Panos aliferis IBM Jan. 09 quantum computing hardware with highly biased noise.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits T. Yamamoto, Yu. A. Pashkin, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura & J. S. Tsai Presented.
Advertisements

The Toffoli gate & Error Correction
Three-qubit quantum error correction with superconducting circuits
What’s QEC to Solid State Physics David DiVincenzo QEC14.
Low frequency noise in superconducting qubits
Superinductor with Tunable Non-Linearity M.E. Gershenson M.T. Bell, I.A. Sadovskyy, L.B. Ioffe, and A.Yu. Kitaev * Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Materials Science in Quantum Computing. Materials scientist view of qubit Materials –SiOx sub substrate –Superconductor (Al,Nb) –SiO x dielectric –Al0.
Adiabatic Quantum Computation with Noisy Qubits Mohammad Amin D-Wave Systems Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
Scaling up a Josephson Junction Quantum Computer Basic elements of quantum computer have been demonstrated 4-5 qubit algorithms within reach 8-10 likely.
Five criteria for physical implementation of a quantum computer 1.Well defined extendible qubit array -stable memory 2.Preparable in the “000…” state 3.Long.
High fidelity Josephson phase qubits winning the war (battle…) on decoherence “Quantum Integrated Circuit” – scalable Fidelity b reakthrough: single-shot.
Superconducting transport  Superconducting model Hamiltonians:  Nambu formalism  Current through a N/S junction  Supercurrent in an atomic contact.
 From a single molecule to an ensemble of molecules at T ~0 : Both tunneling rate and decoherence increase  LZ probability: P LZ = 1 – exp[-  (  /ħ)
Operating in Charge-Phase Regime, Ideal for Superconducting Qubits M. H. S. Amin D-Wave Systems Inc. THE QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANY TM D-Wave Systems Inc.,
D-Wave Systems Inc. THE QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANY TM A.M. Zagoskin (D-Wave Systems and UBC) Tunable coupling of superconducting qubits Quantum Mechanics.
Holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces Lian-Ao Wu Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control In collaboration with Polao Zanardi.
Experimental quantum information processing - the of the art Nadav Katz A biased progress report Contact: Quantum computation.
Superconducting Flux Qubits: Coherence, Readout, and Coupling
The noise spectra of mesoscopic structures Eitan Rothstein With Amnon Aharony and Ora Entin Condensed matter seminar, BGU.
Josephson Junctions, What are they?
Local Fault-tolerant Quantum Computation Krysta Svore Columbia University FTQC 29 August 2005 Collaborators: Barbara Terhal and David DiVincenzo, IBM quant-ph/
Quantum Computing with Superconducting Circuits Rob Schoelkopf Yale Applied Physics QIS Workshop, Virginia April 23, 2009.
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Error-correcting the IBM qubit error-correcting the IBM qubit panos aliferis IBM.
SQUID Based Quantum Bits James McNulty. What’s a SQUID? Superconducting Quantum Interference Device.
Schrödinger’s Elephants & Quantum Slide Rules A.M. Zagoskin (FRS RIKEN & UBC) S. Savel’ev (FRS RIKEN & Loughborough U.) F. Nori (FRS RIKEN & U. of Michigan)
Coherence and decoherence in Josephson junction qubits Yasunobu Nakamura, Fumiki Yoshihara, Khalil Harrabi Antti Niskanen, JawShen Tsai NEC Fundamental.
Oscillator Circuits. Outline Oscillators – Inverter-Based Oscillator – Introduction of Phase Noise Simulation – LC-Tank Based Oscillator Laplace Analysis.
Superconducting Qubits Kyle Garton Physics C191 Fall 2009.
Dressed state amplification by a superconducting qubit E. Il‘ichev, Outline Introduction: Qubit-resonator system Parametric amplification Quantum amplifier.
P. Bertet Quantum Transport Group, Kavli Institute for Nanoscience, TU Delft, Lorentzweg 1, 2628CJ Delft, The Netherlands A. ter Haar A. Lupascu J. Plantenberg.
Paraty - II Quantum Information Workshop 11/09/2009 Fault-Tolerant Computing with Biased-Noise Superconducting Qubits Frederico Brito Collaborators: P.
Quantum systems for information technology, ETHZ
