Authors: Pooria Hosseini MD, Jeff Pawelek BS, Gregory Mundis MD, Burt Yazsay MD, John Ferguson MD, Ilkka Helenius MD, Kenneth Cheung MD, Gokhan Demirkiran.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E-Poster #510 Mineralized Collagen and Bone Marrow Aspirate in Anterior Interbody Carbon Fiber Cages Achieve High Fusion Rates in Multilevel Adult Spinal.
Advertisements

F Schwab 1,2, JP Farcy 1,2, K Bridwell 2, S Berven 2, S Glassman 2,
Fusionless Correction for Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) Emma Orton BME 281.
POSTOPERATIVE LEFT SHOULDER ELEVATION (LSE) IN PATENTS WITH NON-STRUCTURAL PROXIMAL THORACIC CURVES (PT): CAN IT BE PREVENTED IN PATIENTS WITH PREOPERATIVE.
Jason B. Anari, MD. ; Sumeet Garg, MD#; Peter F. Sturm, MD&; Patrick J
Thoracogenic Spinal Deformity: A Rare Cause of Early Onset Scoliosis International Congress on Early Onset Scoliosis November 19 & 20, 2015 A. Noelle Larson,
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
A Comparison of Patients Treated with Shilla Growing Rods for Early Onset Scoliosis 9 th International Congress on Early Onset Scoliosis November 19-20,
Growth Preserving Spinal Surgery for Scoliosis in Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta Lawrence Karlin, MD, Amer Samdani, MD, Anna McClung, BSN, RN, Michael.
In the first 5 years of Treatment, the Charges for Guided Growth Constructs are 30% less than Growing Rods Lindsay M. Andras MD 1, Liam Harris BS 1, Scott.
Short Term Health Related Quality of Life and Family Burden after Surgical or Casting Treatment Hiroko Matsumoto, Nicholas Feinberg, Julie Yoshimachi,
NS Harshavardhana, TJ Guillaume, MHH Noordeen, JH Perra What is Magical about Magnet driven Growth Rods (MdGR) Used for Early- onset Scoliosis (EOS)?
A minimum of 2 year follow up of 22 EOS patients who were treated with 2 nd generation MCGR Karsten Ridderbusch, Christian Hagemann, Ralf Stücker Childrens.
Intra-wound Vancomycin Powder Significantly Reduces the Risk of Infection in Growth-friendly Surgery John T. Smith, MD Justin Haller, MD Angela Presson,
John T. Wilkinson m. d. , Chad E. Songy m. d. , Frances l
The Use of MAGEC Growing Rods as a temporary distraction rod in Severe Kyphoscoliosis: A Case Report. John T. Smith, MD Mary Scowcroft Perry Presidential.
K O B E U N I V E R S I T Y O R T H O P E D I C S A K O B E U N I V E R S I T Y O R T H O P E D I C S A Nippon Steel Hirohata Hospital Nippon Steel Hirohata.
ICEOS 2015 Comparison of Weight Percentile Gain with Growth-Friendly Constructs in Early Onset Scoliosis Liam Harris BS1, Lindsay M Andras MD1, Paul D.
Incidence of Proximal junctional kyphosis with Magnetic Expansion Control Rods in early onset scoliosis P Inaparthy, JC Queruz, C Thakar, D Rolton, C Nnadi.
The Rib Construct (RC) has provided secure proximal fixation for management of patients with EOS and severe thoracic hyperkyphosis Alaa Azmi Ahmad – MD.
Final Fusion in Patients Treated with Rib Based Distraction: A Review of Peri- operative Results THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.
Burt Yaszay, MD Jeff B. Pawelek, BS John Emans, MD Patrick Cahill, MD Bo Robertson Gregory M. Mundis, MD Behrooz A. Akbarnia, MD Children’s Spine Study.
The Clunking Phenomenon in Magnetically-controlled growing rods: Possible risk factors James Tan, Dino Samartzis, Cora Bow, Jason Pui Yin Cheung, Kenneth.
Authors: Pooria Hosseini MD MSc, Jeff Pawelek BS, Stacie Nguyen MPH, George H. Thompson MD, Suken A. Shah MD, John M. Flynn MD, John P. Dormans MD, Behrooz.
Sample Disclosure Slide for Presenters
Does posterior fusion prevent parasol deformity of the chest in inmature patients (Risser sign 0 and open triradiate cartilage of pelvis) with MSA type.
Complications of Growing Rods - has the Magec Rod overcome all of it ?
Xingye Li, Jianxiong Shen, M.D.
Olson EM, Sturm PF, Jain VV, Schultz LR, Glos DL, Bylski-Austrow DI
Prospective clinical study of spine growth modulation using
ICEOS 2016 Pelvic obliquity correction in distraction based growing spine constructs Mathew Schur BA1, Lindsay M Andras MD1, Nicholas R Gonsalves MD1,
Adam Margalit, BS Paul D. Sponseller, MD Richard McCarthy, MD
ICEOS 2016 Comparison of Weight Percentile Gain with Growth-Friendly Constructs in Early Onset Scoliosis Liam Harris BS1, Lindsay M Andras MD1, Paul D.
How is definitive treatment effective in early onset scoliosis treated with Growing implants? Review of one centre series Tiziana Greggi, Elena Maredi,
DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PROGRAMMED AND OBSERVED DISTRACTIONS IN MAGNETICALLY-CONTROLLED GROWING ROD TREATED PATIENTS María del Mar Pozo-Balado, PhD; Noelia.
Retrospective Review of Shoulder Balance Comparing Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) to Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) Patrick J. Cahill William Lavelle.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
A. Aoude, L. Simoes, S. Aldebeyan, J. Ouellet McGill University
John T. Smith, MD Jessica V. Morgan John A. Heflin, MD
Children’s National Health System ICEOS 2016 – Utrecht, Holland
Surgical treatment of severe scoliosis in young children using magnetically controlled growing rods – initial experience in a prospective cohort Benny.
PELVIC OBLIQUITY CONTROL IN CHILDREN WITH NEUROMUSCULAR EARLY ONSET SCOLIOSIS TREATED WITH MAGNETICALLY-CONTROLLED GROWING RODS María del Mar Pozo-Balado,
Distraction-to-stall ensures spinal growth in Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods Benny Dahl1), Casper Dragsted2), Søren Ohrt-Nissen2), Thomas Andersen2),
Richard Schwend, MD Robert Tung, BS Division of Orthopedic Surgery
John T. Smith, MD Jessica V. Morgan John A. Heflin, MD
Distraction-Based Surgeries Increase Spine Length for Patients with Non-Idiopathic EOS - 5 Year Follow up Yehia ElBromboly, Jennifer Hurry, Kedar Padhye,
O C Shirley, A Field, A Barrie, J Ferguson
The Use of MAGEC Growing Rods as a temporary distraction rod in Severe Kyphoscoliosis: 2 Case Reports. John T. Smith, MD Mary Scowcroft Perry Presidential.
Early Experience of Frequent Small Increments Lengthening of Magnetic Spinal Growing Rods in Children with Severe Early Onset Scoliosis Joseph Ivan Krajbich.
Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
Does rod orientation and use of cross connector affect spinal height in magnetically controlled growing rod patients? Pooria Hosseini, Behrooz A. Akbarnia,
E-Poster 159 VEPTR Implantation to Treat Children with Early Onset Scoliosis without Rib Abnormalities: A Prospective Multicenter Study Ron El-Hawary,
Evaluation of Pulse Oximetry in Pre- and Post Casting
Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: Sagittal Plane Analysis and the Risk of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Purnendu Gupta, Felix Brassard, Jennifer Schottler,
Sara K. Fuhrhop, BS Mark J. McElroy, MS Harry C. Dietz, MD
Charles E. Johnston, MD Anna McClung BSN, RN Scott Paradise
Complications of Anchors in the Growing Rod Technique
A New Classification System to Report Complications in Growing Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Consensus Study   John T. Smith, MD, Charles Johnston,
Dual Rods and Submuscular Rod Placement Reduce Complications and Unplanned Surgeries in the Growing Spine: Analysis of 910 Surgeries in 143 Patients Shay.
Behrooz A. Akbarnia Nima Kabirian Jeff Pawelek Milad Alam
Is Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR) Application a Sufficient Method to Provide Expected Spinal Growth in Congenital Scoliosis? M. Bulent.
John A Heflin, MD John T. Smith, MD
Classification of EOS Treatment
Nicholas D. Fletcher, MD¹ Charles E. Johnston III, MD²
MAGNETICALLY CONTROLLED GROWING ROD IN EARLY ONSET SCOLIOSIS: RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW FOCUSING ON COMPLICATIONS   Francesco Lolli, Elena Maredi, Konstantinos.
HAZEM B ELSEBAIE FRCS, MD
Suken A. Shah, MD Jon Oda, MD William Mackenzie, MD
Amer F. Samdani, MD Tricia St. Hilaire John Emans, MD John Smith, MD
Simultaneous Vertebral Column Resection (VCR) and Growing Rods (GR) or Shilla for Severe Early Onset Spinal Deformity (EOS) John Emans, MD; Ashley Goldthwait,
Presentation transcript:

Authors: Pooria Hosseini MD, Jeff Pawelek BS, Gregory Mundis MD, Burt Yazsay MD, John Ferguson MD, Ilkka Helenius MD, Kenneth Cheung MD, Gokhan Demirkiran MD, Ahmet Alanay MD, Alpaslan Senkoylu MD, Hazem Elsebaie MD, Behrooz A. Akbarnia MD Magnetically-controlled growing rods for early onset scoliosis: A multicenter study of 23 cases with minimum 2 years follow-up ICEOS 2015, 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON EARLY ONSET SCOLIOSIS (ICEOS), Boston, MA, USA

Ellipse Technologies Inc. funded this study. Gregory Mundis - Nuvasive (a,d,g), K2M (a,d), Medicrea (d), Misonix (d), ISSGF (g), Society of Lateral Access Surgery (h) Burt Yaszay - DePuy Synthes (b, d), K2M (a,d, f, i), Globus (d), NuVasive (d), Orthopediatrics (f) John Ferguson – Aukland DHB trust (k) Illka Helenius - Ellipse technology (j), Medtronic (d), Baxter (d), Depuy Synthes (d) Kenneth Cheung - SRS (h,k), Ellipse (d), RGC general research fund (j) Behrooz A. Akbarnia - Nuvasive, K2M, DePuy Synthes (a), Ellipse, Nuvasive, K2M (d), Nuvasive, Ellipse (f), ISSGF, Nuvasive, K2M (g), GSF, SDSF, SRS, SOLAS (h) For the rest of coauthors nothing was declared. (a) Royalties (b) Speakers bureau/paid presentations (c) Paid employee (d) Paid consultant (e) Unpaid consultant (f) Stock or stock options (g) Research support from a company or supplier as a PI (h) Board member/committee appointments for a society, (i) Patents (j) Grant (k)Other financial or material support Disclosure

To report the 2-year clinical and radiographic results of patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). Objective

MCGR for EOS has been reported to provide adequate spinal growth and curve correction while eliminating surgical lengthening procedures 1. This study was designed to report the results of MCGR patients with 2-year follow up. 1. Cheung, K. M., et al. (2012). "Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: a prospective case series." Lancet 379(9830): Summary of background data

Retrospective study of MCGR patients Inclusion criteria: 1) Major curve size ≥ 30° 2) T1-T12 thoracic height < 22 cm 3) Ten years and younger 54 patients enrolled 23 had 2-year follow-up. All patients were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months. Methods

Etiology (%)

Mean Pre-op ageDeNovo: 6.6±2.6 years Conversion: 8.3±2.2 years Adverse events41 adverse events occurred in 11 patients, of which 14 events were implant related Major coronal curve magnitude DeNovo: improved from 61° to 34° from baseline to post operation Conversion: Improved from 49° to 44° from baseline to post operation Curve correctionmaintained for two years in both groups. T1-S1 heightDeNovo: improved from 253 to 289 mm and was maintained for two years. Conversion: Some decline in T1- S1 height; mean loss of 4.2 mm (1.5%) from post operation to two years, p > 0.05). Results

% Major coronal curve correction compared with baseline

% T1-S1 height changes compared with baseline

This study showed satisfactory curve correction and growth is achieved among primary cases. T1-S1 height in conversion cases had a slight decline compared with post-op in two years. However, this decline was not statistically significant. Conclusion

The limitations of this study include: 1. sample size 2. variation in diagnosis and age, 3. retrospective nature of the study. Limitations

Thanks