1 Prakash Karamchandani 1, David Parrish 2, Lynsey Parker 1, Thomas Ryerson 3, Paul O. Wennberg 4, Alex Teng 4, John D. Crounse 4, Greg Yarwood 1 1 Ramboll.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REDUCTION OF HIGHLY REACTIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS & VARIABLE EMISSIONS IN HOUSTON/GALVESTON: MONITORING, MODELING, MEASURING, RULEMAKING David Allen.
Advertisements

Template Development and Testing of PinG and VBS modules in CMAQ 5.01 Prakash Karamchandani, Bonyoung Koo, Greg Yarwood and Jeremiah Johnson ENVIRON International.
Template Evaluating NOx Emission Inventories for Regulatory Air Quality Modeling using Satellite and Model Data Greg Yarwood, Sue Kemball-Cook and Jeremiah.
Investigate possible causes Intercontinental Transport and Chemical Transformation (ITCT) An International Global Atmospheric Chemistry (IGAC) Program.
MODELING CHEMICALLY REACTIVE AIR TOXICS IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA USING CAMx Chris Emery, Greg Yarwood and Ed Tai ENVIRON International Corporation.
Template Reactive Plume Modeling to Investigate NO x Reactions and Transport in Nighttime Plumes and Impact on Next-day Ozone Prakash Karamchandani, Greg.
Evaluating emissions from top-down observations T. Ryerson – NOAA Chemical Sciences Division Motivation Most inventories compiled from bottom-up estimates,
Mercury Source Attribution at Global, Regional and Local Scales Christian Seigneur, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Kristen Lohman, and Prakash Karamchandani AER.
Estimating the impacts of emissions from single sources on secondary PM 2.5 and ozone using an Eulerian photochemical model 1 James T. Kelly, Kirk R. Baker,
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
Detection of anthropogenic formaldehyde over North America by oversampling of OMI data: Implications for TEMPO Lei Zhu and Daniel J. Jacob.
Simulation of Houston-Galveston Airshed Ozone Episode with EPA’s CMAQ Daewon Byun: PI Soontae Kim, Beata Czader, Seungbum Kim Emissions input Chemical.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
Sub-Grid Scale Modeling of Air Toxics Concentrations Near Roadways Prakash Karamchandani, Kristen Lohman & Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 6th Annual.
Plume-in-Grid Modeling for PM & Mercury Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen & Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 5th Annual CMAS.
STUDY OF SOURCE ATTRIBUTION OF UNSATURATED HYDROCARBONS FOR OZONE PRODUCTION IN THE HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA WITH THE EXTENDED SAPRC99 CHEMICAL MECHANISM.
Examination of the impact of recent laboratory evidence of photoexcited NO 2 chemistry on simulated summer-time regional air quality Golam Sarwar, Robert.
Template Improving Sources of Stratospheric Ozone and NOy and Evaluating Upper Level Transport in CAMx Chris Emery, Sue Kemball-Cook, Jaegun Jung, Jeremiah.
Developing chemical mechanisms that are more robust to changes in atmospheric composition Gookyoung Heo, a William P. L. Carter, a Greg Yarwood b a Center.
Development and Application of a State-of-the-Science Plume-in-Grid Model CMAQ-APT Prakash Karamchandani, Christian Seigneur, Krish Vijayaraghavan and.
Template Evaluation of an Advanced Reactive Puff Model using Aircraft-based Plume Measurements Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani, Bart Brashers,
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
1 Neil Wheeler, Kenneth Craig, and Clinton MacDonald Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, California Presented at the Sixth Annual Community Modeling and.
Melanie Follette-Cook Christopher Loughner (ESSIC, UMD) Kenneth Pickering (NASA GSFC) CMAS Conference October 27-29, 2014.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
CMAQ APPLICATION TO OZONE POLLUTION IN THE PEARL RIVER DELTA OF CHINA Wei Zhou 1,2,Yuanghang Zhang 1,Xuesong Wang 1,Daniel Cohan 2 1.College of Environmental.
Presented at the AQAST 9 th Semiannual Meeting Wednesday June 3 rd, 2015 Presentation by: Dan Goldberg, Ph.D. Candidate Co-authors: Tim Canty, Tim Vinciguerra,
Evidence for an increase in the photochemical lifetime of ozone in the eastern United States Presented at the 14 th CMAS Meeting Wednesday October 7 th,
2012 CMAS meeting Yunsoo Choi, Assistant Professor Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston NOAA Air quality forecasting and.
Application of the CMAQ Particle and Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) to Support Water Quality Planning for the Virginia Mercury Study 6 th Annual.
Development and Application of Parallel Plume-in-Grid Models Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen and Christian Seigneur AER, San.
Goal: “What are the sources and physical mechanisms that contribute to high ozone concentrations aloft that have been observed in Central and Southern.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Southeast US air chemistry: directions for future SEAC 4 RS analyses Tropospheric Chemistry Breakout Group DRIVING QUESTION: How do biogenic and anthropogenic.
Template Simulation of Wintertime High Ozone Concentrations in Southwestern Wyoming Ralph E. Morris, Susan Kemball-Cook, Bonyoung Koo, Till Stoeckenius.
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
Effects of Emission Adjustments on Peak Ground-Level Ozone Concentration in Southeast Texas Jerry Lin, Thomas Ho, Hsing-wei Chu, Heng Yang, Santosh Chandru,
Evaluation and Application of AMSTERDAM: Focus on Plume In Grid Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen and Rochelle Balmori Atmospheric.
1. How is model predicted O3 sensitive to day type emission variability and morning Planetary Boundary Layer rise? Hypothesis 2.
Vertical transport of chemical compounds from the surface to the UT/LS: What do we learn from SEAC 4 RS? Qing Liang 1 & Thomas Hanisco 2, Steve Wofsy 3,
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emission Reduction An FAA/NASA/TC-sponsored Center of Excellence Matthew Woody and Saravanan Arunachalam Institute.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
Template Summary of FY12-13 Work Plan Technical Activities Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood NETAC Policy Committee Meeting April 22, 2014.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Template A screening method for ozone impacts of new sources based on high-order sensitivity analysis of CAMx simulations for Sydney Greg Yarwood
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
The regional chemical transport model, STEM, with advanced photochemical modules including SAPRC99 mechanism, KPP chemical solver and explicit photolysis.
Template Application of SCICHEM-2012 for 1-Hour NO 2 Concentration Assessments Prakash Karamchandani, Ralph Morris, Greg Yarwood, Bart Brashers, S.-Y.
Understanding the impact of isoprene nitrates and OH reformation on regional air quality using recent advances in isoprene photooxidation chemistry Ying.
Ship emission effect on Houston Ship Channel CH2O concentration ——study with high resolution model Ye Cheng.
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
Single-Source Impacts with SCICHEM and CAMx
Ozone Transport Analysis Using Back-Trajectories and CAMx Probing Tools Sue Kemball-Cook, Greg Yarwood, Bonyoung Koo and Jeremiah Johnson, ENVIRON Jim.
Dynamic Evaluation of CMAQ-Modeled Ozone Response to Emission Changes in The South coast air Basin Prakash Karamchandani1, Ralph Morris1, Andrew Wentland1,
The 96th AMS Annual Meeting
Photochemical Modeling of Industrial Flare Plumes with SCICHEM 3.1
16th Annual CMAS Conference
C. Nolte, T. Spero, P. Dolwick, B. Henderson, R. Pinder
Shell Center for Sustainable Development Seminar
17th Annual CMAS Conference
Matthew J. Alvarado, Benjamin Brown-Steiner,
Characteristics of Urban Ozone Formation During CAREBEIJING-2007 Experiment Zhen Liu 04/21/09.
Ozone Trends along U.S. West Coast
5th Annual CMAS Conference Friday Center Chapel Hill, NC 10/17/2006
SELECTED RESULTS OF MODELING WITH THE CMAQ PLUME-IN-GRID APPROACH
Detection of anthropogenic formaldehyde over North America by oversampling of OMI data: Implications for TEMPO Lei Zhu and Daniel J. Jacob.
Presentation transcript:

