FIRE Engineering John A. Schmidt NSO PAC Meeting February 27, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Report from US ITER Fusion Power Associates December 15, 2011 Ned Sauthoff Project Manager.
Advertisements

PPPL ST-FNSF Engineering Design Details Tom Brown TOFE Conference November 10, 2014.
Stuart East, 22 nd May 2012 Delivering industrial solutions for the fusion research community Stuart East.
FES International Collaboration Program: Vision and Budget Steve Eckstrand International Program Manager Office of Fusion Energy Sciences U.S. Department.
ASIPP Zhongwei Wang for CFETR Design Team Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto University.
Conceptual design of a demonstration reactor for electric power generation Y. Asaoka 1), R. Hiwatari 1), K. Okano 1), Y. Ogawa 2), H. Ise 3), Y. Nomoto.
EFDA Fusion Roadmap Status of implementation Francesco Romanelli EFDA Leader.
September 15-16, 2005/ARR 1 Status of ARIES-CS Power Core and Divertor Design and Structural Analysis A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.
FNSF Blanket Testing Mission and Strategy Summary of previous workshops 1 Conclusions Derived Primarily from Previous FNST Workshop, August 12-14, 2008.
Overview of ARIES Compact Stellarator Power Plant Study: Initial Results from ARIES-CS Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego Japan/US Workshop.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 Plan for Engineering Study of ARIES-CS Presented by A. R. Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting UCSD San.
Suggested US Plans and Strategy for ITER Test Blanket Mohamed Abdou Presented at APEX/TBM Meeting, UCLA, November 3-5, 2003.
Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.
Burning Plasma Gap Between ITER and DEMO Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy US-Japan Workshop Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies.
March 3-4, 2008/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: TRL for Heat and Particle Flux Handling A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.
Development of the New ARIES Tokamak Systems Code Zoran Dragojlovic, Rene Raffray, Farrokh Najmabadi, Charles Kessel, Lester Waganer US-Japan Workshop.
Overview of ARIES Compact Stellarator Study Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego US/Japan Workshop on Power Plant Studies & Related Advanced.
February 24-25, 2005/ARR 1 ARIES-CS Power Core Engineering: Status and Next Steps A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting GA.
The main function of the divertor is minimizing the helium and impurity content in the plasma as well as exhausting part of the plasma thermal power. The.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Review of the mechanical design of the final focusing region of the HIF Point Design T. Brown ARIES Project Meeting January 8, 2003.
1 FIRE Engineering Summary Phil Heitzenroeder for the FIRE Engineering Team Presented to the FIRE Physics Validation Review Committee March 30, 2004.
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
Kaschuck Yu.A., Krasilnikov A.V., Prosvirin D.V., Tsutskikh A.Yu. SRC RF TRINITI, Troitsk, Russia Status of the divertor neutron flux monitor design and.
Page 1 of 11 An approach for the analysis of R&D needs and facilities for fusion energy ARIES “Next Step” Planning Meeting 3 April 2007 M. S. Tillack ?
ILO Meeting #26 Ongoing and forthcoming Procurement activities 29 th September San Sebastian F4E Market Intelligence group - ILO Meeting #26 – 29th.
Advanced Tokamak Regimes in the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment (FIRE) 30th Conference on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics St. Petersburg, Russia.
ARIES Project Meeting, L. M. Waganer, Dec 2007 Page 1 Restructuring System Cost Accounts and Algorithms L. Waganer December 2007 ARIES Project.
An Expanded View of RAMI Issues 02 March 2009 RAMI Panel Members: Mohamed Abdou (UCLA), Tom Burgess (ORNL), Lee Cadwallader (INL), Wayne Reiersen (PPPL),
Selection of Plasma Facing Components for ITER and ITER Operational plan V. Chuyanov (Thanks to Y. Shimomura ) ITPA Garching May
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
US ITER UFA Meeting APS-DPP Savannah, GA Ned Sauthoff (presented by Dale Meade) November 15, 2004 US In-kind Contributions and Starting Burning Plasma.
Exploring Magnetically Confined Burning Plasmas in the Laboratory AAAS Annual Meeting Ned Sauthoff February 18, 2005 “Yearn to burn” “Burn to learn” Marshall.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 16th TOFE Madison, Sept , EUROPEAN TECHNOLOGICAL EFFORT IN PREPARATION OF ITER CONSTRUCTION ROBERTO.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego ARIES brainstorming meeting UC San Diego April 3-4, 2007 Electronic copy:
FIRE Activities with Emphasis on Technology Needs VLT PAC Meeting MIT September 4, 2003 AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT,
1 Subprojects of IFERC K.Lackner (as Chair of IFERC Project Committee) Garching – 14 Apr 2011.
Thoughts on Fusion Competitiveness Initiative Farrokh Najmabadi, George Tynan UC San Diego University Fusion Initiatives Meeting, MIT 14-15, February 2008.
Fusion Fire Powers the Sun Can we make Fusion Fire on earth? National FIRE Collaboration AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT,
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
KIT Objectives in Fusion by 2020 Workshop on the European Fusion Roadmap for FP8 and beyond April 13 – 14, 2011; IPP Garching.
Charles C. Baker Virtual Laboratory for Technology presented at the U.S. ITER Forum University of Maryland, College Park May 8, 2003 US ITER Technology.
Conceptual Design Requirements for FIRE John A. Schmidt FIRE PVR March 31, 2004.
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Presentation to ARIES Program Peer Review August 29, 2013, Washington, DC.
ITPA12 Diagnostics - PPPL - 3/26-30/07 1 US ITER Project Plans David Johnson Diagnostics Team Leader March 26, 2007 ITPA12 Design Basis US Scope Port Plugs.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
February 5-6, 2004 HAPL meeting, G.Tech. 1 Chamber Tasks Coordination Presented by A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions from J. Blanchard and the HAPL.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc NSO Collaboration Implications.
Advanced Design Activities in US Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants & Related Technologies.
Approach for a High Performance Fusion Power Source Pathway Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy ARIES Team Meeting March 3-4, 2008 UCSD, San.
1 AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration
Field-Reversed Configuration Fusion Power Plants John F. Santarius University of Wisconsin Workshop on Status and Promising Directions for FRC Research.
11 Introduction of ITER Port plug and Diagnostics Integration 17 April 2015 Damao Yao.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
1 The Five Year Plan review went well on all counts Review held June 30 - July 2 > 1.5 days of presentations by the Team Panel of nine (Hooper, Bravenec,
Boundary Physics Breakout Session was a Good Start Breadth of topics: many issues pointed out in three plenary talks: pedestal, SOL/div/PFC, and technology,
Magnetics Program Highlights VLT Conference Call September 13, 2000 presented by J.V. Minervini MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center.
US Participation in the
Pilot Plant Study Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting 19 May 2010.
The European Power Plant Conceptual Study Overview
Can We achieve the TBR Needed in FNF?
Advanced Design Activities in US
TRL tables: power conversion and lifetime
TWG goals, approach and outputs
ARIES-CS Power Core Engineering: Status and Next Steps
University of California, San Diego
Presentation transcript:

FIRE Engineering John A. Schmidt NSO PAC Meeting February 27, 2003

Engineering Themes Develop confidence that the tokamak systems can fit within the established envelopes while meeting the physics requirements Establish a cost estimate that is consistent with the level of design

General Status The magnet systems are the primary space users The magnet design has a simple configuration and a good basis in past experience and therefore should be reasonably straight forward However, some R&D will be required to support design An additional margin has been established for the magnets to provide added assurance that they will fit within their space envelops

General Status 2 A first cut at allocating the space envelopes for the 2.14 m design has been developed keying off the 2 m design This allocation will be optimized this summer based on ongoing analysis at the subsystem level Engineering design development will be needed to support the ongoing AT physics development

Magnets The stress levels are well balanced between the individual coil systems 18 % extra margin is remaining for completing the design Primary issues that remain to be addressed are: –Insulator life We have a reasonable set of options to choose from A test program has been developed by MIT –Materials (CuCrZr) that achieve published properties –Improved cooling to increase the pulse rate by about 3

PFC’s PFC’s will continue to be an issue for burning plasma experiments The space envelop for the PFC’s is not a large design driver The design drivers will be: power/pulse length, disruptions and tritium retention The ITER development of a tungsten divertor plate supports FIRE needs Remaining issues include: Elm’s, bonding and scale-up of small scale prototypes

Vessel Disruption analysis must be completed for the 2.14 m design to confirm the vessel thickness (double shell SS306L) Analysis of the new supporting arrangement for the divertor modules must be completed to assure adequacy of local material thickness Should we consider ferritic steels?

Diagnostics Port allocations have been developed Magnetic diagnostics have a significant impact on the PFC design and therefore these two design must be developed in concert The integration of specific diagnostics with port shielding must be shown to meet the dose requirements at the ports (neutronics underway) These port configurations must be shown to be compatible with remote maintenance requirements

FY 04 Plans Advance the design of FIRE as part of the FESAC Dual Path Strategy, and be prepared to initiate a conceptual design by the time of the U.S. decision on participation in ITER construction Support both the ITER and FIRE paths of the FESAC Dual Path Strategy: –address generic burning plasma R&D activities (e.g., PFC, disruption mitigation, plasma engineering, insulation development) –continue the development of advanced tokamak scenarios and advanced technologies needed for an attractive tokamak power plant in coordination with ARIES design activities. facilitate broad community involvement in the US burning plasma initiative

Conclusions We are well on our way to providing confidence that the tokamak systems will fit within their space envelopes and meet physics requirements. Small scale R&D and material purchases will be required to support further design development