverse dynamics at RHIC, March 2003 A story of centrality dependent pt spectra of identified charged.
Recent Results from the BRAHMS Experiment at RHIC Paweł Staszel, Jagellonian University for the BRAHMS Collaboration Eighth Workshop on Non-Perturbative.
1 April 21 DIS2006 J.H. Lee (BNL) SSA in BRAHMS J.H. Lee (BNL) for BRAHMS Collaboration DIS2006, Tsukuba, April 2006 Short Introduction Preliminary results.
20-26 Feb Lake Louise Eun-Joo Kim Parton energy loss, saturation, and recombination at BRAHMS Eun-Joo Kim University of Kansas For the BRAHMS collaboration.
Fouad RAMI Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, Strasbourg  Introduction  The BRAHMS Experiment  Overview of Main Results  Bulk observables.
BRAHMS 22. Oktober 2004 Forward Physics Workshop, KU I.G.Bearden, Niels Bohr Institute 1 BRAHMS Particle Production Studied with BRAHMS I.G. Bearden, Niels.
1 Physics at forward rapidities How well does pQCD work p+p at 200 and 62 GeV Probing the initial condition d+Au collisions at 200 GeV Final state effects.
QM 2009, Knoxville1 Forward-Rapidity Azimuthal and Radial Flow of Identified Particles for = 200 GeV Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions S.J. Sanders (U. Kansas)
2nd International Workshop on the critical point and the onset of deconfinement Charged mesons in Au+Au interactions at 62.4 AGeV Ionut Arsene for the.
Rapidity Dependence of Charged Hadron Yields in Central Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV Djamel Ouerdane Niels Bohr Institute for the BRAHMS Collaboration Quark.
BRAH Broad RAnge Hadron MS Magnetic Spectrometers 2.3° 30° 90° 30° The BRAHMS HI and Spin Programs S. J. Sanders U. Kansas.
Charged-particle pseudorapidity densities in d-Au collisions at  s=200GeV/A Hironori Ito Brookhaven National Laboratory BRAHMS Collaboration.
Results from the BRAHMS Experiment at RHIC F.Rami* for the BRAHMS Collaboration * Institut de Recherches Subatomiques and Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg.
Results from First RHIC run QM 2001 January 15, 2001 Results from First RHIC run QM 2001 January 15, 2001 F.Videbœk Physics Department Brookhaven National.
Strangeness production in Au+Au collisions at RHIC Jens Ivar Jørdre University of Bergen, Norway.
1 Results from the BRAHMS experiment at RHIC Dieter Röhrich Fysisk institutt, Universitetet i Bergen for the BRAHMS collaboration Experimental setup Stopping.
Rapidity Dependence of Pion Elliptic Flow Hironori Ito 1 Erik Johnson 2 Steve Sanders 2 BRAHMS Collaboration 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory 2 University.
Recent Results from BRAHMS from y=0 to y=3 I. G. Bearden Niels Bohr Institute University of Copenhagen, Denmark Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes,
HIGHLIGHTS BRAHMS I.G. Bearden, Niels Bohr Institute QM'06 Shanghai 2 Outline BRAHMS Intermediate PT Soft physics.
BRAHMS Scanning the phases of QCD I. Arsene, I.G. Bearden, D. Beavis, C. Besliu, B. Budick, H. Bøggild, C. Chasman, C. H. Christensen, P. Christiansen,
Presentation for NFR - October 19, Trine S.Tveter Recent results from RHIC Systems studied so far at RHIC: - s NN 1/2 = 
Elementary interactions and cold nuclear matter at RHIC Bjørn H. Samset Dr. student., UiO (In melting the nucleus, did we break some stained glass windows?)
Phases of matter in the BRAHMS experiment Paweł Staszel, Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics Jagiellonian University for the BRAHMS Collaboration.
DNP2004 Oct Hyatt Regency Chicago IL Ramiro Debbe for the BRAHMS collaboration Physics Department Forward Identified Particle Production in d+Au.
Truls Martin Larsen, BRAHMS Collaboration, QM Aug 1 Nuclear Modification factors in Cu-Cu and Au-Au collisions Truls Martin Larsen.
Rapidity dependence of charged particle yields with BRAHMS for Au+Au at 200 GeV Djamel Ouerdane for the BRAHMS collaboration Quark Matter 2002 Nantes,
Zbigniew Majka M.Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland Review of early results from BRAHMS experiment.
Kaon Production in Central Au+Au Collisions at 200 and 63 GeV Djamel Ouerdane Niels Bohr Institute for the BRAHMS Collaboration Strange Quark Matter 2004.
Hadron Spectra and Yields Experimental Overview Julia Velkovska INT/RHIC Winter Workshop, Dec 13-15, 2002.
BRAHMS Heavy Ion Results and Perspectives Erik Bjorn Johnson RHIC & AGS Users Meeting June 8, 2006.
Eun-Joo Kim ( Chonbuk Nat. Univ.) Hongyan Yang ( Univ. of Bergen ) For the Collaboration N MF Nuclear Modification Factors at BRAHMS.
BRAHMS 18. JUNI 2003 BNL High Pt Colloquium I.G.Bearden, Niels Bohr Institute 1 BRAHMS High P T Measurements with BRAHMS I.G. Bearden, Niels Bohr Institute.
8 th February 2002Michael Murray, Texas A&M, CMS Heavy Ion Mtg at MIT Brahms: Forward Physics at RHIC T1 MTPC1 T2 MTPC2 MRS: 90 deg 6.5 msr FS: 6 deg 0.8.
Kansas OCT 2004 Ramiro Debbe for the BRAHMS collaboration Physics Department BRAHMS Forward Physics Program Forward Physics at RHIC and LHC University.
HAW Sep Maui, Hawaii Ramiro Debbe BNL Physics Department The excess of positive charged particles measured at forward rapidities in d+Au.
BRAHMS Zhongbao Yin Department of Physics, University of Bergen for the BRAHMS Collaboration High p T Spectra of Protons and Charged Pions in Au+Au and.
Baryon-to-meson production in a wide range of baryo-chemical potential at RHIC Paweł Staszel, Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics Jagiellonian University.
Radoslaw Karabowicz for the BRAHMS Collaboration
High-pT Identified Hadron Production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu Collisions
Eun-Joo Kim University of Kansas For the BRAHMS collaboration
Soft Physics at Forward Rapidity
Identified hadron production in d+Au and p+p collisions at RHIC
Recent Results from the BRAHMS
BRAHMS overview Paweł Staszel,
Identified Charged Hadron Production at High pT
Forward Physics with BRAHMS at RHIC University of Bergen & CERN
Presentation transcript:

Jaipur, India Feb title Recent Results from BRAHMS R. Debbe for the BRAHMS Collaboration Physics Dept. Brookhaven National Laboratory

Jaipur, India Feb  Extent of sQGP in rapidity space.  Particle production (in rapidity space) as function of energy and system size.  Strangeness production in AuAu collisions at 62.4 GeV  Extracting high-x physics with the p/  + ratio and the R AuAu of protons in Au+Au collisions.  Systematics of baryon transport. Outline of presentation

Jaipur, India Feb T.Hirano and Y.Nara, Nucl.Phys.A743(2004)305 Energy loss: first order GLV (x,y)=(0,0) E max  Gauss E max =45 GeV/fm 3  flat = 2.0  Gauss = 0.8  0 = 0.6 fm/c We will make use of a 3D+1 hydrodynamic model provided graciously by T. Hirano to guide the description of our results. y=2.95 Parameterization of initial energy density

Jaipur, India Feb The animations show equal energy density contours at four rapidity values in proper time steps of 0.2fm/c Partons simulated with Pythia are transported through the expanding system, average energy loss changes by ~X2 from y=0 to y=3, but the ratio of p T distributions of partons is insensitive to that change. y=0y=1y=2y=3

Jaipur, India Feb The R AuAu at high y is consistent with reduced energy loss and leaves room for saturation effects.

Jaipur, India Feb Consistent with dense medium effects not fully extending to high y, with binary coll. scaling restored at mid-central collisions. Centrality dependence of R AuAu pi- at 200 GeV y=0 y=3.1

Jaipur, India Feb At 62.4 GeV, dense system has shorter lifetime At high y(>2), effects of dense medium start to disappear. Isospin effects grow stronger I.G. Bearden 5th Feb.14:00 Au+Au 0-10% central Top energy density ~20 GeV/fm 3

Jaipur, India Feb Particle production systematics Positive pion production in p+p collisions at √s=200 and 62.4 GeV. Systematic errors shown with gray boxes are mainly driven by extrapolations of p T distributions. Measurements normalized to total inelastic cross section (41mb 200GeV and 36mb at 62.4 GeV)

Jaipur, India Feb Positive pion production in d+Au at 200 GeV The centrality dependence shows the presence of the Au “target” source at negative rapidity, as well as the projectile d at high rapidity. The distribution becomes similar to p+p in the most peripheral sample. H. Yang 9th Feb. 14:00

Jaipur, India Feb Positive pion produced in central (0-10%) Au+Au coll. at 62.4 GeV Fit to single gaussian yields width consistent with Landau’s model:  2 =ln(√s/2m p )  Landau = 1.87 Positive pion production in Au + Au at √s NN = 62.4 GeV

Jaipur, India Feb Positive pion production in Au+Au at 200 GeV To first order, all distributions are described with a single gaussian. Width of central events consistent with Landau’s value:  Landau = 2.16  meas. = 2.23±0.06

Jaipur, India Feb Evolution of the multiplicity dist. Shapes with centrality Central collisions, (up to 40%) scale with N part. The tails of the peripheral distributions deviate from that scaling. ( This has been attributed to pion emission from spectators. PHOBOS PRL ) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV

Jaipur, India Feb One can tune the baryo- chemical potential using the pbar/p values measured at different rapidities. The high y K/pi+ ratios at RHIC (62.4 GeV) are very similar to the SPS results from the high energy slope of the “MarekHorn”. (At same pbar/p ratio and thus driven by the baryo- chemical potential.) I.C. Arsene 5th Feb. 15:00 Poster by M. Murray

Jaipur, India Feb High-x physics accessible with the p/  + ratio The puzzling abundance of protons with respect to pions has been attributed to recombination effects that do reproduce the data at mid-rapidity for pt values that range up to ~6 GeV/c. Our results at high y indicate that this ratio may rather be driven by beam fragmentation.

Jaipur, India Feb Comparison of the p/  + in p+p and Au+Au systems at 62.4 GeV The overall difference between the ratio measured in pp and AuAu is consistent with the favored interpretation based on coalescence in Au+Au The similarity of the ratio in both systems may be driven by incoherent proton fragmentation. Large p+p value of ratio may be driven by proximity to beam rapidity. Poster by N. Katrynska ‘ p+p Au+Au

Jaipur, India Feb Comparison of the p/  + in p+p and Au+Au systems at 200 GeV At mid-rapidity the difference between pp and AuAu system can be related to re-combination which favors proton production. A much pronounced effect at higher rapidity may be an interplay between fragmentation effects, parton coalescence and baryon transport.

Jaipur, India Feb Nuclear modification factor for protons as function of y in AuAu 0-10% 200 GeV As already seen with the p/  + ratio, baryons do not behave as mesons; this R AuAu shows the increased proton production at high y. Strong enhancement of pbars at y~3 is not understood, yet. protonsanti-proton

Jaipur, India Feb R AuAu of (p+pbar)/2 as function of centrality in AuAu 200 GeV Remarkable enhancement of proton prod. In peripheral coll. y=0 y=3 Consistent with interplay of energy loss and multiple scattering effects. As well as radial flow.

Jaipur, India Feb Baryon transport studies BRAHMS experimental program will deliver a wealth of information on baryon transport with results that range from p+p collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV to bigger systems like Cu+Cu and Au+Au at both energies an different centralities p+p collisions at 200 GeV Poster by H.H. Dalsgaard

Jaipur, India Feb Centrality dependent net-proton distributions AuAu 200 GeV N part scaling in semi-central to central coll. (below 40%). Similar scaling appears to extend to ~high rapidity. Shape changes are evident at the “rapidity shifted” peak. Poster by C. Nygaard Hijing-B v1.1 AMPT

Jaipur, India Feb Summary and outlook Using some guidance from 3D+1 hydro dynamical expansion calculation, we find that, the fact that nuclear modification factors remain constant as function of y, is an indication that other factors besides energy loss do contribute to the overall small measured value. The strength of these effects would grow with y. We have described ongoing analysis of particle production in all the measured systems. In particular, a comparison to SPS indicates that the K/pi+ ratio is driven by the  B potential. We have reported interesting effects related to protons at moderate p T at high rapidity. We presented results on baryon transport, with special focus on the AuAu system. We need to balance the need to bring analyses to publication and new focus for each member institution.

Jaipur, India Feb BRAHMS Collaboration I. C. Arsene 12, I. G. Bearden 7, D. Beavis 1, S. Bekele 12, C. Besliu 10, B. Budick 6, H. B ø ggild 7, C. Chasman 1, C. H. Christensen 7, P. Christiansen 7, H.Dahlsgaard 7, R. Debbe 1, J. J. Gaardh ø je 7, K. Hagel 8, H. Ito 1, A. Jipa 10, E.B.Johnson 11, J. I. J ø rdre 9, C. E. J ø rgensen 7, R. Karabowicz 5, N. Katrynska 5,E. J. Kim 11, T. M. Larsen 7, J. H. Lee 1, Y. K. Lee 4,S. Lindahl 12, G. L ø vh ø iden 12, Z. Majka 5, M. J. Murray 11,J. Natowitz 8, C.Nygaard 7 B. S. Nielsen 7, D. Ouerdane 7, D.Pal 12, F. Rami 3, C. Ristea 8, O. Ristea 11, D. Röhrich 9, B. H. Samset 12, S. J. Sanders 11, R. A. Scheetz 1, P. Staszel 5, T. S. Tveter 12, F. Videb æ k 1, R. Wada 8, H. Yang 9, Z. Yin 9, I. S. Zgura 2 A. Qviller 7 1. Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA 2. Institute of Space Science, Bucharest - Magurele, Romania 3. Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien et Universit é Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France 4. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA 5. M. Smoluchkowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland 6. New York University, New York, USA 7. Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 8. Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA 9. University of Bergen, Department of Physics and Technology, Bergen, Norway 10. University of Bucharest, Romania 11. University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA 12. University of Oslo, Department of Physics, Oslo, Norway