1 Prakash Karamchandani 1, David Parrish 2, Lynsey Parker 1, Thomas Ryerson 3, Paul O. Wennberg 4, Alex Teng 4, John D. Crounse 4, Greg Yarwood 1 1 Ramboll Environ, Novato, CA 2 David.D.Parrish, LLC, Boulder, CO 3 NOAA ESRL Chemical Sciences Division, Boulder, CO 4 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA REACTIVE PLUME MODELING OF HRVOC EMISSIONS FROM THE HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL 14 th Annual CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, North Carolina, October 5-7, 2015

22 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported by the State of Texas through the Air Quality Research Program (AQRP) administered by The University of Texas at Austin by means of a grant from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), AQRP Project The TCEQ has not yet fully reviewed the findings presented here

33 BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES Enhanced O 3 in Houston associated with HRVOC (ethene, propene, butenes, 1,3- butadiene) emissions from the Houston Ship Channel (HSC) Objective of study: improve and quantify understanding of O 3 and HCHO from HRVOC emissions from the HSC Quantifying relative contributions of HRVOCs has been difficult Recent aircraft (NASA DC-8) measurements in Houston during the 2013 SEAC 4 RS study provide unique data to quantify contributions: Caltech measurements of β-hydroxynitrates (βHNs), formed when HRVOCs react in the atmosphere when NOx is present, downwind of the HSC Measurements of O 3 and aldehyde enhancements in the HSC plumes Combination of observational data analysis and reactive plume modeling to accomplish study objectives