Quantum computation with solid state devices - “Theoretical aspects of superconducting qubits” Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos, Varenna 5-15 July.
Non-linear driving and Entanglement of a quantum bit with a quantum readout Irinel Chiorescu Delft University of Technology.
Quantum measurement and superconducting qubits Yuriy Makhlin (Landau Institute) STMP-09, St. Petersburg 2009, July 3-8.
Coherence in Superconducting Materials for Quantum Computing David P. Pappas Jeffrey S. Kline, Fabio da Silva, David Wisbey National Institute of Standards.
Quantum Computing Preethika Kumar
What's super about superconducting qubits? Jens Koch Departments of Physics and Applied Physics, Yale University Chalmers University of Technology, Feb.
2008 BBN Quantum Computing Kickoff Quantum Materials David P. Pappas Jeffrey S. Kline, Minhyea Lee National Institute of Standards & Technology, Electronics.
Michael A. Nielsen Fault-tolerant quantum computation with cluster states School of Physical Sciences Chris Dawson (UQ) Henry Haselgrove (UQ) The University.
Meet the transmon and his friends
Global control, perpetual coupling and the like Easing the experimental burden Simon Benjamin, Oxford. EPSRC. DTI, Royal Soc.
Quantum entanglement and Quantum state Tomography Zoltán Scherübl Nanophysics Seminar – Lecture BUTE.
Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)
What is Qu antum In formation and T echnology? Prof. Ivan H. Deutsch Dept. of Physics and Astronomy University of New Mexico Second Biannual Student Summer.
Quantum Control Classical Input Classical Output QUANTUM WORLD QUANTUM INFORMATION INSIDE Preparation Readout Dynamics.
Noise and decoherence in the Josephson Charge Qubits Oleg Astafiev, Yuri Pashkin, Tsuyoshi Yamamoto, Yasunobu Nakamura, Jaw-Shen Tsai RIKEN Frontier Research.
Quantum computation with solid state devices - “Theoretical aspects of superconducting qubits” Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos, Varenna 5-15 July.
A Study of Error-Correcting Codes for Quantum Adiabatic Computing Omid Etesami Daniel Preda CS252 – Spring 2007.
September 12, 2014 Martin Suchara Andrew Cross Jay Gambetta Supported by ARO W911NF S IMULATING AND C ORRECTING Q UBIT L EAKAGE.
Adiabatic Quantum Computation with Noisy Qubits M.H.S. Amin D-Wave Systems Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
Entangling Quantum Virtual Subsytems Paolo Zanardi ISI Foundation February Universita’di Milano.
1 Conference key-agreement and secret sharing through noisy GHZ states Kai Chen and Hoi-Kwong Lo Center for Quantum Information and Quantum Control, Dept.
Measuring Quantum Coherence in the Cooper-Pair Box
Quantum Computing: Solving Complex Problems David DiVincenzo, IBM Fermilab Colloquium, 4/2007.
Charge pumping in mesoscopic systems coupled to a superconducting lead
2 Qubits: Coupled pair of DQD. Physical system and effective Hamiltonian Electrostatic coupling between DQD1 and DQD2.
Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Phase-slip Oscillator Alina M. Hriscu, Yuli V. Nazarov Kavli Institute for Nanoscience, TU Delft Acknowledgements.
On Decoherence in Solid-State Qubits Josephson charge qubits Classification of noise, relaxation/decoherence Josephson qubits as noise spectrometers Decoherence.
Adiabatic quantum computer (AQC) Andrii Rudavskyi Supervisor: prof. Petra Rudolf.
Quantum dynamics in nano Josephson junctions Equipe cohérence quantique CNRS – Université Joseph Fourier Institut Néel GRENOBLE Wiebke Guichard Olivier.
Superconducting Qubits
Unconditional Security of the Bennett 1992 quantum key-distribution protocol over a lossy and noisy channel Kiyoshi Tamaki * *Perimeter Institute for.
Outline Device & setup Initialization and read out
Design and Realization of Decoherence-Free
Decoherence at optimal point: beyond the Bloch equations
Josephson Flux Qubits in Charge-Phase Regime
Determining the capacity of any quantum computer to perform a useful computation Joel Wallman Quantum Resource Estimation June 22, 2019.
Dynamics of a superconducting qubit coupled to quantum two-level systems in its environment Robert Johansson (RIKEN, The Institute of Physical and Chemical.
Presentation transcript:

panos aliferis IBM Jan. 09 quantum computing hardware with highly biased noise

biased noise - for a resting qubit, biased noise means,i.e., relaxation and leakage much weaker than dephasing.

biased noise j 0 i j 1 i j 2 i leakage relaxation energy dephasing - for a resting qubit, biased noise means,i.e., relaxation and leakage much weaker than dephasing.

biased noise - for a qubit undergoing a noisy operation, ideal superoperator noise superoperator N ¢ O N ( X ) = P k N k XN y k

biased noise - for a qubit undergoing a noisy operation, ideal superoperator noise superoperator N ¢ O N ( X ) = P k N k XN y k diagonal qubit operator leakage operator non-diagonal qubit operator identity N k = I k + N k ; l + N k ; : d + N k ; d

biased noise - for a qubit undergoing a noisy operation, ideal superoperator noise superoperator N ¢ O N ( X ) = P k N k XN y k diagonal qubit operator leakage operator non-diagonal qubit operator identity N k = I k + N k ; l + N k ; : d + N k ; d = ³ ^ I + F l + F : d + F d ´ ( X )

biased noise - for a qubit undergoing a noisy operation, ideal superoperator noise superoperator N ¢ O N ( X ) = P k N k XN y k diagonal qubit operator leakage operator non-diagonal qubit operator identity N k = I k + N k ; l + N k ; : d + N k ; d noise is biased if. jj F l jj ¦. jj F : d jj ¦ ¿ jj F d jj ¦ = ³ ^ I + F l + F : d + F d ´ ( X )

biased noise - for a qubit undergoing a noisy operation, ideal superoperator noise superoperator N ¢ O N ( X ) = P k N k XN y k diagonal qubit operator leakage operator non-diagonal qubit operator identity N k = I k + N k ; l + N k ; : d + N k ; d noise is biased if. jj F l jj ¦. jj F : d jj ¦ ¿ jj F d jj ¦ - most resting qubits have biased noise; but noisy operations may not. - highly biased noise can be engineered by using (quasi) adiabatic control. = ³ ^ I + F l + F : d + F d ´ ( X )

e.g., integrated-circuit qubits - dissipation in metallic parts must be low at the operating temp. and freq. - energy spectrum must be unharmonic ( ) so qubits are usable use low-temperature superconductors ( Al, Nb, etc. ) build circuits with non-linear components ¢E 01 6 = ¢E 12

¼ 1 nm e.g., integrated-circuit qubits - dissipation in metallic parts must be low at the operating temp. and freq. - energy spectrum must be unharmonic ( ) so qubits are usable use low-temperature superconductors ( Al, Nb, etc. ) build circuits with non-linear components ¢E 01 6 = ¢E 12 the Josephson junction: a nondissipative nonlinear inductor = L J C J L

flux qubits zoo © 0 2 energy j 0 i / j L i + j R ij 1 i / j L i ¡ j R ij L ij R i

flux qubits zoo © 0 2 © 0 2 © 0 2 ¡ © 0 2 energy j 0 i / j L i + j R ij 1 i / j L i ¡ j R ij L ij R i © c © c

IBM flux qubit © 0 2 ¡ © 0 2 © c ² = 0

² = 0 bare (unstabilized) qubit oscillator- stabilized qubit

IBM flux qubit

E 11 6 = E 01 + E 10 and we can implement a conditional phase gate. the pulses are adiabatic, except at the two level crossings where we want to tunnel perfectly through the very small gap. during the 35ns pulsing,

IBM flux qubit - by numerical simulations, we can estimate the effect of noise on this CPHASE ¼ 3 : 5 £ 10 ¡ 6 ¼¼ 3 : 5 £ 10 ¡ 6 2 £ 10 ¡ 3 which also apply for preparing, and measuring. e i µ ¾ z ¾ x µ IO O ¾ z ¶ jj F l jj ¦. jj F : d jj ¦ ¿ jj F d jj ¦ ; j + i / j 0 i + j 1 i

IBM flux qubit - by numerical simulations, we can estimate the effect of noise on this CPHASE ¼ 3 : 5 £ 10 ¡ 6 ¼¼ 3 : 5 £ 10 ¡ 6 2 £ 10 ¡ 3 - since noise is mostly diagonal, we can encode in a classical code, e.g., µ IO O ¾ z ¶ j + i ! j + i ­ j + i ­ ¢¢¢ ­ j + i |{z} n ; j ¡ i ! j ¡ i ­ j ¡ i ­ ¢¢¢ ­ j ¡ i |{z} n then, the error-correction circuit looks like and similar circuits allow implementing a universal set of logical operations. jj F l jj ¦. jj F : d jj ¦ ¿ jj F d jj ¦ ; which also apply for preparing, and measuring. e i µ ¾ z ¾ x j + i / j 0 i + j 1 i

hard realities - resonators: T 1 ¼ 3 ¹s - flux qubits: T 1 ¼ 10 ns IBM experiments:

hard realities - resonators: T 1 ¼ 3 ¹s - flux qubits: T 1 ¼ 10 ns - however, other flux qubits work much better… IBM experiments: Delft: small & symmetric Berkeley: large & symmetric

hard realities - why is symmetry important ? = L J C J LC g C c Z 0 © 0 2 I

hard realities - why is symmetry important ? = L J C J LC g C c Z 0 © 0 2 I vs. L J C J C g C c Z 0 I L 2 L 2 C g I

hard realities Berkeley qubit T 1 ¼ 200 ns

hard realities Berkeley qubit T 1 ¼ 200 ns IBM qubit - also, play with the UCSB phase qubit.

references quantum computing against biased noise PA and Preskill, arXiv: PA, Brito, DiVincenzo, Preskill, Steffen, and Terhal, arXiv: IBM flux qubit Berkeley flux qubit Koch et. al., PRL 96 (2006) Koch et. al., PRB 72 (2005) Plourde et. al., PRB 72 (2005) Hime et. al., Science 314 (2006) 1427

panos aliferis IBM, January 09 quantum computing against highly biased noise