Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Resistance to the HIV-Integrase Inhibitor Raltegravir: Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Greatest Hits of 2012 Mark Wainberg McGill AIDS Centre Jewish General Hospital Montreal, Quebec.
Advertisements

Evoluzione genetica di HIV ed evoluzione clinica della malattia AIDS: due aspetti correlati? Carlo Federico Perno.
Objective of the DAP A) Specify an analysis plan that can be applied to a wide variety of clinical HIV resistance studies. B) Include both Intervention.
20th International AIDS Conference; July 20-25, 2014; Melbourne, Australia DTG-Based Regimens Are Active in INI-Naive Patients With a History of NRTI Resistance.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study 3D (Ombitasvir-Paritaprevir-Ritonavir + Dasabuvir) + RBV in GT1 TURQUOISE-I.
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS (maturation inhibitor)
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS , prodrug of BMS (attachment inhibitor) - AI Study.
The Unique Resistance Profile of Tipranavir Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
ACTG 333 The Antiviral Effect of Switching from Saquinavir to the New Formulation of Saquinavir vs. Switching to Indinavir After >1 year of Saquinavir.
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Potent Antiretroviral Effect of MK-0518, a Novel HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor, in Patients with Triple-class Resistant Virus Potent Antiretroviral Effect.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
IAS 2011_ Abstract # WEPDB0102 Sustained Efficacy and Tolerability of Raltegravir after 240 Weeks of Combination ART in Treatment- Naive HIV-1 Infected.
Copyright ©2011 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA, All Rights Reserved IAS 2011_ Abstract # WEPDB0102 Sustained Efficacy and Tolerability.
CCR5 Monoclonal Antibody PRO 140 Inhibited HIV-1 Resistant to Maraviroc, a Small Molecule CCR5 Antagonist Andre J Marozsan Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
HIV-1 Resistance - Implications For Clinicians Joseph J. Eron Jr., MD Professor of Medicine University of North Carolina.
1 Novel HIV Suppressive Approaches with Integrase Inhibitors Mark A Wainberg McGill University AIDS Centre Montreal, Canada.
Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved 14 th CROI February 27, 2007 Next Generation Inhibitors of.
IAC 2006 Abs# THLB0214 Potent Antiretroviral Effect of MK-0518, a Novel HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor, as part of Combination ART in Treatment -Naïve HIV-1.
1 Resistance and Tropism - Maraviroc Lisa K. Naeger, Ph.D. Division of Antiviral Products Food and Drug Administration April 24, 2007 FDA Antiviral Advisory.
1 RESIST Trials - Grade 3 or 4 AST, ALT or Total Bilirubin: Actions and Outcomes Action Taken: TPV/r N=748 CPI/r N=737 Total Number of Grade 3 or 4 ALT,
TITAN = TMC114/r In Treatment-experienced pAtients Naïve to lopinavir
Simplification from Protease Inhibitors to Once or Twice Daily Raltegravir: the ODIS trial Eugenia Vispo, Pablo Barreiro, Francisco Blanco, Sonia Rodríguez-Novoa*,
Combined PI and NNRTI Resistance Analysis of the Pooled DUET Trial: Towards a Regimen-Based Resistance Interpretation J. M. Schapiro, J. Vingerhoets, S.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
AI Study  Design SOF 1W then DCV + SOF 23W DVC + SOF Randomisation* 1 : 1 : 1 Open-label AI Study: DCV + SOF + RBV for genotypes 1, 2 and.
Poster # 873 *Sharon Nachman SUNY Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY Background: RAL is a potent selective HIV-1 integrase inhibitor.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Eron JJ, Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11: QDMRK  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV.
How to avoid a resistance issue with the first generation protease inhibitors ? O. Lada PHD Service d’Hépatologie et INSERM CRB3, AP-HP Hopital Beaujon,
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
Mounir Ait-Khaled, The Predictive Quality of Genotype and Phenotype Data on Virological Response to Salvage Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients.
Potential Utility of Tipranavir in Current Clinical Practice Daniel R. Kuritzkes, MD Director of AIDS Research Brigham and Woman’s Hospital Division of.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Copyright © 2008 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA, All Rights Reserved CROI 2008 Abstract # J-117 Poster # Week Results from.
1 © 2009 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ USA. All rights reserved, Emerging Patterns of Resistance to Integrase Inhibitors Michael D. Miller,
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  NEAT001/ANRS 143  MODERN.
Forns X. J Hepatology 2015; 63: C-SALVAGE Study: grazoprevir + elbasvir + RBV in genotype 1 with failure to PI-based regimen –NS3 and NS5A RAVs.
Sulkowski M. Lancet 2015;385: C-WORTHY  Design Randomisation* Open-label > 18 years HCV genotype 1, treatment naïve HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/ml No cirrhosis.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
SAILING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment- experienced INI-naïve patients DK/DLG/0041/14c September 2015.
CROI 2008 Abstract # J-114 Poster #788 Copyright © 2008 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA, All Rights Reserved 48-Week Results from.
Date of download: 5/28/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Low-Frequency HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations and.
Copyright © 2008 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Raltegravir.
Daniel R. Kuritzkes, MD Director of AIDS Research Brigham and Women’s Hospital Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Boston, Massachusetts Role.
VIKING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects SE/HIV/0023/14b January 2014.
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
KLEAN Study: Fosamprenavir/Ritonavir Associated With Similar Efficacy and Safety as Lopinavir/Ritonavir SGC in Treatment- Naive Patients Slideset on: Eron.
Adefovir Suppresses HBV DNA Levels in Lamivudine-Resistant HIV/HBV Patients Slideset on: Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Dolutegravir versus Raltegravir in Treatment Experienced SAILING Study
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-1 (TMC125-C206)
Darunavir/r versus Other PIs in Treatment Experienced POWER 1 and 2
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
Impact of Baseline NNRTI Mutations on the Virologic Response to TMC125 in the Phase III Clinical Trials DUET-1 and DUET-2 J Vingerhoets, A Buelens, M.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Resistance to the HIV-Integrase Inhibitor Raltegravir: Analysis of Protocol 005, a Phase 2 Study in Patients with Triple-Class Resistant HIV-1 Infection D.J. Hazuda, M. D. Miller, B. Y. Nguyen and J. Zhao for the P005 Study Team Merck Research Labs, North Wales PA 19454

