C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Improvement of Least-Squares Collocation error estimates using local GOCE Tzz signal standard.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,

Advertisements

Ocean circulation estimations using GOCE gravity field models M.H. Rio 1, S. Mulet 1, P. Knudsen 2, O.B. Andersen 2, S.L. Bruinsma 3, J.C. Marty 3, Ch.

ARCGICE WP 4.3 Recommendations for inclusion of GOCE data C.C.Tscherning & S.Laxon C.C.Tscherning, UCPH, S.Laxon, UCLA,

1 High resolution SST products for 2001 Satellite SST products and coverage In situ observations, coverage Quality control procedures Satellite error statistics.

Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic Survey On the Solutions of.

Satellite geodesy. Basic concepts. I1.1a = geocentric latitude φ = geodetic latitude r = radial distance, h = ellipsoidal height a = semi-major axis, b.

ARCGICE WP 2.2 ERROR ESTIMATION OF NEW GEOID C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.

Datum-shift, error-estimation and gross-error detection when using least-squares collocation for geoid determination. by C.C.Tscherning Department of Geophysics,

CHAMP Gravity Field Models using Precise Orbits by C.C.Tscherning & E.Howe Department of Geophysics University of Copenhagen, Denmark 2. CHAMP Science.

ARCGICE WP 2.1 Leader: DSPC Make new geoid of afrctic region based on GRACE C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.

Geoid determination by least-squares collocation using

CHAMP Satellite Gravity Field Determination Satellite geodesy Eva Howe January

ARCGICE WP 1.4 ERROR ESTIMATES IN SPATIAL AND SPECTRAL DOMAINS C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,

ARCGICE WP 5.2 Plan for development of Atctic geoid using GOCE C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,

Improving modelling of GOCE data using reduced point mass or multipole base functions sdfsdfdsf Matija Herceg 1, Carl Christian Tscherning 2, Per Knudsen.

ARCGICE WP 5.1 Leader: UCL Synthesis report on benefit of combining data C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen,

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 1 Gravity Field.

Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005

J. Ebbing & N. Holzrichter – University of Kiel Johannes Bouman – DGFI Munich Ronny Stolz – IPHT Jena SPP Dynamic EarthPotsdam, 03/04 July 2014 Swarm &

Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.

Error Analysis of the NGS Gravity Database Jarir Saleh, Xiaopeng Li, Yan Ming Wang, Dan Roman and Dru Smith, NOAA/NGS/ERT Paper: G , 04 July 2011,

Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U.S. GRAV-D Project Theresa M. Damiani 1, Vicki Childers 1, Sandra Preaux 2, Simon Holmes 3,

Calibration in the MBW of simulated GOCE gradients aided by ground data M. Veicherts, C. C. Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen,

Institut für Erdmessung (IfE), Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany Quality Assessment of GOCE Gradients Phillip Brieden, Jürgen Müller living planet.

1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.

ESA Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, T. Gruber, C. Ackermann, T. Fecher, M. Heinze Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie (IAPG)

A spherical Fourier approach to estimate the Moho from GOCE data Mirko Reguzzoni 1, Daniele Sampietro 2 2 POLITECNICO DI MILANO, POLO REGIONALE DI COMO.

GOCE ITALY scientific tasks and first results Fernando Sansò and the GOCE Italy group.

GOCE OBSERVATIONS FOR DETECTING UNKNOWN TECTONIC FEATURES BRAITENBERG C. (1), MARIANI P. (1), REGUZZONI M. (2), USSAMI N. (3) (1)Department of Geosciences,

Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC February 2009.

Institute for Mathematics Applied to Geoscience Geophysical Statistics Project - GSP Data Assimilation Research Section - DAReS Turbulence Numerics Team.

1 Average time-variable gravity from GPS orbits of recent geodetic satellites VIII Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–21 June 2013 Aleš Bezděk 1.

C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Developments in the implementation and use of Least-Squares Collocation. IAG Scientific Assembly, Potsdam,

GP33A-06 / Fall AGU Meeting, San Francisco, December 2004 Magnetic signals generated by the ocean circulation and their variability. Manoj,

Data Requirements for a 1-cm Accurate Geoid

Numerical aspects of the omission errors due to limited grid size in geoid computations Yan Ming Wang National Geodetic Survey, USA VII Hotine-Marussi.

EGU General Assembly 2011, 3 rd – 8 th April 2011, Vienna, Austria EGU EIGEN-6 A new combined global gravity field model including GOCE data from.

M. Herceg and C.C.Tscherning, University of Copenhagen Evaluation of Least-Squares Collocation and the Reduced Point Mass method using the International.

OSTST March, Hobart, Tasmania Ocean Mean Dynamic Topography from altimetry and GRACE: Toward a realistic estimation of the error field Marie-Helene.

Progress in Geoid Modeling from Satellite Missions

Regional Enhancement of the Mean Dynamic Topography using GOCE Gravity Gradients Matija Herceg 1 and Per Knudsen 1 1 DTU Space, National Space Institute,

Parameters : Temperature profile Bulk iron and olivine weight fraction Pressure gradient. Modeling of the Martian mantle Recently taken into account :

International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems GGHS 2012, Venice, Italy 1 GOCE data for local geoid enhancement Matija Herceg Per Knudsen.

IAG Scientific Assembly – Cairns, Australia, August 2005 The GOCE Mission GOCE (Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer) will be.

Full Resolution Geoid from GOCE Gradients for Ocean Modeling Matija Herceg & Per Knudsen Department of Geodesy DTU Space living planet symposium 28 June.

Lecture 7 – Gravity and Related Issues GISC February 2008.

