Meetingthe Freight Challenges Moving Ahead/Staying Ahead The AASHTO-FHWA Freight Transportation Partnership —Meeting the Freight Challenges Moving Ahead/Staying.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coastwise Coalition. An integrated, multi-modal system in which coastwise and inland shipping operates in conjunction with rail and trucking to: Increase.
Advertisements

Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
PLANNING HORIZONS PLANNING HORIZONS March 12, 2002 GOODS MOVEMENT.
Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
1 Port Freight Infrastructure Planning & Investment John N. Young Director of Freight & Surface Transportation Policies American Association of Port Authorities.
Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AASHTO Spring Meeting Transportation Economics and Logistics MAY 30, 2014 | LOUISVILLE KY.
Freight Action Strategy for the Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Corridor February 2003.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA’s Talking Freight Seminar presented by Michael Williamson Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April.
URBAN FREIGHT Getting kicked to the curb?. How will we live?
FREIGHT PLANNING – MPO’S ROLE Ms. Pragati Srivastava Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) February 27, 2014.
Capacity- Building Workshop for the Pacific region for implementation Of the programme of Work on Protected Areas Nadi, Fiji, 9-12 February 2009 SOLOMON.
Freight and Transportation Planning Workshop- Executive Summary Presented by the Federal Highway Administration Date Location.
Engaging the Private Sector in Freight Planning An Executive Overview Presented by the Federal Highway Administration January 16, 2007 TX Border Partnership.
Maine Department of Transportation Office of Freight Transportation 16 State House Station Augusta, Maine (207)
1 Advancing Arizona’s Economy Transportation is the Road to Prosperity Arizona Department of Transportation Public Affairs.
Transport Investing in Regions SEATS Meeting 17 February 2012.
Rail Investment and Public/Private Partnerships September 2014 David P. Simpson David P. Simpson Consultants LLC.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Freight Issues and Policy Options Memphis Freight Planning Conference October 2, 2001 Gary Maring, FHWA.
Engaging the Private Sector in Freight Planning. 1-2 FHWA tools to help you A Guidebook for Engaging the Private Sector in Freight Transportation Planning.
California Marine Transportation System: Challenges and Potential Solutions Presented to: Western Cargo Conference San Diego, CA October 16, 2004 Gill.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
Building Community Partnerships to Serve Immigrant Workers Funded by the Ford Foundation Nonprofit and Community College Collaborations.
Summary of Review of capital city strategic planning systems Brian Howe Chair, Cities Expert Advisory Panel COAG Reform Council.
National Multimodal Freight Trends/Issues/Forecasts/ Policy Implications.
Talking Freight Promoting Economic Revitalization through Enhanced Freight Transportation Eric G. Madden Deputy Secretary for Aviation and Rail Freight.
Freight Council Webinar February 21, 2006 Anthony T. Furst Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations The Framework for National Freight.
Engaging Freight and Supply Chain Representatives in Public Sector Projects.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
APEC ENERGY WORKING GROUP FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING ENERGY INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (November 2004).
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
Building the social and solidarity economy through partnerships and networking Social and solidarity economy Academy Montreal, Canada October 2011.
Canada’s Supply Chain Sector. Brief Overview  The Canadian supply chain sector includes planning and management of activities involved in:  sourcing.
Department of Innovation, Trade and Rural Development Municipal Symposium May 10, 2008.
FAST Corridor Freight Action Strategy for Everett-Seattle-Tacoma Steve Sewell Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative 2006.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Greening the Trade Corridors in North America: Why Corridors and Why Green? Benjamin Teitelbaum CEC, April 22 nd.
Statewide Freight Planning Considerations Ohio Department of Transportation Suzann Rhodes, AICP Administrator, Office of Urban and Corridor Planning
AASHTO-FHWA Freight Partnership II Survey and Meeting: FHWA Perspective Tony Furst, FHWA-Office of Freight Management & Operations April 18, 2007.
Freight Policy Legislative Team & Financing & Funding Freight Modal Group Freight Policy & Funding Presentation to the Joint Meeting of SCOFA & Finance.
Competitive and Efficient Freight Transportation
Northern California Goods Movement Challenges: The I-580 Altamont Corridor Steve Heminger Executive Director, MTC Presentation to Congressman Richard Pombo.
Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations 1 FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR MULTI-STATE/JURISDICTIONAL DECISION MAKING Christine.
Transportation Technology Exchange Globally Presented by: Kay Nordstrom U.S. Dept. of Transportation at U.S./East Africa Workshop Arusha, Tanzania August.
Nate Asplund Director – Public Private Partnerships September 20, 2009 SCORT 2009 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.
Report on Session Guidelines Bruce Lambert Executive Director Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies.
Freight-21: A National Strategic Freight Mobility Program & Trust Fund Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors.
PROJECT OVERVIEW FHWA Talking Freight Seminar December 15, 2004 Dilara Rodriguez Project Manager, CALTRANS National I-10 Freight Corridor Study.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative Update I-95.
Creating Innovation through International collaboration Melanie Relton & Helen Kidd, British Council 7 April 2013, Qatar.
1 Advancing Arizona’s Economy Transportation is the Road to Prosperity Kathy Boyle Public Affairs Manager Arizona Department of Transportation.
2013 SCOWT WASHINGTON MEETING/ WASHINGTON, DC 20 JUNE2013 AASHTO Waterborne Freight Bottom Line Report Chris Smith Intermodal Policy and Program Manager.
Presented by Libby Ogard Prime Focus, LLC July 16, 2008 Freight Planning and Programming Summary of NCHRP Project 8-53 Guidebook for Integrating Freight.
Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.
GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 1 Goods Movement Collaborative and Goods Movement Plan Final Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission.
Presented to Indiana Logistics Summit Indianapolis, Indiana presented by Keith Bucklew Director - Freight Mobility Indiana Department of Transportation.
Partnering with Local Institutional Stakeholders.
MAP 21 Freight Talking Freight December 14, 2011 Leo Penne AASHTO.
Rice University – Baker Institute
Intermodal Freight Program Coordinator
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
AASHTO Waterborne Freight
The Role of Bilateral Donors in supporting capacity-building in the area of ICT Open Consultations on Financing Mechanisms for Meeting the Challenges.
Rail Investment and Public/Private Partnerships
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Meetingthe Freight Challenges Moving Ahead/Staying Ahead The AASHTO-FHWA Freight Transportation Partnership —Meeting the Freight Challenges Moving Ahead/Staying Ahead Synthesis of Findings from the AASHTO/FHWA Survey and Meeting Leo Penne Program Director, Intermodal & Industry Activities April 18 th 2007