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (IC 50 ~ 10 nM) –hydroxypyrimidinone carboxamide Antiviral IC 95 ~ 31  20 nM (50% NHS) Active across diverse clinical isolates and HIV-2 Potent antiviral effect in treatment naïve patients –Phase II 24 week data (Markowitz et. al. IAS 2006) Robust activity in HIV-1 patients with triple class resistance – Phase II 24 week data (Grinsztejn et al ICAAC 2006) – Phase III data (Cooper et al & Steigbigel et al CROI 2007) MK-0518: Raltegravir

+ OBT § GSS = Genotypic sensitivity score by Phenosense GT Grinsztejn et al. Lancet 2007; 369: PN005 Phase 2 Study in Treatment Experienced Patients: Baseline Characteristics MK-0518*Placebo* 200 mg N= mg N= mg N=45N=45 Median Age (yrs) Male84%89%91%89% Mean log 10 HIV RNA Mean CD4 Count (/mm 3 ) Median Years of Prior ARTs OBT: Median # of ARTs 4444 GSS § : 0 to all ARTs 27 (63%) 38 (84%) 35 (78%) 28 (62%) GSS § : 0 to PI # pts with enfuvirtide as new OBT 38 (88%) 13 (30%) 45 (100%) 8 (18%) 41 (91%) 13 (29%) 39 (87%) 10 (22%) Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved

Raltegravir Phase 2 PN005 Efficacy: Percent (95% CI) of Patients with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL and <50 copies/mL * BID + OBT Noncompleters = Failure approach Grinsztejn et al. Lancet 2007; 369: Number of Patients

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Methods: PN005 Phase 2 Integrase Genotyping/Phenotyping Analysis Genotyping –population sequencing –first point identified as failure (non-responder and rebound) –compare sequence taken at baseline –cross sectional analysis –limited longitudinal studies (ongoing) Phenotyping –site directed mutants –limited data on patient derived sequences –single cycle infection assays with LTR- responsive reporter cell lines

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Analysis of raltegravir resistance in PN005: Phase 2 Study in patients w/triple class resistance: Genotype of first time point, 24 week results Virologic failure was observed in 38/133 (28.6%) patients on RAL Integrase mutations were observed in 35 of 38 patients failing RAL RAL failure was generally associated with either of two genetic pathways (N155 or Q148) Additional mutations were frequently observed with both pathways Q148 containing mutants were more common than N155 Most common pattern Q148H/G140S N155H pathway Total N = 14 Q148 pathway Total N = 20 N155H (n = 2)Q148H, G140S (N=13) N155H, L74L/M (n = 1)Q148R (n = 1) N155H, E92Q (n = 1)Q148R, G140S (n = 2) N155H, T97A (n = 3)Q148K, E138K (n = 1) N155H, Y143H (n = 1)Q148R, E138E/K (n = 1) N155H, G163K (n = 1)Q148R, L74L/M, E138A (n = 1) N155H, E92Q, T97A (n = 1)Q148H/R, G140S (n = 1) N155H, V151I (n = 1) N155H, G163G/R (n = 2*) N155H, D232N (n = 1)Y143R (n = 1)

