Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p1 Michele Punturo on behalf of the ET team GA #211743 A short introduction to the project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michele Punturo on behalf of the ET team GA # A short introduction to the project.
Advertisements

Michele Punturo European Gravitational Observatory and INFN-Perugia On behalf of the GW ILIAS-next community Gravitational Wave Network.
 ET is a “design study” supported by the European Commission under the Framework Programme 7 (FP7)  It is a ~3 years project supported by EC with about.
Michele Punturo ET scientific Coordinator INFN Perugia and EGO On behalf of the ET design study team 1ET-Michele Punturo.
Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO On behalf of the Einstein Telescope Design Study Team 1GWDAW-Rome 2010.
FP7 Design study proposal Michele Punturo Harald Lueck.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
LIGO-G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
VIRGO: WHERE WE COME FROM WHERE WE ARE GOING GIOVANNI LOSURDO - INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Project Leader for the Virgo Collaboration (and the LIGO Scientific.
Design study for 3rd generation interferometers Work Package 1 Site Identification Jo van den Brand
1 st Feedback from the Gravitational-waves working group Harald Lück Valencia, November 2006.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1 Observing the Most Violent Events in the Universe Virgo Barry Barish Director, LIGO Virgo Inauguration 23-July-03 Cascina 2003.
Gravitational-waves: Sources and detection
Towards a Design Study Proposal for a 3rd Generation Interferometric Gravitational- wave Detector Harald Lück London, October 26th 2006.
Capabilities of a Gravitational Wave Network Bernard F Schutz Albert Einstein Institute (Potsdam, Germany) and School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff.
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
Einstein gravitational wave Telescope Next steps: from technology reviews to detector design Andreas Freise for the ET WG3 working group , 2nd.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
Advanced LIGO: our future in gravitational astronomy K.A. Strain for the LIGO Science Collaboration NAM 2008 LIGO-G K.
Gravitational Wave Arezu Dehghafnar Physics Department SUT.
Design study for ET 3rd generation Gravitational Wave Interferometer Work Package 2 Suspension, Thermal noise and Cryogenics Piero Rapagnani
Paris, November 5th, ILIAS/N5: The GW antenna network Raffaele Flaminio EGO and LAPP/CNRS Summary - History - GWA Objectives & Contents - Management.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
E.T. Design Study Harald Lück. 3 main noise sources Thermal Noise Seismic Shot Noise.
E.T. Design Study & European roadmaps Michele Punturo/Harald Lück.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
Status of Virgo A. Viceré INFN-Firenze – Università di Urbino.
Lisbon, 8 January Research and Development for Gravitational Wave Detectors Raffaele Flaminio CNRS/LMA Lyon.
1 Gravitational Wave Astronomy using 0.1Hz space laser interferometer Takashi Nakamura GWDAW-8 Milwaukee 2003/12/17.
R&D on thermal noise in Europe: the STREGA Project Geppo Cagnoli University of Glasgow AMALDI 6 – Okinawa - Japan June
DECIGO – Japanese Space Gravitational Wave Detector International Workshop on GPS Meteorology January 17, Tsukuba Center for Institutes Seiji Kawamura*
LISA News from ESA O. Jennrich LISA Project Scientist.
WG3 Report Michele Punturo Harald Lück. WG3 composition Co-Chairmen M.Punturo INFN Perugia, Italy H.Lück MPI für Gravitationsphysik, AEI, Hannover, Germany.
Deci-hertz Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (DECIGO) 7th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop December 17, International Institute.
Introduction Coalescing binary compact objects for a 1.4 M  neutron star inspiralling into a 10 M  black hole would be in-band for ~200 s. We could detect.
G Z The LIGO gravitational wave detector consists of two observatories »LIGO Hanford Observatory – 2 interferometers (4 km long arms and 2 km.
Advanced Towards Advanced Virgo Giovanni Losurdo – INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Coordinator on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
January 20, 2009 ET-WP3 Geometryy 1 ET Geometry/Topology Some possible studies January 20, 2009 B. Mours.
Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO 11st ELiTES meeting.
ELiTES 1 st General Meeting Tokyo, October 2012 Federico Ferrini – EGO Director Thanks to the European Union Delegation.
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
Toward ET ? Michele Punturo INFN and EGO 1ET: EU framework.
Gravitational Wave Physics Programme: - new initiative - Group composition (current): 3 staff, 0 postdoc, 2 PhD Investment Budget: under discussion Jo.
GWADW Elba Setting the stage GWADW2011, La Biodola Francesco Fidecaro Pisa.
Harald Lück AEI Hannover. Thank you Science Team! You did a great job!
ELiTES 4 th General Meeting Michele Punturo EGO and INFN.
Michele Punturo EGO & INFN Perugia 1 2nd ET meeting, Erice Oct'09.
THE NEXT GENERATIONS OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTORS (*) Giovanni Losurdo INFN Firenze – Virgo collaboration (*) GROUND BASED, INTERFEROMETRIC.
Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO 1MGR13- ET.
Lessons to be learned from the ET design study Michele Punturo INFN Perugia ET-0005A-16 Dawn Meeting
The Quest for Gravitational Waves: a global strategy
Advanced Detector Status Report and Future Scenarios
Critical Technology Giant leaps Near-term steps Non-IFO methods
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
GW Policy: The Future: G3 Detectors
Commission II meeting – 7 March 2009
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Signal recycling R&D at LAL: Influence in Virgo
LIGO detectors: past, present and future
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
Quantum noise reduction techniques for the Einstein telescope
ELiTES The European-Japanese collaboration in Gravitational Wave research Dr. Michele Punturo Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) European Gravitational.
ILIAS WP3 activities report and ET organization
Stochastic gravitational wave and its spectral property
WP4 Positioning European Astroparticle Physics in the world-wide context WP leader CNRS Partners: FOM, IFIN-HH, FRS-FNRS/FWO, FCT Total work: 22 months.
The views of Virgo collaboration groups on upgraded/advanced Virgo
Presentation transcript:

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p1 Michele Punturo on behalf of the ET team GA # A short introduction to the project

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p2 ET is a conceptual design study supported, for about 3 years ( ), by the European Commission under the Framework Programme 7 (PF7) EU financial support ~ 3M€ Aim of the project is the delivery of a conceptual design of a 3rd generation GW observatory  Sensitivity of the apparatus~10 better than advanced detectors GA #211743

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p3 The proposal has been presented by the major groups working in GEO600 and Virgo Project coordinator: EGO INFN MPG CNRS Birmingham Univ. Glasgow Univ. NIKHEF Cardiff University GA #211743

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p4 The project is substantially subdivided in 4 technical Working Packages Project Coordinator Scientific Coordinator WP1 coordinator: Infrastructures Task responsibl e WP2 coordinator: suspensions Task reponsible Task responsibl e WP3 coordinator: Topology Task responsibl e WP4 coordinator: Astrophysics Task responsibl e WP5: Management Secretary  These WPs are related to the main aspects to be investigated drafting a 3 rd generation GW detector GA #211743

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p5 WP1: Infrastructures - Coordinator: Jo van den Brand Definition of the site requirements. Keywords:  Low seismic activity, reduction of the Newtonian noise  Multi-km (~10km) arms possibilities. Costs WP2: Suspensions and test masses – (Piero Rapagnani) Keywords:  1 Hz seismic filtering, reduction of the thermal noise through cryogenics and new materials; mechanical and optical properties of new materials for the test masses WP3: Topology – (Andreas Freise) Design of the geometry and configuration of the core ITF. Keywords:  HP lasers, alternative ITF geometries, quantum noise reduction WP4: Astrophysics issues – (B.S. Sathyaprakash) The goal of WP4 is to address ET science and data analysis. Keywords:  ET potentialities, Science Case, computational costs GA #211743

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p6 The WPs are under construction just now: The coordinators are contacting potential collaborators:  Please, facilitate their job! A collaboration distribution has been created:  Please, register here:  The Science Team will include also scientists not belonging to the 8 “beneficiaries” A WP4 meeting is scheduled for tomorrow WPs (virtual) meetings are scheduled from now to November November: first ET general meeting at EGO/Virgo (in collaboration with ILIAS-GWA) More info: LV Meeting - Amsterdam 09/2008 GA #211743

ET Design Study: WG4 - Science Potential and Data Analysis B.S. Sathyaprakash

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p8 Objectives of WP4 ET Requirements Detection capabilities requirements Data analysis requirements Computational power requirements Evaluation of design driven potentialities of ET Astrophysics Cosmology Fundamental Physics