Natchez ImpressionsObservations PlacesPeople FocusDirection

2.) How high a priority is freight transportation in your organization? Extremely Somewhat Neutral Not Very

Natchez Key Messages Natchez Key Messages Freight is voting Institutions need to flow with freight

Natchez Key Messages Senator Trent Lott: It is important that we come together in every possible venue to talk about how we’re going to do a better job in the freight arena.

4.) What high priority freight issues to you foresee in the next five to ten years for your State, region, or locality? Freight System Congestion/Capacity (All modes) Expanding, Upgrading, Adapting Highway Infrastructure Truck Size and Weight Issues Intermodal Connections/Facilities Access to Class 1RRs Diverting Traffic to Rail

5.) What high priority freight issues to you foresee in the next five to ten years for the Nation? Capacity/Congestion/Chokepoints Funding and Policy Global Developments—NAFTA, Asia, Europe

Natchez Key Messages Natchez Key Messages Freight Champions:  At all levels  not a cookies cutter model  Visible and indispensable  Seizes opportunities when they come  Establishing institutional capacity provides a place for partners to connect

top three 6.) What are the top three priority freight initiatives in your State, Region, and Locality? State:State: Determination of freight capacity needs on State trade corridors relief of various rail and truck capacity crunches in and out of the West coast ports  a.) Determination of freight capacity needs on State trade corridors, b.) Harmonizing truck size, weight and permitting with adjacent states and provinces, c.) relief of various rail and truck capacity crunches in and out of the West coast ports Region:Region: Developing connections to the entire transportation system and regional gateways Multi state Regional Corridor groups  a.) Developing connections to the entire transportation system and regional gateways b.) Multi state Regional Corridor groups Locality:Locality: Reduce/Minimize congestionMaintenance of existing facilities  a.) Reduce/Minimize congestion, b.) Maintenance of existing facilities

Natchez Key Messages Natchez Key Messages Tracy Rosser, Corporate Traffic: There is nothing more valuable that public sector planners can do than learn and understand how what you do impacts the competitiveness and productivity of private industry

7.) Does your organization have an individual in a leadership position who actively advances these priorities (i.e., a freight champion)?

Natchez Key Messages Natchez Key Messages Developing and Nurturing Partnerships:  Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) can work when there are benefits for both sectors  Sharing and Partnering is vital to resolving the freight transportation challenge—No Silver Bullet  Mixed bag of experiences and different tools  Contributing sources: states DOT’s, Federal Government, MPO’s and various regional councils and coalitions

Does the leadership in your organization recognize the importance of freight transportation needs in your State, region, or locality? 8.) Does the leadership in your organization recognize the importance of freight transportation needs in your State, region, or locality?

OBSTACLE 12.) What is the most significant OBSTACLE to collaboration with MPOs? CommunicationCommunication (e.g. Lack of education and understanding, (e.g. Lack of education and understanding, private sector involvement— “Private sector private sector involvement— “Private sector not interested in MPO process”. not interested in MPO process”. FundingFunding (e.g. Limited source of funding –Dedicated (e.g. Limited source of funding –Dedicated source of Freight funding) source of Freight funding) Staffing Staffing (e.g. Lack of staff time and expertise) (e.g. Lack of staff time and expertise)

21.) In general, what delivery mechanisms would you prefer in meeting your training and technical assistance needs? Top Three Most Preferred methods: In-Person Training Courses—78%In-Person Training Courses—78% In-Person Workshops—69%In-Person Workshops—69% Peer to Peer Exchanges—56%Peer to Peer Exchanges—56%

Top Training Needs Engaging with Freight Stakeholders…and keeping them engaged Freight 101—General Education Financing Freight Projects Engaging the Private Sector Freight Data and Performance Measures

AASHTO Freight Bottom Line Freight Demand and Logistics Highway Freight Movement Rail Freight Movement Water Freight Movement

AASHTO States and Freight 1. Organizing to do freight 2. Collaborating to invest

Going Forward Continuing the Freight partnership –meant to be an ongoing relationship: AASHTO/FHWA Freight Partnership and  Conduct Regional Freight Scans to complement national and international Scan  Global economy  Build community  Education of others—”why freight matters”  Strengthen organizations--integration  Strengthen professional development  Financing, planning, integration, collaboration

Discussion For more Information: Leo Penne