4 HSC PLUME MODELING WITH SCICHEM 3.0 * Lagrangian 3-D puff model Puff dispersion based on SCIPUFF (Second Order Closure Integrated Puff Model) Full chemistry treatment, comparable to CAMx and CMAQ Chemistry updates to SCICHEM 3.0 for HRVOC modeling: CB6r2 chemistry mechanism HRVOC tracer mechanism to estimate direct O 3 and aldehyde formation from individual alkenes Oxidation of individual alkenes in the presence of NOx Formation of βHNs, O 3, and aldehydes _________________________________________________________ * See SCICHEM 3.0 poster on October 6, 2015

55 HSC SOURCE CONFIGURATIONS FOR SCICHEM Base Case – 1 source Sensitivity Studies – 6 sources HSC emissions of ethene, propene, HCHO and NOx based on 2011 Solar Occultation Flux (SOF) and mobile DOAS measurements of Johansson et al. (2014a; 2014b)

66 SPECIFICATION OF BACKGROUND CHEMISTRY Typically specified as fixed or diurnally varying concentrations Different approach adopted in this study: Simultaneous simulation of transport and chemistry of background surface emissions and HSC emissions Regionally averaged (60 km by 60 km boxes) surface background emissions to the west, south and northeast of the HSC Based on CAMx inputs for the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria (HGB) 4 km modeling domain Allows more accurate interaction of regional background with the Ship Channel plume since background evolves along with the plume

77 PLUME TRANSPORT ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2013 Aircraft Measurements Modeled Plume Aircraft and Model Transects T80 T40 T100

88 MODEL VS MEASUREMENTS-SINGLE HSC SOURCE 40 km 80 km 100 km O3O3 NOz HCHO

99 MODEL VS MEASUREMENTS-MULTIPLE HSC SOURCES O3O3 NOz HCHO 40 km 80 km 100 km

10 DIRECT (AND INDIRECT) CONTRIBUTIONS 40 km 80 km 100 km O 3 24% HCHO 80% CH 3 CHO 84% 25% 23% 83% 88% 49% 40%

11 INDIVIDUAL HRVOC CONTRIBUTIONS TO DOWNWIND O 3 FORMED DIRECTLY FROM HRVOCS HRVOC 40 km downwind ΔO 3 = 2.3 ppb 80 km downwind ΔO 3 = 2.7 ppb 100 km downwind ΔO 3 = 2.1 ppb Ethene 24%32%34% Propene 36% 35% Butenes 37%30%29% 1,3-Butadiene 3%2% From Plume Model HRVOC 40 km downwind ΔO 3 = 2.7 ppb 80 km downwind ΔO 3 = 3.0 ppb 100 km downwind ΔO 3 = 2.6 ppb Ethene 37%53% Propene 39%26%27% Butenes 19%15%14% 1,3-Butadiene 6% From Observational Analysis of βHN Measurements

12 O 3 PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY VS. PLUME PHOTOCHEMICAL AGE From Plume ModelFrom Measurements

13 SENSITIVITY STUDIES: SEGREGATING NOX AND VOC No Segregation Divide HSC VOC and NOx emissions equally among 6 sources Total Segregation Sources A, C, E: NOx only Sources B, D, F: VOC only Partial Segregation Sources A, C, E: 90% of total NOx, 10% of total VOC Sources B, D, F: 90% of total VOC, 10% of total NOx

14 EFFECT OF NOX AND VOC SEGREGATION SCICHEM allows overlapping plumes to interact chemically Total segregation slows down chemistry as NOx and VOC plumes are separated initially Partial segregation has small impact Implications for fine-scale modeling

15 CONCLUSIONS O 3 in modeled plume downwind of HSC is in good agreement with observations NOz and aldehyde results show that chemistry proceeds more slowly in the modeled plume than observed during early plume stages when one large source represents HSC emissions Overall effect of using multiple narrower source plumes is more rapid chemistry and better model performance at 40 km downwind Direct formation of O 3 from the HSC HRVOC emissions explains about 20% of the plume O 3 increments: remaining O 3 formed indirectly by the interaction of HSC emissions with emissions of other species (e.g., isoprene) Plume chemistry is sensitive to whether HRVOC and NOx are released together or segregated in separate plumes that interact as they disperse and overlap each other

16 LIMITATIONS OF STUDY Actual HSC emissions for 18 September 2013 are not known (but estimates from 2011 SOF measurements work quite well in the model) 18 September 2013 had moderate ozone enhancements; higher direct contributions are expected for days with higher HRVOC emissions The modeled HSC source locations are conceptual scenarios

17 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES Understand direct versus indirect O 3 formation from HRVOC emissions Interaction of HRVOC plumes with background emissions; role of isoprene Investigation of the role of initial plume width and emissions segregation on O 3 production from industrial sources Plume modeling Fine-scale grid modeling