International Design Study for a Neutrino Factory in the 5 Year Plan A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2010 1A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The US 5 Year Muon Acceleration R&D Program To Boldly Go… MICE Collaboration Meeting Harbin January, 2009.
Advertisements

CERN First Considerations to implement nuSTORM on the CERN site “North Area Neutrino Hub” E.Wildner, CERN Wednesday, March 27, 2013Elena Wildner,
Participants WP3total Imperial College CERN STFC University Warwick CRNS University Oxford6 6 Total Euro  - WP3.
25/10/2007M. Dracos1 EURO The European Design Study for a high intensity neutrino oscillation facility (Rob Edgecock, Mats Lindroos, Marcos Dracos)
1 Muon Bunching for a Muon Collider David Neuffer FNAL August 3, 2010.
MCTF Harold G. Kirk MUTAC 5-Year Plan Review 22 August Targetry R&D in the 5-Year Plan Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Lab.
1 DOE Annual Review -June 15,2005 An Overview of Conventional Facilities (Civil Construction) U. S. ILC Civil studies and cost issues for Snowmass Fred.
The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London. Neil Bliss, Norbert Collomb, Alan Grant, STFC/DL, Daresbury. Costing Methodology and Status of the Neutrino Factory.
MUON COLLIDER: R&D Status & Opportunities for Participation FNAL, February 24, 2011   1.Motivation & OverviewSteve Geer 2.Accelerator R&DVladimir.
WP5: Detector Performance and Cost EuroNu Launch Meeting 5 February 2008 Coordinator: Paul Soler, University of Glasgow Deputy: Anselmo Cervera Villanueva,
MCTF Michael Lamm MUTAC 5-Year Plan Review 22 August Magnet R&D for Muon Accelerator R&D Program Goals Proposed Studies Preliminary Effort and Cost.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
BENE Meeting April 28, 2006 A. Bross US Contribution to the IDS Aka WDS BENE IDS/FP7 at RAL April 28, 2006 A. Bross.
Institutional Logo Here Harold G. Kirk DOE Review of MAP (FNAL August 29-31, 2012)1 The Front End Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Lab August 30, 2012.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
Steve Geer OsC RAL 21 June, Muon Accelerator Program MUON COLLIDER & NEUTRINO FACTORY R&D in the U.S.  
Front-End Design Overview Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014 D. Stratakis | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1.
J. Pozimski UKNF WP1 meeting 10 March 2010 UKNF WP1 milestone table status.
Muon Acceleration Program Technology Development A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009 It is not a Project!
An Intense Muon Source for Future Accelerators Neutrino Sources and Muon Colliders What is a Neutrino Source Neutrino Source Study at Fermilab Scope of.
WG3 – Part 3 - Design Studies Introduction Introduction View from Europe - RE View from Europe - RE “ “ Japan- Yoshi Kuno “ “ Japan- Yoshi Kuno “ “ US-
Staging of a Neutrino Factory (and beyond…) Mark Palmer Director, US Muon Accelerator Program NuFACT 2014, Glasgow, August 25-30, 2014 NUFACT2014 XVIth.
Overlap of Project X and Beamline to DUSEL June 2, 2008.
John Womersley Welcome Director of Particle Physics, CCLRC International Scoping Study Meeting, RAL April 2006.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
NEUTRINO DETECTORS Cutting-Edge Accelerator Research for a Neutrino Factory and Other Applications Ajit Kurup for the FETS and UKNF Collaborations Cutting-Edge.
PIP-II: Why a new accelerator? Paul Derwent Fermilab Community Advisory Board 23 July 2015.
Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration DOE Briefing Meeting Alan Bross.
Alain Blondel -- After the ISS -- What did ISS achieve? 1. Established a « baseline » for the accelerator study 2. Rejuvenated simulation and study of.
MCTF Steve Geer AAC Meeting May MUON COLLIDER & NEUTRINO FACTORY R&D AT FERMILAB Overview of organization, budgets, and plans.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
Muon Collider R&D Plans & New Initiative 1.Introduction 2.Muon Collider Schematic 3.Conceptual Breakthrough 4.Ongoing R&D 5.Muon Collider Task Force 6.Muon.
Institutional Logo Here July 11, 2012 Muon Accelerator Program Advisory Committee Review (FNAL July 11-13, 2012)1 The Front End.
FFAG Acceleration David Neuffer Fermilab FFAG Workshop ‘03.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
1 Alan Bross AEC March 31, 2008 MuCool RF Program Muon Cooling R&D Alan Bross.
June 3, 2004G.W.Foster - Proton Driver Proton Driver Project Development, Tactics & Strategy G. W. Foster Fermilab User’s Meeting June 3, 2004.
CLIC project 2012 The Conceptual Design Report for CLIC completed – presented in SPC, ECFA and numerous meetings and conferences, also providing basis.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
Status of Project X Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Winter Meeting - March 1, 2011.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
EU accelerator contributions to the IDS … R. Garoby ISS meeting RAL 28/04/2006.
EURO EURO A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe Introduction Aims Structure Tasks Link to other activities Future dates.
WP3: The Neutrino Factory Costing Status Ajit Kurup CERN Costing Workshop 8 th December 2011.
A CCELERATOR S ESSIONS S UMMARY D AVE W ARK, I LIAS E FTHYMIOPOULOS Neutrino Strategy Workshop CERN, October 3, 2009 Outline  Show highlights from the.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
Muon Accelerators for Particle Physics Working Group Summary Conveners: Jaroslaw Pasternak Imperial College/RAL STFC Mark Palmer Fermilab Proton Accelerators.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Proposal Preparation. Documents for June PAC  Full Proposal  Starting point is LOI + updates in EOI  Project Definition Report  Cost estimate  Excel-based.
MCS meeting 20/11/2015 S. Guiducci. Introduction Yesterday meeting has shown an interest in a large physics community to incremental development of muon.
Neutrinos from Stored Muons STORM physics with a μ storage ring.
Fermilab: Introduction Young-Kee Kim DOE KA12 (Electron Research)Review June 22-23, 2010.
Muon Accelerator Program: Overview & Directions Mark Palmer June 19, 2013.
K. Long, 25 June, 2016 IDR: structure and overall timeline: Slides are to introduce discussion of how we prepare IDR. Propose to revise slides as we discuss.
K. Long, R. Roser, 23 July 2014 Report from the Neutrino Summit.
Opportunities from the Intensity Frontier to the Energy Frontier J.P.Delahaye/SLAC.
Fundamental aspects of muon beams submitted to Accelerator R&D panel for GARD funding consideration by J.P.Delahaye/SLAC & Robert D. Ryne/LBNL.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Summary Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab, USA.
CARESG, 11Apr2006V. Palladino Report on BENE Activities Beams for European Neutrino Experiments (BENE) subtitle: A Network aiming at a consensual road.
Fermilab-India Agreements and Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Project-X, International Collaboration Coodinator Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia,
Research and development toward a future Muon Collider Katsuya Yonehara Accelerator Physics Center, Fermilab On behalf of Muon Accelerator Program Draft.
Muon Acceleration using 8 GeV Proton Driver Linac
m+ m- n Muon Collider R&D MUON COLLIDER & NEUTRINO FACTORY R&D
A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe
Final Remarks Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics
A High Intensity Neutrino Oscillation Facility in Europe
Presentation transcript:

International Design Study for a Neutrino Factory in the 5 Year Plan A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009

IDS-NF RDF  One additional task will be on Neutrino Detector Magnetization Studies u Separate Detector R&D Proposal  The primary goals of the IDS-NF are to: u Deliver a Reference Design Report for the NF accelerator complex and its neutrino detectors by 2013 u Estimate the cost of the facility at the +50–75% uncertainty level u Identify possible staging scenarios s Now including Low-Energy NF u Consider possible sites for the accelerator complex and neutrino detectors, taking into account, where appropriate, the existence of suitable infrastructure 2A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009

US Areas of Participation  Proton driver u Site Specific – ie, Project X (or whatever it is eventually called).  Targetry and target stations  Pion capture and muon phase rotation  Ionization cooling  Accelerator systems  Site-specific (FNAL) underground engineering issues for the muon storage rings  Magnetization concepts for neutrino detectors  Overall coordination of effort for the low-energy NF option 3A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009

RDR Task Milestones and Deliverables DateMilestoneDesignationDeliverables FY10Deliver interim reference design reportNF10.1FR FY11Complete simulation study of TASD b) NF11.1DR FY12Complete front-end engineering designNF12.1DR Specify performance of low-energy NFNF12.2MR FY13Complete costing of front-end and target systems NF13.1MR FY14Finish -NF RDR reportNF14.1FR 4A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009

Acceleration Systems  Aligned with, but not identical, to MC u Main U.S. contribution will be to prepare an engineering design foundation for the acceleration systems including the following aspects: s Definition and design of beam lines or lattices s Development of full component lists and detailed specifications for each system s Studies of beam loading in FFAGs Both Baseline (25 Gev) and LE (4-5 GeV) Options 5A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009

SCRF Cryo-modules  201-MHz superconducting cavities are utilized in the acceleration  Initial studies will use 500 MHz model cavities u Cornell Proposal  ALD Processing u What Jim described on Thursday 6A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009

IDS-NF Effort/resources  For the most part, the IDS-NF work will mirror the FE activities for the MC  Deliverable: RDR 7A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009

IDS-NF Effort/Resources II  What is not covered u Underground engineering u TASD R&D u Large Magnetic Volume R&D  Underground engineering effort may be shared with LBNE where there is synergy u All underground structures (tunnels, caverns, and intersections) will be of “modest span” (between 2 and 4 m in width). u At least some of these underground facilities will be aligned on steep gradients, at depths up to 0.5 km below grade u A design brief can be generated in-house at Fermilab, with support from the MAP and laboratory ES&H, and accomplished in a six-month period. s The brief will be relatively simple, consisting of an initial set of single-line drawings showing the underground space envelopes and a list of key as- built requirements consistent with the technical needs and conventional infrastructure.  TASD and Large Magnetic Volume R&D is currently orphaned u Will likely require a separate proposal u Will be difficult to fund in current environment u Engineering design effort on LMV may be available with Fermilab TD 8A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009

Side Note: MUTAC Recommendation  IDS, Europe, Japan, and other international issues u The Collaboration should continue to develop stronger ties with the international community, as it plans to do, and particular attention should be paid to the exploration of further connections with Japanese counterparts.  Well, u This will be difficult, to say the least s Particularly w/r to the IDS-NF and Japan s With the MC in general  However, at this point in time, the IDS-NF is our best vehicle for obtaining international participation in the MC 9A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009

Extension to 5 Year Work Plan  My Opinion: u During the 5 Year R&D study, develop a “Shovel (is)-Ready” design for the (4MW) target station and muon collection system s Muon Collider Test Facility Concept  Advantages u Giant step towards muon facility s We need to demonstrate increase in muon production rate s Could mesh well with Project X s Experts in US (ORNL) are up to the job s As we have recently seen, shovel-ready projects can get funded if you are in the right place at the right time 10A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009