Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop IHOP Intercomparisons Selection of Case Studies & First Quicklooks Andreas Behrendt, Thorsten Schaberl, Hans-Stefan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre High Resolution Airborne DIAL Measurements of Water Vapor and Vertical Humidity Fluxes.
Advertisements

Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre High Resolution Airborne DIAL Measurements of Water Vapour and Vertical Humidity.
Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre High Resolution Airborne DIAL Measurements of Water Vapour and Vertical Humidity.
C. Flamant (1), C. Champollion (1,2), S. Bastin (1) and E. Richard (3) (1) Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, UPMC/CNRS/UVSQ (2) Géosciences Montpellier UM2/CNRS,
Upper Tropospheric Humidity: A Comparison of Satellite, Radiosonde, Lidar and Aircraft Measurements Satellite Lidar Aircraft Radiosonde.
Calibration Scenarios for PICASSO-CENA J. A. REAGAN, X. WANG, H. FANG University of Arizona, ECE Dept., Bldg. 104, Tucson, AZ MARY T. OSBORN SAIC,
Uncertainty in Cloud Aerosol Transport System (CATS) Products and Measurements Presented by Patrick Selmer Goddard advisor: Dr. Matthew McGill Assisted.
Penn State K. Davis, K. Craig, A. Desai, S. Kang, B. Reen, S. Richardson, N. Seaman and D. Stauffer Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania State University.
DOW Observations in IHOP and Analyses of CI Yvette Richardson, Nettie Arnott and Joshua Wurman.
US Calibration/Validation Activities for the ADM/Aeolus Mission Mike Hardesty and Lars-Peter Riishojgaard.
Task Group 3 AT2 workshop, 30 Sept – 1 Oct 2008 Task Group 3 Achievements and Prospects Ankie Piters, KNMI.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
Water vapour intercomparison effort in the frame of the Convective and Orographically-induced Precipitation Study 6th COPS Workshop 27 – 29 February 2008.
On average TES exhibits a small positive bias in the middle and lower troposphere of less than 15% and a larger negative bias of up to 30% in the upper.
THE BLACK FOREST STORM OF 15 JULY 2007: NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND SENSITIVITY STUDIES Evelyne Richard 1, Jean-Pierre Chaboureau 1 Cyrille Flamant 2 and.
4 th COPS Workshop, Hohenheim, 25 – 26 September 2006 Modeling and assimilation efforts at IPM in preparation of COPS Hans-Stefan Bauer, Matthias Grzeschik,
Scanning Raman Lidar Error Characteristics and Calibration For IHOP David N. Whiteman/NASA-GSFC, Belay Demoz/UMBC Paolo Di Girolamo/Univ. of Basilicata,
INTERNATIONAL H 2 O PROJECT (IHOP_2002) FLIGHT PLANNING PLAYBOOK.
Ben Kravitz November 5, 2009 LIDAR. What is LIDAR? Stands for LIght Detection And Ranging Micropulse LASERs Measurements of (usually) backscatter from.
Planning for airborne LIDAR survey Dr.Lamyaa Gamal El-deen.
David N. Whiteman/NASA-GSFC, Belay Demoz/UMBC
Application of a High-Pulse-Rate, Low-Pulse-Energy Doppler Lidar for Airborne Pollution Transport Measurement Mike Hardesty 1,4, Sara Tucker 4*,Guy Pearson.
Science Objectives for the ATHENA-OAWL Venture Tech Airborne Mission M. Hardesty CIRES University of Colorado/NOAA S. Tucker and C. Weimer Ball Aerospace.
Water Vapour Intercomparison Effort in the Frame of the Convective and Orographically-Induced Precipitation Study: Airborne-to-Ground-based and airborne-to-airborne.
Kick-Off-Treffen SPP, Bonn October 2006 Improved Water Vapour and Wind Initialisation for Precipitation Forecasts: Impact Studies with the ECMWF.
IHOP Workshop – Toulouse – June 2004 Multiscale Analyses of Moisture Transport by the Central Plains Low-Level Jet during IHOP Edward I. Tollerud 1, Brian.
Hyperspectral Data Applications: Convection & Turbulence Overview: Application Research for MURI Atmospheric Boundary Layer Turbulence Convective Initiation.
IHOP Workshop, Boulder, CO, March, 2003 DLR-DIAL Observations Instrument PI: Gerhard Ehret Instrument operation: Gorazd Poberaj, Andreas Fix, Martin.
JCSDA Summer Colloquium Erica Dolinar 4 August 2015.
IHOP Operations Plan, Chapter 7: Other Special Ground-Based Instrumentation Operation Frédéric Fabry et al. General overview Instrument deployment and.
1 Scott Zaccheo AER, Inc ASCENDS End-to-End System Performance Assessment: Analysis of Atmospheric State Vector Variability.
