Pydna June 22, 168 BC Strategic Context Following the death of Philip V of Macedon in 179 BC, Perseus of Macedon hopes to renew his father’s ambition of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alexander The Great The Major Battles. Division of the Army Cavalry Infantry Skirmishers.
Advertisements

MARK ANTONY. Born April 20 th 83 BC He was born in the City of Rome Died August 1 st 30 BC Died in Alexandria, Ptolemaic Kingdom Was 53 years old. BirthDeath.
Battle in Ancient Greece And Rome. Organization Units were organized into tightly pact units. This unit was known as a Phalanx.
Revolt of Agis III of Sparta While Alex is away the spartans play.
Romans (Flaminius) Carthaginians (Hannibal) Flaminius deploys his force in column formation, heavy infantry acting as an advance guard and cavalry as the.
 216 BC: Hannibal attacked Roman supply lines  Gauis Terrentius Varro was elected consul  Found Hannibal at the Audifus River  Hannibal declared for.
Marathon August [?], 490 BC Strategic Context After the failures of an expedition in 492 BC and diplomacy the following year, Darius of Persia invades.
Kosovo June 20, 1389 Strategic Context The Ottoman Empire is growing steadily at the expense of neighbouring powers in the Balkans where Murad I wishes.
Cowpens January 17, 1781 Strategic Context The overall strategic situation of the American Revolutionary War is already decidedly in the American favour.
Leuthen December 5, 1757 Strategic Context The Seven Years’ War begins! Backed only by Britain after attacking Saxony, Prussia finds itself surrounded.
The Ice April 5, 1242 Strategic Context The Catholic and Orthodox Churches collided in the Baltic during Christianity’s spread from Palestine, hence the.
Grunwald July 15, 1410 Strategic Context Founded in 1190 in Acre, the Teutonic Knights are unable to expand against the Saracens, and eventually accept.
Adrianople August 9, 378 Strategic Context The Visigoths and Ostrigoths conspire to assassinate Roman Emperor Valens but fail; the Romans consequently.
Maling 342 BC Strategic Context Of the Seven Warring States in China, Wei finds itself particularly vulnerable following its defeat at the Battle of Kuei-ling.
Fornovo July 6, 1495 Strategic Context In February 1495, Charles VIII of France is able to conquer Naples with the help of Milan, following a long march.
Cape Ecnomus 256 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Ayacucho December 9, 1824 Strategic Context Stakes
Saratoga October 7, 1777 Strategic Context The British look to strangle the American Revolution in 1777 by cutting off the more troublesome northeastern.
Blenheim August 13, 1704 Strategic Context England, as part of its commitment to the Grand Alliance with Holland, Austria and Prussia, sends then-Earl.
Raphia June 22, 217 BC Strategic Context Antiochus III the Great inherits the Seleucid throne in 223 BC and undertakes a quest to restore the lands lost.
Torvioll June 29, 1444 Strategic Context The Ottoman Empire recovers from its decade-long civil war in 1415, and subsequently seeks to reestablish control.
Bannockburn June 24, 1314 Strategic Context Edward I of England defeats William Wallace at the Battle of Falkirk in 1298, crushing the Scottish uprising.
Thymbra [?], 546 BC Strategic Context In 559 BC, Cyrus deposes Astyages of Media and begins to consolidate his new Persian state, which he accomplishes.
Tuyuti May 24, 1866 Strategic Context With Brazil and Uruguay at war, Paraguayan President Francisco Solano López invades southern Brazil in support of.
Ankara July 28, 1402 Strategic Context The clash between the Timurid and Ottoman Empires is somewhat inevitable in the early 1400s. Tamerlane’s Tatars.
Zama October 19, 202 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca leads a Carthaginian army from Spain across the Alps to invade attack the Roman Empire.
Lake Trasimene June 24, 217 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca negates Roman control of the seas by leading the Carthaginians through Spain.
Ilipa [?], 206 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca leads a Carthaginian army from Spain across the Alps to invade the Roman Empire. Despite.
Kulikovo September 8, 1380 Strategic Context The Golden Horde is deteriorating due to internal and external power struggles. The khan’s authority falls.
Kulikovo September 8, 1380 Strategic Context The Mongol-Tatar Golden Horde is deteriorating due to internal and external power struggles. The Khan’s authority.
Catalaunian Plains June 20, 451 Strategic Context After four years of peace, Attila leads his Huns against the Western Roman Empire, sacking Trier and.
Catalaunian Plains June 20, 451 Strategic Context After four years of peace, Attilla leads his Huns against the Western Roman Empire, sacking Trier and.
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Ad Decimum September 13, 533 Strategic Context Stakes No Image
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Varna November 10, 1444 Strategic Context Stakes
The Tactics of Alexander
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Ilipa [?], 206 BC Strategic Context Stakes No Image Available
Gaugamela October 1, 331 BC Strategic Context Stakes
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Alexander The Great The Major Battles.
THE BATTLE OF GAUGAMELA
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
The Trebia December [?], 218 BC
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Daras [?], 530 Strategic Context Stakes
Strasbourg August [?], 357 Strategic Context Stakes No Image Available
Zama October 19, 202 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Ruspina January 4, 46 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Breitenfeld September 17, 1631
Ipsus [?], 301 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Presentation transcript:

Pydna June 22, 168 BC Strategic Context Following the death of Philip V of Macedon in 179 BC, Perseus of Macedon hopes to renew his father’s ambition of conquering Greece. This leads to tensions and eventual war with Pergamum, which is expanding quickly under the leadership of King Eumenes. Rome, more concerned with Macedonian power and its alliances with anti-Roman factions in Thrace, sides with Pergamum, resulting in an indecisive war BC. Dissatisfied with this result, the Roman Senate appoints Lucius Aemilius Paullus as commander of the army to properly subdue Macedon. In June 168 BC, Paullus advances, outflanking Macedonian mountain positions, and forcing Perseus to retreat to Pydna. There the two armies encamp for days until a skirmish erupts into a full-scale battle. Stakes + A Macedonian victory would preserve its existence and end Roman influence in Greece. + A Roman victory would effectively end Macedonian independence and pacify Greece. By Jonathan Webb, 2011 ©

Pydna, 168 BC Strength  Macedonians  Well  Romans  Well  Perseus  20,000 legionnaires  21,000 phalangites  Lucius Aemilius Paullus  19,000 other infantry  4,000 cavalry  2,000 cavalry  15,000 other infantry By Jonathan Webb, 2011 ©  22 war elephants

Macedonians (Perseus) Romans (Paullus) Paullus deploys alongside his experienced heavy infantry, the legionnaires, at the center. They are flanked by lighter infantry on each side, Greek allies on their left, Latin allies on their right. Paullus places his few cavalry on each flank, and his war elephants on the right wing. Perseus deploys his compact infantry phalanx at the center. It is flanked by lighter infantry on each side, mercenaries on its left, Thracians on its right. Perseus deploys an experimental anti-elephant unit opposite the Roman war elephants in the hopes of neutralizing them; Perseus holds his cavalry back on each wing awaiting the result of this experiment, himself occupying a position on the right wing. Perseus orders his infantry forward without committing his cavalry. The Thracians on the right surge ahead of the slow-moving phalanx to engage Paullus’ Greek allied infantry. The Macedonian phalanx advances gradually as a single mass, pinning down the Roman legionnaires and gaining an early advantage with its long spears over their swords. The Pelignians, stationed with the Latin allied infantry, attempt a counter-attack – their commander resorting to tossing their standard into the enemy ranks to incite them – but are repulsed with heavy loss and pushed back by the Macedonian mercenaries. The Macedonian phalanx simply pushes the Roman legionnaires back, their long spears continuing to outrange the Roman sword. However, as the Roman legionnaires fall back, the Macedonian phalanx becomes increasingly disordered as it advances over rough hilly terrain. The tight, dense formation begins to show disruption and breaks in its cohesion; a gap between the phalanx and the left wing also widens as the Roman war elephants prepare to enter the battle. Paullus orders the legionnaires to break down into smaller units to infiltrate the disrupted phalanx though many of which are already doing so on their own initiative. The Roman legionnaires exploit any and all gaps, forcing the Macedonian phalangites to drop their long spears and resort to their ineffective short swords. The Roman attack is particularly effective on the phalanx’s exposed left flank. Paullus also orders a war elephant charge which routs the anti-elephant corps and threatens the entire Macedonian left wing. With war elephants on the field, Perseus cannot commit his cavalry and influence the battle. The Roman war elephants smash the Macedonian mercenaries, hitting their left flank and rear. Meanwhile, the Roman legionnaires continue to slaughter the Macedonian phalangites as their formation disintegrates and routs; only a small unit of the phalanx maintains its resolve and fights to the last. With the collapse of the phalanx, Perseus and the cavalry flee. Macedonians (Perseus) 21,000 phalangites 19,000 other infantry 4,000 cavalry Romans (Lucius Aemilius Paullus) 20,000 legionnaires 15,000 other infantry 2,000 cavalry 22 war elephants

Pydna, 168 BC Casualties & Aftermath Macedonians:Romans: 31,000 or 70% 1,000 or 3% By Jonathan Webb, 2011 © The Romans captured Perseus shortly after the battle, ending the war. The Roman Senate decided to deal with Macedon harshly to avoid any future troubles, occupying its territory and disarming is citizens. The Romans imprisoned anyone believed to have been involved with Perseus indefinitely and even vilified King Eumenes of Pergamum, whose territory became a Roman vassal as a result of the power shift in the region. In 150 BC, Macedon again became a problem for Rome when Andriscus claimed to be heir to Perseus and led a popular uprising; the uprising was crushed once again near Pydna in 148 BC.

The Art of Battle: Animated Battle Maps By Jonathan Webb, 2011 ©