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Profile of Patients in PN005 with virologic failure on raltegravir Similar number of patients with mutations at amino acids 148 or 155 across 200, 400, and 600 mg treatment groups Factors decreasing likelihood of developing mutations at a.a. 148 alone, 155 alone, either 148 or 155 (hazard ratio < 1): –Lower viral load (≤ 100,000 copies/mL vs. > 100,000 copies/mL) –New use of enfuvirtide in OBT –PSS > 0 Baseline Characteristics Patients with virologic failure on RAL vRNA > 100,000 53% vRNA < 100,000 47% CD4 <200 58% CD4 >200 42% GSS = 0 68% GSS ≥ 1 32%

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Mutations observed in PN005 are similar to those selected with different integrase inhibitors in cell culture

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Effect of signature and secondary mutations on raltegravir resistance Q148 PathwayN155 Pathway

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Effect of signature and secondary mutations on infectivity Q148H/K/R and N155H single mutants display reduced infectivity. Among all mutants examined, Q148H/G140S has highest replication capacity in both infectivity (shown) and multiple cycle replication assays (data not shown). Q148 PathwayN155 Pathway

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Summary of integrase genotyping and phenotyping results in PN005 Signature mutations Q148H/R/K and N155H engender: –>10-fold reduced susceptibility to raltegravir –decreased viral replication capacity Secondary mutations were usually observed: –consistently enhanced the level of raltegravir resistance –sometimes improved viral replication capacity (subset of combinations) Q148-containing combinations displayed higher level resistance than N155H-containing combinations –Q148 mutations were more prevalent in PN005 The G140S/Q148H variant was the most resistant and most fit variant –Resistance >100x; replication capacity near WT –Most common combination observed in PN005 Resistance is the primary driver for the acquisition of additional mutations, is there a pharmacologic threshold?

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Longitudinal analysis of subjects with early N155H genotype: evidence of ongoing evolution to acquire higher level resistance

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved The Q148 pathway may be preferred Combinations containing Q148 mutations were more frequent in PN005 Resistance to raltegravir was generally higher with combinations containing Q148 mutations Patients who fail with Q148 combinations return to baseline vRNA –Some patients with N155H viruses appear to retain lower vRNA set point, partial activity or fitness? More longitudinal analysis is required

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Mutations can confer cross resistance to structurally diverse integrase inhibitors IC 50 ratio of mutants vs. WT HIV-1 in infectivity assay 399 / 838 / 2194X 502X

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Conclusions Raltegravir failure <30% in triple class resistant patients in PN005 –GSS=0 in >68% of virologic failures Raltegravir failure was associated with integrase mutations in two distinct genetic pathways defined by two or more mutations including –A signature mutation at either Q148(H/R or K) or N155(H) and –one or more secondary mutations unique to each pathway Signature mutations at Q148 and N155 conferred >10X reduced susceptibility to raltegravir and resulted in decreased viral replication capacity Secondary mutations appear to serve primarily to enhance the level of resistance to raltegravir –Although mitigation of effects on replication capacity were observed for a subset of combinations (eg. G140S/Q148H the most common variant), all combinations evaluated to date displayed increased resistance –Despite >10X resistance, viruses with a single mutation at N155 evolved to acquire increased resistance suggesting a pharmacologic threshold Mutations at Q148 and N155 can confer cross resistance to structurally diverse integrase inhibitors

Copyright © 2007 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved AcknowledgementsInvestigators B. GrinsztejnBrazil C. KatlamaFrance J. GatellSpain A. LazzarinItaly D. VittecoqFrance C. GonzalezUSA J. Sierra Mexico G. CarosiItaly S. LittleUSA M. MoroniItaly J. Rockstroh Germany M. Kozal USA R. LiporaceUSA E. Jones-LopezUSA B. Clotet Spain S. StaszewskiGermany Merck Research Labs B-Y. Nguyen J. Chen R. Isaacs C. Harvey H. Teppler L. Wenning M. Miller D. Hazuda R. Danovich M. Rowley V. Summa J. Vacca J. Wai D. McMahonUSA P. KumarUSA C. LeeMalaysia K. SquiresUSA M. Opravil Switzerland N. ClumeckBelgium J. LennoxUSA J. EronUSA J. GallantUSA M. NelsonUK S. BrownUSA K. TashimaUSA V. SorianoSpain C. CrumpackerUSA D. KuritzkesUSA All patients in Protocol 005