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p9 Deliverables Vision document Assume a frequency range of operation of 1 Hz – 10 kHz produce a straw man document discussing a minimum and an optimum (ambitious?) science requirement Study of the benefit of tuning to different frequencies low frequency (1-10 Hz) medium frequency ( Hz) high frequency (0.1-1 kHz) very high frequency (1-10 kHz) Reports Annual report (after 12 months) Annual report (after 24 months) Final Report (after 36 months) Also half-yearly reports to ET Executive Committee and Governing Council

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p10 Initial Thoughts on ET Specs A total of 30 km beam tube Different topologies to be explored Underground Cryogenic Non-diffractive optics Broadband sensitivity in the range 1 Hz to 10 kHz

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p11 Sensitivity (Hz -1/2 ) Credit: M.Punturo LIGO Advanced LIGO/Virgo (2014) Virgo GEO-HF 2011 Einstein Telescope Frequency (Hz) Ad LIGO/Virgo NB

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p12  /2 What Topology and What Network? Distributed Detectors 7.5 km

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p13 Antenna pattern of 2 L-shaped Detectors

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p14 What Topology and What Network? A Triangle  /3 10 km Three independent detectors

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p15 Antenna Pattern of a Triangle No dependence on azimuth Better sensitivity and sky-coverage to bursts and inspirals as two L-shaped IFOs of the same total beam tube length

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p16 ET’s Distance Reach Z=1 Z=4 Z=3 Z=2 Z= Observed Mass M  10 3

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p17 * * * * * * * * * * * Image: WMAP * * *

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p18 CW Signal in 3 Years Vs Noise Credit: M.Punturo Einstein Telescope Frequency (Hz) h 3-yr e = e = e = e =

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p19 ET Science Goals Fundamental physics What are the different polarization states of gravitational waves? Black hole spectroscopy and the no-hair theorem Is general relativity the correct description of strong gravity? Are gravitons massive? Cosmology Independent and accurate measurement of the Hubble constant What is the nature of dark energy? How is matter organized on very large scales?

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p20 ET Science Goals Astrophysics What is the origin of gamma-ray bursts and what are the different populations? Are ULX sources Intermediate Mass Black Holes? How and when did they form? How asymmetric are neutron stars and what is their equation-of-state? What is the mass function of compact objects and what does it tell us about the stellar mass function and history of star formation rate? What is the end state of gravitational collapse? What causes pulsar glitches and magnetar flares?

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p21 ET Data Analysis Goals ET is likely to observe long-lived sources and multiple sources at any given time For example, a BNS signal starting at 1 Hz will last for 4 months and one starting at 5 Hz will last for half-a-day We open the window to a host of slowly rotating neutron stars Are there source populations that could contaminate the sensitivity by confusion noise? A paradigm shift in the way we analyze the data might be needed What can we learn from current data analysis efforts and what are relevant data analysis methods? Similarities with LISA: How can MLDC benefit ET DA? Opportunities for multi-messenger astronomy

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p22 ET Computational Infrastructure What is the computational burden ? What is the computational cost for key science deliverables? What is the cost to do secondary science deliverables? What will be the data output rates and how do we manage data archival and access? What will be the status of computing environments on 2018 time scale? Do we benefit from having specialist hardware?

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p23 Participation in the Study As a member of an institution that led the FP7 proposal or via the ET Science Team. The ET web pages at: To register for WG4 mailing list go to WG4 address is: WG4-et AT ego-gw.it WG4 working area is at: Astrophysicshttps://workarea.et-gw.eu/et/WG4- Astrophysics To register for the ET Science Team go Science Team is: science-team-et AT ego-gw.it

Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p24 Summary of WG4 Design Study Produce a vision document within the first six months that identifies the most important problems in fundamental physics, astrophysics and cosmology which ET could shed light on What is the limitation of second generation detectors? And why do we need a new set of detectors and new infrastructure? This may be our “CERN” – a facility for the next 30 or 50 years! Focus away from “more of the same”, what new can ET do? Overlap with LISA: time for a binary of (10,1000) M  to evolve from 0.01 Hz to 10 Hz is ~6 yr. For (100,1000) M  it is 7 months! Develop tools that can assess the potential for different optical configurations, topologies, sites and networks Don’t focus on just parameter estimation, relate that to science (tests of general relativity, astrophysical and cosmological models, etc.)