Nodal Short Pay and Uplift Process CWG Meeting May 28, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nodal Credit Limit Overview Credit Work Group May 28, 2008 Cheryl Yager.
Advertisements

INSULATING PRICE RESPONSIVE LOAD FROM RUC CAPACITY SHORT CHARGE Mark W. Smith J. Kay Trostle August 2008 DSWG.
Automation and Improvements to Default Uplift Methodology (summary/white paper of a draft NPRR)
9/13/2007 Nodal COMS Extracts & Reports Market Requirements Review SDAWG Jackie Ashbaugh ERCOT ***NOTE: All information contained in this presentation.
CRR Shortfall – Revenue Equalization Part 2 (Continuation from 2/21/08 TPTF discussion) Bill Barnes TPTF 3/5/2008.
May 18, 2009 SEWG Dispute due dates when extracts are delayed Art Deller.
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
NPRR Proposed Changes TPTF Meeting 26 Aug 2008.
1 February 17, 2009 Review of Key ISO Credit Policies and Proposed Changes Review ERCOT Unsecured Credit Process.
Chad V. Seely Assistant General Counsel Tab 6.2: User Fee – Digital Certificate Fee Finance & Audit Committee Meeting ERCOT Public November 12, 2012.
Draft Dispute NPRR and NPRR 75 A comparison for COPS.
ERCOT Billing, Settlement Disputes & Data Extracts
MCWG Update to WMS Loretta Martin LCRA, Chair Josephine Wan AE, Vice Chair 03/05/
01/21/2008 Nodal COMS Extracts & Reports Market Requirements Review SDAWG Jackie Ashbaugh ERCOT ***NOTE: All information contained in this presentation.
Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Exemption Proposals for Settlements and Billing Changes COPS June 14, 2011 Cheryl Yager, Mandy Bauld, Leslie.
7/15/2013 CSWG CSWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Matthew Tozer.
1 CRR Credit Policy Task Force Update TPTF July 21, 2008.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes January 28, 2009 WMS Meeting.
1 COMS/Settlements/Credit Weekly Update June 11, 2010.
January 14, New logic and invoices used in January 2015 when closing out December 2014 New Bill Determinants: CRRBAFA- CRR Balancing Account Fund.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. Late Fees and Short Payments in Bankruptcies / Payment Plans.
WMS Subgroup – CRR Credit 3.Review of CRR margining methodology for PTP Obligations in Nodal Protocols 4.Potential credit margin alternatives Cheryl Yager.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 14, 2010.
March 10, 2009 COPS Uplift Update Mandy Bauld. 2 February 10, 2009 Update ‘Summer 2008 Defaults’ Uplift Process is complete 1st Uplift (Jan 09) Uplift.
Texas Nodal Section 9: Invoicing ERCOT, Settlements & Billing SDAWG - August 2007.
RPRS ERCOT System Wide Insufficiency Charge Presented at the Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
Market Credit Working Group update to the Wholesale Market Subcommittee 06/03/
1 CRR Credit Policy Task Force Update WMS April 16, 2008.
Nodal Settlement Delta Calculations and Statements – 7/11/06 Workshop  Objective: Describe design concepts of nodal settlement delta calculations and.
Nodal Program Update and SEWG Update COPS 1/11/2011 Jim Galvin.
DEFAULT FUND MCWG date 1. General Concept  Operate as a mutual fund  Set a funded cap  Set entity ongoing responsibility  Set process to redistribute.
1 COMS/Settlements/Credit Weekly Update July 2, 2010.
Matt Tozer ERCOT Manager, Settlements & Billing 9/4/2013 ERCOT Update Management of the Balancing Account CMWG.
CRR Shortfall – Revenue Equalization Part 3 (Continuation from 3/5/08 TPTF discussion) Bill Barnes/Sharon Wang TPTF 3/21/2008.
