1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
Advertisements

5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
11th April 2008TOF DA & ppChiara Zampolli. DAQ-DA Three DAQ-DAs implemented, deployed, validated, and tested: TOFda TOFnoiseda TOFpulserda DCS-DA One.
HLT & Calibration.
DQM news Technical side. Web tools  Advantages  Can be ran out of P2 with access rights  Centrally maintained -> can’t be altered on machines  Modern.
1 TPC Online Monitoring Guide – P. Christiansen (Lund) TPC Online Monitoring Guide P. Christiansen (Lund) “Old” online monitors (/ RAW data monitors) 
Event display monitoring Giuseppe Zito : Infn Bari Italy Beliy Nikita : University of Mons-Hainaut Belgium.
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Tracker
L3 Filtering: status and plans D  Computing Review Meeting: 9 th May 2002 Terry Wyatt, on behalf of the L3 Algorithms group. For more details of current.
1 TPC online  offline calibration November 2002.
SSD Status P. Christakoglou (NIKHEF-UU) for the SSD collaboration Thanks to: Marco vL, Enrico, Mino, Marek and Massimo.
Offline Tracker DQM Shift Tutorial. 29/19/20152 Tracker Shifts Overview Online Shifts at P5 (3/day for 24 hours coverage) – One Pixel shifter and one.
Experience with analysis of TPC data Marian Ivanov.
Online Monitoring and Analysis for Muon Tomography Readout System M. Phipps, M. Staib, C. Zelenka, M. Hohlmann Florida Institute of Technology Department.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
Offline report – 7TeV data taking period (Mar.30 – Apr.6) ALICE SRC April 6, 2010.
CMS pixel data quality monitoring Petra Merkel, Purdue University For the CMS Pixel DQM Group Vertex 2008, Sweden.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
1 N. BrunerUniv. of New Mexico MuTr Software  Online  Calibration  Offline.
1 ITS Quality Assurance (& DQM) P. Cerello, P. Christakoglou, W. Ferrarese, M. Nicassio, M. Siciliano ALICE OFFLINE WEEK – April 2008.
CERN – Alice Offline – Thu, 20 Mar 2008 – Marco MEONI - 1 Status of Cosmic Reconstruction Offline weekly meeting.
ALICE Pixel Operational Experience R. Santoro On behalf of the ITS collaboration in the ALICE experiment at LHC.
Tracker Visualization Tool: integration in ORCA Maria S. Mennea, Giuseppe Zito University & INFN Bari, Italy Tracker b-tau Cosmic Challenge preparation.
September 2007CHEP 07 Conference 1 A software framework for Data Quality Monitoring in ATLAS S.Kolos, A.Corso-Radu University of California, Irvine, M.Hauschild.
T0 offline status Alla Maevskaya for T0 team 8 March 2011 ALICE offline week.
1 SDD: DA and preprocessor Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – April 11th 2008.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
RPC DQM status Cimmino, M. Maggi, P. Noli, D. Lomidze, P. Paolucci, G. Roselli, C. Carillo.
TPC QA + experience with the AMORE framework Marian Ivanov, Peter Christiansen + GSI group.
1 SDD offline status Francesco Prino INFN sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – March 15th 2010.
Pixel DQM Status R.Casagrande, P.Merkel, J.Zablocki (Purdue University) D.Duggan, D.Hidas, K.Rose (Rutgers University) L.Wehrli (ETH Zuerich) A.York (University.
DQM for the RPC subdetector M. Maggi and P. Paolucci.
Online Monitoring System at KLOE Alessandra Doria INFN - Napoli for the KLOE collaboration CHEP 2000 Padova, 7-11 February 2000 NAPOLI.
TDAQ Experience in the BNL Liquid Argon Calorimeter Test Facility Denis Oliveira Damazio (BNL), George Redlinger (BNL).
1 The status of the SDD detector - OFFLINE - Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE CLUB – October 14th 2008.
October Test Beam DAQ. Framework sketch Only DAQs subprograms works during spills Each subprogram produces an output each spill Each dependant subprogram.
Summary of User Requirements for Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Offline Week Alignment and Calibration Workshop February.
1 SDD offline status Francesco Prino INFN sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – October 20th 2008.
The MEG Offline Project General Architecture Offline Organization Responsibilities Milestones PSI 2/7/2004Corrado Gatto INFN.
Quality assurance for TPC. Quality assurance ● Process: ● Detect the problems ● Define, what is the problem ● What do we expect? ● Defined in the TDR.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 July 2008.
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
 offline code: changes/updates, open items, readiness  1 st data taking plans and readiness.
Some topics for discussion 31/03/2016 P. Hristov 1.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)Offline week / CERN Status of the SPD Offline Domenico Elia (INFN Bari) Overview:  Response simulation (timing info, dead/noisy.
AliRoot survey: Calibration P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)ALICE Offline week / CERN Update on the SPD Offline Domenico Elia in collaboration with H. Tydesjo, A. Mastroserio Overview:
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
Barthélémy von Haller CERN PH/AID For the ALICE Collaboration The ALICE data quality monitoring system.
10/8/ HMPID offline status D. Di Bari, A. Mastroserio, L.Molnar, G. Volpe HMPID Group Alice Offline Week.
V4-19-Release P. Hristov 11/10/ Not ready (27/09/10) #73618 Problems in the minimum bias PbPb MC production at 2.76 TeV #72642 EMCAL: Modifications.
CALIBRATION: PREPARATION FOR RUN2 ALICE Offline Week, 25 June 2014 C. Zampolli.
Christoph Blume Offline Week, July, 2008
CALGO: Software Tasks cal software:
Massimo Masera INFN sezione di Torino
ALICE analysis preservation
SDD Quality Assurance (& DQM)
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
Experience between AMORE/Offline and sub-systems
HLT & Calibration.
Analysis framework - status
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Silicon Strip Tracker Detector
TPC status - Offline Q&A
QA tools – introduction and summary of activities
SDD in February ‘08 cosmic run
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
DQM for the RPC subdetector
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Drift Chamber Monitoring
Presentation transcript:

1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano

2 GoalsGoals Checks on the data at different levels Controls from the acquisition to the reconstruction of data Controls of the calibrations

3 OutlineOutline AMORE online monitoring AMORE online monitoring Raw data monitoring RecPoint Monitoring CDB Monitoring Calibration Monitoring Calibration Monitoring Offline QA and Fast Checks at Point2 Offline QA and Fast Checks at Point2 Raw Data QA RecPoint QA Trend QA QA Train QA Train

4 AMORE DB DAQ SDD Amore Agent AMORE CDB AliRootQA SDD GUI ALICE SDD Data Quality Monitoring Two lists filled: Raw Data Clusters Extra: Calibration Monitoring Extension by a flag of the QA histogram list managed by AMORE to add more information about the detector and acquisition status during the data taking

5 SDD DQM Distributions Raw Patterns Hit Maps single event DDL connections Data Size Raw Data distributions

6 SDD DQM Distributions DQM histograms RecPoints Patterns Local Coordinates Global Distribution FSE RecPoints Distributions

7 SDD Online DA Monitoring DA: send histograms to AMORE DataBase Three distributions for each quantity: – Parameter distribution – Difference distribution – Trend distribution

8 Four macros for calibration parameters checks Stored in $ALICE_ROOT/ITS/macrosSDD ShowCalibrationSDD.C: Module Status of the SDD starting from the output of the PEDESTAL and PULSER calibration run stored in the OCDB (OCDB/ITS/CalibSDD) ShowDriftSpeedSDD.C: Drift Speed and Injector Status from the output of a INJECTOR run stored in the OCDB (OCDB/ITS/DriftSpeedSDD) SDD Offline Calibration Checks

9 Trend macros of the calibration parameters PlotCalibSDDVsTime.C: Trend of the good anodes in acquisition from PEDESTAL and PULSER runs PlotDriftSpeedVsTime.C : Trends of the modules Drift Speed from the INJECTOR Runs SDD Offline Calibration Checks

10 Some Plots Fraction of Good Anodes Noise Drift Speed

11 SDD QA Offline Raw Data: – Pattern Distributions – Normalized Pattern to number of good Anodes and number of Events RecPoints: – Charge – Drift time – Local and Global Coordinate Distribution – Radius and angular distribution – Patterns and Normalized Patterns

12 SDD QA Offline Different checks – Check on single chunk (non (yet) reconstructed data) – Check on single run (reconstructed data) – Trend: Check on more runs (more analyzed data) Data are so checked in different phases Comparison between different data takings

13 After the data migration Fast checks on the collected data by mean of the QA distribution on a data sample Tested on during the last week data taking Kit: – QA execution macro: soon in the trunk – Visualization macro: in the trunk Check on a single chunk

14 Example: Run One chunk Integrated Global Distributions Charge Drift Time

15 After reconstruction pass Checks on the reconstructed data by mean of the QA distribution on a single run or a groups of chunks Available on the trunk Visualization kit: – Script: ShowSDDQA.sh Ask the relevant information for the execution of the two macros (run number, period, pass, year) Creation of the folders that files and images are stored – Merging macro: ReadQASDD.C Query of the Merged.QA.data.root files present in the chunk and merging in on file called File.QA.year.period.pass.Run.run.root – Visualization macro: PlotSDDQA.C – Take the the SDD histograms of the QA file and plot them in the canvas – Creation of ps file that collects the images of the plot is created and optionally eps files of the images. Check on a single run

16 Example: run LHC10g

17 QA Trend Check the values of some relevant quantities in function of the run number in a certain range All in the trunk Visualization kit: – TrendingSDD.sh: Script that guides the user to introduce the relevant information needed to the visualization Charge trend Normalized Charge and drift time superposition plots – TrendSDDQA.C : Macro that creates the trend plots, save them in a ps file and store them in a root file

18 Example: Trend LHC10h Last 24h Charge Trend Normalized Charge Superposition Normalized Drift Time superposition

19 QA train SDD task running on QA train, to check From RecPoints  Detector occupancy  Drift time distribution From ESD:  SDD points in tracks (good, missing, track crossing dead region)  dE/dx information from SDD (vs. module number) From TrackPoints (= clusters associated to tracks)  Detector occupancy  Drift time distribution, extra clusters  dE/dx vs. drift time  Cluster size Macro to plot the results for single run/chunk on svn and used by SDD experts on call and shifter to check the detector performance Macro to plot trending vs. run number prototyped,first version on svn, new developments ongoing. QA Train

20 ESD plots From run pass1plus Pseudo-efficiency for each module estimated from: - number of tracks with point in SDD - number of tracks crossing dead region -number of tracks with missing point in SDD ESDs Plots

21 Track Points Plots

22 Conclusions Good performance of the SDDs !!!! Differents data checks at different levels From data taking to the ESDs Calibration checked at different levels too Most of the macros are in $ALICE_ROOT/ITS/macrosSDD All the macros have been tested with success!

23 Thanks!!

24 Example: Trend LHC10h Last 24h

25 Example: Trend LHC10h Last 24h

26 Example: LHC10h Last 24h

27 Basic Idea: exploit the possibility to create and fill by mean the Offline Quality Assurance framework the relevant distributions and publish them to the AMORE database, the ALICE framework for the Online Data Quality Monitoring. Extension by a flag of the QA histogram list managed by AMORE to add more information about the detector and acquisition status during the data taking. Two lists filled: Raw Data Clusters Calibration Monitoring AMORE Online Monitoring