ESRM 410 Forest Soils and Site Productivity 2013 Nutrient Limitation ‘What if Scenario’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Riparian Thinning Logic
Advertisements

Modeling Tree Growth Under Varying Silvicultural Prescriptions Leah Rathbun University of British Columbia Presented at Western Mensurationists 2010.
The Effects of Site and Soil on Fertilizer Response of Coastal Douglas-fir K.M. Littke, R.B. Harrison, and D.G. Briggs University of Washington Coast Fertilization.
Height to DBH Ratio in N. Olympic Forests Karsten Turrey, North Olympic Peninsula Skills Center Natural Resources Prior Knowledge I know that as trees.
P449. p450 Figure 15-1 p451 Figure 15-2 p453 Figure 15-2a p453.
Examining Clumpiness in FPS David K. Walters Roseburg Forest Products.
ESRM 410 Forest Soils and Site Productivity 2011 Nutrient Limitation ‘What if Scenario’
Predicting Nitrogen Fertilizer Response in Douglas-fir Plantations Kim Littke Rob Harrison.
ESRM 304 Final Exam Hints The exam will contain up to 7 sections of : Short Answers, Calculations, Definitions, Multiple Choice, and/or True and False.
SADC Course in Statistics Comparing Means from Independent Samples (Session 12)
Comparing Two Samples: Part II
Using Urban Forests to Predict the Success of Western Red Cedar during Global Change Anna O’Brien University of Washington.
Fall River Long-term Productivity Study : Predictions of Pre-harvest Biomass and Nutrient Pools K. Petersen, B. Strahm, C. Licata, B. Flaming, E. Sucre,
Statistics 101 Class 9. Overview Last class Last class Our FAVORATE 3 distributions Our FAVORATE 3 distributions The one sample Z-test The one sample.
EFFECT OF HARVEST REMOVAL ON PRODUCTIVITY OF A 15-YEAR-OLD DOUGLAS-FIR PLANTATION. by Dale W. Cole and Jana E. Compton University of Washington and Harvard.
Ecological succession is... Two kinds of Succession: Primary & Secondary Primary succession is… Ecological succession is the sequence of community changes.
November 14, 2014 Objectives: ◦ Differentiate between independent variables, dependent variables, and constants ◦ Explain how to carry out a scientific.
Projected Deliverables: Estimates of N losses due to leaching, volatilization, and uptake by competing understory vegetation Determine the relative efficiency.
Constant Dosage day 7 Apigenin Control. Weight Adjusted Dosage Control Apigenin.
Acknowledgments This study is a product of the Sustainable Forestry Component of Agenda 2020, a joint effort of the USDA Forest Service Research and Development.
Bonanza Creek & Andrews LTER GEOG 4401/5401 Soils Geography Fall 2007 – Univ of Colorado, Boulder Kerry Malm & Phil Garcia.
Profile Analysis. Definition Let X 1, X 2, …, X p denote p jointly distributed variables under study Let  1,  2, …,  p denote the means of these variables.
Jenna Forsyth 12/07/09 Chester Morse Lake, Cedar River Watershed, WA Photo Courtesy of
Experiment Title Include the following somewhere on this slide! Lab Number (Example, Lab 2 for Free Fall etc.) Instructor: Date of the Lab: Team: (Names.
10-1 Introduction 10-2 Inference for a Difference in Means of Two Normal Distributions, Variances Known Figure 10-1 Two independent populations.
Modeling Crown Biomass for Three North Idaho Conifers Ann Abbott Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow Forestry Sciences Laboratory and University of.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 24 Comparing Means.
New Tools for Interpreting Foliar Nutrient Status Fertilization Working Group February 8, 2012.
Relationship between two variables Two quantitative variables: correlation and regression methods Two qualitative variables: contingency table methods.
Sustainable Production Forestry THE JOINT FORCES OF CSIRO & SCION Development of a productivity Index for Douglas-fir Leith Knowles.
Projected Deliverables: Estimates of N losses due to leaching, volatilization, and uptake by competing understory vegetation Determine the relative efficiency.
Type your question here. Type Answer Type your question here. Type Answer.
Symbiosis Clip. Ecological Succession Ecological Succession: Series of predictable changes in a community over time. Ecosystems are constantly changing.
Foliar Nutrient Analysis Foliage collection and interpretation of laboratory results.
Unit 1: Scientific Process. Level 2 Can determine the coordinates of a given point on a graph. Can determine the independent and dependent variable when.
8.2 Testing the Difference Between Means (Independent Samples,  1 and  2 Unknown) Key Concepts: –Sampling Distribution of the Difference of the Sample.
Please write HW in your agenda. Please update your table of contents. At the top of page 134, respond to the following: o “By the time you have read this,
Type Your Poster Title Here School name and Watershed name (e.g. Sand Hill River Watershed) Date Insert school logo up here Picture of team? Natural Resource.
Interspecific Competition Effects on Plants: Growth Rate, Plant Height, Plant Weight, and Plant Densities Amy Salamone Undergraduate Student (Marine Biology.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter 9 Inferences Based on Two Samples Confidence Intervals and Tests of Hypotheses.
ISMT253a Tutorial 1 By Kris PAN Skewness:  a measure of the asymmetry of the probability distribution of a real-valued random variable 
Elizabeth Traver University of Wyoming Quantifying spatial patterns in time of transpiration in aspen, alder, and sugar maple dominated forests.
Squamish Forest Ecosystems Ecosystem (noun): a community of species interacting with themselves and the physical environment 1 Ecosystem Controls Squamish.
The Normal Distribution
Understanding Site-Specific Factors Affecting the Nutrient Demands and Response to Fertilizer by Douglas-fir Center for Advanced Forestry Systems 2010.
Annualized diameter and height growth equations for plantation grown Douglas- fir, western hemlock, and red alder Aaron Weiskittel 1, Sean Garber 1, Greg.
Introduction to Fry Creek, Aberdeen, WA Watershed: Chehalis River Soil Type: Zenker Silt Loam Site Index: 175 for Douglas-fir Elevation: feet Native.
Establishing Plots to Monitor Growth and Treatment Response Some do’s and don’ts A discussion.
Hypothesis Tests u Structure of hypothesis tests 1. choose the appropriate test »based on: data characteristics, study objectives »parametric or nonparametric.
S519: Evaluation of Information Systems Social Statistics Inferential Statistics Chapter 9: t test.
Common Trees of the Gulf Islands: Identification and Knowledge.
Lecture PowerPoint Slides Basic Practice of Statistics 7 th Edition.
Forests of Western Washington
Questions of the day 1. How are forests vital for humans?
Fir Douglas or cedar red western?
Figure 3 An example plot with high error index values for the estimated diameter distributions: ML-estimation (48.5), parameter recovery (70.7), ALS-based.
Oregon Eastside Forests Project
Geography of Canada Forestry Geography of Canada
Forestry.
Post-fire management regimes on plantation growth and development: can we find effective tools to quickly restore a resilient forest? Jianwei Zhang - USDA.
Forestry Canadian Geography.
Explain the difference between a species and a population
Forestry Geography of Canada.
Title of Study Presenter names Major department names
Effects of forest composition on soil nutrient concentration
Kirk Hanson (360)
Forestry Geography of Canada.
(a, b) Hypothetical scenario where 2 samples of 2 proportions may explain two different scenarios in the environment. (a, b) Hypothetical scenario where.
Geography of Canada Forestry Geography of Canada
Figure 1. Map of Alaska indicating the location of (A) the Caribou Poker Creek Research Watershed (CPCRW) and (B) the ... Figure 1. Map of Alaska indicating.
Presentation transcript:

ESRM 410 Forest Soils and Site Productivity 2013 Nutrient Limitation ‘What if Scenario’

Cedar River Watershed – plots just located upstream of ‘you are here’ pointer

This slide and some following contain the design, stand characteristics and initial growth results. Please concentrate on explaining factors that might have led to: the differential growth of Douglas-fir vs. red alder on each site and also the differential growth of each species on different initial site Figure 1. Layout of study.

Alder replanted with Alder

DF replanted with DF

Alder replanted with DF

DF replanted with Alder

Table 1.

Table 2. Stand C distribution in the 50-yr-old Douglas fir and red alder stands. Tree and understory C concentrations were assumed to be 500 mg C kg-1. Where possible from sampling procedure, variability between plots was assessed and means compared via two-tailed two-sample t-test (Freund, 1988).

Figure 2. Growth of new plantations. DF - DF DF - RA RA - DF RA - RA

Please concentrate on explaining factors that might have led to: – the differential growth of Douglas-fir vs. red alder on each site, and also – the differential growth of each species on different initial site So, the these groups will respond to the above questions with the following comparisons: (many other comparisons can be made but just concentrate on answering the questions related to these forest plots) Group 1 will compare = RA-RA vs. DF-RA Group 2 will compare = RA-DF vs. DF-DF Figure 1. Layout of study.