Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 Title I, Subtitles A and B Commodity Programs for Covered Commodities: Sign-up Decisions 2002 Farm Bill.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peanut Provisions of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of Farm Bill Education Conference Kansas City, Missouri May 20-21, 2002 Nathan.
Advertisements

Peanut Provisions in the Farm Bill Nathan Smith, PhD Extension Economist Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia.
Dr. Jody Campiche Oklahoma State University 2014 Farm Bill Commodity Programs.
2014 FARM BILL: COMMODITY PROGRAMS Jody Campiche Assistant Professor & Extension Economist Oklahoma State University.
Provisions of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 (FAIR Act of 1996) Also referred to Freedom to Farm Developed by: Joe L. Outlaw.
Overview of Commodity Program Changes Jody Campiche Assistant Professor and Extension Economist Oklahoma State University November 10, 2014.
New Disaster Assistance Programs in the 2008 Farm Bill: Focus on SURE Rod M. Rejesus Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist Dept. of Ag. and Resource.
Agricultural Act of 2014 PLC (Price Loss Coverage) And ARC (Agriculture Risk Coverage) FSA 2014 Farm Bill TrainingMontana Producer Meetings1.
A New Approach to Providing an Agricultural Safety Net Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University Presented at.
Wesley N. Musser Farm Management Specialist Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of Maryland.
Choosing Crop Insurance for 2012 William Edwards, ISU Extension Economist.
Allan W. Gray, Purdue University 2002 Farm Bill Decision Time Allan Gray Purdue University.
Allan Gray and Chris Hurt, Purdue University 2002 Farm Bill Decision Time Allan Gray and Chris Hurt Purdue University.
ARC / PLC Program Overview. The 2014 Farm Bill provides the following: Eliminates DCP and ACRE program Allows for a “one-time” decision –REALLOCATE base.
The 2012, 2013, 2014 Farm Bill (The Agricultural Act of 2014) Will Snell – University of KY
2014 FARM BILL: COLLABORATION AND EDUCATION STRATEGIES Jody Campiche Oklahoma State University.
Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 Title I, Subtitles A and B Commodity Programs for Covered Commodities 2002 Farm Bill Education Conference.
Farm Bill 2014 “Agricultural Act of 2014” Commodity Title Options Crop Insurance Changes for 2015.
George Haynes Professor and Extension Specialist Montana State University Vincent Smith Professor Montana State University Ft. Peck Community College/MSU.
USDA Farm Service Agency Iowa July Iowa Farm Service Agency Local County Offices/Service Centers County Committee Both Farm Programs and Farm Loans.
2012 or 2013 FarmBill For 2014 and Beyond. Signed Feb 7, years late 956 Billion over 10 years Farm Bill is a mis-nomer.
2014 Farm Bill Overview Agricultural Council of Arkansas Board of Directors Meeting West Memphis, AR May 13, 2014.
The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 General Overview Crop Program Changes Dairy Provisions.
Farm Program Support Mechanisms 2004 Beltwide Cotton Conference San Antonio, TX January 5-9, Beltwide Cotton Conference San Antonio, TX January.
FARM ACT: The Farm Security & Rural Investment Act of 2002 (FSRIA) Lesson 5c—AGEC 3703 Larry D. Sanders Fall 2005 Dept. of Agricultural Economics.
The 2007 US Farm Bill: Analysis of the USDA proposals Agricultural Trade Policy Analysis DG for Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
By: Cody Darius Shay Alix Carmen Revenue Protection.
2014 FARM BILL COMMODITY PROGRAMS Dr. Jody Campiche Dr. Eric DeVuyst Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University.
2014 Farm Bill Cotton Decisions and Implications Don Shurley Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Georgia National Farm Bill.
The Agricultural Act of 2014 Farm Service Agency Programs Farm Service Agency Programswww.fsa.usda.gov/ne The Agricultural Act of
Dr. Jody Campiche Oklahoma State University May 16, 2013 ACRE vs. DCP.
Department of Economics ACRE Chad Hart ISU Extension Farm Management In-Service Ames, Iowa September 19, 2008.
Econ 339X, Spring 2010 ECON 339X: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Perspectives on Impacts of the 2002 U.S. Farm Act Paul C. Westcott Agricultural Economist U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service April.
Risk Management Programs in the 2008 Farm Bill William Edwards, Extension Economist.
Global Policies and Risk Management Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
Carl Zulauf Ag. Economist, Ohio State University Presentation at “Farm Bill Education Conference,” Kansas City, Missouri July 8, 2008 COMMODITY PROGRAM.
1 Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Farm Bill) Disclaimer: Provisions provided in this presentation are subject to change or interpretive differences.
Pat Westhoff University of Missouri Farm Bill Education Conference Kansas City,
The Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP) Presentation Developed by: Joe Parcell, Assistant Professor and Extension Economist, University of.
The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 General Overview Crop Programs Dairy Provisions.
The ACRE Decision Bruce A. Babcock Iowa State University Presented at the North Dakota Corn Growers Association Annual Convention. Fargo, ND. February.
PLC OR ARC? F ARM B ILL P ROGRAM S IGN - UP AND D ECISION A IDS Nick Baker Rock County UW Extension Agriculture Agent
Overview of Commodity Program Changes Joe Outlaw Professor and Extension Economist Co-Director, AFPC October 27, 2014.
Agricultural Act of 2014 PLC (Price Loss Coverage) And ARC (Agricultural Risk Coverage) Farm Bill Webinar1.
Payment Limitations 2002 Farm Bill Education Conference Kansas City, Missouri May 20-21, 2002 Joe Outlaw Texas A&M University.
Department of Economics SURE Farm Program North Central Iowa Crop & Land Stewardship Clinic Iowa Falls, Iowa December 30, 2009 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain.
Econ 337, Spring 2012 ECON 337: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Assistant Professor
Average Crop Revenue Election ACRE Program Ron Haugen/Dwight Aakre Farm Management Specialists February 2010.
Steven L. Klose Financial And Risk Management Assistance Department of Agricultural Economics Texas AgriLife Extension Service The Texas A&M University.
Roman Keeney, Assistant Professor Learning Tuesday—April 13, 2010 Policy Web Address:
Department of Economics Soybean Outlook and the New Farm Bill Programs Iowa Soybean Association Annual Meetings Ames, Iowa December 19, 2008 Chad Hart.
Implications of the 2002 U.S. Farm Act for World Agriculture Presented to the Policy Disputes Information Consortium Ninth Agricultural and Food Policy.
Price outlook for the 21 covered commodities and risk considerations Peter Food and Agricultural Policy.
Crop Insurance Decisions and the new Farm Bill
2014 Farm Bill Commodity Programs Overview
University of Illinois
Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP)
2014 Farm Bill Commodity Programs PLC
Edwin Young and Barry Krissoff, Economic Research Service, USDA
The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002
The conference call & webinar will begin at the top of the hour
OSU Policy & Outlook Program
OSU Policy & Outlook Program
ACRE Rain and Hail Agricultural Insurance Johnston, Iowa June 17, 2009
Farm Bill Global Agriculture Conference Spencer, Iowa
Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Associate Professor/Crop Markets Specialist
Allee Demonstration Farm, 50th Anniversary Field Day
Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Presentation transcript:

Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 Title I, Subtitles A and B Commodity Programs for Covered Commodities: Sign-up Decisions 2002 Farm Bill Education Conference Kansas City, Missouri May 20-21, 2002 Jim NovakBrad Lubben Auburn UniversityKansas State University

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions Overview –Producers must decide whether to sign up for farm program –If producers sign up, then they must decide whether to use their “old” or “new” acreage base –If producers use their “new” acreage base, then they must decide whether to use their “old” or “new” yields, and if “new”, which method to calculate “new” yields

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions Overview –Existing or “old” program acreage base refers to contract acreage used to calculate the 2002 Production Flexibility Contract (PFC) payment under the 1996 Farm Bill –Existing or “old” payment yield refers to the payment yield established for the 1995 crop covered under the 1990 Farm Bill Same yield as was used for PFC payments under the 1996 Farm Bill Payment yields under previous farm programs were frozen since 1985 and should be reflective of the production period

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions Overview –Average acreage or “new” acreage refers to acres planted and prevented from planting for each covered commodity for the years 1998 through 2001 –Average yield or “new” yield refers to the average yield per planted acre for the covered commodity for the years 1998 through 2001, not including years in which when the crop was not planted

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions Overview –Regardless of acreage base and yield decisions, producers will need information and documentation for acreage and yield from At a minimum, oilseeds will be added to the “old” base Or, all crops will be updated to the “new” base

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions 1.Decide whether to participate In 1996, this was the only decision As with the 1996 Farm Bill, participating producers maintain planting flexibility and no set-aside requirements Program participation requirements Conservation compliance Wetlands protection requirements Planting flexibility restrictions regarding production of fruits, vegetables, and wild rice on contract acres Farmland remains in agricultural use Neither the producer nor the land had to previously participate in the farm program to be eligible for sign-up

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions 2.Decide which acreage base to use a)Average acreage for each covered commodity for (“new” base) Including acres planted and prevented planted Average of acreage for all four years, including years in which crop was not planted OR…

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions 2.Decide which acreage base to use b)Existing program acreage base (“old” base) plus average acreage for each oilseed for Includes acres planted and prevented planted Average of acres for all four years, including years in which crop was not planted

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions 2.Decide which acreage base to use b)Existing program acreage base (“old” base) plus average acreage for each oilseed for Total oilseed acres added under this option are limited to the total average acres of the covered commodities for minus the existing base acreage Additional oilseed acres may be added up to their average acreage with a one-for-one reduction in another crop’s base acreage On farms where a history of double-cropping is established, the total acreage limit is adjusted to account for the double-cropped acres

Commodity Program Sign-up: Example Base Acreage Decision (100 acre farm) Existing base –50 acres wheat –30 acres cotton –20 acres with no base Average acreage for –50 acres corn –50 acres soybeans Use “new” base –50 acres corn –50 acres soybeans Use “old” base plus oilseeds –50 acres wheat –30 acres cotton –20 acres soybeans –Additional soybean acres allowed up to 50 with a one-for-one reduction in wheat or cotton base acreage

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions 3.Decide which payment yield to use If producer uses “old” base plus oilseeds, producer must use “old” yields Use existing (“old”) payment yields for all commodities except oilseeds Use “new” yields for oilseeds and adjust them back to “old” yields reflective of

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions Adjusting “new” oilseed yields back to “old” oilseed yields –Determine average yield per planted acre for each oilseed for Exclude years in which no acres of the oilseed were planted In years in which the farm yield is less than 75 percent of the county average yield, substitute 75 percent of the county average yield –Adjust “new” yield to “old” yield based on ratio of national average yield to national average yield for each oilseed

Commodity Program Sign-up: Example Soybean Yield Calculation Farm yields (per planted acre) –1998 – 20 bu/ac –1999 – 50 bu/ac –2000 – no planted acres –2001 – 55 bu/ac County average yields (per planted acre) –1998 – 40 bu/ac –1999 – 41 bu/ac –2000 – 42 bu/ac –2001 – 43 bu/ac National average yields (per planted acre) – – bu/ac – – bu/ac Ratio of national average yield to national average yield / = 78.14%

Commodity Program Sign-up: Example Soybean Yield Calculation Calculate average farm yield 1998: higher of 20 bu/ac or 75% of 40 bu/ac = 30 bu/ac 1999: higher of 50 bu/ac or 75% of 41 bu/ac = 50 bu/ac 2000: no planted acres 2001: higher of 55 bu/ac or 75% of 43 bu/ac = 55 bu/ac Farm average for = ( )/3 = 45 bu/ac Multiply average farm yield by ratio of national average yield 45 bu/ac by 78.14% = bu/ac

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions 3.Decide which payment yield to use If producer uses “new” base plus oilseeds, producer has 3 options a)Use existing payment yields and “old” oilseed yields OR b)Use partially updated yields based on 70 percent of the difference between “old” and “new” yields OR c)Use partially updated yields based on 93.5 percent of “new” yields

3.Decide which payment yield to use a)Use existing payment yields and “old” oilseed yields Payment yield = bu/ac Commodity Program Sign-up: Example Soybean Yield Calculation

3.Decide which payment yield to use b)Use partially updated yields based on 70 percent of the difference between “old” and “new” yields Payment yield = (new yield – old yield) x 70% + old yield Payment yield = (45 – 35.16) x 70% = = bu/ac

Commodity Program Sign-up: Example Soybean Yield Calculation 3.Decide which payment yield to use c)Use partially updated yields based on 93.5 percent of “new” yields Payment yield = new yield x 93.5% Payment yield = 45 x 93.5% = bu/ac

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions 3.Decide which payment yield to use Additional considerations “New” yields are calculated for other commodities in the same manner as that for oilseeds For commodities other than oilseeds for which “old” payment yields are unavailable, the Secretary shall establish an appropriate payment yield relative to similar farms Whichever option is used to establish payment yields must be used for all commodities

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions - Summary Sign-up Options 1.Use “old” acreage base plus “new” oilseed acreage and use “old” yields 2.Use “new” acreage base and use “old” yields 3.Use “new” acreage base and use partially updated yields based on 70 percent of difference between “old” and “new” yields 4.Use “new” acreage base and use partially updated yields based on 93.5 percent of “new” yields

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions - Summary Making sign-up decisions under risk –Do you select the option that provides the largest guaranteed payments (direct payments)? –Do you select the option that provides the largest expected payments (direct payments plus counter-cyclical payments)? –Do you select the option that minimizes risk? –Do you select the option that optimizes the combination of risk and expected payments given the producer’s risk preferences?

Commodity Program Sign-up Decisions - Summary Parting shots and caveats –Remember the timing of payments when deciding preferences –Remember the impact of payment limits on expected payments –Remember that counter-cyclical payments could be reduced if “amber box” payments would exceed WTO limits –Finally, the calculations are based on the best current interpretation of the legislation – exact details and numbers are yet to come