Retail DR and Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley Updates to DSWG & RMS January 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Results from the 2013 Survey of LSEs to Obtain Retail DR and Dynamic Pricing information Public Summary Frontier Associates LLC June
Retail DR and Price Response 2014 Product Headcounts Paul Wattles, ERCOT Market Design & Development DSWG Feb. 3, 2015.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Workshop Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG/REP Workshop April 9, 2014.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
September 15, 2006 Mending the Fractured Value Chain Through Functional Use of Demand Response.
RMS Update December 14,  Advanced Meter Settlement Impacts  January 2012 – ERCOT settling 4.4M ESIIDs using Advanced Meter data  January 2012–
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Data Collection Project and Lessons Learned Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG March 2014.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG and RMS sub team October 16, 2012.
ERS Update for DSWG June 1, Agenda June – September 2012 Procurement XML Project Update Clearing Price discussion NPRR 451 Q & A.
Retail Smart Grid Trends Paul Wattles Senior Analyst, Market Design & Development UT Energy Week: “How Smart Grids Enable Consumers” Feb. 18, 2015.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Update to RMS Karen Farley June 3, 2014.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Workshop Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG/REP Workshop April 2014.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Price Responsive Load Survey Draft Results Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG and RMS Aug. 22, 2012.
Distributed Energy Resources Concept Document Discussion ERCOT Staff DREAM Task Force Aug. 25,
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
ERCOT Demand Response Spring 2015 ERCOT Operator Seminar.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
ERS Update Plus Revisions to Proposed Changes for ERS Time Periods Presented to: Demand Side Working Group November 5, 2014.
Reliability Demand Response Product February 25, 2011
Demand Side Products in PJM Joseph BowringCornell University January 17, 2011.
Advanced Metering’s Next Frontier: Demand Response Interim Report Advanced Metering Implementation Team/ ERCOT Demand Side Working Group February 2012.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Load Participation in Real-Time Market: LMP Minus G.
1 ESI ID SERVICE HISTORY AND USAGE DATA EXTRACT SYSTEM CHANGE REQUEST (SCR 727) February 24, 2003.
NPRR 571 ERS Weather Sensitive Loads Requirements Carl Raish, ERCOT QSE Managers Working Group November 5, 2013.
Final Report Weather Sensitive Emergency Response Service (WS ERS) Pilot Project Carl Raish, ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 7, 2013.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
RMS/COPS Workshop VI 1 October 06, Antitrust Admonition ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in.
Profiling Working Group October 16, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting October 16, 2003.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR RMS Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish October 6, 2015.
Sept. 28, 2007 Interim Update Load Response Survey.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Workshop Paul Wattles Carl Raish Karen Farley REP Roundtable August 5, 2015 – Updates in RED.
01/17/ CP Discussion October 16,2002 Retail Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
Advanced Metering Rule Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas June 6, 2007 Retail Market Workshop COMET WG Meeting.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
Distributed Generation Registration June 30, 2008.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR DSWG Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish September 17, 2015.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
Price Responsive Load / Retail Demand Response 2013 Analysis Report Overview ERCOT Staff & Frontier Associates RMS Meeting August 5, 2014.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
February 2, 2016 RMS Meeting 1. * Reasons: * Per the ERCOT Board Report dated 8/5/14 there were 6.6M Advanced Metering System (AMS) Electric Service Identifiers.
Status Report on DSWG Task 11: Retail DR/Dynamic Pricing Project Presentation to the ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates LLC.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
Load Participation in Nodal Training Session Update DSWG December 7, 2007.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations June 27, 2012 – ETWG Meeting.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR RMS Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish September 1, 2015.
Thoughts on DER Aggregations ERCOT Staff DREAM TF Sept. 28, DER Aggregations.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
RMS Update to TAC June 7, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR052 File Naming Convention for Customer Billing Contact Information URGENT (Vote) RMS Procedures:
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
AMIT-DSWG Workshop ‘AMI’s Next Frontier: Demand Response Part 2’
Analysis of Load Reductions Associated with 4-CP Transmission Charges in ERCOT Carl L Raish Principal Load Profiling and Modeling Demand Side Working Group.
Principal Load Profiling and Modeling
Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461
Presentation transcript:

Retail DR and Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley Updates to DSWG & RMS January 2013

2 Why it’s important to understand retail DR & price response Resource adequacy concerns –Brattle report underscores the important role of DR in the ERCOT markets Advanced metering –Enablement of DR is an important element in the return on the AMI investment There are limits on the amount of DR that the ISO can contract for (e.g., Ancillary Services and ERS) The bulk of new DR will likely need to be enabled by LSEs: –Price and 4CP-responsive Load –Other retail DR incentives and technologies Ability to track growth of these products is a key metric in measuring the success of the ERCOT retail market January 2013DR/Price Response

3 The need to dig deeper PUC Subst. Rule §25.505(e)(5): –Load serving entities (LSEs) shall provide ERCOT with complete information on load response capabilities that are self-arranged or pursuant to bilateral agreements between LSEs and their customers. Phase 1 – Survey –Results shared at August RMS and DSWG Phase 2 – Data collection –October and November market meetings –Updates to DSWG, RMS on progress, next steps Phase 3 – Analysis –After data collection, evaluation of price elasticity and how it affects: Load forecasting Wholesale market price formation Resource adequacy –Analysis will be at the aggregate, no specific market participant information will be shared January 2013DR/Price Response We are here!