A comparison of different geoid computation procedures in the US Rocky Mountains YM Wang 1, H Denker 2, J Saleh 3, XP Li 3, DR Roman 1, D Smith 1 1 National.

ESA living planet symposium Bergen Combination of GRACE and GOCE in situ data for high resolution regional gravity field modeling M. Schmeer 1,

Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.

ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.

4.Results (1)Potential coefficients comparisons Fig.3 FIR filtering(Passband:0.005~0.1HZ) Fig.4 Comparison with ESA’s models (filter passband:0.015~0.1HZ)

Astronomical Institute University of Bern Astronomical Institute, University of Bern Swarm Gravity Field Results with the CMA Adrian Jäggi, Daniel Arnold,

An oceanographic assessment of the GOCE geoid models accuracy S. Mulet 1, M-H. Rio 1, P. Knudsen 2, F. Siegesmund 3, R. Bingham 4, O. Andersen 2, D. Stammer.

Use of topography in the context of the GOCE satellite mission – some examples Moritz Rexer, Christian Hirt, Sten Claessens, Carla Braitenberg 5 th INTERNATIONAL.

GOCE Gravity Field Models – Overview and Performance Analysis Th. Gruber*, R. Rummel* & High Level Processing Facility (HPF) Team *Institute of Astronomical.

How Do we Estimate Gravity Field? Terrestrial data –Measurements of surface gravity –Fit spherical harmonic coefficients Satellite data –Integrate equations.

D.N. Arabelos, M. Reguzzoni and C.C.Tscherning HPF Progress Meeting # 26, München, Feb , Global grids of gravity anomalies and vertical gravity.

GOCE geoids and derived Mean Dynamic Topography in the Arctic Ocean Ole B. Andersen & Per Knudsen. DTU Space – Copenhagen, Denmark.

ESA Living Planet Symposium, 29 June 2010, Bergen (Norway) GOCE data analysis: the space-wise approach and the space-wise approach and the first space-wise.

1 UPWARD CONTINUATION OF DOME-C AIRBORNE GRAVITY AND COMPARISON TO GOCE GRADIENTS AT ORBIT ALTITUDE IN ANTARCTICA Hasan Yildiz (1), Rene Forsberg (2),

Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005

Nils Holzrichter, Jörg Ebbing

Chairs: H. Sünkel, P. Visser

D. Rieser *, R. Pail, A. I. Sharov

Martin Pitoňák1, Michal Šprlák2 and Pavel Novák1

Daniel Rieser, Christian Pock, Torsten Mayer-Guerr

Geoid Enhancement in the Gulf Coast Region

Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U. S

Presentation transcript:

C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Improvement of Least-Squares Collocation error estimates using local GOCE Tzz signal standard deviations. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

GOCE Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

GOCE Tzz (-ITG_Grace 2010s to 36), mean of 1 deg. Blocks, E.U. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

Use of Gradients: Contribution to determination of coefficients and error estimates of Spherical Harmonic Models Estimation of global grids of gravity anomalies or gradients at satellite (mean) altitude, at 10 km height or on ground level + error-estimates, see e.g. “Global grids of gravity anomalies and vertical gravity gradients at 10 km altitude from GOCE gradient data and polar gravity, by D.N. Arabelos, M. Reguzzoni and C.C.Tscherning”, submitted, 2013”, Error estimates not satisfactory – reason for this presentation. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

PURPOSE OF ERROR ESTIMATES (1)an indicator of the quality of an observed or estimated quantity (2) for the use of data in a data assimilation procedure such as estimating ocean current velocities or an EGM (3) in simulation studies and (4) for gross-error detection Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

ERROR ESTIMATES FROM LEAST-SQUARES COLLOCATION Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

ERROR ESTIMATES OF HEIGHT ANOMALIES FROM GRAVITY, units: m. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

ERROR ESTIMATES + IMPROVEMENTS (1)Only show location of data (2)Sometimes quality of data (3)Influence of different data types (4)But may be improved knowing local signal standard deviation or (rms) Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013

Example of local improvement of error estimates Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013 Gravity anomalies from GOCE Tzz & EGM2008 to 512. (ITG- Grace2010c to 36 subtracted everywhere), units: mgal.

Differences and LSC error estimates Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013 Differences gravity fromGOCE Tzz- EGM2008 to 512 and LSC error estimates.

GOCE Tzz RMS in 1 deg. blocks and scaled error estimates Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013 GOCE Tzz RMS (E.U.) and scaled error estimates (mgal). Now error-estimates show how error varies.

Global scaling using GOCE Tzz RMS in 1 deg. Blocks. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013 GOCE Tzz (-ITG-GRACE2010c to 36) RMS (E.U)

Global scaling possibel ? Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013 LSC error estimates of predicted reduced gravity in 20x20 blocks from GOCE Tzz.

Global scaling of LSC error estimates in 1x1 deg blocks. Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013 Scaled error-estimates of predicted reduced gravity anomalies.

Conclusion It is planned to use the procedure in order to provide error-estimates of the global deg. gravity anomaly grids predicted from GOCE Tzz. Problems remaining: How should the local signal standard deviations be computed in case of a local bias ? Should the root-mean-square variation be used ? Should the scaling be done regionally or by using the global root-mean-square variation ? In both cases the bias is small due to the subtraction of for example the ITG- Grace 2010s field or other Earth Gravity Models to the same maximal degree.. The scaling of LSC derived error-estimates improves the estimates, so that the variation of the error due to changing local signal standard deviation is seen. Same procedure may be used e.g. on error-estimates associated with spherical harmonic models of the gravity field and in many other cases ! Hotine-Marussi Symposium, Rome, June 2013