1 Morgan Stanley Global Electricity & Energy Conference March 13, 2003

In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, FPL Group, Inc. is hereby presenting cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause its actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward- looking statements (as such term is defined in the Reform Act) made by or on behalf of FPL Group in this presentation, in response to questions or otherwise. Any statements that express, or involve discussions as to expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, estimated, projection, target, outlook) are not statements of historical facts and may be forward-looking. Forward- looking statements involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties. Accordingly, any such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to, and are accompanied by, the following important factors (in addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such forward-looking statements) that could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. The following are some important factors that could have a significant impact on FPL Group's operations and financial results, and could cause FPL Group's actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements: FPL Group is subject to changes in laws or regulations, including the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, as amended, and the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended, changing governmental policies and regulatory actions, including those of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Florida Public Service Commission and the utility commissions of other states in which FPL Group has operations, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with respect to, among other things, allowed rates of return, industry and rate structure, operation of nuclear power facilities, operation and construction of plant facilities, operation and construction of transmission facilities, acquisition, disposal, depreciation and amortization of assets and facilities, recovery of fuel and purchased power costs, decommissioning costs, return on common equity and equity ratio limits, and present or prospective wholesale and retail competition (including but not limited to retail wheeling and transmission costs). The Florida Public Service Commission has the authority to disallow recovery of costs that it considers excessive or imprudently incurred. The regulatory process generally restricts FPL's ability to grow earnings and does not provide any assurance as to achievement of earnings levels. 2 Cautionary Statements And Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results

FPL Group is subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental statutes, rules and regulations relating to air quality, water quality, waste management, natural resources and health and safety that could, among other things, restrict or limit the use of certain fuels required for the production of electricity. There are significant capital, operating and other costs associated with compliance with these environmental statutes, rules and regulations, and those costs could be even more significant in the future. FPL Group operates in a changing market environment influenced by various legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding deregulation, regulation or restructuring of the energy industry, including deregulation of the production and sale of electricity. FPL Group and its subsidiaries will need to adapt to these changes and may face increasing competitive pressure. The operation of power generation facilities involves many risks, including start up risks, breakdown or failure of equipment, transmission lines, pipelines, the dependence on a specific fuel source or the impact of unusual or adverse weather conditions (including natural disasters such as hurricanes), as well as the risk of performance below expected levels of output or efficiency. This could result in lost revenues and/or increased expenses. Insurance, warranties or performance guarantees may not cover any or all of the lost revenues or increased expenses, including the cost of replacement power. In addition to these risks, FPL's nuclear units face certain risks that are unique to the nuclear industry including additional regulatory actions up to and including shut down of the units stemming from public safety concerns at FPL's plants, as well as at the plants of other nuclear operators. Breakdown or failure of an FPL Energy, LLC operating facility may prevent the facility from performing under applicable power sales agreements which, in certain situations, could result in termination of the agreement or incurring a liability for liquidated damages. FPL Group's ability to successfully and timely complete its power generation facilities currently under construction, those projects yet to begin construction or capital improvements to existing facilities is contingent upon many variables and subject to substantial risks. Should any such efforts be unsuccessful, FPL Group could be subject to additional costs, termination payments under committed contracts and/or the write off of its investment in the project or improvement. FPL Group uses derivative instruments, such as swaps, options, futures and forwards to manage their commodity and financial market risks, and to a lesser extent, engage in limited trading activities. FPL Group could recognize financial losses as a result of volatility in the market values of these contracts, or if a counterparty fails to perform. There are other risks associated with FPL Group's nonregulated businesses, particularly FPL Energy. In addition to risks discussed elsewhere, risk factors specifically affecting FPL Energy's success in competitive wholesale markets include the ability to efficiently develop and operate generating assets, the price and supply of fuel, transmission constraints, competition from new sources of generation, excess generation capacity and demand for power. There can be significant volatility in market prices for fuel and electricity, and there are other financial, counterparty and market risks that are beyond the control of FPL Energy. FPL Energy's inability or failure to effectively hedge its assets or positions against changes in commodity prices, interest rates, counterparty credit risk or other risk measures could significantly impair its future financial results. In keeping with industry trends, a portion of FPL Energy's power generation facilities operate wholly or partially without long-term power purchase agreements. As a result, power from these facilities is sold on the spot market or on a short-term contractual basis, which may affect the volatility of FPL Group's financial results. In addition, FPL Energy's business depends upon transmission facilities owned and operated by others; if transmission is disrupted or capacity is inadequate or unavailable FPL Energy's ability to sell and deliver its wholesale power may be limited. 3

FPL Group is likely to encounter significant competition for acquisition opportunities that may become available as a result of the consolidation of the power industry. In addition, FPL Group may be unable to identify attractive acquisition opportunities at favorable prices and to successfully and timely complete and integrate them. FPL Group relies on access to capital markets as a significant source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by operating cash flows. The inability to raise capital on favorable terms, particularly during times of uncertainty in the capital markets, could impact FPL Group's ability to grow its businesses and would likely increase its interest costs. FPL Group is subject to costs and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims; as well as the effect of new, or changes in, tax rates or policies, rates of inflation or accounting standards. FPL Group is subject to direct and indirect effects of terrorists threats and activities. Generation and transmission facilities, in general, have been identified as potential targets. The effects of terrorist threats and activities include, among other things, actions or responses to such actions or threats, the inability to generate, purchase or transmit power, the risk of a significant slowdown in growth or a decline in the U.S. economy, delay in economic recovery in the U.S., and the increased cost and adequacy of security and insurance. FPL Group's ability to obtain insurance, and the cost of and coverage provided by such insurance, could be affected by recent national events as well as company-specific events. FPL Group is subject to employee workforce factors, including loss or retirement of key executives, availability of qualified personnel, collective bargaining agreements with union employees or work stoppage. The issues and associated risks and uncertainties described above are not the only ones FPL Group may face. Additional issues may arise or become material as the energy industry evolves. The risks and uncertainties associated with these additional issues could impair FPL Group's businesses in the future. 4

5 Capitalizing on Our Strengths  Premier integrated utility –high growth, stable customer base –favorable regulatory climate  Successful wholesale generation business –well hedged portfolio –attractive earnings growth prospects  Strong balance sheet  Substantial cash flow to fund expansion  Premier integrated utility –high growth, stable customer base –favorable regulatory climate  Successful wholesale generation business –well hedged portfolio –attractive earnings growth prospects  Strong balance sheet  Substantial cash flow to fund expansion

Capacity % contracted 1 : FPL 100% FPL Energy 77% Total FPL Group 2 97% Financial Discipline Well Hedged Position Florida Power & Light FPL Energy Corp. & Other Earnings Contribution % 2003E Notes: 1 As of 3/5/03 2 Weighted average based on 2003 estimated earnings contribution

7

8  Favorable customer mix  Strong customer and usage growth  Operational excellence  Proven cost management  Constructive regulatory environment  Superior environmental performance Premier Electric Utility Attractive financial returns

9 Growing EPS at FPL Excluding nonrecurring items.

10 High Growth Utility with Favorable Customer Mix  Solid customer base –over 4 million customer accounts –residential and commercial customers > 90% of total  Strong demand growth 1 –2.0% avg. annual increase in customer accounts –1.6% avg. annual increase in usage per customer FPL Industry Average Note: 1 Over last 10 years % of Revenues

11 Substantial Regulated Generation Fleet  Nearly 20,940 MW of generating capability in Florida –1,300 MW to be added in 2003 –1,900 MW to be added in 2005  Diverse fuel mix Oil Natural Gas Nuclear Coal Purchased Power Energy Sources (by kWh produced)

12 Operational Excellence Plant Availability FPL = 50% better than average Service Reliability Service Reliability Outage Time Per Customer (Min.) Fossil Nuclear FPL information as of 2002; industry information as of 2001.

13 Superior Cost Management (O&M $ per customer) Industry Average FPL

14 FPL Residential Rates Low Comparisons of a 1,000 kWh residential bill as of 3/4/03. Rates for FPL, PEF and TECO are effective on 4/1/03.

15 Superior Environmental Performance “FPL received a rating of AAA, ranking 1 out of 30 Electric Companies in this sector.” “As consistently demonstrated in many industry sectors, environmental leadership by companies such as FPL reflects visionary management that ultimately leads to financial and stock out- performance.” Frank Dixon - Innovest Innovest Names FPL Group #1 Environmental Performer among Top 30 Utilities

16 Constructive Regulatory Environment  Fuel, capacity charges directly passed through to customers  “Rate certainty” through end of 2005 – incentive-based agreement allowing shareholders to benefit from productivity improvements – “win-win” revenue sharing provision instead of ROE measure  No current activity on wholesale restructuring  Fuel, capacity charges directly passed through to customers  “Rate certainty” through end of 2005 – incentive-based agreement allowing shareholders to benefit from productivity improvements – “win-win” revenue sharing provision instead of ROE measure  No current activity on wholesale restructuring

17 Business Strategies  Capitalize on growing demand for electricity in our service territory  Continue to improve our outstanding operating performance  Seek opportunities to profitably grow our core utility business  Work to maintain the collaborative and progressive regulatory environment in Florida  Capitalize on growing demand for electricity in our service territory  Continue to improve our outstanding operating performance  Seek opportunities to profitably grow our core utility business  Work to maintain the collaborative and progressive regulatory environment in Florida

18

19 Disciplined Wholesale Generator  Low risk approach –diversified by region, fuel source –well hedged portfolio –emphasis on base-load assets  Low cost provider –modern, efficient, clean plants –operational excellence  Industry leader in wind generation  Conservative, integrated asset optimization function 7,249 1 net MW in operation presence in 22 states Note: 1 Includes 550 MW of leased capacity at R.I.S.E.P.

20 Growing EPS at FPL Energy Excluding nonrecurring items and the effect of non-managed hedges.

21 Northeast Mid-Atlantic 23% 26% 15% 36% West Regional Diversity Fuel Diversity Gas 61% 19% Wind Other 1% Hydro 3% 7% Oil Diversified Portfolio Year-end 2004 (Projected) (11,366 1 Net MW in Operation) Central Nuclear 9% Note: 1 Includes 550 MW of leased capacity at R.I.S.E.P.

22 Wind Energy: Unique Advantage  More than 1,700 net MW in operation –U.S. market leader with more than 1/3 market share  Supported by policy trends (RPS, PTCs) and economics  Attractive financial characteristics –long-term power contracts (15 – 25 years) –ROEs in the high teens/low 20s –accretive in first full year  Disciplined development opportunities underway

23 Wind Energy: Announced Growth (Projected Operating Net MW)

24 Strong Contract Coverage More than 90 percent of expected 2003 gross margin hedged Notes: 1 Weighted to reflect in-service dates, planned maintenance, and refueling outage for Seabrook 2 Reflects RTC MW 3 Reflects on-peak MW As of 3/5/03

25 MW Under Contract Wind As of 3/5/03

26 MW Under Contract QFs / Other Projects As of 3/5/03

27 Projected EBIT for 2003 Excludes G&A allocation. Includes PTCs “grossed-up” to a pre-tax basis.

28 Project Restructuring Opportunities  Highly experienced project restructuring team  Proven track record with two significant project restructurings in 2002 –gas contract –power supply contract  Substantial backlog of opportunities for 2003 –power contracts in PJM –natural gas supply contract in Northeast –3rd-party QF restructurings in NEPOOL and PJM  Highly experienced project restructuring team  Proven track record with two significant project restructurings in 2002 –gas contract –power supply contract  Substantial backlog of opportunities for 2003 –power contracts in PJM –natural gas supply contract in Northeast –3rd-party QF restructurings in NEPOOL and PJM

29 Business Strategies  Remain a low-cost provider  Selective development, primarily wind and some fossil, but only with long-term contracts  Maintain a portfolio diversified by region and fuel source  Reduce risk by contracting majority of output and hedging fuel requirements  Continue to further optimize portfolio  Consider acquisitions that are accretive, strategically attractive and financeable

30

31  Financial discipline  Strong credit ratings A2 / A - = FPL Group Capital Aa3 / A = Florida Power & Light Company  2002 net income of $831 million 1  Prudent dividend policy Strong Financial Position Notes: 1 Excluding mark-to-market effect of non-managed hedges and nonrecurring items 2 FPL Group Debt to Cap Ratio = 49% with 80% equity credit for equity-linked securities 55 2

32  FPL –expect 4 - 5% earnings growth off the 2002 weather- normalized base –equates to $725 - $735 million 2003 weather-normalized earnings  FPL Energy –expect 2003 earnings growth of % –> 90 percent of 2003 gross margin hedged –full year impact of Seabrook and 324 MW of wind projects –targeting additional ,200 MW of wind projects by year end  Corporate and Other –breakeven results at FPL FiberNet –higher interest expense –net drag of cents per share Outlook for 2003 Remains Strong EPS guidance of $4.80 to $5.00

33  Premier integrated utility serving a vibrant territory  Growing wholesale generation business with moderate risk profile  Operational and environmental excellence  Financial strength and discipline  Proven track record  Solid corporate governance policies and practices FPL Group: A Solid Investment

34

Appendix

36 Capital Plan Supports Disciplined Growth Strategy Projected Capital Sources & Uses ($ billion) Operating cash flow less dividends Equity issuance through benefit plans Future debt issuance Regulated utility FPL Energy Sources Uses Wind Gas 0.4

37 Potential Drivers of 2003 Earnings Variability Weather variability at 80% probability ±18¢ Customer growth ±4-5¢ Usage growth ±7-8¢ O&M expenses 2% variation ±8¢ See Safe Harbor Statement and SEC filings for full discussion of risks (as of 1/24/03) IssueVariability2003 EPS Impact

38 Potential Drivers of 2003 Earnings Variability  Commodity price exposure (hedging)  Counterparty performance (credit risk)  Weather (wind, hydro)  Wind development program  Development and asset restructuring activities  Plant reliability See Safe Harbor Statement and SEC filings for full discussion of risks

39 Market Price Sensitivity Unhedged Segment +$7 -$6 +$2 -$2 +$2 -$3 +$7 -$6 ±1¢±1¢±2¢±3¢±7¢±1¢±1¢±2¢±3¢±7¢ Notes: 1 Weighted to reflect in-service dates; all assets adjusted for 2003 outages, including refueling outage for Seabrook 2 Does not include Maine hydro; pricing based on NEPOOL RI Zone 3 Represents on-peak MW unhedged only 4 Weighted average of available MW As of 3/5/03

40 Managing Credit Exposure  87% of 2003 revenues are with investment grade counterparties –92% excluding Southern California Edison and PG&E  In net payable position with non-investment grade counterparties See Safe Harbor Statement and SEC filings for full discussion of risks (as of 1/24/03)

41 Earnings Sensitivity to Weather and Other Factors +7¢ -3¢ +6¢ -6¢ ¢ ¢ Note: 1 Represents 1 standard deviation See Safe Harbor Statement and SEC filings for full discussion of risks (as of 1/24/03)

42