4 Data Collection – Progress and Next Steps Market meetings held to discuss idea of categories, definitions of categories and data elements –Good participation from both REP and NOIE markets Separate sessions in October to focus on specific issues for each audience –Category definitions (see appendix) were discussed and refined –REPs and NOIEs will need to analyze their programs/products and determine which category to assign –ERCOT and REPs agreed to a standard data collection approach –ERCOT and NOIEs agreed to bilateral discussions with respondents with programs above a certain size ERCOT may repeat the survey to get more details NOIEs may provide aggregated reports to ERCOT –May be able to share a NERC report with ERCOT DR/Price ResponseJanuary 2013

5 Data Collection – Progress and Next Steps REPs shall create and submit to ERCOT a Comma Separated Values (CSV) file via NAESB First file will be a snap shot of 06/15/2013 –ERCOT proposed a snap shot 2x a year – once for summer (6/15), once for winter (12/1) –Will revisit the request after we see the first snap shot Target date of file to ERCOT 08/01/2013 Data elements from REPs –LSE DUNS –ESI ID – active within a category –Category Code –Direct Load Control (Y/N) – DR initiated by LSE or 3 rd party (other than customer) –Start Date – the date this ESI ID commenced service under this category – MMDDYYYY If an ESI ID is in multiple categories, please submit it twice in the file, once with each category DR/Price ResponseJanuary 2013

6 Data Collection – Progress and Next Steps ERCOT will meet with NOIEs (based upon the survey responses) in Jan / Feb –To learn what is in place for measurement and verification Data collection may be specific to each NOIE –May be an aggregated report –Leverage what is already being done, where possible First report will be a snap shot of 06/15/2013 –ERCOT proposed a snap shot 2x a year – once for summer (6/15), once for winter (12/1) –Will revisit the request after we see the first snap shot Target date of report to ERCOT 08/01/2013 DR/Price ResponseJanuary 2013

7 Questions? ON OFF January 2013DR/Price Response

8 Appendix – Categories ERCOT would like to correlate premises to the types* of products they are on –RTP – Real Time Pricing –BI – Block & Index –CPP – Critical Peak Pricing –PR – Peak Rebates –4CP – Four Coincident Peak –TOU – Time of Use / Thermal Storage / DG –OLC – Other Load Control –OTH – Other Voluntary Demand Response Product –FO – Financial Option * see next slides for definitions January 2013DR/Price Response

9 Appendix – Definitions RTP – Real Time Pricing - retail prices for all hours based on ERCOT Real- Time Settlement Point Prices for the premise Load Zone, calculated every 15 minutes, or other real-time wholesale price indicator(s). BI – Block & Index – fixed pricing for a defined volume of usage, coupled with pricing indexed to the wholesale market for usage exceeding the block. Block prices and volumes may vary by time of day/week. Option could include if usage dips below the block. CPP – Critical Peak Pricing – contracts that call for prices to rise during critical peaks: limited duration, dynamically set periods of time that usually correlate to high prices in the real-time wholesale market. Critical peak events may occur a limited number of times per year and may be communicated in advance. May be enabled by DG or other technology. PR – Peak Rebates – full time fixed price contracts that pay rebates to customers for load reductions taken during specified hours. May be enabled by DG or other technology. DR/Price ResponseJanuary 2013

10 Appendix – Definitions 4CP – Four Coincident Peak – predictor signals or direct load control provided to customers in advance of potential Four Coincident Peak (4CP) intervals during summer months (June through September). Reducing load during such intervals lowers transmission charges. –4CP charges apply to large customers (peak demand ≥700 kW) in competitive choice areas, and also to NOIEs at the boundary meter level. TOU – Time of Use / Thermal Storage / Distributed Generation – prices that vary intraday across defined blocks of hours, with predefined prices and schedules. (As used here, does not apply to seasonal adjustments). DR/Price ResponseJanuary 2013

11 Appendix – Definitions OLC – Other Direct Load Control – contracts that allow the LSE or a third party to control the customer’s load remotely for economic or grid reliability purposes. This category applies to Direct Load Control (DLC) with different deployment criteria than described elsewhere. (Avoid double counting if DLC data was reported in other categories.) OTH – Other Voluntary Demand Response Product – any retail product that includes a demand response incentive or signal not covered in the other categories. FO – Financial Option – product where LSE purchases an option from the customer that is backed by a specified level of DR and uses it for their portfolio trades in the wholesale market. DR/Price ResponseJanuary 2013

12 Future ERCOT analysis Collecting premise-level data on these retail products would allow ERCOT to quantify retail DR and track trends: –Chart market growth in participation for each product type –Develop models (baselines) for the premise load based on historical usage –Compare the baselines to usage on days with likely DR events, depending on identified triggers: High LMPs (for Real-Time or Critical Peak products) Probable 4CP signals (for 4CP products) Energy Emergency Alerts –Evaluate TOU premise peak usage vs. baselines and/or control groups –Provide periodic progress reports to the market on an aggregated basis January 2013DR/Price Response