MCWG Update to WMS 08/14/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update -July 31 st Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review NPRRs All operational except – NPRR 552 – Additional.
October 20, 2010 WMS Credit Update. 2 Topics Nodal exposure – how much collateral CRR/TCR auctions – December 2010 Preliminary Credit Cutover Timeline.
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Sept 16, 2009.
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
TCR to CRR Transition Plan Proposed method for TCR Auction Revenue refunds Contingency plans For TAC Nov 1st, 2007.
9/17/2012 CSWG CSWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT. 2 Settlements Project & Operational Updates February 27, 2012 NPRR 347: Combined Daily Invoice –Still on track.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Settlement Invoices Business Requirements Settlements and.
ERCOT Market Credit Working Group Presentation to the Finance and Audit Committee Payment Short Pay/Default and Uplift for Congestion Revenue rights (CRRs)
1 Nodal Credit Update at WMS June 16, 2010.
Mitigation of Credit Tail Risk Exposure Donald Meek Credit Working Group January 20, 2015.
Market Credit Working Group Update to WMS Wed. Nov 18, 2009.
1 Protocol Clarification: Section , Resolution of Dispute Notification of Financial Impact of Granted and Granted with Exception Disputes COPS.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Dispute Management System Business Requirements ERCOT.
Default Uplift Max MWh Activity Total Matthew Tozer Manager, Settlements and Billing WMS 1/8/2014.
November 27, 2012 NPRR322, Real-Time PTP Option Modeling Implementation Overview.
Item 10: Mitigation of Credit Tail Risk Exposure Donald Meek 2015 Chair, Credit Work Group Finance & Audit Committee Meeting ERCOT Public February 9, 2015.
1 NPRR 484/554 Phase 2 Suresh Pabbisetty, ERP, CQF, CSQA Lead Technical Analyst, Credit CWG / MCWG May 20, 2015 ERCOT Public.
July 28, 2010 Market Readiness Seminar Credit Transition to Nodal (Preliminary)
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
1 Nodal Day Ahead Invoice Taskforce Update COPS, May 8, 2007.
MCWG Update to WMS 2/9/2010. Agenda Items Exposure / Collateral Status Update 1/26 MCWG/CWG Joint Meeting – Potential NPRR to enable expiring CRRs to.
October, 2011 MCWG/CWG Review of Abacus Loss Allocation ERCOT Mandy Bauld.
1 Credit Parameters Review TAC July 2, Protocol Section , “Credit Requirement for DAM Bids and Offers” specifies: Credit Requirement for.
March 22, 2011 ERCOT Board of Directors Commercial Market Operations Version 2 - Updated on March 18, 2011 Betty Day.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
08/07/2007 Nodal COMS Extracts & Reports Update SDAWG Jackie Ashbaugh ERCOT.
CRR Default and the Nodal Market Wholesale Market Subcommittee February 20, 2008.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Report to TAC June In Brief Working Group Reports Working Group Reports CMWG CMWG MCWG MCWG QMWG QMWG VCWG VCWG Other Reports Other Reports NOGRR.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee May 7, 2009.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Settlement Statements and Calendar Business Requirements Settlements.
February 10, 2009 Uplift update Cheryl Yager / Amanda Bauld.
CRR Deration and NPRR821 WMS 09/06/2017.
Nodal COMS Additional Items Update
Settlements Analysis due to SFT Deration Issue
Presentation transcript:

Nodal Short Pay and Uplift Process CWG Meeting May 28, 2008

Overview Nodal Protocols – Summary of Short Pay and Uplift Provisions Current proposal Appendix

Nodal Protocols – Summary of Short Pay and Uplift Provisions Real Time Market –Similar to Zonal market provisions The market is financially settled in a two day process. Amounts due TO ERCOT are made on day one (usually Thursday) and amounts due FROM ERCOT are paid out on day two (usually Friday). When an Invoice payment is not received by ERCOT on day one: Step 1: Short payment. Those that are expecting payment from ERCOT on day two are paid less than the full amount owed on the next business day (on a pro rata basis). Step 2: Uplift. If the amount due is not subsequently collected from the defaulting entity, the short paid amounts are uplifted to CPs representing load in the market based on the pro rata portion of that load. Uplift begins around180 days after the default occurs. No more than $2,500,000 in total may be uplifted to the market at a time and short payment invoices are issued at least 30 days apart.

Nodal Protocols – Summary of Short Pay and Uplift Provisions Day ahead market The DAM is financially settled in a two day process. Amounts due TO ERCOT are made on day one (usually Thursday) and amounts due FROM ERCOT are paid out on day two (usually Friday). When an Invoice payment is not received by ERCOT on day one: –Short payment. Those that are expecting payment from ERCOT on day two are paid less than the full amount owed on the next business day (on a pro rata basis).

Current proposal There is currently no uplift mechanism defined for the Day Ahead Market –Those that are short paid, bear the loss CRRs are primarily settled in DAM –With a CRRAH default, there can be Short Payments in the DAM over an extended period WMS is concerned that a prolonged period of forecasted short payments will be harmful to the DAM –Sellers may be reluctant to sell when they know there is a short payment pending (and don’t know the amount) –WMS Credit task force (to which CWG members were invited) established to review the issue

Current proposal WMS Credit task force proposes that an uplift mechanism be defined and identified 4 alternatives: 1) Recover the default using the CRR Balancing Account 2) Recover the default using the mechanism for RT defaults 3) Option (1) reverting to Option (2) after 180 days 4) Recover the default using both the CRR Balancing Account and CRR Auction Revenues After discussion at WMS in May, I believe an NPRR is being drafted around option (4)

Appendix

Nodal Protocol language 9.7.3Partial Payments by Invoice Recipients for the RTM If at least one Invoice Recipient owing funds does not pay its RTM Invoice in full (i.e. a short-pay), ERCOT shall follow the procedure set forth below: (a)ERCOT shall make every reasonable attempt to collect payment from each short-paying Invoice Recipient before ERCOT makes any payments for that RTM to applicable Invoice Recipient(s). (b)ERCOT shall draw on any available security pledged to ERCOT by each short-paying Invoice Recipient that did not pay the amount due under paragraph (a) above. (c)ERCOT shall offset or recoup any amounts owed, or to be owed, by ERCOT to a short-paying Invoice Recipient against amounts not paid by that Invoice Recipient, and ERCOT shall apply the amount offset or recouped to cover short pays by that Invoice Recipient. (d)If, after taking the actions set forth in paragraph (a), (b) and (c), above, ERCOT still does not have sufficient funds to pay in full all amounts owed to RTM Invoice Recipients, ERCOT shall deduct any applicable RTM administrative fees as specified in Section 9.16 and payments for RMR Services from the amount received or collected and reduce payments to all RTM Invoice Recipients owed monies from ERCOT except for monies owed for RMR Services. The reductions must be based on a pro rata basis of monies owed to each RTM Invoice Recipient, to the extent necessary to clear ERCOT’s accounts on the payment due date to achieve revenue neutrality for ERCOT.

Nodal Protocol language ERCOT shall provide to all Market Participants payment details on all short pays and subsequent reimbursements of short pays. Details must include the identity of each short-paying Invoice Recipient and the dollar amount attributable to that Invoice Recipient, broken down by Invoice numbers. In addition, ERCOT shall provide the aggregate total of all amounts due to all Invoice Recipients before applying the amount not paid on the RTM Invoice. (e)One hundred eighty days following a short-pay of a RTM Invoice, if sufficient funds continue to be unavailable for ERCOT to pay all amounts in full (excluding late fees) to short-paid Entities for that RTM Invoice, and the short- paying Entity is not complying with a payment plan designed to enable ERCOT to pay all amounts in full (excluding late fees) to short-paid Entities, the following shall occur: (i) ERCOT will cease charging late fees to the short-paying Entity; provided however, that ERCOT may cease charging late fees earlier than 180 days following a short-payment of a RTM Invoice if ERCOT, in its sole discretion, determines that the recovery of late fees from the short-paying Entity is unlikely; and (ii) ERCOT shall uplift short-paid amounts through the RTM Uplift process described below in Sections , RTM Uplift Invoices and Section , Payment Process for RTM Uplift Invoices.