LASE Measurements During IHOP Edward V. Browell, Syed Ismail, Richard A. Ferrare, Susan A Kooi, Anthony Notari, and Carolyn F. Butler NASA Langley Research.
Falcon coordinator: Martin Weissmann Aircraft manager: Andrea Hausold Falcon Steering Committee (SC): M. Weissmann, P. Harr, T. Nakazawa, S. Jones, H.-S.
Intercomparisons of Water Vapor Measurements during IHOP_2002 – Radiosonde and Dropsonde Junhong (June) Wang NCAR Atmospheric Technology Division Acknowledgement:
Toulouse IHOP meeting 15 June 2004 Water vapour variability within the growing convective boundary layer of 14 June 2002 with large eddy simulations and.
Airborne Measurement of Horizontal Wind and Moisture Transport Using Co-deployed Doppler and DIAL lidars Mike Hardesty, Alan Brewer, Brandi McCarty, Christoph.
INFRARED-DERIVED ATMOSPHERIC PROPERTY VALIDATION W. Feltz, T. Schmit, J. Nelson, S. Wetzel-Seeman, J. Mecikalski and J. Hawkinson 3 rd Annual MURI Workshop.
This is tes box Multi-scale Analyses of Moisture and Winds during the 3 and 9 June IHOP Low-Level Jet Cases Edward Tollerud, Fernando Caracena, Adrian.
SRL/Reference sonde P. Di Girolamo, D. Whiteman, B. Demoz, J. Wang, K. Beierle, T. Weckwerth The Reference sonde (C34) consists of a Snow White (SW) chilled-mirror.
Airborne/ground-based sensor intercomparison: SRL/LASE Paolo Di Girolamo, Domenico Sabatino, David Whiteman, Belay Demoz, Edward Browell, Richard Ferrare.
October 02, st IHOP_2002 Water Vapor Intercomparison Workshop Status of intercomparisons and the next steps  Characterize moisture measuring techniques.
Slide 1 7th Session of the THORPEX International Core Steering Committee WMO Headquarters, Geneva, 19 November 2008 T-NAWDEX THORPEX- North Atlantic Waveguide.
Evaluation of T511(1°) clouds Simpson Weather Associates 7 June 2007 NCEP OSSE meeting.
IHOP Radiosonde and Dropsonde Data: Highlights and Problems
A new method for first-principles calibration
Oct. 28 th th SRNWP, Bad Orb H.-S. Bauer, V. Wulfmeyer and F. Vandenberghe Comparison of different data assimilation techniques for a convective.
CCN Variability During LBA-SMOCC-EMfiN! 2002 and Its Role on Precipitation Initiation Over the Amazon Basin.
5 th COPS Workshop, Hohenheim, March 2007 Real-time assimilation efforts during COPS Hans-Stefan Bauer, Matthias Grzeschik, Florian Zus, Volker Wulfmeyer,
NOAA Airborne Doppler Update Mike Hardesty, Alan Brewer, Brandi McCarty and Christoph Senff NOAA/ETL and University of Colorado/CIRES Gerhard Ehret, Andreas.
TAbMEP Assessment: POLARCAT H 2 O Measurements. Assessment Summary Table 1. Recommended POLARCAT H 2 O measurement treatment AircraftInstrument Reported.
ISTP 2003 September15-19, Airborne Measurement of Horizontal Wind and Moisture Transport Using Co-deployed Doppler and DIAL lidars Mike Hardesty,
NASA Science Overview Ramesh Kakar NASA Program Scientist for Wind Lidar (also, Aqua, TRMM, GPM and CYGNSS) 28 April,
S-HIS Retrieval Study Sahara Air Layer (SAL) Caribbean Sea: 19 July 2007 TC4 Robert Knuteson and S-HIS team Uni. Of Wisconsin-Madison Space Science and.
TAMDAR AERIBAGO Validation Experiments (TAVE) - Memphis Wayne Feltz, Erik Olson, Sarah Bedka, Kristopher Bedka, John Short, Tim Wagner, and Scott Cultice.
DOE ARM Calibration / Validation Instrumentation Data essentially available in real-time –ARM (Atmospheric Radiation Measurement) –CART (Cloud And Radiation.
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS SURFACE PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS FROM THE ORBITING CARBON OBSERVATORY-2.
Comparison of lidar water vapor measurements at Fixed PISA 2
UND Citation Aircraft OLYMPEX Data
LIDAR Ben Kravitz November 5, 2009.
Overview of The International H2O Project (IHOP_2002)
NPOESS Airborne Sounder Testbed (NAST)
LASE Measurements of Water Vapor During IHOP
Overview of IHOP-FRA activities including LEANDRE 2 analyses
Preliminary Analyses of S-Pol’s Refractivity Field
March 13, 2012 Get out your homework to be checked for completion
Edward I. Tollerud1, Brian D. Jamison2, Fernando Caracena1, Steven E
Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets
IHOP_2002 AERI INSTRUMENT SUMMARY
Refractivity During IHOP_2002
Assimilation of high-resolution DIAL water vapor data into the MM5 modeling system – Comparison of the performance of different assimilation methods Content:
Presentation transcript:

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop IHOP Intercomparisons Selection of Case Studies & First Quicklooks Andreas Behrendt, Thorsten Schaberl, Hans-Stefan Bauer, Volker Wulfmeyer, Cyrille Flamant, Christoph Kiemle  WALES  IHOP Intercomparison Table  Airborne-airborne intercomparisons  Airborne-ground intercomparisons  First Quicklooks  Conclusions & Outlook Contents

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop Water Vapor Lidar Experiment in Space (WALES) European Space Agency Earth Explorer Mission in Phase A

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop  Use unique IHOP_2002 data set:  Task1: Intercomparisons and collection of data  Task2: Organization of water vapor and background data  Task3: Case studies  Task4: Input data for end-to-end performance model  Task5: Conclusion and recommendations WALES Verification

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop Airborne DIAL systems  DLR Falcon - H2O-DIAL  NASA DC8 - LASE  NRL P3 - LEANDREII Ground-based Raman lidar systems  SRL  CARL Lidar Instruments

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop 1.Collection of flight times –Mission reports –Quick looks 2.Calculating instrument distances –Ignore horizontal distances > 20 km 3.Including instrument operation times and mode –Mission reports –Communication with PIs 4.Taking data quality and weather conditions into account –Communication with PIs 1.Quick looks Selection of Case Studies Intercomparison days 

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop Aircraft Flight Times

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop Aircraft – Aircraft Distances 

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop Aircraft – Aircraft Distances

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop Lidar operation times –When were H 2 O measurements done? Lidar operation mode –Was LEANDREII pointing sideway? Weather conditions –No H 2 O data due to clouds? 2 nd step

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop Airborne-Airborne Intercomparison Table

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop Airborne-Airborne Intercomparison Table 7 profilesNo direct comparisons possible. 2 formation flights + 3 profiles

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop Airborne/Ground-Based Intercomparisons SRL site

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop Two aircrafts: First priority :11 – 20:39 UTC (DLR DIAL and LEANDREII against SRL) :52 – 21:32 UTC (DLR DIAL and LASE against SRL) :56 – 19:41 UTC (DLR DIAL and LEANDREII against SRL) :55 – 20:31 UTC (DLR DIAL and LASE against SRL) :59 – 18:49 UTC (DLR DIAL and LASE against SRL) One aircraft: Second priority: :50/18:15/18:49 UTC (DLR DIAL against SRL) :10/17:16/19:49 UTC (LEANDREII against CARL) :47/02:58/06:21 UTC (LASE against CARL) :09/18:13/19:13/20:08 UTC (LASE against SRL) Airborne/Ground-Based Intercomparisons Many profiles for SRL and two aircrafts.

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop First Quicklook: 7/8 June 2002 LeandreII/DLR-DIAL Formation Flight

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop First Quicklook: 7/8 June 2002 LeandreII/DLR-DIAL Formation Flight

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop Mixing Ratio, g/kg P3-

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop  DIAL/DIAL formation flight comparisons: - Falcon/P-3: 19 May (~ 9 minutes) and 07 June (~ 10 minutes)  DIAL/DIAL profile/profile: - no P-3/DC-8 - Falcon/DC-8: 7 profiles - Falcon/P-3: 3 additional profiles  DIAL/ground-based SRL: many profiles available  DIAL/ground-based CARL: - P-3 and DC-8: max. 3 profiles each on and 2.6., resp.  DIAL/dropsondes, DIAL/AERI ??? Conclusions

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop  Several comparisons of DIAL systems available to investigate systematic errors  Large amount of data available to specify noise errors and the effects of atmospheric inhomogeneities for WALES  Cases selected, data intercomparison ongoing! Outlook

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop

Andreas Behrendt 25 March 2003IHOP Workshop 19 May 2002: DLR DIAL/LEANDREII formation flight comparison BLH day for task 4 studies. 24 May 2002: DLR DIAL/LASE comparisons CI day for task 4 studies. 29 May 2002: DLR DIAL/LEANDREII intercomparison data points. Homestead intercomparison day (DLR DIAL/SRL and LEANDREII/SRL). BLH day for task 4 studies. 3 June 2002: Spare day for data analysis. 7/8 June 2002: DLR DIAL/LEANDREII formation flight. E-LLJ day for studies within task 4. 9 June 2002: Spare day for data analysis. 14 June 2002: DLR DIAL/LASE comparisons. Homestead intercomparisons (DLR DIAL/SRL, LASE/SRL) BLE day for task 4 studies All Possible Intercomparisons: