Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM meeting, Dubna 2008/10/14 L1 CA Track Finder Status Ivan Kisel (KIP, Uni-Heidelberg), Irina Rostovtseva (ITEP Moscow) Study of L1 CA track finder with.
Advertisements

1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
12 th CBM Collaboration Meeting October 13-18, 2008, JINR, Dubna A. Zinchenko 1 (L.Naumann 2, D.Peshekhonov 1, V.Peshekhonov 1 ) 1 VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Framework for track reconstruction and it’s implementation for the CMS tracker A.Khanov,T.Todorov,P.Vanlaer.
Vector meson study for the CBM experiment at FAIR/GSI Anna Kiseleva GSI Germany, PNPI Russia   Motivation   The muon detection system of CBM   Vector.
Simulation activities in India: students working on various topics.. Partha(VECC), Hemen (GU) : Trigger, SIS100, physics simulation Bipasha (CU): dynamic.
CA+KF Track Reconstruction in the STS I. Kisel GSI / KIP CBM Collaboration Meeting GSI, February 28, 2008.
KIP TRACKING IN MAGNETIC FIELD BASED ON THE CELLULAR AUTOMATON METHOD TRACKING IN MAGNETIC FIELD BASED ON THE CELLULAR AUTOMATON METHOD Ivan Kisel KIP,
Online Track Reconstruction in the CBM Experiment I. Kisel, I. Kulakov, I. Rostovtseva, M. Zyzak (for the CBM Collaboration) I. Kisel, I. Kulakov, I. Rostovtseva,
CA tracker for TPC online reconstruction CERN, April 10, 2008 S. Gorbunov 1 and I. Kisel 1,2 S. Gorbunov 1 and I. Kisel 1,2 ( for the ALICE Collaboration.
Many-Core Scalability of the Online Event Reconstruction in the CBM Experiment Ivan Kisel GSI, Germany (for the CBM Collaboration) CHEP-2010 Taipei, October.
Di-electron pair reconstruction CBM Collaboration Meeting, 28 February 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Di-electron pair reconstruction Tetyana Galatyuk GSI-Darmstadt.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Speed-up of the ring recognition algorithm Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt, Germany and LIT JINR, Dubna, Russia Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna, Russia.
STS track recognition by 3D track-following method Gennady Ososkov, A.Airiyan, A.Lebedev, S.Lebedev, E.Litvinenko Laboratory of Information Technologies.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
Material budget, energy losses and multiple scattering.
Fast reconstruction of tracks in the inner tracker of the CBM experiment Ivan Kisel (for the CBM Collaboration) Kirchhoff Institute of Physics University.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Fast track reconstruction in the muon system and transition radiation detector of the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 3 Ivan Kisel.
TRD and Global tracking Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration meeting Dresden, 27 September.
G.Ososkov NEC Pattern recognition methods for data handling of the CBM experiment Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna, Russia Andrey and Semeon.
August, 7ILC1 Kudzanayi Munetsi-Mugomba supervised by Dr. Caroline Milstene Software Infrastructure for the Charged Particles Reconstruction at the International.
M. Deveaux, CBM collaboration meeting, Oct. 2008, Dubna, Russia A revision of the concept of the CBM – MVD Or: Do we need an intermediate pixel.
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
Summary STS working group Design optimization STS (Strip) layout R&D (MAPS) Working packages.
Status of Reconstruction in CBM
A.Ayriyan 1, V.Ivanov 1, S.Lebedev 1,2, G.Ososkov 1 in collaboration with N.Chernov 3 1 st CBM Collaboration Meeting, JINR Duba,19-22 May JINR-LIT,
Track reconstruction and pattern recognition V.V. Ivanov Laboratory of Information Technologies Joint Institute for Nuclear Research,
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
KIP Ivan Kisel JINR-GSI meeting Nov 2003 High-Rate Level-1 Trigger Design Proposal for the CBM Experiment Ivan Kisel for Kirchhoff Institute of.
Standalone FLES Package for Event Reconstruction and Selection in CBM DPG Mainz, 21 March 2012 I. Kisel 1,2, I. Kulakov 1, M. Zyzak 1 (for the CBM.
Optimization of the Silicon Tracking System (STS) layout and beam pipe configuration for the CBM experiment. Andrey Chernogorov, Sergey Belogurov, ITEP,
Track Finding based on a Cellular Automaton Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg Tracking Week, GSI January 24-25, 2005 KIP.
V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 
Tracking in High Density Environment
1 Open charm simulations ( D +, D 0,  + c ) Sts geometry: 2MAPS +6strip (Strasbourg geo) or 2M2H4S (D+ and D - at 25AGeV); TOOLS: signal (D +  K - 
Ring Recognition and Electron Identification in the RICH detector of the CBM Experiment at FAIR Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt, Germany and LIT JINR, Dubna,
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
RPC Design Studies Gabriel Stoicea, NIPNE-HH, Bucharest CBM Software Week GSI-Darmstadt May 10, 2004.
Fast Tracking of Strip and MAPS Detectors Joachim Gläß Computer Engineering, University of Mannheim Target application is trigger  1. do it fast  2.
CBM Simulation Walter F.J. Müller, GSI CBM Simulation Week, May 10-14, 2004 Tasks and Concepts.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Cellular Automaton Method for Track Finding (HERA-B, LHCb, CBM) Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg Second FutureDAQ Workshop, GSI.
Muon detection in the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 1 Ivan Kisel 1 Anna Kiseleva 3 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für.
HLT Kalman Filter Implementation of a Kalman Filter in the ALICE High Level Trigger. Thomas Vik, UiO.
Monday, January 24 TimeTitleSpeaker 10:00 – 10:30The CBM experimentV. Friese (GSI) 10:30 – 11:00CBM Silicon Pixel Vertex DetectorM. Deveaux (GSI/IReS)
CA+KF Track Reconstruction in the STS S. Gorbunov and I. Kisel GSI/KIP/LIT CBM Collaboration Meeting Dresden, September 26, 2007.
CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.
Kalman Filter based Track Fit running on Cell S. Gorbunov 1,2, U. Kebschull 2, I. Kisel 2,3, V. Lindenstruth 2 and W.F.J. Müller 1 1 Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
Ring finding efficiencies and RICH event display Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
Fast parallel tracking algorithm for the muon detector of the CBM experiment at FAIR Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Claudia Höhne 1 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
Parallel Implementation of the KFParticle Vertexing Package for the CBM and ALICE Experiments Ivan Kisel 1,2,3, Igor Kulakov 1,4, Maksym Zyzak 1,4 1 –
LIT participation LIT participation Ivanov V.V. Laboratory of Information Technologies Meeting on proposal of the setup preparation for external beams.
Track Reconstruction in MUCH and TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory of Information.
Study of the electron identification algorithms in TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,3, Semen Lebedev 2,3, Gennady Ososkov 3 1 Frankfurt University, 2 Giessen University.
Multi-Strange Hyperons Triggering at SIS 100
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
Y. Fisyak1, I. Kisel2, I. Kulakov2, J. Lauret1, M. Zyzak2
A Kalman Filter for HADES
Kalman filter tracking library
Tracking muons in Panda(Root)
TPC reconstruction in the HLT
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Presentation transcript:

Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory of Information Technologies, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia 1 st CBM Russia Meeting May 18-22, 2009 JINR, Dubna, Russia

2 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Outline Global tracking – Geometries – Requirements – Tracking – Results Speed up of the tracking software

3 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM CBM setups “Muon” setup – STS+MUCH+(TRD)+(TOF) “Electron” setup – STS+(RICH)+(TRD)+(TOF)+(ECAL)

4 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Segmented MUCH 6 absorbers – 225 cm of iron 2 stations in first 5 gaps 3 stations in the last gap for trigger 2 sides in each station Back sideFront side Optionally: STRAW TUBES in the last stations (V.Peshehonov et al) V.Nikulin E.Kryshen M.Ryzhinskiy Front sideBack sideFront sideBack sideFront side

5 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Segmented TRD – Segmented geometry – 2 cm thick support frames – More dead zones Leads to detector inefficiency

6 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Global tracking procedure CbmLitFindGlobalTracks – Tracking + Merging – Automatic configuration, depending on the setup STS+(TRD)+(TOF) STS+MUCH+(TRD)+(TOF) STS MUCH TRD TOF L1 STS tracking LIT tracking Hit-to-track merging

7 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Tracking Initial seeds are tracks reconstructed in STS (L1 tracking) Tracking is based on – Track following – Kalman Filter – Validation gate – Different hit-to-track association techniques

8 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Tracking methods Branching – Branch is created for each hit in the validation gate. Nearest Neighbor – The closest by a Euclidean statistical distance hit from a validation gate is assigned to track. Weighting – Doesn’t allow track splitting, it collects all the hits in the validation gate.

9 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Simulation parameters Events – Muons: 1000 UrQMD at 25 AGeV + 10 mu in each event – Electrons: 500 UrQMD at 25 AGeV + 10 electrons in each event Efficiency ( CbmLitReconstructionQa ) – Global tracking: STS – 4 MC STS points STS+TRD(MUCH) – 4 MC STS and 8(12) MC TRD(MUCH) points STS+TRD(MUCH)+TOF - 4 MC STS and 8(12) MC TRD(MUCH) points + TOF point – Local tracking and merging: TRD(MUCH) – STS as 100% + 8(12) MC points in TRD(MUCH) TOF merging – STS+TRD(MUCH) as 100% + TOF point

10 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Muons muonsall STSSTS+MUCH STS+MUCH+TOF MUCHTOF all reference muons Efficiency in %

11 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Electrons electronsall STSSTS+TRD STS+TRD+TOF TRDTOF all reference electrons Efficiency in %

12 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Speed up [1]: number of branches Motivation: The main problem with branching algorithm is that its computational and memory requirements can grow with time and saturate computing system. Solution: Only a limited number of the nearest hits in the validation gate can start a new branch. Maximum number of hits in the validation gate Tracking efficiency,% Time, s/event MUCH tracking, UrQMD 25 AGeV Au-Au + 10 muons 4 times faster! CPU: Intel C2D P8400

13 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Speed up [2]: fast search of hits Motivation -Hits are sorted by x position -Binary search is used to find Min and Max index Maximum measurement error on the station Fast search of hits Loop over MIN and MAX indices Loop over MIN and MAX indices 2 times increase in speed! 1.05 s/event -> 0.52 s/event (MUCH tracking, UrQMD+10mu) CPU: Intel C2D P8400

14 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Speed up [3]: simplification of the geometry Simplified geometry – TGeoManager: storage + navigation – Stations are approximated as planes Reduction of number of nodes from 800k to s/event  0.3 s/event Future plans – Custom navigation (assuming detector planes are perpendicular to z) – Optimization of the step size in the track propagation CPU: Intel C2D P8400

15 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Speed up: plans of further developments Magnetic field access (same as for L1) – approximation of the magnetic field Parallelism – SIMDization 46% of total track propagation costs is due to access to the magnetic field Reachable gain of speed: 100? 1000?...

16 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Summary and outlook Summary: – The Lit track reconstruction package has been significantly improved global tracking procedure implemented algorithm speed up results in 0.3 s/event for MUCH tracking Outlook – Continue speed up studies – MUCH trigger

17 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Back up

18 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Track propagation Extrapolation. Two models: – Straight line in case of absence of magnetic field. – Solution of the equation of motion in a magnetic field with the 4 th order Runge-Kutta method. Material Effects. – Energy loss (ionization: Bethe-Bloch, bremsstrahlung: Bethe-Heitler, pair production) – Multiple scattering (Gaussian approximation) Navigation. – Based on the ROOT TGeoManager. The Algorithm: Trajectory is divided into steps. For each step: Straight line approximation for finding intersections with different materials (geometry navigator) Geometrical extrapolation of the trajectory Material effects are added at each intersection point Track propagation components

19 A.Lebedev, I.Kisel, G.Ososkov, Global Tracking for CBM Weighted track fit Weight is assigned to each hit Weight is proportional to the multivariate Gaussian distribution and includes temperature parameter T Weighted hit is calculated as a weighted mean of the hits from the same station Weighted track is fitted with standard KF Temperature is gradually decreasing. Simulated annealing is applied to track fit 1) The process starts at a high temperature, all hits have the same weights. 2) Weights are updated at a lower temperature. 3) Weights are frozen.