Nodal Protocol language RTM Uplift Invoices (1)ERCOT shall collect the total short-pay amount of an RTM Invoice, less the total payments expected from a payment plan from the QSEs representing LSEs. The amount charged to each QSE is determined using the Load Ratio Share for the calendar month three months before the date on which ERCOT issues the RTM Uplift Invoice. ERCOT must pay the funds it collects from payments on RTM Uplift Invoices to the Entities previously short-paid. ERCOT shall notify those Entities of the details of the payment. (2)Any Uplifted short-paid amount greater than $2,500,000 must be scheduled so that no amount greater than $2,500,000 is charged on each set of RTM Uplift Invoices until ERCOT Uplifts the total short-paid amount. ERCOT must issue RTM Uplift Invoices at least 30 days apart from each other. (3)ERCOT shall issue RTM Uplift Invoices no earlier than 180 days following a short-pay of a RTM Invoice on the date specified in the Settlement Calendar. The Invoice Recipient is responsible for accessing the Invoice on the MIS Certified Area once posted by ERCOT.

Nodal Protocol language 9.4.3Partial Payments by Invoice Recipients for the DAM If at least one Invoice Recipient owing funds does not pay its DAM Invoice in full (short-pays), then ERCOT shall follow the procedure set forth below: (a)ERCOT shall make every reasonable attempt to collect payment from each short-paying Invoice Recipient before any payments owed by ERCOT for that DAM is due to be paid to applicable Invoice Recipient(s). (b)ERCOT shall draw on any available security pledged to ERCOT by each short-paying Invoice Recipient that did not pay the amount due under paragraph (a) above. (c)ERCOT shall offset or recoup any amounts owed, or to be owed, by ERCOT to a short-paying Invoice Recipient against amounts not paid by that Invoice Recipient, and ERCOT shall apply the amount offset or recouped to cover payment shortages by that Invoice Recipient. (d)If, after taking the actions set forth in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c), above, ERCOT still does not have sufficient funds to pay all amounts that it owes to DAM Invoice Recipients in full, ERCOT shall deduct any applicable DAM administrative fees as specified in Section 9.16, Administrative Fees, payments for RMR Services and amounts calculated for the CRR Balancing Account from the amount received or collected and then reduce payments to all DAM Invoice Recipients owed monies from ERCOT. The reductions must be based on a pro rata basis of monies owed to each Invoice Recipient, to the extent necessary to clear ERCOT’s accounts on the payment due date to achieve revenue neutrality for ERCOT.

Nodal Protocol language ERCOT shall provide to all Market Participants payment details on all short payments and subsequent reimbursements of short pays. Details must include the identity of each short-paying Invoice Recipient and the dollar amount attributable to that Invoice Recipient, broken down by Invoice numbers. In addition, ERCOT shall provide the aggregate total of all amounts due to all Invoice Recipients before applying the amount not paid on the Invoice. (e)One hundred eighty days following a short-payment of a DAM Invoice, if sufficient funds continue to be unavailable for ERCOT to pay all amounts in full (excluding late fees) to short-paid Entities for that DAM Invoice, and the short-paying Entity is not in compliance with a payment plan designed to enable ERCOT to pay all amounts in full (excluding late fees) to short-paid Entities, –ERCOT will cease charging late fees to the defaulting Entity; provided that ERCOT may cease charging late fees earlier than 180 days following a short-payment of a DAM Invoice if ERCOT, in its sole discretion, determines that the recovery of late fees from the defaulting Entity is unlikely.